Clinical research

A new rebleeding prediction model and scoring system for patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

  • Li-ting XI ,
  • Jin-zhou ZHU ,
  • Chen-yan YU ,
  • Liu-jing NI ,
  • Chun-fang XU ,
  • Ai-rong WU
Expand
  • Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
WU Ai-rong, E-mail: arwu@suda.edu.cn.

Online published: 2021-12-03

Supported by

2019 Suzhou Youth Science and Technology Project of "Science, Education and Health"(KJXW2019001)

Abstract

Objective

·To explore independent risk factors of rebleeding and construct a prediction model and risk scoring system of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB).

Methods

·A total of 686 patients with ANVUGIB admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 were collected. The general conditions, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, endoscopic findings and prognosis were recorded. The Baylor score, Rockall score, Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Predictive Index(CSMCPI), AIMS65 and MAP (ASH) for each patient were calculated. The collected data were randomly divided into a training set (n=481) and a validation set (n=205). A new prediction model for rebleeding was established by binary Logistic regression based on the training set data. The discrimination and calibration of the training and validation set were evaluated respectively, and then the model was transformed into a risk scoring system. The comparisons between the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were based on the Delong test.

Results

·Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that low systolic blood pressure, low hemoglobin level, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade>3, and endoscopic findings of clots, visible vessels and active bleeding were independent risk factors for rebleeding. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.892 (95% CI 0.838?0.946, P=0.001), Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.934. The validation set AUC=0.915 (95% CI 0.851?0.980, P=0.001), Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.871. The scoring system (AUC=0.882, 95% CI 0.823?0.942) was better at predicting rebleeding than all other scores mentioned except MAP (ASH) score (P<0.05).

Conclusion

·The scoring system could predict rebleeding after ANVUGIB, which could be an option in clinical practice.

Cite this article

Li-ting XI , Jin-zhou ZHU , Chen-yan YU , Liu-jing NI , Chun-fang XU , Ai-rong WU . A new rebleeding prediction model and scoring system for patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2021 , 41(11) : 1491 -1497 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.11.013

References

1 Van Leerdam ME. Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2008, 22(2): 209-224.
2 Rotondano G. Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2014, 43(4): 643-663.
3 Jiménez Rosales R, Martínez-Cara JG, Vadillo-Calles F, et al. Analysis of rebleeding in cases of an upper gastrointestinal bleed in a single center series[J]. Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Dig, 2019, 111(3): 189-192.
4 ?中华内科杂志?编辑委员会, ?中华医学杂志?编辑委员会, ?中华消化杂志?编辑委员会,等. 急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血诊治指南(2018年,杭州)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2019, 58(3): 173-180.
5 Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2019, 19(1): 136.
6 Stanley AJ. Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(22): 2739-2744.
7 Ebrahimi Bakhtavar H, Morteza Bagi HR, Rahmani F, et al. Clinical scoring systems in predicting the outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a narrative review[J]. Emerg (Tehran), 2017, 5(1): e36.
8 任海霞, 王建华, 单铁英, 等. 非静脉曲张性上消化道出血内镜治疗术后再出血危险因素分析[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2016, 29(8): 48-52.
9 彭敦煌. 消化内镜治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血后再出血危险因素分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2019, 17(35): 152-154.
10 García-Iglesias P, Villoria A, Suarez D, et al. Meta-analysis: predictors of rebleeding after endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 34(8): 888-900.
11 Lee YJ, Kim ES, Hah YJ, et al. Chronic kidney disease, hemodynamic instability, and endoscopic high-risk appearance are associated with 30-day rebleeding in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2013, 28(10): 1500-1506.
12 Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications[J]. Anesthesiology, 1978, 49(4): 239-243.
13 Redondo-Cerezo E, Vadillo-Calles F, Stanley AJ, et al. MAP(ASH): a new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 35(1): 82-89.
14 Marmo R, Koch M, Cipolletta L, et al. Predictive factors of mortality from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a multicenter study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2008, 103(7): 1639-1647; quiz1648.
15 Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer[J]. New Engl J Med, 1994, 331(11): 717-727.
16 Bai Y, Du YQ, Wang D, et al. Peptic ulcer bleeding in China: a multicenter endoscopic survey of 1006 patients[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014, 15(1): 5-11.
17 Lee JG, Turnipseed S, Romano PS, et al. Endoscopy-based triage significantly reduces hospitalization rates and costs of treating upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999, 50(6): 755-761.
18 González-González JA, Monreal-Robles R, García-Compean D, et al. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly people: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors[J]. J Dig Dis, 2017, 18(4): 212-221.
19 Nakamura S, Matsumoto T, Sugimori H, et al. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients[J]. Dig Endosc, 2014, 26(3): 369-376.
20 孙喜斌, 张玉虹, 左路广, 等. 血清IL-6与红细胞分布宽度联合检测对上消化道再出血的预测价值[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(19): 50-53.
21 Yue W, Liu Y, Jiang W, et al. Prealbumin and D-dimer as prognostic indicators for rebleeding in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020, 66:1949-1956.
22 Lee HH, Park JM, Lee SW, et al. C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator for rebleeding in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2015, 47(5): 378-383.
Outlines

/