Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
Efficacy of modified ridge preservation on socket healing after mandibular third molar extractions
Received date: 2022-02-16
Accepted date: 2022-04-18
Online published: 2022-08-19
·To evaluate the efficacy of the preservation of alveolar crest in situ for regeneration of periodontal osseous defect distal to the mandibular second molar (M2) after mandibular third molar extractions.
·After screening by evaluation, a total of 19 patients were enrolled and accepted the mandibular third molar extractions with modified ridge preservation at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from August 2020 to August 2021. Meanwhile, 8 cases of traditional tooth extraction were included in the control group. All the patients were followed up at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after operation. Postoperative symptoms including pain, swelling and nerve injury were also recorded in detail. Intraoral clinical examination was performed on M2, including cold and heat stimulation, tooth percussion results and looseness. Osseous defect depth (ODD) on the disto-buccal aspect of M2 was taken as the primary outcome variable. Probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were taken as the secondary outcome variables during the follow-up period. In the meantime, all the patients received cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the data were analyzed and reconstructed for the measurement of ODD through CS3DImaging software.
·No obvious postoperative complications such as infection or never injury were found in any patient. The PD, CAL and ODD on the disto-buccal aspect of M2 at 6 months after operation in the two groups were both improved compared with those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05 for all). Furthermore, all the data in the experimental group were lower than those of the control group at any time of the follow-up (P<0.05 for all).
·Modified ridge preservation has a notable improvement in regeneration of periodontal osseous defect distal to the M2 after mandibular third molar extractions.
Yeping LU , Minjie CHEN . Efficacy of modified ridge preservation on socket healing after mandibular third molar extractions[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022 , 42(6) : 729 -734 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.06.006
1 | KUGELBERG C F. Impacted lower third molars and periodontal health. An epidemiological, methodological, retrospective and prospective clinical, study[J]. Swed Dent J Suppl, 1990, 68: 1-52. |
2 | TRYBEK G, ANIKO-W?ODARCZYK M, JARO? A. Assessment of electrosensitivity of the pulp of the mandibular second molar after surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(16) : 3614. |
3 | ARENAZ-BUA J, LUACES-REY R, SIRONVALLE-SOLIVA S, et al. A comparative study of platelet-rich plasma, hydroxyapatite, demineralized bone matrix and autologous bone to promote bone regeneration after mandibular impacted third molar extraction[J]. Med Oral, 2010, 15(3): e483-e489. |
4 | BARBATO L, KALEMAJ Z, BUTI J, et al. Effect of surgical intervention for removal of mandibular third molar on periodontal healing of adjacent mandibular second molar: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontol, 2016, 87(3): 291-302. |
5 | SAMMARTINO G, TIA M, MARENZI G, et al. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in periodontal defect treatment after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(6): 766-770. |
6 | JUNG R E, IOANNIDIS A, H?MMERLE C H F, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Periodontol, 2000, 2018, 77(1): 165-175. |
7 | 戈旌, 杨驰, 郑家伟, 等. 阻生第三磨牙拔除术后自体骨回植第二磨牙远中骨缺损的单中心随机对照临床研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(4): 334-340. |
7 | GE J,YANG C, ZHENG J W, et al. Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Chin J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 15(4): 334-340. |
8 | ZHOU J, HONG H Y, ZHOU H, et al. Orthodontic extraction of a high-risk impacted mandibular third molar contacting the inferior alveolar nerve, with the aid of a ramus mini-screw[J]. Quintessence Int, 2021, 52(6): 538-546. |
9 | DAWARE S N, BALAKRISHNA R, DEOGADE S C, et al. Assessment of postoperative discomfort and nerve injuries after surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a prospective study[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2021, 10(4): 1712-1717. |
10 | Couso-Queiruga E, Mansouri C J, Alade A A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy.[J]. J Periodontol, 2022.DOI: 10.1002/JPER.22-0030. |
11 | Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, et al. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology: is it still a “gold standard”? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2017, 3(1): 23. |
12 | 梁德凤, 周鑫才, 李艳芬, 等. 自体骨即刻移植对阻生第三磨牙拔除术后第二磨牙远中骨质缺损的疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2019, 39(7): 624-627, 631. |
12 | LIANG D F, ZHOU X C, LI Y F, et al. Effect of autogenous bone graft on distal bone defect of the second molar after the extraction of the impacted third molar[J]. Stomatology, 2019, 39(7): 624-627, 631. |
13 | Elgali I, Omar O,Dahlin C, et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2017, 125(5) : 315-337. |
14 | I??K G, YüCE M ?, KO?AK-TOPBA? N, et al. Guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement using bovine-derived xenograft with and without liquid platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(9): 5563-5575. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |