Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
Experimental study on the accuracy evaluation of robot-assisted osteotomy of genioplasty
Received date: 2022-06-15
Accepted date: 2022-08-17
Online published: 2022-09-28
Supported by
Excellent Technical Leader of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(20XD1433400);Science and Technology Support Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(20S31902200);Technology Transfer Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(ZT202109);Cross-research Fund Project of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(JYJC201802);Multidisciplinary Team Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(201906);Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(JYLJ201920)
Objective ·To preliminarily evaluate the execution accuracy of the self-developed cranial-maxilofacial robot (CMF ROBOT) system for genioplasty osteotomy of skull models. Methods ·Nine patients with chin deformity who were admitted to Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from August 2019 to October 2020 were included in the study. Before the operation, the spiral CT images of the whole head of the patients were collected, the skull models were made by 3D printing, and the virtual surgical planning was carried out. During the operation, the experimental group used CMF ROBOT system to perform automatic osteotomy on 9 skull models; the control group was manually osteotomized by senior surgeons assisted by 3D printing surgical guide plate. After the operation, spiral CT scanning was performed to measure the distance error and the direction error of the osteotomy plane of the two groups in three dimensions, and the differences of the two errors between the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results ·The osteotomy of genioplasty was successfully completed in the two groups. The distance error of the overall osteotomy in the experimental group was (1.40±0.27) mm and the direction error was 7.03°±3.02°, while the distance error of the overall osteotomy in the control group was (1.23±0.27) mm, and the direction error was 6.08°±2.24°. There was no significant difference between the two errors mentioned above (P=0.256, P=0.462). Conclusion ·The CMF ROBOT system can complete the automatic osteotomy of genioplasty according to the preoperative planning, and the distance error and direction error of the osteotomy surface can reach the precision level of manual osteotomy assisted by 3D printing surgical guide plate.
Key words: medical robot; computer-assisted surgery; control mode; genioplasty
Wenyu HUI , Jinyang WU , Jianhua HUANG , Nan LUAN , Zhiyuan ZHANG , Shilei ZHANG . Experimental study on the accuracy evaluation of robot-assisted osteotomy of genioplasty[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022 , 42(9) : 1347 -1352 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.09.023
1 | LI Y Q, YANG X, LI D. The application of three-dimensional surface imaging system in plastic and reconstructive surgery[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2016, 77(Suppl 1): S76-S83. |
2 | WONG A, GOONEWARDENE M S, ALLAN B P, et al. Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 50(4): 494-500. |
3 | YU H B, SHEN S G, WANG X D, et al. The indication and application of computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery-Shanghai's experience based on 104 cases[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013, 41(8): 770-774. |
4 | WU J Y, HUI W Y, CHEN S H, et al. Error analysis of robot-assisted orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(8): 2324-2328. |
5 | LIN H H, LONIC D, LO L J. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery: a literature review[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2018, 117(7): 547-558. |
6 | CHEN J, ZHANG R, LIANG Y, et al. Deviation analyses of computer-assisted, template-guided mandibular reconstruction with combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position technology: a comparative study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 719466. |
7 | SIRES J D, CRAIK J D, WILSON C J. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(7): 745-748. |
8 | DE SMET M D, NAUS G J L, FARIDPOOYA K, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in ophthalmology[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2018, 29(3): 248-253. |
9 | LIEBERMAN I H, KISINDE S, HESSELBACHER S. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement during spine surgery[J]. JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 2020, 10(2): e0020. |
10 | MIKHAIL D, SARCONA J, MEKHAIL M, et al. Urologic robotic surgery[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2020, 100(2): 361-378. |
11 | PARK S Y, KIM H K, JANG D S, et al. Initial experiences with robotic single-site thoracic surgery for mediastinal masses[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 107(1): 242-247. |
12 | MOZER P S. Accuracy and deviation analysis of static and robotic guided implant surgery: a case study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(5): e86-e90. |
13 | CHAO A H, WEIMER K, RACZKOWSKY J, et al. Pre-programmed robotic osteotomies for Fibula free flap mandible reconstruction: a preclinical investigation[J]. Microsurgery, 2016, 36(3): 246-249. |
14 | ZHU J H, DENG J, LIU X J, et al. Prospects of robot-assisted mandibular reconstruction with filbula flap: comparison with a computer-assisted navigation system and freehand technique[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2016, 32(9): 661-669. |
15 | BELL S W, ANTHONY I, JONES B, et al. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(8): 627-635. |
16 | SUN M, LIN L, CHEN X, et al. Robot-assisted mandibular angle osteotomy using electromagnetic navigation[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(7): 567. |
17 | SUN M Z, CHAI Y H, CHAI G, et al. Fully automatic robot-assisted surgery for mandibular angle split osteotomy[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(2): 336-339. |
18 | LIN L, SHI Y Y, TAN A, et al. Mandibular angle split osteotomy based on a novel augmented reality navigation using specialized robot-assisted arms: a feasibility study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016, 44(2): 215-223. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |