
Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
Prediction of postoperative prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver transplantation based on preoperative CT imaging combined with clinical indicators
Received date: 2025-09-07
Accepted date: 2026-03-26
Online published: 2026-05-15
Objective ·Based on preoperative CT imaging combined with clinical indicators, predictive models were constructed to evaluate its application value in the recurrence risk and survival status of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation. The aim was to identify patients who exceeded the Milan criteria but could still obtain an ideal prognosis after liver transplantation, and to provide a new evidence-based basis for optimizing the selection strategy of liver transplant recipients. Methods ·Patients with HCC who underwent first orthotopic liver transplantation at Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from January 2015 to January 2025 were included. The clinical data, including laboratory examinations, pathological results, and CT imaging were collected. The follow-up period was defined as the time from the date of liver transplantation to patient death or the study endpoint (January 31, 2025). The patients included in the study were evaluated using the Milan criteria, and the distribution of patients who met and exceeded the Milan criteria was analyzed. Through univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, independent risk factors affecting tumor recurrence and overall survival after liver transplantation in patients with HCC were screened, and predictive models for recurrence risk and survival prognosis were constructed. According to the regression coefficient (β) of each variable in the multivariate Cox regression results, proportional scores were assigned. According to the principle of maximizing the Youden index, the optimal cut-off value of the risk score was determined. The patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups, and the differences in recurrence-free survival and cumulative survival between the two groups were evaluated. The model risk scores were cross-stratified with the UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) standard to analyze the differences between the recurrence-free survival and cumulative survival among different stratified groups. Results ·A total of 95 patients with HCC were included in the study, among whom 64 exceeded the Milan criteria and 44 had postoperative tumor recurrence. According to the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis, preoperative AFP>400 ng/mL, tumor number>3, maximum tumor diameter>3 cm, and liver-spleen maximum length ratio (LSLR)>1.43 were included to establish the recurrence-free prediction model (P<0.05). Additionally, preoperative AFP>400 ng/mL, tumor number>3, maximum tumor diameter>3 cm, and liver-to-spleen density ratio (LSR)>1.2 were included to establish the survival prediction model (P<0.05). According to the models, the patients were subsequently stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups. In the recurrence-free prediction model, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates (86.2% vs 22.7%, 78.0% vs 6.5%, 78.0% vs 3.2%; χ2=63.642, P<0.001) and cumulative survival rates (87.8% vs 74.2%, 82.8% vs 51.2%, 79.0% vs 25.6%; χ2=14.878, P<0.001) in the low-risk group were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group. In the survival prediction model, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates (82.5% vs 19.8%, 68.7% vs 4.9%, 68.7% vs 4.9%; χ2=55.999, P<0.001) and cumulative survival rates (90.8% vs 67.2%, 83.9% vs 42.2%, 80.4% vs 14.1%; χ2=27.590, P<0.001) in the low-risk group were also significantly higher than those in the high-risk group. In the recurrence-free prediction model and survival prediction model, there were no significant differences in the recurrence-free survival and cumulative survival between the low-risk group within the UCSF criteria and the low-risk group beyond the UCSF criteria. Conclusion ·The recurrence and survival prediction models constructed in this study can effectively evaluate the recurrence risk and survival status of HCC patients after liver transplantation, and can provide a new basis for screening patients who exceed the Milan criteria but still achieve favorable prognosis after liver transplantation, thereby contributing to the optimization of liver transplant recipient selection strategies.
