Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 885-892.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.07.006
• Clinical research • Previous Articles
LAI Xiuxiu1(), ZHU Qingyan1, TAN Jiaqi2, YANG Ling1, ZHU Yan1, ZHOU Gongmin1()
Received:
2022-03-09
Accepted:
2022-06-10
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-25
Contact:
ZHOU Gongmin
E-mail:lxx1989lxx@163.com;whazqp@163.com
Supported by:
CLC Number:
LAI Xiuxiu, ZHU Qingyan, TAN Jiaqi, YANG Ling, ZHU Yan, ZHOU Gongmin. Clinical study of low dose febuxostat on improving renal function in elderly patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(7): 885-892.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://xuebao.shsmu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.07.006
Item | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) | F/χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age/year | 88.66±2.88 | 89.28±3.47 | 89.68±3.35 | 0.824 | 0.442 |
Male/n (%) | 18 (56.3) | 13 (40.6) | 15 (44.1) | 1.735 | 0.420 |
SBP/mmHg | 126.34±11.23 | 127.13±8.95 | 126.38±13.92 | 0.046 | 0.955 |
DBP/mmHg | 65.16±9.04 | 65.91±5.53 | 65.85±9.46 | 0.083 | 0.920 |
BMI/(kg·m-2) | 24.97±4.08 | 25.20±5.50 | 24.58±3.32 | 0.171 | 0.843 |
HbA1c/% | 6.34±0.75 | 6.23±0.53 | 6.30±0.66 | 0.204 | 0.816 |
HB/(g·L-1) | 115.56±16.42 | 121.66±16.89 | 119.94±16.07 | 1.170 | 0.315 |
Albumin/(g·L-1) | 39.50±3.50 | 39.68±3.64 | 39.65±3.38 | 0.025 | 0.976 |
TAG/(mmol·L-1) | 1.23±0.53 | 1.37±0.65 | 1.36±0.73 | 0.486 | 0.616 |
TC/(mmol·L-1) | 3.94±0.95 | 3.72±0.85 | 4.09±0.85 | 1.457 | 0.238 |
HDL-C/(mmol·L-1) | 1.24±0.24 | 1.22±0.31 | 1.22±0.28 | 0.063 | 0.939 |
LDL-C/(mmol·L-1) | 2.12±0.95 | 1.89±0.62 | 2.25±0.68 | 1.859 | 0.161 |
SUA/(μmol·L-1) | 494.16±57.12 | 487.34±70.03 | 492.00±61.98 | 0.097 | 0.907 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | 119.71±24.01 | 115.80±23.52 | 117.33±22.81 | 0.227 | 0.798 |
Cys-C/(mg·L-1) | 1.71±0.36 | 1.68±0.35 | 1.71±0.37 | 0.109 | 0.897 |
Ccr/(mL·min-1) | 33.05±8.69 | 31.75±7.55 | 30.18±7.08 | 0.228 | 0.796 |
eGFR1/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 48.52±10.47 | 47.28±9.27 | 47.12±7.62 | 0.227 | 0.797 |
eGFR2/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 42.91±9.79 | 41.89±8.63 | 41.54±6.91 | 0.230 | 0.795 |
UACR | 0.06 (0.05, 0.14) | 0.06 (0.04, 0.09) | 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) | 3.547 | 0.170 |
Hcy/(μmol·L-1) | 17.03±5.23 | 17.51±5.24 | 16.83±5.28 | 0.141 | 0.868 |
Comorbidity/n (%) | |||||
Diabetes mellitus | 13 (40.6) | 7 (21.9) | 7 (20.6) | 4.083 | 0.147 |
Hypertension | 26 (81.3) | 26 (81.3) | 28 (82.4) | 0.018 | 0.991 |
Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease | 20 (62.5) | 23 (71.9) | 17 (50.0) | 3.355 | 0.187 |
Drug/n (%) | |||||
ACEI/ARB | 17 (53.1) | 12 (37.5) | 12 (35.3) | 2.521 | 0.283 |
Calcium antagonists | 9 (28.1) | 10 (31.3) | 16 (47.1) | 2.986 | 0.225 |
Diuretics | 11 (34.4) | 13 (40.6) | 10 (29.4) | 0.917 | 0.632 |
Sodium bicarbonate | 2 (6.3) | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
SGLT2i | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
Calcium dobesilate | ‒ | 1 (3.1) | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
Tab 1 Clinical characteristics of patients at baseline in the three groups
Item | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) | F/χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age/year | 88.66±2.88 | 89.28±3.47 | 89.68±3.35 | 0.824 | 0.442 |
Male/n (%) | 18 (56.3) | 13 (40.6) | 15 (44.1) | 1.735 | 0.420 |
SBP/mmHg | 126.34±11.23 | 127.13±8.95 | 126.38±13.92 | 0.046 | 0.955 |
DBP/mmHg | 65.16±9.04 | 65.91±5.53 | 65.85±9.46 | 0.083 | 0.920 |
BMI/(kg·m-2) | 24.97±4.08 | 25.20±5.50 | 24.58±3.32 | 0.171 | 0.843 |
HbA1c/% | 6.34±0.75 | 6.23±0.53 | 6.30±0.66 | 0.204 | 0.816 |
HB/(g·L-1) | 115.56±16.42 | 121.66±16.89 | 119.94±16.07 | 1.170 | 0.315 |
Albumin/(g·L-1) | 39.50±3.50 | 39.68±3.64 | 39.65±3.38 | 0.025 | 0.976 |
TAG/(mmol·L-1) | 1.23±0.53 | 1.37±0.65 | 1.36±0.73 | 0.486 | 0.616 |
TC/(mmol·L-1) | 3.94±0.95 | 3.72±0.85 | 4.09±0.85 | 1.457 | 0.238 |
HDL-C/(mmol·L-1) | 1.24±0.24 | 1.22±0.31 | 1.22±0.28 | 0.063 | 0.939 |
LDL-C/(mmol·L-1) | 2.12±0.95 | 1.89±0.62 | 2.25±0.68 | 1.859 | 0.161 |
SUA/(μmol·L-1) | 494.16±57.12 | 487.34±70.03 | 492.00±61.98 | 0.097 | 0.907 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | 119.71±24.01 | 115.80±23.52 | 117.33±22.81 | 0.227 | 0.798 |
Cys-C/(mg·L-1) | 1.71±0.36 | 1.68±0.35 | 1.71±0.37 | 0.109 | 0.897 |
Ccr/(mL·min-1) | 33.05±8.69 | 31.75±7.55 | 30.18±7.08 | 0.228 | 0.796 |
eGFR1/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 48.52±10.47 | 47.28±9.27 | 47.12±7.62 | 0.227 | 0.797 |
eGFR2/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | 42.91±9.79 | 41.89±8.63 | 41.54±6.91 | 0.230 | 0.795 |
UACR | 0.06 (0.05, 0.14) | 0.06 (0.04, 0.09) | 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) | 3.547 | 0.170 |
Hcy/(μmol·L-1) | 17.03±5.23 | 17.51±5.24 | 16.83±5.28 | 0.141 | 0.868 |
Comorbidity/n (%) | |||||
Diabetes mellitus | 13 (40.6) | 7 (21.9) | 7 (20.6) | 4.083 | 0.147 |
Hypertension | 26 (81.3) | 26 (81.3) | 28 (82.4) | 0.018 | 0.991 |
Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease | 20 (62.5) | 23 (71.9) | 17 (50.0) | 3.355 | 0.187 |
Drug/n (%) | |||||
ACEI/ARB | 17 (53.1) | 12 (37.5) | 12 (35.3) | 2.521 | 0.283 |
Calcium antagonists | 9 (28.1) | 10 (31.3) | 16 (47.1) | 2.986 | 0.225 |
Diuretics | 11 (34.4) | 13 (40.6) | 10 (29.4) | 0.917 | 0.632 |
Sodium bicarbonate | 2 (6.3) | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
SGLT2i | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
Calcium dobesilate | ‒ | 1 (3.1) | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ |
Group | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) | P value① | P value② |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUA/(μmol·L-1) | |||||
Baseline | 494.16±57.12 | 487.34±70.03 | 492.00±61.98 | 0.884 | 0.775 |
1 month after treatment | 233.00±89.20③ | 267.87±52.98③ | 448.79±46.74 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
3 months after treatment | 245.28±86.41③ | 269.78±58.87③ | 439.15±64.21③ | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | |||||
Baseline | 119.71±24.01 | 115.80±23.52 | 117.33±22.81 | 0.681 | 0.789 |
1 month after treatment | 120.00±25.76 | 109.85±18.80④ | 117.95±25.20 | 0.745 | 0.146 |
3 months after treatment | 117.41±32.71 | 109.13±20.11⑤ | 120.42±24.30 | 0.671 | 0.045 |
Ccr/(mL·min-1) | |||||
Baseline | 33.05±8.69 | 31.75±7.55 | 30.18±7.08 | 0.120 | 0.329 |
1 month after treatment | 33.17±9.47 | 33.64±8.95⑥ | 29.96±7.27 | 0.126 | 0.070 |
3 months after treatment | 34.46±10.44 | 33.97±9.01⑥ | 29.21±7.07 | 0.019 | 0.019 |
eGFR1/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | |||||
Baseline | 48.52±10.47 | 47.28±9.27 | 47.12±7.62 | 0.536 | 0.941 |
1 month after treatment | 48.67±11.35 | 50.27±11.31⑦ | 47.12±8.27 | 0.528 | 0.200 |
3 months after treatment | 51.20±13.49④ | 50.65±11.00⑦ | 45.28±6.97 | 0.027 | 0.020 |
eGFR2/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | |||||
Baseline | 42.91±9.79 | 41.89±8.63 | 41.54±6.91 | 0.511 | 0.855 |
1 month after treatment | 43.04±10.57 | 44.62±10.35⑧ | 41.55±7.56 | 0.511 | 0.170 |
