Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) >
A modified clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula risk evaluation model based on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a prospective study
Received date: 2022-10-10
Accepted date: 2023-03-14
Online published: 2023-04-28
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82071942);Shanghai Pujiang Program(2020PJD008);Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center(SHDC2020CR1031B)
Objective ·To modify previous clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) risk evaluation models with quantitative evaluation of pancreatic tissue stiffness by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). Methods ·In this prospective study, the patients who were diagnosed as having pancreatic tumors and scheduled to undergo pancreatectomy at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were initially enrolled, whose clinical information was collected. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification technology (VTIQ) assessment was applied to the patients within one week before the surgery to measure the shear wave velocity (SWV) of pancreatic lesions and the normal parenchyma of pancreatic body in the superficial layer of the portal vein. During the surgery, the surgeons qualitatively evaluated the stiffness of pancreases via direct palpation and divided them into soft pancreases and medium-hard pancreases. During the 3-week follow-up period after pancreatectomy, CR-POPF was diagnosed according to 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) standard. Peri-operative risk factors of CR-POPF were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression to build the prediction model. Evaluation and comparison of diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits among different models were then performed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results ·From September 2021 to March 2022, 100 patients were enrolled in this study, including 33 patients (33.0%) who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 67 patients (67.0%) who received distal pancreatectomy. CR-POPF was diagnosed in 35 patients (35.0%) during the 3-week post-pancreatectomy follow-up. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that the SWV value of the body part of pancreatic parenchyma in the superficial layer of the portal vein [lgOR=-2.934 (95%CI -4.387?-1.479), P=0.000] and the presence of a non-dilated main pancreatic duct (≤3 mm) [lgOR=0.805 (95%CI 0.274?1.335), P=0.003] were independent risk factors that significantly correlated with the occurrence of CR-POPF after pancreatectomy. The modified model based on the SWE parameter achieved the area under the ROC curve of 0.842, with the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value and the likelihood ratio of 85.7%, 64.6%, 70.5%, 81.8% and 2.422 in predicting CR-POPF. DCA revealed a better clinical benefit of the modified model compared to the previous prediction models [fistula risk score (FRS) and alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS)]. Conclusion ·The modified model based on the SWE parameter and identified clinical risk factors can make non-invasive, quantitative and objective evaluation of CR-POPF risk before pancreatectomy, and provide sufficient diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits.
Xiaofan TIAN , Yi DONG , Wenhui LOU , Qi ZHANG , Yijie QIU , Dan ZUO , Wenping WANG . A modified clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula risk evaluation model based on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a prospective study[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023 , 43(4) : 437 -444 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.04.005
1 | AOYAMA T, MURAKAWA M, KATAYAMA Y, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence in pancreatic cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015, 35(4): 2401-2409. |
2 | TIAN X F, KUANG T T, DONG Y, et al. Prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy by virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification (VTIQ) technology[J]. Pancreatology, 2021, 21(8): 1498-1505. |
3 | BASSI C, MARCHEGIANI G, DERVENIS C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(3): 584-591. |
4 | KAWAIDA H, KONO H, HOSOMURA N, et al. Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(28): 3722-3737. |
5 | WILLIAMSSON C, ANSARI D, ANDERSSON R, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula-impact on outcome, hospital cost and effects of centralization[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2017, 19(5): 436-442. |
6 | CALLERY M P, PRATT W B, KENT T S, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(1): 1-14. |
7 | MUNGROOP T H, VAN RIJSSEN L B, VAN KLAVEREN D, et al. Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(5): 937-943. |
8 | HATANO M, WATANABE J, KUSHIHATA F, et al. Quantification of pancreatic stiffness on intraoperative ultrasound elastography and evaluation of its relationship with postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. Int Surg, 2015, 100(3): 497-502. |
9 | KUWAHARA T, HIROOKA Y, KAWASHIMA H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic tumor fibrosis using shear wave elastography[J]. Pancreatology, 2016, 16(6): 1063-1068. |
10 | 罗海峰, 高雪, 杜渐, 等. 胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(10): 1036-1041. |
10 | LUO H F, GAO X, DU J, et al. Analysis of risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2017, 16(10): 1036-1041. |
11 | TAJIMA Y, KAWABATA Y, HIRAHARA N. Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Today, 2018, 48(2): 140-150. |
12 | LEE T K, KANG C M, PARK M S, et al. Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after pancreatectomy: assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(5): 781-786. |
13 | SHI H Y, LU Z P, LI M N, et al. Dual-energy CT iodine concentration to evaluate postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Radiology, 2022, 304(1): 65-72. |
14 | YOON J H, LEE J M, LEE K B, et al. Pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis: quantitative assessment with preoperative multiparametric MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2016, 279(1): 140-150. |
15 | FUJITA Y, KITAGO M, ABE T, et al. Evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and automated quantification of pancreatic tissue components[J]. Pancreas, 2018, 47(10): 1277-1282. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |