Clinical research

Role of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in initial stage of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

  • Yeqing YAN ,
  • Sheng LIANG ,
  • Bin YANG ,
  • Renjian ZOU ,
  • Yufei MA ,
  • Lisheng CAI ,
  • Hui WANG ,
  • Hongliang FU
Expand
  • 1.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
    2.Department of Urology, Tenth People′s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
    3.National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20816, USA
FU Hongliang, E-mail: fuhongliang@hotmail.com.

Received date: 2023-03-02

  Accepted date: 2023-05-18

  Online published: 2023-07-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82001856)

Abstract

Objective ·To evaluate the role of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in the initial stage of patients with moderate and high risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods ·A total of 67 patients with moderate and high risk PCa who were treated in Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from September 2017 to June 2022 were initially staged by 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT. Conventional imaging (CI), including multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS), were performed within two weeks before 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT. Twenty-five patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at the same time. The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACU) of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in the initial stage were evaluated, and the results were compared with those of 18F-FDG PET/CT, mp-MRI and BS. The consistency of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and CI in terms of primary lesion, regional lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis was evaluated by Kappa consistency test refering to the postoperative pathological T and N staging results and bone metastasis results of clinical follow-up. Kappa coefficient was calculated and compared. Results ·Of the 67 patients with PCa, 38 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and had completed pathological data, with 27 patients undergoing regional lymphadenectomy and 1 patient undergoing expanded pelvic lymphadenectomy at the same time. The pathological results were obtained as gold standard. The detection rates of mp-MRI and 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing intrathecal lesions were both 100%. The SENs in diagnosing bilateral intralobular lesions were 26.3% and 63.2%, respctively; the SPECs were both 75.0%.The Kappa consistency test showed that the consistency of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosis of extracapsular extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and bladder neck invasion (BNI) was higher than that of mp-MRI. Fisher′s exact test showed that there were no statistically significant differences in SEN (P=0.226, P=0.491) and SPEC (P=1.000, P=0.342) between the two methods for diagnosing EPE and SVI, as well as SEN (P=1.000) for diagnosing BNI. In terms of diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, based on the analysis of lymph node numbers, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and pathological results was higher than that of mp-MRI (Kappa coefficients of 0.555 and 0.137, respectively). Fisher′s exact test showed that there were no statistically significant differences in SEN and SPEC between the two examination methods (P=0.562, P=0.829). Based on the patients, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and pathological results was higher than that of mp-MRI (Kappa coefficients of 0.850 and 0.313, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=1.000). In terms of diagnosis of bone metastasis, based on the analysis of bone lesion numbers, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and clinical follow-up results was higher than that of BS (Kappa coefficients of 0.500 and 0.299, respectively). Fisher′s exact test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=0.219). Based on the patients, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and clinical follow-up results was higher than that of BS (Kappa coefficients of 0.953 and 0.766, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=1.000). The risks of 21 patients (31.3%) were increased after 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT detection, with 1 patient (1.5%) decreasing. The initial stage of 32 cases (47.8%) were changed after 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT detection, with 27 cases (40.3%) upstaged and 5 cases (7.5%) downstaged. Conclusion ·18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT is superior to CI in the diagnosis of bilateral intralobular lesions, EPE, SVI, regional lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis in intermediate and high risk PCa, and on this basis, the diagnosis of clinical stage and metastatic status of some patients has been changed.

Cite this article

Yeqing YAN , Sheng LIANG , Bin YANG , Renjian ZOU , Yufei MA , Lisheng CAI , Hui WANG , Hongliang FU . Role of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in initial stage of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023 , 43(7) : 873 -881 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.07.009

References

1 BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2 顾秀瑛, 郑荣寿, 张思维, 等. 2000—2014年中国肿瘤登记地区前列腺癌发病趋势及年龄变化分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52(6): 586-592.
2 GU X Y, ZHENG R S, ZHANG S W, et al. Analysis on the trend of prostate cancer incidence and age change in cancer registration areas of China, 2000 to 2014[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 52(6): 586-592.
3 TROYER J K, BECKETT M L, WRIGHT G L. Detection and characterization of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in tissue extracts and body fluids[J]. Int J Cancer, 1995, 62(5): 552-558.
4 WRIGHT G L, HALEY C, BECKETT M L, et al. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues[J]. Urol Oncol, 1995, 1(1): 18-28.
5 AFSHAR-OROMIEH A, MALCHER A, EDER M, et al. Reply to Reske et al.: pet imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 40(6): 971-972.
6 WERNER R A, DERLIN T, LAPA C, et al. 18F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging[J]. Theranostics, 2020, 10(1): 1-16.
7 FDA approves 18F-DCFPyL PET agent in prostate cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2021, 62(8): 11N.
8 KOH W J, ABU-RUSTUM N R, BEAN S, et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(2): 170-199.
9 METSER U, ORTEGA C, PERLIS N, et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR [J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(11): 3702-3711.
10 SONNI I, FELKER E R, LENIS A T, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a histopathology gold standard in the detection, intraprostatic localization, and determination of local extension of primary prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial[J]. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(6): 847-854.
11 DONATO P, ROBERTS M J, MORTON A, et al. Improved specificity with 68Ga PSMA PET/CT to detect clinically significant lesions “invisible” on multiparametric MRI of the prostate: a single institution comparative analysis with radical prostatectomy histology[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(1): 20-30.
12 CAGLIC I, SUSHENTSEV N, SHAH N, et al. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy na?ve patients[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2021, 141: 109804.
13 BOESEN L, CHABANOVA E, L?GAGER V, et al. Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(6): 1776-1785.
14 POPI?A C, POPI?A A R, ANDREI A, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with multiparametric-MRI: accuracy and inter-reader agreement [J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2020, 93(2): 150-161.
15 YILMAZ B, TURKAY R, COLAKOGLU Y, et al. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer[J]. Prostate, 2019, 79(9): 1007-1017.
16 KOSEOGLU E, KORDAN Y, KILIC M, et al. Diagnostic ability of Ga-68 PSMA PET to detect dominant and non-dominant tumors, upgrading and adverse pathology in patients with PIRADS 4-5 index lesions undergoing radical prostatectomy[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2021, 24(1): 202-209.
17 UCAR T, GUNDUZ N, DEMIRCI E, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: a retrospective study [J]. Prostate, 2022, 82(15): 1462-1468.
18 ?ELEN S, GüLTEKIN A, ?ZLüLERDEN Y, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-I/T PET-CT and multiparametric MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer patients: a pilot study[J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(9/10): 684-691.
19 ARSLAN A, KARAARSLAN E, LEVENT GüNER A, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of multiparametric prostate MRI versus 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT in the evaluation lymph node involvement and extraprostatic extension[J]. Acad Radiol, 2022, 29(5): 698-704.
20 HOPE T A, EIBER M, ARMSTRONG W R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(11): 1635-1642.
21 MAURER T, GSCHWEND J E, RAUSCHER I, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of 68gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2016, 195(5): 1436-1443.
22 WOO S, SUH C H, KIM S Y, et al. The diagnostic performance of MRI for detection of lymph node metastasis in bladder and prostate cancer: an updated systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(3): W95-w109.
23 BUD?US L, LEYH-BANNURAH S R, SALOMON G, et al. Initial experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 393-396.
24 YUMINAGA Y, ROTHE C, KAM J, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus CT and bone scan for investigation of PSA failure post radical prostatectomy[J]. Asian J Urol, 2021, 8(2): 170-175.
25 PYKA T, OKAMOTO S, DAHLBENDER M, et al. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2016, 43(12): 2114-2121.
26 ACAR E, BEKI? R, POLACK B. Comparison of bone uptake in bone scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT images in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Curr Med Imaging Rev, 2019, 15(6): 589-594.
27 RUSTHOVEN C G, JONES B L, FLAIG T W, et al. Improved survival with prostate radiation in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(24): 2835-2842.
28 SATKUNASIVAM R, KIM A E, DESAI M, et al. Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy vs no local therapy for survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER-medicare analysis[J]. J Urol, 2015, 194(2): 378-385.
29 OST P, REYNDERS D, DECAESTECKER K, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase Ⅱ trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(5): 446-453.
Outlines

/