上海交通大学学报（医学版）

›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1506-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2012.11.023

• 论著（卫生事业管理） • 上一篇    下一篇

临床医学硕士研究生培养质量的实证研究

陈 莉, 张国栋, 袁晓燕, 汤 丽, 富冀枫   

  1. 上海交通大学 研究生院医学院分院, 上海 200025
  • 出版日期:2012-11-28 发布日期:2012-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 富冀枫, 电子信箱: fujf@shsmu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:陈 莉（1975—）, 女, 助理研究员, 硕士生；电子信箱: lichen@shsmu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    上海交通大学医学院人文社会科学创新研究培育基金重点项目(W21213)

Empirical research on training quality of clinical postgraduate students

CHEN Li, ZHANG Guo-dong, YUAN Xiao-yan, TANG Li, FU Ji-feng   

  1. School of Medical Graduate, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Online:2012-11-28 Published:2012-11-30
  • Supported by:

    Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Foundation, W21213

PDF (PC)

870

摘要：

目的 了解临床医学硕士研究生培养质量的现状，并分析存在的问题。方法 采用分层整群随机抽样的方法，在上海交通大学2006—2009年毕业的622名临床医学硕士研究生中，按照就业主要聚集地区和分布单位，抽取在上海地区26家医院就业的415名研究生，由医院的人事主管或科室领导对临床医学硕士研究生培养质量（包括职业价值观、专业能力、职业发展能力、身心素质和科研能力5个方面）进行评判，并与毕业生的自我评价结果作配对比较。结果 用人单位对临床医学硕士研究生培养质量评价较低的依次是批判性思维能力（21.62%）、创新能力（36.0%）和相关学科知识（36.04%）；用人单位对研究生培养质量的评价与毕业生的自我评价比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；用人单位注重毕业生职业价值观的培养，毕业生注重专业技能的训练；用人单位对是否为独生子女、居住地、本科毕业院校的毕业生质量评价比较有统计学差异（P<0.05）。实证因子分析得出4个公因子，分别是专业知识和专业技能、可迁移能力、科研能力和职业价值观。结论 用人单位认为临床医学硕士研究生的创新能力不足、相关学科知识薄弱。用人单位和毕业生对临床医学研究生培养质量的预期目标存在差异，是否为独生子女、城乡差异、本科毕业院校等因素对研究生培养质量存在影响。评价临床医学硕士研究生的培养质量，可从专业知识和专业技能、可迁移能力、科研能力和职业价值观4个方面展开。

关键词: 临床医学, 硕士研究生, 培养质量, 实证研究

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the status of training quality of clinical postgraduate students, and analyse the potential problems. Methods Cluster random sampling method was utilized to select 415 clinical postgraduate students 622 who graduated from Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between 2006 and 2009 and worked in 26 hospitals in Shanghai. The training quality of clinical postgraduate students was evaluated by department leaders or personnel staff on the aspects of ethical norms, professional ability, career development ability, health status and scientific research ability, and the results were compared with those of self-evaluation from the graduates. Results The aspects of training quality which were poorly thought of by the employers were the ability of critical thinking (21.62%), creativity （36.0%）and professional knowledge (36.04%). There were significant differences in the evaluation of training quality between employers and graduates (P<0.05). Employers emphasized on the cultivation of professional values, while graduates paid more attention to the training of professional skills. There were significant differences in the training quality among graduates with different family background, permanent residential place and undergraduate universities evaluated by the employers （P<0.05）. Factor analysis yielded 4 common factors, which were professional knowledge and skills, transferable skills, research capacity and professional values. Conclusion Employers deem that the graduates lack the ability in innovation and scientific research. Employers and graduates hold different opinions with regard to the goal of clinical postgraduate training. The family background, permanent residential place and undergraduate university may influence the training quality of clinical postgraduate students. Professional knowledge and skills, transferable skills, research capacity and professional values should be considered to evaluate the training quality of clinical postgraduate students.

Key words: clinical medicine, postgraduate students, training quality, empirical research