Gao Linna , Tang Yangyang , Liu Yifan , Xu Junming , Xing Tonghai . Prediction of postoperative prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver transplantation based on preoperative CT imaging combined with clinical indicators[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2026 , 46(5) : 642 -650 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.05.010
| [1] | Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. |
| [2] | di Marco L, Romanzi A, Pivetti A, et al. Suppressing, stimulating and/or inhibiting: the evolving management of HCC patient after liver transplantation[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2025, 207: 104607. |
| [3] | Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(11): 693-699. |
| [4] | Shen Y H, Chen S, Peng Y F, et al. Quantitative assessment of the effect of glutathione S-transferase genes GSTM1 and GSTT1 on hepatocellular carcinoma risk[J]. Tumor Biol, 2014, 35(5): 4007-4015. |
| [5] | 郭晓娜, 韩文, 陈思荣. 肝脾体积在肝硬化中的相关进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(12): 11045-11050. |
| Guo X N, Han W, Chen S R. Related progress in liver and spleen volume in liver cirrhosis[J]. Advances in Clinical Medicine, 2022, 12(12): 11045-11050. | |
| [6] | Kwon J H, Lee S S, Yoon J S, et al. Liver-to-spleen volume ratio automatically measured on CT predicts decompensation in patients with B viral compensated cirrhosis[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2021, 22(12): 1985-1995. |
| [7] | Hu N, Yan G, Tang M W, et al. CT-based methods for assessment of metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease[J]. Eur Radiol Exp, 2023, 7(1): 72. |
| [8] | Brown Z J, Ruff S M, Pawlik T M. The effect of liver disease on hepatic microenvironment and implications for immune therapy[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 14: 1225821. |
| [9] | Ren A, Li Z Q, Zhou X Z, et al. Evaluation of the α-fetoprotein model for predicting recurrence and survival in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis who received liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Front Surg, 2020, 7: 52. |
| [10] | Sullivan L M, Massaro J M, D′Agostino R B Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions[J]. Stat Med, 2004, 23(10): 1631-1660. |
| [11] | 张炜琪, 谢炎, 陈池义, 等. 超米兰标准肝细胞癌肝移植术后复发预测模型的建立[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(4): 837-842. |
| Zhang W Q, Xie Y, Chen C Y, et al. Development of a new model for predicting recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(4): 837-842. | |
| [12] | Jou Y J, Huang C L, Cho H J. A VIF-based optimization model to alleviate collinearity problems in multiple linear regression[J]. Comput Stat, 2014, 29(6): 1515-1541. |
| [13] | Hassanzad M, Hajian-Tilaki K. Methods of determining optimal cut-point of diagnostic biomarkers with application of clinical data in ROC analysis: an update review[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2024, 24(1): 84. |
| [14] | 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,中华医学会器官移植学分会肝移植学组. 中国肝癌肝移植临床实践指南(2021版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 321-328. |
| Chinese College of Transplant Doctors, Liver Transplantation Group, Chinese Society of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Medical Association. The Chinese clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation (Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(6): 321-328. | |
| [15] | 沈未, 鲁迪, 徐骁. 肝癌肝移植适应证的科学演进[J]. 器官移植, 2025, 16(2): 202-207. |
| Shen W, Lu D, Xu X. Scientific evolution of indications for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Organ Transplantation, 2025, 16(2): 202-207. | |
| [16] | Schindler P, von Beauvais P, Hoffmann E, et al. Combining radiomics and imaging biomarkers with clinical variables for the prediction of HCC recurrence after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2025, 31(10): 1226-1237. |
| [17] | Jiang N, Zeng K N, Dou K F, et al. Preoperative α-fetoprotein and fibrinogen predict hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation regardless of the Milan criteria: model development with external validation[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2018, 48(1): 317-327. |
| [18] | Brusset B, Dumortier J, Cherqui D, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-life comparison of Milan criteria and AFP model[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(10): 2480. |
| [19] | Kutaiba N, Chung W, Goodwin M, et al. The impact of hepatic and splenic volumetric assessment in imaging for chronic liver disease: a narrative review[J]. Insights Imaging, 2024, 15(1): 146. |
| [20] | Huang D Q, Tran A, Tan E X, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion following surgical resection: a meta-analysis of 40 studies and 8 218 patients[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2022, 11(6): 848-860. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |