Basic research

Screening of key genes and pathways involved in lupus nephritis based on GEO database

  • Yin LIU ,
  • Tao YANG ,
  • Yu-sai XIE ,
  • Yu-zhu WANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Nephrology, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing 100080, China
    2.Department of Pathology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang 110112, China

Online published: 2021-06-29

Abstract

Objective

·To identify the differentially expressed genes and pathways involved in lupus nephritis (LN) using bioinformatics analysis.

Methods

·The matrix data of GSE32591 dataset was downloaded from the GEO database, and the limma package of R software was applied to standardize and screen the differentially expressed genes. The volcano map and heatmap of the differentially expressed genes were drawn by ggpubr and pheatmap packages. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes were performed using DAVID online database, and bar plot and bubble chart were drawn using R software ggplot package. STRING database and Cytoscape software were used to construct protein interaction networks of differentially expressed genes, and MCODE and cytohubba plug-ins were used to screen out the most significant modules and key genes involved in lupus nephritis. GSE99339 dataset was used to verify the differential expression of hub genes.

Results

·The GSE32591 data set was analyzed through the limma package, and 367 differentially expressed genes were obtained, including 253 up-regulated genes and 114 down-regulated genes. GO analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes were significantly enriched in virus defense response, cytoplasmic matrix, influenza A, tuberculosis, EB virus infection, complement pathway, etc. A protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes was constructed by STRING and Cytoscape, and 10 pivotal genes related to LN were identified. The hub genes are significantly differentially expressed in the GSE99339 validation dataset.

Conclusion

·The 367 differentially expressed genes and 10 hub genes are potential biomarkers of LN.

Cite this article

Yin LIU , Tao YANG , Yu-sai XIE , Yu-zhu WANG . Screening of key genes and pathways involved in lupus nephritis based on GEO database[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2021 , 41(6) : 749 -755 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.06.007

References

1 Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, et al. The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2017, 56(11): 1945-1961.
2 Yu F, Haas M, Glassock R, et al. Redefining lupus nephritis: clinical implications of pathophysiologic subtypes[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2017, 13(8): 483-495.
3 Almaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on lupus nephritis[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 12(5): 825-835.
4 Tektonidou MG, Dasgupta A, Ward MM. Risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with lupus nephritis, 1971-2015: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2016, 68(6): 1432-1441.
5 Devarapu SK, Lorenz G, Kulkarni OP, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of autoimmunity and lupus nephritis[J]. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2017, 332: 43-154.
6 Bing PF, Xia W, Wang L, et al. Common marker genes identified from various sample types for systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(6): e0156234.
7 Coit P, Jeffries M, Altorok N, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation study suggests epigenetic accessibility and transcriptional poising of interferon-regulated genes in na?ve CD4+T cells from lupus patients[J]. J Autoimmun, 2013, 43: 78-84.
8 Clough E, Barrett T. The gene expression omnibus database[J]. Methods Mol Biol Clifton N J, 2016, 1418: 93-110.
9 Piao J, Sun J, Yang Y, et al. Target gene screening and evaluation of prognostic values in non-small cell lung cancers by bioinformatics analysis[J]. Gene, 2018, 647: 306-311.
10 Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015, 43(database issue): D1049-D1056.
11 Du JL, Yuan ZF, Ma ZW, et al. KEGG-PATH: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes-based pathway analysis using a path analysis model [J]. Mol Biosyst, 2014, 10(9): 2441-2447.
12 Dennis G, JR., Sherman BT, Hosack DA, et al. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery[J]. Genome Biol, 2003, 4(5): P3.
13 Kumar MS, Adki KM. Marine natural products for multi-targeted cancer treatment: a future insight[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2018, 105: 233-245.
14 Wang J, Zhong J, Chen G, et al. ClusterViz: a cytoscape APP for cluster analysis of biological network[J]. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform, 2015, 12(4): 815-822.
15 Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, et al. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome[J]. BMC Syst Biol, 2014, 8(): S11.
16 Yang H, Li H. CD36 identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis as a hub candidate gene in lupus nephritis[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e7722.
17 Shu B, Fang Y, He W, et al. Identification of macrophage-related candidate genes in lupus nephritis using bioinformatics analysis[J]. Cell Signal, 2018, 46: 43-51.
18 Reder AT, Feng X. Aberrant type I interferon regulation in autoimmunity: opposite directions in MS and SLE, shaped by evolution and body ecology[J]. Front Immunol, 2013, 4: 281.
19 Bezalel S, Guri KM, Elbirt D, et al. Type I interferon signature in systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2014, 16(4): 246-249.
20 Chen JY, Wang CM, Chen TD, et al. Interferon-λ3/4 genetic variants and interferon-λ3 serum levels are biomarkers of lupus nephritis and disease activity in Taiwanese [J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2018, 20(1): 193.
21 Becker AM, Dao KH, Han BK, et al. SLE peripheral blood B cell, T cell and myeloid cell transcriptomes display unique profiles and each subset contributes to the interferon signature[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e67003.
22 Reynaud JM, Kim DY, Atasheva S, et al. IFIT1 differentially interferes with translation and replication of alphavirus genomes and promotes induction of type I interferon[J]. PLoS Pathog, 2015, 11(4): e1004863.
23 Zhang L, Wang B, Li L, et al. Antiviral effects of IFIT1 in human cytomegalovirus-infected fetal astrocytes[J]. J Med Virol, 2017, 89(4): 672-684.
Outlines

/