Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science

Optimizing arch expansion with clear aligners in the mixed dentition based on finite element analysis

  • Qinyi Lü ,
  • Ziqi GAO ,
  • Qingchen FENG ,
  • Hongxiang MEI ,
  • Juan LI
Expand
  • Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University; State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Chengdu 610041, China
LI Juan, E-mail: lijuan@scu.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-03-05

  Accepted date: 2024-06-05

  Online published: 2024-08-27

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32271364);Major Special Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province(2022ZDZX0031);Angelalign Scientific Research Fund(SDTS21-4-01);Clinical Research Project of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University(LCYJ2019-22)

Abstract

Objective ·To reveal the direction, efficiency, and mechanical load of single tooth displacement with clear aligners for expansion treatment during the transitional dentition period with the aid of finite element analysis. Additionally, overcorrection and torque compensation systems were designed to address insufficient expansion efficiency and buccal inclination of posterior teeth. Methods ·One volunteer in mixed dentition period was included to construct a three dimentional cranio-maxillary complex model and an invisible orthodontic system, simulating the buccal displacement (load 1?4: 0.200, 0.275, 0.300, 0.325 mm, respectively) and root buccal torque (load 1: buccal displacement load 0.200 mm, root buccal torque 0°; load 5: buccal displacement load 0.275 mm, root buccal torque 1.0°; load 6: buccal displacement load 0.300 mm, root buccal torque 1.3° and load 7: buccal displacement load 0.325mm, root buccal torque 1.8°) on the maxillary deciduous teeth to the first permanent molar with a non bracket invisible orthodontic appliance. Through finite element analysis, the tooth displacement and equivalent stress distribution of the periodontal membrane can be calculated. Results ·Expansion treatment with clear aligners in the transitional dentition phase primarily revealed the effect of buccal expansion of teeth; different teeth achieved different levels of expansion rate. At a set expansion amount of 0.200 mm per side, expansion efficiency in the maxillary first permanent molar was 51.86%, second primary molar 68.76%, first primary molar 73.48%, and primary cuspid 84.17%. By designing over-correction (0.275, 0.300, 0.325 mm), the results showed significant enhancement in expansion effect. When overcorrection length reached 150% (0.300 mm), expansion efficiency at the maxillary first permanent molar, second primary molar, first primary molar, and primary cuspid were 75.16%, 99.96%, 107.35%, and 122.37%, respectively. The expansion efficiency of maxillary second primary molar, first primary molar, and primary cuspid was close to 100.00%. The overcorrection design exacerbated the dental effects of expansion, intensifying the tendency for teeth to tilt toward the cheek side, leading to side effects such as buccal inclination and drooping of the palatal cusps. When the overcorrection amount for expansion reached 150%, the crown-root displacement in the upper first permanent molar, second primary molar, first primary molar, and primary cuspid were -0.109, -0.134, -0.132, and -0.298 mm, respectively. Applying specific torque compensation for different tooth positions can combat the buccal inclination of posterior teeth. At an overcorrection length of 150% (0.300 mm) with an added 1.3° root buccal torque, expansion efficiency was 56.15%, 73.88%, 79.49%, and 87.80%, respectively. While the crown-root displacement differences reduced to -0.081, -0.097, -0.095, and -0.208 mm. Conclusion ·When using clear aligners for expansion treatment during a transitional dentition period, side effects such as buccal inclination of posterior teeth exist. Furthermore, various teeth realize differing levels of expansion efficiency, necessitating the design of unique adjustment strategies according to different tooth positions. Overcorrection can improve expansion efficiency but needs to be coordinated with root buccal torque for the whole tooth to move buccally.

Cite this article

Qinyi Lü , Ziqi GAO , Qingchen FENG , Hongxiang MEI , Juan LI . Optimizing arch expansion with clear aligners in the mixed dentition based on finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024 , 44(8) : 935 -943 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.08.001

References

1 RICKETTS R M. A detailed consideration of the line of occlusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 1978, 48(4): 274-282.
2 LEE R T. Arch width and form: a review[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1999, 115(3): 305-313.
3 OCAK I, KARSLI N, ALTUG A T, et al. Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class Ⅱ malocclusion: a retrospective study[J]. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e16031.
4 KUNTZ T R, STALEY R N, BIGELOW H F, et al. Arch widths in adults with Class Ⅰ crowded and Class Ⅲ malocclusions compared with normal occlusions[J]. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78(4): 597-603.
5 TERVAHAUTA E, NOKELA J, VUOLLO V, et al. Associations of sagittal malocclusions with dental arch characteristics and crowding in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2022, 25(4): 468-475.
6 SAGHIRI M A, EID J, TANG C K, et al. Factors influencing different types of malocclusion and arch form: a review[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 122(2): 185-191.
7 LIONE R, PAOLONI V, BARTOLOMMEI L, et al. Maxillary arch development with Invisalign system[J]. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(4): 433-440.
8 GALAN-LOPEZ L, BARCIA-GONZALEZ J, PLASENCIA E. A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign?[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(3): 140-149.
9 PHAN X, LING P H. Clinical limitations of Invisalign[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2007, 73(3): 263-266.
10 HOULE J P, PIEDADE L, TODESCAN R Jr, et al. The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017, 87(1): 19-24.
11 YAO S, JIANG W, WANG C J, et al. Improvements of tooth movement efficiency and torque control in expanding the arch with clear aligners: a finite element analysis[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1120535.
12 ZHANG Y Q, HUI S Y, GUI L Y, et al. Effects of upper arch expansion using clear aligners on different stride and torque: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2023, 23(1): 891.
13 ZHOU N, GUO J. Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system[J]. Angle Orthod, 2020, 90(1): 23-30.
14 LEVRINI L, CARGANICO A, ABBATE L. Maxillary expansion with clear aligners in the mixed dentition: a preliminary study with Invisalign? First system[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2021, 22(2): 125-128.
15 SOLANO-MENDOZA B, SONNEMBERG B, SOLANO-REINA E, et al. How effective is the Invisalign? system in expansion movement with Ex30' aligners?[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(5): 1475-1484.
16 LIONE R, CRETELLA LOMBARDO E, PAOLONI V, et al. Upper arch dimensional changes with clear aligners in the early mixed dentition: a prospective study[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2023, 84(1): 33-40.
Outlines

/