Academician forum

New progress and prospects of blood glucose monitoring technology

  • Weiping JIA
Expand
  • Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus; Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai 200233, China
JIA Weiping, E-mail: wpjia@sjtu.edu.cn

Received date: 2022-08-29

  Accepted date: 2022-09-07

  Online published: 2022-09-23

Supported by

Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty

Abstract

Glucose monitoring is an important part of diabetes management. For over a century, diabetes monitoring technology has developed from the initial urine glucose test, to the later blood glucose test, and finally to the current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which is evolving in a more convenient, accurate, minimally invasive, and even non-invasive direction. CGM refers to the technology that continuously measures glucose concentrations in the subcutaneous interstitial fluid by glucose sensors. It can detect hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia that are not easily recognized by traditional monitoring methods. Using the huge amounts of glucose data generated by CGM technology, diabetes management is expected to be more targeted, with glucose control more accurate. In this context, novel measure of glucose control represented by time in range (TIR) has been popularized, which can provide comprehensive information including hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glucose fluctuation. Hence, the modern approach to glucose control should focus not only on glycosylated hemoglobin, but also pay attention to new metrics such as TIR. In the future, more mature, minimally invasive and even non-invasive glucose monitoring technologies that are comfortable, stable and highly accurate should be further developed to greatly improve the experience and enthusiasm of the patients in blood glucose monitoring. Meanwhile, closed-loop insulin infusion system should be further developed, to truly realize individualized and automated glucose control, as well as further improvement of glucose control in the patients with diabetes.

Cite this article

Weiping JIA . New progress and prospects of blood glucose monitoring technology[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022 , 42(9) : 1171 -1175 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.09.002

References

1 International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas 2021[M]. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.
2 LI H Q, TIAN S H, CHEN T, et al. Newly diagnosed diabetes is associated with a higher risk of mortality than known diabetes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2020, 22(10): 1897-1906.
3 RAHBAR S. An abnormal hemoglobin in red cells of diabetics[J]. Clin Chimica Acta, 1968, 22(2): 296-298.
4 SELVIN E. Hemoglobin A1c—using epidemiology to guide medical practice: Kelly West Award Lecture 2020[J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(10): 2197-2204.
5 戴冬君, 周健. 组织间液葡萄糖监测的意义及研究进展[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(40): 3296-3298.
5 DAI D J, ZHOU J. Significance and research progress of interstitial fluid glucose monitoring[J]. Natl Med J China, 2018, 98(40): 3296-3298.
6 CLARK L C Jr, LYONS C. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1962, 102(1): 29-45.
7 贾伟平. 持续葡萄糖监测[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2017.
7 JIA W P. Contiuous glucose monitoring[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2017.
8 EHRHARDT N, HIRSCH I B. The impact of COVID-19 on CGM use in the hospital[J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(11): 2628-2630.
9 SHEN Y, FAN X H, ZHANG L, et al. Thresholds of glycemia and the outcomes of COVID-19 complicated with diabetes: a retrospective exploratory study using continuous glucose monitoring[J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(4): 976-982.
10 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国血糖监测临床应用指南(2021年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(10): 936-948.
10 Chinese Diabetes Society. Clinical application guideline for blood glucose monitoring in China (2021 edition)[J]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2021, 13(10): 936-948.
11 LU J Y, WANG C F, CAI J H, et al. Association of HbA1c with all-cause mortality across varying degrees of glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2021, 106(11): 3160-3167.
12 DANNE T, NIMRI R, BATTELINO T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring[J]. Diabetes Care, 2017, 40(12): 1631-1640.
13 LU J Y, MA X J, ZHANG L, et al. Glycemic variability modifies the relationship between time in range and hemoglobin A1c estimated from continuous glucose monitoring: a preliminary study[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2020, 161: 108032.
14 戴冬君, 陆静毅, 周健. 持续葡萄糖监测新指标: 葡萄糖在目标范围内时间的临床意义解析[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2019, 11(2): 139-142.
14 DAI D J, LU J Y, ZHOU J. A new indicator of continuous glucose monitoring: analysis of the clinical significance of time in range[J]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2019, 11(2): 139-142.
15 LU J Y, MA X J, ZHOU J, et al. Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2018, 41(11): 2370-2376.
16 BECK R W, BERGENSTAL R M, RIDDLESWORTH T D, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(3): 400-405.
17 LU J Y, WANG C F, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(2): 549-555.
18 MAYEDA L, KATZ R, AHMAD I, et al. Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease[J]. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020, 8(1): e000991.
19 YOO J H, CHOI M S, AHN J, et al. Association between continuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range, other core metrics, and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020, 22(10): 768-776.
20 GUO Q Y, ZANG P, XU S Y, et al. Time in range, as a novel metric of glycemic control, is reversely associated with presence of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy independent of HbA1c in Chinese type 2 diabetes[J]. J Diabetes Res, 2020, 2020: 5817074.
21 KIM M Y, KIM G, PARK J Y, et al. The association between continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021, 23(6): 434-442.
22 LU J Y, MA X J, SHEN Y, et al. Time in range is associated with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020, 22(2): 72-78.
23 XIE P G, DENG B, ZHANG X, et al. Time in range in relation to amputation and all-cause mortality in hospitalised patients with diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2022, 38(2): e3498.
24 KRISTENSEN K, ?GGE L E, SENGPIEL V, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies[J]. Diabetologia, 2019, 62(7): 1143-1153.
25 ZHENG Y W, SHEN Y, JIANG S S, et al. Maternal glycemic parameters and adverse pregnancy outcomes among high-risk pregnant women[J]. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2019, 7(1): e000774.
26 American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021[J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(Suppl 1): S73-S84.
27 GRUNBERGER G, SHERR J, ALLENDE M, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology clinical practice guideline: the use of advanced technology in the management of persons with diabetes mellitus[J]. Endocr Pract, 2021, 27(6): 505-537.
28 WILMOT E G, LUMB A, HAMMOND P, et al. Time in range: a best practice guide for UK diabetes healthcare professionals in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic[J]. Diabet Med, 2021, 38(1): e14433.
29 BATTELINO T, DANNE T, BERGENSTAL R M, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(8): 1593-1603.
Outlines

/