Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
Construction of inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system for studying gene function in mouse
Received date: 2020-03-11
Online published: 2021-04-06
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81871287);Innovative Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai(SSMU-ZDCX20180100)
·To construct inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system for studying gene function in mouse immune cells, combining Dox-inducible single guide RNA (sgRNA) expression vector with Cas9 transgenic mice.
·U6-TetO-sgRNA and EF1α-T2A-Puro-BFP-T2A-TetR fragments were obtained by gene synthesis. The two synthetic fragments were assembled into the retroviral vector backbone by using homologous recombination. sgRNA targeting protein coding region of F4/80 and non-targeting control (NC) were designed. Bone marrow cells were isolated from Cas9 transgenic mice and transfected with retrovirus expressing sgRNA. The experimental conditions were divided into Dox-added group (Dox +) and non Dox-added group (Dox-). The knockout effect was tested by flow cytometry and T7 endonuclease Ⅰ (T7EⅠ) experiments.
·①Dox-inducible sgRNA retroviral vector and Cas9 transgenic mice were successfully constructed. ② The result of flow cytometry showed that F4/80 was only knocked out in the F4/80Dox+ population, but not in NC Dox-, NC Dox+ and F4/80 Dox- populations. ③ T7EⅠ results showed that the DNA was cut into two bands in the F4/80Dox+ group, while the DNA band was intact in the F4/80 Dox- group.
·An inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system combining Dox-inducible sgRNA retroviral vector with Cas9 transgenic mice are successfully constructed. With this system, inducible gene knockout in mouse immune cells are successfully achieved.
Yan-na ZHAO , Rong QIU , Nan SHEN , Yuan-jia TANG . Construction of inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system for studying gene function in mouse[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2021 , 41(3) : 297 -301 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.03.002
1 | Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821. |
2 | Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011, 9(6): 467-477. |
3 | Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Shabalina SA, et al. A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action[J]. Biol Direct, 2006, 1(1): 1-26. |
4 | Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase Ⅲ[J]. Nature, 2011, 471(7340): 602-607. |
5 | Davis AJ,Chen DJ. DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining[J]. Transl Cancer Res, 2013, 2(3):130-143. |
6 | Butt H, Eid A, Ali Z, et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing using a chimeric single-guide RNA molecule[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1441. |
7 | Liang PP, Xu YW, Zhang XY, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes[J]. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(5): 363-372. |
8 | Pellagatti A, Dolatshad H, Valletta S, et al. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to the study and treatment of disease[J]. Arch Toxicol, 2015, 89(7): 1023-1034. |
9 | Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling[J]. Cell, 2014, 159(2): 440-455. |
10 | Yin WX, Xiang P, Li QL. Investigations of the effect of DNA size in transient transfection assay using dual luciferase system[J]. Anal Biochem, 2005, 346(2): 289-294. |
11 | Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 1911. |
12 | Zhang XH, Tee LY, Wang XG, et al. Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering[J]. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2015, 4: e264. |
13 | Lin YN, Cradick TJ, Brown MT, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(11): 7473-7485. |
14 | Aubrey BJ, Kelly GL, Kueh AJ, et al. An inducible lentiviral guide RNA platform enables the identification of tumor-essential genes and tumor-promoting mutations in vivo[J]. Cell Rep, 2015, 10(8): 1422-1432. |
15 | Cao J, Wu LZ, Zhang SM, et al. An easy and efficient inducible CRISPR/Cas9 platform with improved specificity for multiple gene targeting[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016, 44(19): e149. |
16 | Das AT, Tenenbaum L, Berkhout B. Tet-on systems for doxycycline-inducible gene expression[J]. Curr Gene Ther, 2016, 16(3): 156-167. |
17 | Herold MJ, van den Brandt J, Seibler J, et al. Inducible and reversible gene silencing by stable integration of an shRNA-encoding Lentivirus in transgenic rats[J]. PNAS, 2008, 105(47): 18507-18512. |
18 | Polstein LR, Gersbach CA. A light-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation[J].Nat Chem Biol, 2015, 11(3):198-200. |
19 | Dow LE, Fisher J, O'Rourke KP, et al. Inducible in vivo genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2015, 33(4): 390-394. |
20 | Lu J, Zhao C, Zhao YZ, et al. Multimode drug inducible CRISPR/Cas9 devices for transcriptional activation and genome editing[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018, 46(5): e25. |
21 | de Solis CA, Ho A, Holehonnur R, et al. The development of a viral mediated CRISPR/Cas9 system with doxycycline dependent gRNA expression for inducible in vitro and in vivo genome editing[J]. Front Mol Neurosci, 2016, 9: 70. |
22 | LaFleur MW, Nguyen TH, Coxe MA, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 delivery system for in vivo screening of genes in the immune system[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 1668. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |