Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >

2021 , Vol. 41 >Issue 8: 1017 - 1024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.08.004

Basic research

Establishment and optimization of co-culture technology for breast cancer organoids

  • Tian-hao ZHOU ,
  • Zhao-chen XIN ,
  • Shao-qian DU ,
  • Yuan CAO ,
  • Jing-xuan XU ,
  • Zeng-hong LAO ,
  • Hong-xia WANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201600, China
    2.Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
    3.Department of Oncology, Deqing County People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, Deqing 313216, China
LAO Zeng-hong, E-mail: 2312662994@qq.com. #Co-corresponding authors.
WANG Hong-xia, E-mail: whx365@126.com

Online published: 2021-07-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81472843)

Fold

Abstract

Objective

·To improve the cultivating and passaging method of breast cancer organoids, and establish a co-culture system enriching cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs).

Methods

·Different types of collagenases (type Ⅰ, type Ⅲ and type Ⅳ) were used to digest fresh tissues from 5 breast cancer patients. The number of cells after tissue digestion was counted by cell counting method, and cell viability was analyzed by cell flow cytometry. Three-dimensional culture of primary breast cancer single cells was carried out by using culture system containing different contents of fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7), FGF10 and epidermal growth factor (EGF). The success rate of cell culture and the growing status of organoids were observed and compared. Different centrifugation speeds were used to compare the advantages and disadvantages of passaging methods and simplify the passaging steps. CCK8 assay was used to study the effect of CAFs on the growth of organoids in the co-culture system of primary CAFs and organoids, and the morphological changes of organoids were observed under optical microscope.

Results

·Compared with type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ collagenase, type Ⅳ collagenase got the highest cell yields (P=0.045, P=0.017), and maintained the highest cell viability (P=0.005, P=0.048). By optimizing the composition of organoid medium (omitting FGF7 and FGF10, reducing EGF concentration) and passaging process (improving centrifugal velocity to 900×g), a more economical, effective and rapid method of organoid culture was obtained. Compared with organoids cultured alone, the growth rate (P<0.05) and heterogeneity of organoids increased when organoids were co-cultured with CAFs.

Conclusion

·The optimized culture system can significantly increase the success rate of organoids, simplify the culture steps and reduce the culture cost. The establishment of primary CAFs and organoids co-culture system provides a good in vitro model for the study of breast cancer heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment.

Key words： breast cancer; organoid; improved culture condition; cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF); co-culture

Cite this article

Tian-hao ZHOU , Zhao-chen XIN , Shao-qian DU , Yuan CAO , Jing-xuan XU , Zeng-hong LAO , Hong-xia WANG . Establishment and optimization of co-culture technology for breast cancer organoids[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2021 , 41(8) : 1017 -1024 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.08.004

References

1 Janu?kevi?ien? I, Petrikait? V. Heterogeneity of breast cancer: the importance of interaction between different tumor cell populations[J]. Life Sci, 2019, 239: 117009.
2 Gooding AJ, Zhang B, Gunawardane L, et al. The lncRNA BORG facilitates the survival and chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancers[J]. Oncogene, 2019, 38(12): 2020-2041.
3 Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Breast cancer: a molecularly heterogenous disease needing subtype-specific treatments[J]. Med Sci (Basel), 2020, 8(1): E18.
4 Murayama T, Gotoh N. Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their application[J]. Cells, 2019, 8(6): E621.
5 Ishiguro T, Ohata H, Sato A, et al. Tumor-derived spheroids: relevance to cancer stem cells and clinical applications[J]. Cancer Sci, 2017, 108(3): 283-289.
6 Rosenbluth JM, Schackmann RCJ, Kenneth Gray G, et al. Organoid cultures from normal and cancer-prone human breast tissues preserve complex epithelial lineages[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 1711.
7 Drost J, Clevers H. Organoids in cancer research[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2018, 18(7): 407-418.
8 Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, et al. A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity[J]. Cell, 2018, 172(1/2): 373-386.e10.
9 Calar K, Plesselova S, Bhattacharya S, et al. Human plasma-derived 3D cultures model breast cancer treatment responses and predict clinically effective drug treatment concentrations[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(7): 1722.
10 Zhang L, Adileh M, Martin ML, et al. Establishing estrogen-responsive mouse mammary organoids from single Lgr5+ cells[J]. Cell Signal, 2017, 29: 41-51.
11 Houthuijzen JM, Jonkers J. Cancer-associated fibroblasts as key regulators of the breast cancer tumor microenvironment[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2018, 37(4): 577-597.
12 Truong DD, Kratz A, Park JG, et al. A human organotypic microfluidic tumor model permits investigation of the interplay between patient-derived fibroblasts and breast cancer cells[J]. Cancer Res, 2019, 79(12): 3139-3151.
13 Nayak B, Balachander GM, Manjunath S, et al. Tissue mimetic 3D scaffold for breast tumor-derived organoid culture toward personalized chemotherapy[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2019, 180: 334-343.
14 Richards Z, McCray T, Marsili J, et al. Prostate stroma increases the viability and maintains the branching phenotype of human prostate organoids[J]. iScience, 2019, 12: 304-317.
15 Liu J, Shen JX, Wu HT, et al. Collagen 1A1 (COL1A1) promotes metastasis of breast cancer and is a potential therapeutic target[J]. Discov Med, 2018, 25(139): 211-223.
16 Kauppila S, Stenb?ck F, Risteli J, et al. Aberrant type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ collagen gene expression in human breast cancer in vivo[J]. J Pathol, 1998, 186(3): 262-268.
17 Zhu YY, Chen C, Li JJ, et al. The prognostic value of quantitative analysis of CCL5 and collagen Ⅳ in luminal B (HER2-) subtype breast cancer by quantum-dot-based molecular imaging[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2018, 13: 3795-3803.
18 Carranza-Rosales P, Guzmán-Delgado NE, Carranza-Torres IE, et al. Breast organotypic cancer models[J]. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2018. DOI:10.1007/82_2018_86.
19 Drost J, van Boxtel R, Blokzijl F, et al. Use of CRISPR-modified human stem cell organoids to study the origin of mutational signatures in cancer[J]. Science, 2017, 358(6360): 234-238.
20 Duarte AA, Gogola E, Sachs N, et al. BRCA-deficient mouse mammary tumor organoids to study cancer-drug resistance[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(2): 134-140.
21 Kondo J, Inoue M. Application of cancer organoid model for drug screening and personalized therapy[J]. Cells, 2019, 8(5): E470.
22 Bager CL, Willumsen N, Leeming DJ, et al. Collagen degradation products measured in serum can separate ovarian and breast cancer patients from healthy controls: a preliminary study[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2015, 15(6): 783-788.
23 Rios AC, Clevers H. Imaging organoids: a bright future ahead[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(1): 24-26.
24 Mazzucchelli S, Piccotti F, Allevi R, et al. Establishment and morphological characterization of patient-derived organoids from breast cancer[J]. Biol Proced Online, 2019, 21: 12.
25 Yu J, Huang W. The progress and clinical application of breast cancer organoids[J]. Int J Stem Cells, 2020, 13(3): 295-304.
26 Su SC, Chen JN, Yao HR, et al. CD10+GPR77+ cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness[J]. Cell, 2018, 172(4): 841-856.e16.
27 Costa A, Kieffer Y, Scholer-Dahirel A, et al. Fibroblast heterogeneity and immunosuppressive environment in human breast cancer[J]. Cancer Cell, 2018, 33(3): 463-479.e10.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