国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目立项的影响因素分析——以上海交通大学医学院为例
|
|
陈丽红, 王妍, 周翔天, 郑俊克, 闫小响
|
Influencing factors of the approval of the Young Scientists Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China: a case study of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
|
|
CHEN Lihong, WANG Yan, ZHOU Xiangtian, ZHENG Junke, YAN Xiaoxiang
|
|
表3 青年科学基金项目立项的多因素Logistic回归分析
|
Tab 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the approved Young Scientists Fund
|
|
| Variable | Total number of surveyed applicants (n=921) | | Doctor (n=570) | | Full-time scientific researcher (n=233) |
|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value |
|---|
| Educational background | 1.86 (1.14‒3.04) | 0.014 | | | | | | | Graduate university (985 project university vs non-985 project university) | 2.45 (1.47‒4.08) | 0.021 | | | | | | | | Years of graduation | | | | 0.89 (0.81‒0.97) | 0.008 | | | | | Having participated in national projects such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China | | | | 2.03 (1.11‒3.71) | 0.022 | | | | | Sufficient foundation of previous work | 4.22 (2.44‒7.29) | 0.000 | | 5.28 (2.56‒10.87) | 0.000 | | 3.28 (1.05‒10.22) | 0.041 | | Average impact factor of representative papers | 1.10 (1.04‒1.17) | 0.002 | | 1.20 (1.10‒1.31) | 0.000 | | 1.04 (1.00‒1.08) | 0.037 | | Total self-evaluated score of the application | 1.06 (1.04‒1.08) | 0.000 | | 1.06 (1.03‒1.08) | 0.000 | | 1.09 (1.04‒1.14) | 0.000 |
|
|
|