3 months after treatment | 45.54±12.65⑨ | 44.98±10.15⑩ | 40.07±6.44 | 0.029 | 0.021 |
Tab 2 Comparison of the changes in SUA and renal function among the three groups
Group | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) | P value① | P value② |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUA/(μmol·L-1) | |||||
Baseline | 494.16±57.12 | 487.34±70.03 | 492.00±61.98 | 0.884 | 0.775 |
1 month after treatment | 233.00±89.20③ | 267.87±52.98③ | 448.79±46.74 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
3 months after treatment | 245.28±86.41③ | 269.78±58.87③ | 439.15±64.21③ | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | |||||
Baseline | 119.71±24.01 | 115.80±23.52 | 117.33±22.81 | 0.681 | 0.789 |
1 month after treatment | 120.00±25.76 | 109.85±18.80④ | 117.95±25.20 | 0.745 | 0.146 |
3 months after treatment | 117.41±32.71 | 109.13±20.11⑤ | 120.42±24.30 | 0.671 | 0.045 |
Ccr/(mL·min-1) | |||||
Baseline | 33.05±8.69 | 31.75±7.55 | 30.18±7.08 | 0.120 | 0.329 |
1 month after treatment | 33.17±9.47 | 33.64±8.95⑥ | 29.96±7.27 | 0.126 | 0.070 |
3 months after treatment | 34.46±10.44 | 33.97±9.01⑥ | 29.21±7.07 | 0.019 | 0.019 |
eGFR1/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | |||||
Baseline | 48.52±10.47 | 47.28±9.27 | 47.12±7.62 | 0.536 | 0.941 |
1 month after treatment | 48.67±11.35 | 50.27±11.31⑦ | 47.12±8.27 | 0.528 | 0.200 |
3 months after treatment | 51.20±13.49④ | 50.65±11.00⑦ | 45.28±6.97 | 0.027 | 0.020 |
eGFR2/[mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1] | |||||
Baseline | 42.91±9.79 | 41.89±8.63 | 41.54±6.91 | 0.511 | 0.855 |
1 month after treatment | 43.04±10.57 | 44.62±10.35⑧ | 41.55±7.56 | 0.511 | 0.170 |
3 months after treatment | 45.54±12.65⑨ | 44.98±10.15⑩ | 40.07±6.44 | 0.029 | 0.021 |
Adverse event | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) |
---|---|---|---|
Gout/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Rash/n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Gastrointestinal event/n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) |
Respiratory event/n (%) | 6 (18.8) | 7 (21.9) | 5 (14.7) |
Hepatic dysfunction/n (%) | 3 (9.4) | 1 (3.1) | 2 (5.9) |
Pollakiuria/n (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) |
Allergy/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Tab 3 Adverse events in the three groups
Adverse event | Normal dose group (n=32) | Low dose group (n=32) | Control group (n=34) |
---|---|---|---|
Gout/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Rash/n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Gastrointestinal event/n (%) | 1 (3.1) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) |
Respiratory event/n (%) | 6 (18.8) | 7 (21.9) | 5 (14.7) |
Hepatic dysfunction/n (%) | 3 (9.4) | 1 (3.1) | 2 (5.9) |
Pollakiuria/n (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) |
Allergy/n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
1 | 赵芳雅, 陆俊茜, 张磊, 等. 上海地区糖尿病人群高尿酸血症的易患因素及肾功能预后分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(7): 783-788. |
ZHAO F Y, LU J Q, ZHANG L, et al. Analysis of risk factors of hyperuricemia and its outcomes of renal function in diabetes mellitus in Shanghai[J]. J Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ (Med Sci), 2019, 39(7): 783-788. | |
2 | LI L, YANG C, ZHAO Y L, et al. Is hyperuricemia an independent risk factor for new-onset chronic kidney disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational cohort studies[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2014, 15: 122. |
3 | 赖秀秀, 来芹美, 周公民, 等. 高龄女性血尿酸水平与肾功能的关联性[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2020, 50(5): 401-405. |
LAI X X, LAI Q M, ZHOU G M, et al. Association between serum uric level and renal function in elderly women[J]. J Wenzhou Med Univ, 2020, 50(5): 401-405. | |
4 | HU A M, BROWN J N. Comparative effect of allopurinol and febuxostat on long-term renal outcomes in patients with hyperuricemia and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2020, 39(11): 3287-3294. |
5 | BECKER M A, SCHUMACHER H R, ESPINOZA L R, et al. The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2010, 12(2): R63. |
6 | HOSOYA T, OHNO I. A repeated oral administration study of febuxostat (TMX-67), a non-purine-selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, in patients with impaired renal function in Japan: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2011, 17(4 Suppl 2): S27-S34. |
7 | SEZAI A, SOMA M, NAKATA K I, et al. Comparison of febuxostat and allopurinol for hyperuricemia in cardiac surgery patients with chronic kidney disease (NU-FLASH trial for CKD)[J]. J Cardiol, 2015, 66(4): 298-303. |
8 | BEDDHU S, FILIPOWICZ R, WANG B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of febuxostat therapy on adipokines and markers of kidney fibrosis in asymptomatic hyperuricemic patients with diabetic nephropathy[J]. Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2016, 3: 2054358116675343. |
9 | 孙蔚楠, 朱清, 阎磊, 等. 非布司他治疗3~5期伴高尿酸血症老年慢性肾脏病的疗效与安全性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(4): 862-865. |
SUN W N, ZHU Q, YAN L, et al. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of hyperuricemia with chronic kidney disease stage 3‒5[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2019, 39(4): 862-865. | |
10 | MATSUO H, ISHIKAWA E, MACHIDA H, et al. Efficacy of xanthine oxidase inhibitor for chronic kidney disease patients with hyperuricemia[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2020, 24(4): 307-313. |
11 | 邓卫, 谢辉, 张海红, 等. 无症状高尿酸血症患者综合干预的疗效观察[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(3): 443-446 |
DENG W, XIE H, ZHANG H H, et al. Clinical effect of comprehensive intervention on 182 cases of asymptomatic hyperuricemia[J]. J Pract Med, 2017, 33(3): 443-446. | |
12 | Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases[J]. Kidney Int, 2021, 100(4S): S1-S276. |
13 | FITZGERALD J D, DALBETH N, MIKULS T, et al. 2020 American college of rheumatology guideline for the management of gout[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2020, 72(6): 744-760. |
14 | COCKCROFT D W, GAULT M H. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine[J]. Nephron, 1976, 16(1): 31-41. |
15 | 张博旦, 李寒, 孙倩美. 不同肾小球滤过率评估公式在老年人中的适用性分析[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2018, 17(4): 313-317. |
ZHANG B D, LI H, SUN Q M. Applicability analyses for glomerular filtration rate evaluation formula in the elderly[J]. Chin J Mult Organ Dis Elderly, 2018, 17(4): 313-317. | |
16 | MEEUSEN J W, KASOZI R N, LARSON T S, et al. Clinical impact of the refit CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine-based eGFR equation[J]. Clin Chem, 2022, 68(4): 534-539. |
17 | 高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科共识专家组. 中国高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2017, 56(3): 235-248. |
Multi-Disciplinary Expert Task Force on Hyperuricemia and Its Related Diseases. Chinese multi-disciplinary consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperuricemia and its related diseases[J].Chin J Intern Med, 2017, 56(3): 235-248. | |
18 | KAMEI K, KONTA T, HIRAYAMA A, et al. A slight increase within the normal range of serum uric acid and the decline in renal function: associations in a community-based population[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2014, 29(12): 2286-2292. |
