Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 1101-1108.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.08.010

• Clinical research • Previous Articles    

Clinical value of serum gastrin and pepsinogen in the auxiliary diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis

Wan Ruiming1, He Chunjie2, Zhou Di2, Shi Sufan2, Xie Limei2, Zhang Yu1()   

  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology, the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650032, China
    2.Faculty of Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
  • Received:2026-01-12 Accepted:2026-04-27 Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-10
  • Contact: Zhang Yu E-mail:yuzhang320@sina.com
  • About author:First author contact:Zhang Yu contributed to the study design. He Chunjie, Zhou Di, Shi Sufan, and Xie Limei were involved in data collection. Wan Ruiming and He Chunjie performed data analysis. Wan Ruiming and Zhang Yu participated in manuscript writing and revision. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript for its submission.
  • Supported by:
    Yunnan Provincial Clinical Medicine Center for Digestive System Diseases(2024YNLCYXZX0119);Yunnan Provincial Medical Discipline Leadership Program(D-2024050);Yunnan Provincial Program for Young Academic Leaders(202205AC160070)

Abstract:

Objective ·To investigate the auxiliary diagnostic value of serum gastrin-17 (G-17) and pepsinogen Ⅰ(PGⅠ) as biomarkers for autoimmune gastritis (AIG). Methods ·A total of 100 patients suspected of AIG based on endoscopic screening were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data were collected, including laboratory parameters such as parietal cell antibody (PCA) and intrinsic factor antibody (IFA). Based on serum antibody results, patients positive for either PCA or IFA were assigned to the confirmed AIG group (n=82), and those negative for both antibodies were assigned to the suspected AIG group (n=18). Serological parameters, including G-17, PGⅠ, PGⅡ, and vitamin B12, were compared between the two groups. Multivariable Logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of AIG. The diagnostic performance of serological markers and their combinations was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results ·Serological analysis revealed significantly higher G-17 levels and significantly lower PG Ⅰlevels, PG Ⅰ/Ⅱ ratio, and vitamin B12 levels in the confirmed AIG group (all P<0.05). Multivariable Logistic analysis identified G-17 as an independent predictor of AIG (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.02‒1.16, P=0.009). ROC analysis showed that the combination of G-17>17.84 pmol/L and PGⅠ<12.69 ng/mL yielded the best diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.883 (95% CI 0.800‒0.967), sensitivity of 79.3%, and specificity of 83.3%. Among patients in the confirmed AIG group, 34.1% (28/82) were IFA-positive. Age was identified as an independent predictor of IFA positivity (OR=1.05‒1.06, P<0.05),with age >55.5 years identified as an important risk threshold. A predictive model incorporating age (>55.5 years), G-17, and PG Ⅰ/Ⅱ ratio showed good predictive performance for IFA positivity, with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.598‒0.835), sensitivity of 67.9%, and specificity of 70.4%. Conclusion ·In settings where specific antibody (PCA/IFA) testing is unavailable, the combination of serum G-17 and PG Ⅰ measurements may serve as an effective auxiliary tool for diagnosing AIG. For AIG patients aged >55.5 years, attention to changes in G-17 levels and the PG Ⅰ/Ⅱ ratio may help identify individuals at high risk of IFA positivity.

Key words: autoimmune gastritis (AIG), intrinsic factor antibody (IFA), gastrin, pepsinogen (PG)

CLC Number: