
Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
Clinical efficacy of intra-abdominal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
Received date: 2025-04-24
Accepted date: 2025-12-24
Online published: 2026-04-10
Objective ·To explore the clinical effects of intra-abdominal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Methods ·Clinical data were collected from 92 patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from January 2020 and February 2024. The patients were divided into an intra-abdominal anastomosis group and an extra-abdominal anastomosis group according to the intraoperative anastomosis method. Perioperative general data, intraoperative conditions, postoperative recovery, and short-term complications within 30 d after surgery were collected and compared between the two groups. Results ·After propensity score matching, 64 well-matched patients were obtained, with 32 cases in the intra-abdominal anastomosis group and 32 cases in the extra-abdominal anastomosis group. The intraoperative blood loss in the intra-abdominal anastomosis group was significantly lower than that in the extra-abdominal anastomosis group (P<0.001), and the length of the auxiliary incision was also shorter (P<0.001). Patients in the intra-abdominal anastomosis group had shorter time to first flatus (P=0.012) and time to first defecation (P=0.003), as well as lower postoperative pain scores (P<0.001). The overall incidence of short-term complications and the incidence of surgical site infection in the intra-abdominal anastomosis group were 21.88% and 6.25%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the extra-abdominal anastomosis group (37.50% and 28.13%, respectively; P=0.041 and P=0.032). Within 30 d postoperatively, the intra-abdominal anastomosis group had significantly lower severe complication (Clavien-Dindo≥grade Ⅱ) rate compared with the extra-abdominal anastomosis group (12.50% vs 31.25%, P=0.045). Conclusion ·Compared with extra-abdominal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, intra-abdominal anastomosis demonstrates significant advantages in terms of reduced intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, faster recovery of intestinal function, lower postoperative pain, and a lower incidence of short-term complications.
Jiang Shuang , Yu Jiwei . Clinical efficacy of intra-abdominal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2026 , 46(4) : 502 -508 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.04.010
| [1] | Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN[J]. Gut, 2023, 72(2): 338-344. |
| [2] | Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. |
| [3] | 陈茹,魏文强. 《2022年中国癌症发病和死亡报告》解读[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025. 45(2): 174-180. |
| Chen R, Wei W Q. Interpretation of cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery,2025, 45(2): 174-180. | |
| [4] | Mukund K, Syulyukina N, Ramamoorthy S, et al. Right and left-sided colon cancers-specificity of molecular mechanisms in tumorigenesis and progression[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 317. |
| [5] | Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer[J]. Nat Med, 2015, 21(11): 1350-1356. |
| [6] | Matsusaka S, Hanna D L, Cao S, et al. Prognostic impact of IL6 Genetic variants in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2016, 22(13): 3218-3226. |
| [7] | Boeckx N, Koukakis R, de Beeck K O, et al. Primary tumor sidedness has an impact on prognosis and treatment outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from two randomized first-line panitumumab studies[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(8): 1862-1868. |
| [8] | Barot S, Liljegren A, Nordenvall C, et al. Incidence trends and long-term survival in early-onset colorectal cancer: a nationwide Swedish study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2025, 36(11): 1400-1408. |
| [9] | Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1): 44-52. |
| [10] | Lacy A M, García-Valdecasas J C, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9325): 2224-2229. |
| [11] | Loungnarath R, Fleshman J W. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy techniques[J]. Surg Innov, 2003, 10(4): 219-230. |
| [12] | Ripollés-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Zorrilla-Vaca A. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in surgical oncology[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2022, 24(9): 1177-1187. |
| [13] | Trépanier M, Valin-Thorburn A, Kouyoumdjian A, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right colectomy does not affect gastrointestinal recovery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(10): 4601-4608. |
| [14] | Liao C K, Chern Y J, Lin Y C, et al. Short- and medium-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matched study[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1): 6. |
| [15] | Ferrer-Márquez M, Rubio-Gil F, Torres-Fernández R, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (the IVEA-study)[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2021, 31(4): 408-413. |
| [16] | Zizzo M, Zanelli M, Soriano A, et al. Comment on: randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial)[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(7): e230. |
| [17] | Zheng J C, Zhao S, Chen W, et al. Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis and resection in right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2021, 406(6): 1789-1801. |
| [18] | Wei P Y, Li Y, Gao J L, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J]. Dig Surg, 2024, 41(5/6): 224-244. |
| [19] | Manigrasso M, Musella M, Elmore U, et al. Safety and efficacy of totally minimally invasive right colectomy in the obese patients: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Updates Surg, 2022, 74(4): 1281-1290. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |