Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science

Study on macroscopic anatomy and developmental model of pterygopalatine suture

  • Wenyi ZHANG ,
  • Miri CHUNG ,
  • Yufan XIE ,
  • Lingyong JIANG
Expand
  • Center of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200011, China
JIANG Lingyong, E-mail: jianglingyong@sjtu.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-03-01

  Accepted date: 2024-05-11

  Online published: 2024-08-27

Supported by

Project of Shanghai's Top Priority Research Center(2022ZZ01017);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(YG2023ZD14);Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(2019-I2M-5-037);Project of Biobank of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(YBKB202216);“Two-hundred Talents” Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(20221809);National Innovation Training Program for Undergraduates in Key Fields(1723Z501);Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan-International Science and Technology Cooperation Program(23410713600)

Abstract

Objective ·To analyze the anatomical and macroscopic characteristics of the pterygopalatine suture (PPS) in Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology, and to preliminarily investigate its developmental pattern and its association with the correction of maxillary underdevelopment. Methods ·A total of 134 CBCT images, taken from July to August 2023 at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, were categorized into six age groups. The PPS landmarks were utilized to determine the overall transverse position (XPPS), sagittal position (YPPS), insertion angle (IAP), insertion width of the pyramidal process (IWP), and insertion depth of the pyramidal process (IDP). The pterygomaxillary junction was identified through multiplanar observations. Regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation of these parameters with age and gender, and pairwise comparisons were made to determine the stable age range for parameter changes. Paired t-tests and paired chi-squared tests were conducted to analyze the bilateral parameter differences. Results ·Results showed that YPPS and IDP did not exhibit significant correlation with age, whereas XPPS, IAP, IWP, and the incidence of pterygomaxillary fusion were significantly positively correlated with age (P<0.01). Gender differences were only significant for XPPS, with males demonstrating greater values than females (P<0.01). Analysis of age-related trends indicated significant differences in XPPS between group 1 (6 years≤age<9 years) and group 2 (9 years≤age<12 years) (female: P=0.006, male: P=0.004); significant differences in IAP were observed between group 2 and group 3 (12 years≤age<15 years) (P=0.042), with 98.5% of samples having an IAP greater than 45 degrees; IWP differences were significant between group 1 and group 3 (P=0.016), and the pterygomaxillary fusion incidence was significantly different among group 1, 2, and 3 (group 1 vs. 2: P<0.001, group 2 vs 3: P=0.037, group 1 vs 3: P<0.001), with an incidence rate exceeding 90% in adults. No significant bilateral differences were found for all parameters. Conclusion ·No significant changes were observed in YPPS and IDP after the age of 6, indicating a trend towards fusion of the maxilla with the pterygoid process. The overall transverse position of the PPS tends to stabilize around 12 years of age, while the IAP and IWP continue to increase and reach stability around 15 years of age,with a sagittal insertion orientation of the pyramidal process into the pterygoid notch.

Cite this article

Wenyi ZHANG , Miri CHUNG , Yufan XIE , Lingyong JIANG . Study on macroscopic anatomy and developmental model of pterygopalatine suture[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024 , 44(8) : 944 -950 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.08.002

References

1 Y?LMAZ ASAN C, KüTüK N, KURT G, et al. Development of a new three-directional distractor system for the correction of maxillary transverse and sagittal deficiency[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2018, 46(3): 424-431.
2 MELSEN B, OUSTERHOUT D K. Anatomy and development of the pterygopalatomaxillary region, studied in relation to Le Fort osteotomies[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 1987, 19(1): 16-28.
3 GUPTA V, RAI P, TRIPATHI T, et al. Stress distribution and displacement with four different types of MARPE on craniofacial complex: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Int Orthod, 2023, 21(4): 100813.
4 VENTURA V, BOTELHO J, MACHADO V, et al. Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE): an umbrella review[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(5): 1287.
5 DE SOUZA R A, RINO NETO J, DE PAIVA J B. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class Ⅲ patients: a non-randomized clinical trial[J]. Prog Orthod, 2019, 20(1): 35.
6 BALAKRISHNAN R, SENGOTTUVEL N, ALTAF S K, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary protraction using diverse modes of rapid palatal expansion[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(3): e36328.
7 CHO A R, PARK J H, MOON W, et al. Short-term effects of microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion on the circummaxillary sutures in skeletally mature patients: a cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 161(2): e187-e197.
8 LEE J M, CHOI S H, CHOI Y J, et al. Evaluation of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion success by comparing width of circummaxillary sutures before expansion in adult male patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 93(2): 176-184.
9 LEE D W, PARK J H, MOON W, et al. Effects of bicortical anchorage on pterygopalatine suture opening with microimplant-assisted maxillary skeletal expansion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 159(4): 502-511.
10 HOLLANDER Z, FRASER A, PAREDES N, et al. Nonsurgical maxillary orthopedic protraction treatment for an adult patient with hyperdivergent facial morphology, Class III malocclusion, and bilateral crossbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 162(2): 264-278.
11 CASTRO A C R, KIM H, CHO H J, et al. Three-dimensional micromorphology of human midpalatal suture and pterygomaxillary articular complex[J]. J World Fed Orthod, 2023, 12(4): 141-149.
12 MOON W. Class III treatment by combining facemask (FM) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)[J]. Semin Orthod, 2018, 24(1): 95-107.
Outlines

/