19 | 王贵红, 夏江莉, 周胜利, 等. 逐步增加口服非布司他剂量降尿酸治疗减少痛风性关节炎发作[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2020, 24(6): 388-391. |
WANG G H, XIA J L, ZHOU S L, et al. Reduced gout flares with stepwise dose increase of febuxostat during the initial introduction of urate-lowering therapy[J]. Chin J Rheumatol, 2020, 24(6): 388-391. | |
20 | YAMANAKA H, TAMAKI S, IDE Y, et al. Stepwise dose increase of febuxostat is comparable with colchicine prophylaxis for the prevention of gout flares during the initial phase of urate-lowering therapy: results from FORTUNE-1, a prospective, multicentre randomised study[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77(2): 270-276. |
21 | TOJIMBARA T, NAKAJIMA I, YASHIMA J, et al. Efficacy and safety of febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase for the treatment of hyperuricemia in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(2): 511-513. |
22 | LIANG N, SUN M S, SUN R X, et al. Baseline urate level and renal function predict outcomes of urate-lowering therapy using low doses of febuxostat and benzbromarone: a prospective, randomized controlled study in a Chinese primary gout cohort[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2019, 21(1): 200. |
23 | LEE J W, LEE K H. Comparison of renoprotective effects of febuxostat and allopurinol in hyperuricemic patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019, 51(3): 467-473. |
24 | TSUJI T, OHISHI K, TAKEDA A, et al. The impact of serum uric acid reduction on renal function and blood pressure in chronic kidney disease patients with hyperuricemia[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2018, 22(6): 1300-1308. |
25 | KIMURA K, HOSOYA T, UCHIDA S, et al. Febuxostat therapy for patients with stage 3 CKD and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: a randomized trial[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2018, 72(6): 798-810. |
26 | ZHU W, PANG M, DONG L, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of iridoid glycosides from Paederia scandens (LOUR.) MERRILL (Rubiaceae) on uric acid nephropathy rats[J]. Life Sci, 2012, 91(11-12): 369-376. |
27 | SÁNCHEZ-LOZADA L G, LANASPA M A, CRISTÓBAL-GARCÍA M, et al. Uric acid-induced endothelial dysfunction is associated with mitochondrial alterations and decreased intracellular ATP concentrations[J]. Nephron Exp Nephrol, 2012, 121(3/4): e71-e78. |
28 | ZHOU Y, FANG L, JIANG L, et al. Uric acid induces renal inflammation via activating tubular NF-κB signaling pathway[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e39738. |
29 | CORRY D B, ESLAMI P, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Uric acid stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and oxidative stress via the vascular renin-angiotensin system[J]. J Hypertens, 2008, 26(2): 269-275. |
30 | TANAKA K, NAKAYAMA M, KANNO M, et al. Renoprotective effects of febuxostat in hyperuricemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2015, 19(6): 1044-1053. |
31 | SÁNCHEZ-LOZADA L G, TAPIA E, SOTO V, et al. Effect of febuxostat on the progression of renal disease in 5/6 nephrectomy rats with and without hyperuricemia[J]. Nephron Physiol, 2008, 108(4): p69-p78. |
32 | OMORI H, KAWADA N, INOUE K, et al. Use of xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat inhibits renal interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstructive nephropathy[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2012, 16(4): 549-556. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||