Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >

2024 , Vol. 44 >Issue 6: 687 - 693

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.06.003

Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science

Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation

  • Jiaqi DOU ,
  • Jie GAO ,
  • Xiaoling BIAN ,
  • Feng WANG ,
  • Qinggang DAI ,
  • Yiqun WU
Expand
  • Department of 2nd Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 201999, China
DAI Qinggang, E-mail: daiqinggang@126.com.
WU Yiqun, E-mail: yiqunwu@hotmail.com

Received date: 2024-02-29

  Accepted date: 2024-03-27

  Online published: 2024-06-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82271004);Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(21ZR1436900);Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation(824MS152);Project of Biobank of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(YBKB202101);Rare Disease Registration Platform of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(SH9H-2023-T492-2);Project of Research Physician of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(2022yxyjxys-wf);“Cross” Project Cooperation Fund of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(JYJC202305)

Fold

Abstract

Objective ·To evaluate the dentofacial phenotype in non-syndromic tooth agenesis (NSTA) patients with paired box gene 9 (PAX9) mutation. Methods ·Patients with NSTA who visited the Department of Second Dental Center of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, between January 2016 and December 2023 received whole-exome sequencing to screen PAX9 mutation. The location and number of missing teeth were evaluated by oral pantomography, and dentofacial deformities were evaluated by X-ray cephalometrics. Results ·Seven patients with PAX9 mutation were included in the study, including 3 males (42.9%) and 4 females (57.1%). The patients were 7?31 years old at first visit, with a mean age of (19.7±8.0) years old. All the 7 patients were PAX9 heterozygotes, of which 4 were missense and 3 were frameshift. The average number of missing teeth was 15.9±2.9. The number of missing teeth in maxilla (9.6±2.6) was slightly higher than that in mandible (6.3±2.4) (P=0.030). Maxillary second molar (100.0%), maxillary canine (85.7%) and mandibular second premolar (85.7%) were the three most common missing teeth, while mandibular lateral incisor (14.3%) and mandibular canine (14.3%) were the two least missing teeth. Patients with frameshift mutation had more missing teeth (18.3±2.1) than those with missense mutation (14.0±1.8) (P=0.032). X-ray cephalometrics analysis results showed that the angle sella-nasion-subspinale (SNA), angle nasion-subspinale-subspinale-porion (NA-Apo) and sella-nasion (S-N) in adult patients with PAX9 mutation were significantly lower than the normal reference values, suggesting a shorter anterior cranial base and maxillary length. The frankfort horizontal plane-nasion-porion (FH-NPo) was higher than the reference value, and the Y-axis was lower than the reference value, indicating a more prognathic mandible. The angle subspinale-nasion-supramental (ANB) was lower than the reference value, indicating a skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The angle upper central incisor-nasion-subspinale (angle U1-NA) was higher than the reference value, indicating a lip inclination of maxillary central incisor. The angle lower central incisor-mandibular plane (IMPA) and lower central incisor-nasion-supramental (L1-NB) were lower than the reference values, indicating a retroclination of the mandibular central incisor, and crossbite in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Conclusion ·The dentofacial phenotype of PAX9-mutated patients with NSTA is reported comprehensively. It is helpful to improve the understanding of the role of PAX9 in human maxillofacial development.

Key words： paired box gene 9 (PAX9); dentofacial deformities; X-ray cephalometrics; non-syndromic tooth agenesis; skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion

Cite this article

Jiaqi DOU , Jie GAO , Xiaoling BIAN , Feng WANG , Qinggang DAI , Yiqun WU . Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024 , 44(6) : 687 -693 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.06.003

References

1 POLDER B J, VAN′T HOF M A, VAN DER LINDEN F P, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2004, 32(3): 217-226.
2 KHALAF K, MISKELLY J, VOGE E, et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthod, 2014, 41(4): 299-316.
3 VASTARDIS H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(6): 650-656.
4 LAN R, WU Y Q, DAI Q G, et al. Gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in syndromes with tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2023, 29(6): 2401-2408.
5 YU K, DOU J Q, HUANG W, et al. Expanding the genetic spectrum of tooth agenesis using whole-exome sequencing[J]. Clin Genet, 2022, 102(6): 503-516.
6 YU M, WONG S W, HAN D, et al. Genetic analysis: Wnt and other pathways in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2019, 25(3): 646-651.
7 SANDHU M, MALIK P, SAHA R. Multiple dental and skeletal abnormalities in an individual with Filippi syndrome[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2013, 2013: 845405.
8 TUNA E B, MAR?AN G, GEN?AY K, et al. Craniofacial and dental characteristics of Kabuki syndrome: nine years cephalometric follow-up[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2012, 36(4): 393-400.
9 GUNASHEKHAR M, HAMEED M S, BOKHARI S K. Oral and dental manifestations in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: report of a rare case[J]. Prim Dent Care, 2012, 19(1): 35-38.
10 VERMA L, PASSI S, GAUBA K. Brachman de Lange syndrome[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2010, 1(4): 268-270.
11 ERCAL D, SAY B. Cerebro-oculo-nasal syndrome: another case and review of the literature[J]. Clin Dysmorphol, 1998, 7(2): 139-141.
12 吴钊仪, 岳海棠, 李健, 等. KMT2D基因新发双突变致歌舞伎面谱综合征的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
12 WU Z Y, YUE H T, LI J, et al. Two novel and de novo KMT2D mutations on the same allele cause Kabuki syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
13 FOURNIER B P, BRUNEAU M H, TOUPENAY S, et al. Patterns of dental agenesis highlight the nature of the causative mutated genes[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(12): 1306-1316.
14 SARKAR T, RANJAN P, KANATHUR S, et al. An in vitro and computational validation of a novel loss-of-functional mutation in PAX9 associated with non-syndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Mol Genet Genomics, 2023, 298(1): 183-199.
15 BHOL C S, PATIL S, SAHU B B, et al. The clinical significance and correlative signaling pathways of paired box gene 9 in development and carcinogenesis[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1876(1): 188561.
16 PETERS H, NEUBüSER A, BALLING R. Pax genes and organogenesis: Pax9 meets tooth development[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(Suppl 1): 38-43.
17 CHU K Y, WANG Y L, CHEN J T, et al. PAX9 mutations and genetic synergism in familial tooth agenesis[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2023, 1524(1): 87-96.
18 LI R, CHEN Z, YU Q, et al. The function and regulatory network of Pax9 gene in palate development[J]. J Dent Res, 2019, 98(3): 277-287.
19 NAKATOMI M, LUDWIG K U, KNAPP M, et al. Msx1 deficiency interacts with hypoxia and induces a morphogenetic regulation during mouse lip development[J]. Development, 2020, 147(21): dev189175.
20 BONCZEK O, KREJCI P, IZAKOVICOVA-HOLLA L, et al. Tooth agenesis: what do we know and is there a connection to cancer?[J]. Clin Genet, 2021, 99(4): 493-502.
21 KAUSHAL K, KIM E J, TYAGI A, et al. Genome-wide screening for deubiquitinase subfamily identifies ubiquitin-specific protease 49 as a novel regulator of odontogenesis[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2022, 29(9): 1689-1704.
22 RAHMAN M M, LAI Y C, HUSNA A A, et al. Micro RNA transcriptome profile in canine oral melanoma[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(19): 4832.
23 LAN Y, XU J Y, JIANG R L. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of palatogenesis[J]. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2015, 115: 59-84.
24 JIA S H, ZHOU J, D'SOUZA R N. Pax9's dual roles in modulating Wnt signaling during murine palatogenesis[J]. Dev Dyn, 2020, 249(10): 1274-1284.
25 PETERS H, NEUBüSER A, KRATOCHWIL K, et al. Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities[J]. Genes Dev, 1998, 12(17): 2735-2747.
26 KIST R, GREALLY E, PETERS H. Derivation of a mouse model for conditional inactivation of Pax9[J]. Genesis, 2007, 45(7): 460-464.
27 BONCZEK O, BALCAR V J, ?ERY O. PAX9 gene mutations and tooth agenesis: a review[J]. Clin Genet, 2017, 92(5): 467-476.
28 WANG Y, GROPPE J C, WU J F, et al. Pathogenic mechanisms of tooth agenesis linked to paired domain mutations in human PAX9[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2009, 18(15): 2863-2874.
29 INTARAK N, TONGCHAIRATI K, TERMTEERAPORNPIMOL K, et al. Tooth agenesis patterns and variants in PAX9: a systematic review[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2023, 59: 129-137.
30 LIU H C, LIU H B, SU L X, et al. Four novel PAX9 variants and the PAX9-related non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(15): 8142.
31 WONG S W, HAN D, ZHANG H, et al. Nine novel PAX9 mutations and a distinct tooth agenesis genotype-phenotype[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(2): 155-162.
32 FAUZI N H, ARDINI Y D, ZAINUDDIN Z, et al. A review on non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with PAX9 mutations[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2018, 54(1): 30-36.
33 LEE Y J, LEE Y J, KIM Y J, et al. Novel PAX9 mutations causing isolated oligodontia[J]. J Pers Med, 2024, 14(2): 191.
34 LEI R, QIU X L, HAN Y, et al. Identification and functional study of a novel variant of PAX9 causing tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/odi.14937.
35 ZHOU M Q, ZHANG H, CAMHI H, et al. Analyses of oligodontia phenotypes and genetic etiologies[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2021, 13(1): 32.
36 JARA-ESPEJO M, HAWKINS M T R, FOGALLI G B, et al. Folding stability of Pax9 intronic G-quadruplex correlates with relative molar size in eutherians[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2021, 38(5): 1860-1873.
37 MOSS M L, SALENTIJN L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth[J]. Am J Orthod, 1969, 55(6): 566-577.
38 WISTH P J, THUNHOLD K, B?E O E. The craniofacial morphology of individuals with hypodontia[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1974, 32(4): 281-290.
39 ROALD K L, WISTH P J, B?E O E. Changes in cranio-facial morphology of individuals with hypodontia between the ages of 9 and 16[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1982, 40(2): 65-74.
40 SARN?S K V, RUNE B. The facial profile in advanced hypodontia: a mixed longitudinal study of 141 children[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1983, 5(2): 133-143.
41 OGAARD B, KROGSTAD O. Craniofacial structure and soft tissue profile in patients with severe hypodontia[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 108(5): 472-477.
42 BEN-BASSAT Y, BRIN I. Skeletodental patterns in patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(5): 521-525.
43 ENDO T, YOSHINO S, OZOE R, et al. Association of advanced hypodontia and craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients[J]. Odontology, 2004, 92(1): 48-53.
44 BJ?RK A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1966, 24(2): 109-127.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