论著 · 临床研究

累及髋臼的原发良性与交界性骨肿瘤的术式选择与预后评估

  • 张珠晟 ,
  • 刘琦 ,
  • 鲍其远 ,
  • 沈宇辉 ,
  • 张伟滨 ,
  • 万荣
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院骨科,上海 200025
张珠晟(1996—),男,硕士生;电子信箱:shaunzhang1996@hotmail.com
张珠晟(1996—),男,硕士生;电子信箱:shaunzhang1996@hotmail.com
万荣,电子信箱:rongww@hotmail.com

网络出版日期: 2021-12-03

基金资助

中国临床肿瘤学科学基金(Y-HR2019-0442)

Surgical approach and prognosis evaluation of primary benign and aggressive bone tumors involving the acetabulum

  • Zhu-sheng ZHANG ,
  • Qi LIU ,
  • Qi-yuan BAO ,
  • Yu-hui SHEN ,
  • Wei-bin ZHANG ,
  • Rong WAN
Expand
  • Department of Orthopaedic, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
WAN Rong, E-mail: rongww@hotmail.com.

Online published: 2021-12-03

Supported by

Foundation from Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology(Y-HR2019-0442)

摘要

目的·探讨并总结累及髋臼的良性与交界性骨肿瘤(benign and aggressive bone tumors, BABT)的一般特点、处理原则及预后因素。方法·收集88例髋臼病灶患者病例资料,其中41例为髋臼BABT,就患者人口学资料、外科治疗的选择以及患者的预后情况等进行分析。结果·41例髋臼BABT术后中位随访时间42.6个月。其中30例行病灶刮除植骨术,2例行病灶刮除骨水泥填充术,8例行瘤段切除联合骨盆假体重建术,1例行半骨盆截肢术。术后病理提示良性者23例,其中8例伴有骨皮质破损(34.8%),仅有2例复发。术后病理提示交界性者18例,其中14例伴有骨皮质破损(77.8%),共有5例复发。7例骨巨细胞瘤中1例复发(14.3%),4例非典型软骨肿瘤中3例局部复发(75.0%)。结论·髋臼良性肿瘤不伴骨皮质破损者,单纯刮除术后复发罕见。交界性肿瘤和/或伴骨皮质破损者,单纯刮除术复发率较高,需术前严格确定手术边界。其中,骨巨细胞瘤可酌情采用病灶刮除骨水泥填充术或是瘤段切除术,而非典型软骨肿瘤建议行瘤段切除联合骨盆假体重建术。

本文引用格式

张珠晟 , 刘琦 , 鲍其远 , 沈宇辉 , 张伟滨 , 万荣 . 累及髋臼的原发良性与交界性骨肿瘤的术式选择与预后评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021 , 41(11) : 1470 -1477 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.11.010

Abstract

Objective

·To summarize the general characteristics, management principles and prognosis of benign and aggressive bone tumors (BABT) involving the acetabulum.

Methods

·A total of 88 cases of primary acetabular lesions were collected, including 41 cases of BABTs. The demographic data of the patients, the surgical procedures and the prognosis of the patients were analyzed.

Results

·The median follow-up time of the 41 cases of BABTs was 42.6 months. Lesion curettage with bone grafting was performed in 30 cases, followed by curettage with cement reconstruction (n=2), enbloc resection with endoprosthesis reconstruction (n=8), and hemi-pelvic amputation (n=1). Postoperative pathology confirmed a benign tumor in 23 cases, 8 of which were accompanied by bone cortical damage (34.8%), and only 2 patients had local recurrence. Postoperative pathology demonstrated an aggressive histology in 18 cases, 14 cases of which were accompanied by bone cortical damage (77.8%), and a total of 5 cases had local recurrence. Of the 7 giant cell tumors of bone, one recurred (14.3%), in comparison to 3 local recurrence (75.0%) of the 4 cases of atypical cartilage hyperplasia.

Conclusion

·Benign acetabular tumors without cortical bone damage have a low recurrence rate following lesion curettage. Aggressive tumors and/or tumors with cortical bone damage have a higher recurrence rate following simple curettage, and the surgical margin needs to be strictly determined prior to surgery. Specifically, lesion curettage with bone cement or enbloc resection with endoprosthesis reconstruction could be an appropriate option for giant cell tumor of bone, while enbloc resection with endoprosthesis reconstruction should be always recommended for atypical cartilage tumor.

参考文献

1 Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60(6):731-746.
2 Ueda T, Kakunaga S, Takenaka S, et al. Constrained total hip megaprosthesis for primary periacetabular tumors[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(3):741-749.
3 Guo X, Li X, Liu T, et al. Pasteurized autograft reconstruction after resection of periacetabular malignant bone tumours[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1):13.
4 Zheng K, Yu X, Hu Y, et al. Surgical treatment for pelvic giant cell tumor: a multi-center study[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2016, 14:104.
5 Guo W, Sun X, Zang J, et al. Intralesional excision versus wide resection for giant cell tumor involving the acetabulum: which is better?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(4):1213-1220.
6 Deloin X, Dumaine V, Biau D, et al. Pelvic chondrosarcomas: surgical treatment options[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2009, 95(6):393-401.
7 Novais EN, Zimmerman AK, Lewallen LW, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life following surgical treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts of the pelvis in children[J]. J Child Orthop, 2014, 8(3):281-288.
8 Makhdom AM, Jiang F, Hamdy RC, et al. Hip joint osteochondroma: systematic review of the literature and report of three further cases[J]. Adv Orthop, 2014, 2014:180254.
9 Saibaba B, Sen RK, Sharma M, et al. Pathological fracture dislocation of the acetabulum in a patient with neurofibromatosis-1[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2016, 50(1):103-107.
10 Donati D, Wafa H, Di Bella C, et al. Management of pelvic giant cell tumours involving the acetabular bone[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2008, 74(6):773-778.
11 Zheng K, Wang Z, Wu SJ, et al. