论著·临床研究

术中瑞芬太尼持续泵注对胃肠术后镇痛的影响

  • 李璐宏 ,
  • 罗艳
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院麻醉科,上海 200025
李璐宏(1992—),女,硕士生;电子信箱:llh6177@sjtu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2020-05-20

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-14

Impact of intraoperative continuous pumping of remifentanil on postoperative analgesia after gastrointestinal surgery

  • Lu-hong LI ,
  • Yan LUO
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2020-05-20

  Online published: 2021-05-14

摘要

目的·探讨胃肠术中瑞芬太尼持续低剂量[0.05~0.15 μg/(kg·min)]泵注对术后镇痛效果的影响。方法·回顾性分析2019年4月—12月于上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院行择期胃肠术并使用患者自控静脉镇痛(patient-controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)的患者695例,根据术中是否持续泵注瑞芬太尼0.05~0.15 μg/(kg·min),分为瑞芬太尼组(n=360)和对照组(n=335),应用倾向性评分匹配分析患者术后镇痛补救以及患者自控镇痛(patient-controlled analgesia,PCA)按压情况。结果·通过倾向性评分1∶1匹配,286对患者配对成功。瑞芬太尼组中接受镇痛补救人数占比明显低于对照组(32.5% vs 40.9%,P=0.037),且瑞芬太尼组术后出现PCIA镇痛效果不佳并需镇痛补救的风险降低(RR=0.696,95%CI 0.495~0.980)。瑞芬太尼组和对照组患者PCA总按压次数的中位数(四分位数间距)分别为5(1,12)和5(1,13),差异无统计学意义(P=0.568),但瑞芬太尼组中PCA按压次数>13次的患者占比少于对照组(21.3% vs 24.5%)。结论·择期胃肠手术中瑞芬太尼0.05~0.15 μg/(kg·min)持续泵注有助于改善术后镇痛需求,患者术后出现PCIA镇痛效果不佳且需镇痛补救的风险较低。

本文引用格式

李璐宏 , 罗艳 . 术中瑞芬太尼持续泵注对胃肠术后镇痛的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021 , 41(4) : 509 -513 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.04.015

Abstract

Objective

· To explore the effect of intraoperative continuous remifentanil infusion at the 0.05?0.15 μg/(kg·min) dosage on postoperative analgesia after gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

· The patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after elective gastrointestinal surgery from April to December 2019 in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were included in this retrospective analysis. They were divided into remifentanil group (n=360) and control group (n=335) according to whether the patients were treated with intraoperative continuous pumping of remifentanil at the 0.05?0.15 μg/(kg·min) dosage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the difference of postoperative analgesic remedy and the pressing of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) between the two groups.

Results

· By using a 1∶1 PSM analysis, 286 couples of patients were matched successfully. In the remifentanil group, the proportion of patients receiving postoperative analgesic remedies was significantly less than that in the control group (32.5% vs 40.9%, P=0.037). Compared with the control group, the remifentanil group had a lower risk of poor analgesic effect and necessity of postoperative analgesic remedies (RR=0.696, 95%CI 0.495?0.980). There was no significant difference in the total PCA pressing times between the remifentanil group and control group [5 (1, 12) vs 5 (1, 13), P=0.568], but in the remifentanil group, the proportion of patients with PCA pressing times > 13 was less than that of the control group (21.3% vs 24.5%).

Conclusion

· Continuous pumping of remifentanil at the 0.05?0.15 μg/(kg·min) dosage in elective gastrointestinal surgery is helpful to decrease postoperative analgesic demand. The patients receiving intraoperative remifentanil infusion at a low dosage has a lower risk in requiring postoperative analgesic remedies, compared with patients who do not receive intraoperative remifentanil infusion.

参考文献

1 Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain[J]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9784): 2215-2225.
2 Hurley RW, Elkassabany NM, Wu CL.Acute postoperative pain[M]//Gropper MA. Miller's Anesthesia. 9th ed. Canada: Elsevier, Inc., 2019: 2614-2638.
3 Small C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(2): e70-e80.
4 Hay D, Nesbitt V. Management of acute pain[J]. Surgery (Oxford), 2019,37(8): 460-466.
5 Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 112(6): 991-1004.
6 Lee M, Silverman SM, Hansen H, et al. A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia[J]. Pain Physician, 2011, 14(2): 145-161.
7 Cachemaille M, Grass F, Fournier N, et al. Pain intensity in the first 96 hours after abdominal surgery: aprospective cohort study[J]. Pain Med, 2020, 21(4): 803-813.
8 Yu EH, Tran DH, Lam SW, et al. Remifentanil tolerance and hyperalgesia: short-term gain, long-term pain?[J]. Anaesthesia, 2016, 71(11): 1347-1362.
9 Vinik HR, Kissin I. Rapid development of tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion in humans[J]. Anesth Analg, 1998, 86(6): 1307-1311.
10 Kim SH, Stoicea N, Soghomonyan S, et al. Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2014, 5: 108.
11 Niedermayer S, Heyn J, Guenther F, et al. Remifentanil for abdominal surgery is associated with unexpectedly unfavorable outcomes[J]. Pain, 2020, 161(2): 266-273.
12 Gustorff B, Nahlik G, Hoerauf KH, et al. The absence of acute tolerance during remifentanil infusion in volunteers[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002, 94(5): 1223-1228.
13 Joly V, Richebe P, Guignard B, et al. Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention with small-dose ketamine[J]. Anesthesiology, 2005, 103(1): 147-155.
14 刘艳, 么金明, 吕湘琪. 瑞芬太尼诱发术后痛觉过敏的机制及防治进展[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2019, 39(10): 2298-2303.
15 李新友, 屠伟峰. 术中应用瑞芬太尼维持麻醉患者术后的疼痛管理[J]. 实用疼痛学杂志, 2009, 5(5): 388-391.
16 黄宇光, 黄文起, 李刚, 等. 酒石酸布托啡诺镇痛专家共识[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2011, 27(10): 1028-1029.
17 王旭, 王健. 一种新型镇痛药: 布托啡诺的研究进展[J]. 中国药师, 2006, 9(11): 1044-1045.
18 夏晶. 用瑞芬太尼进行手术麻醉的患者在不同时间应用布托啡诺预防术后早期急性疼痛的效果[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2019, 17(7): 138-140.
文章导航

/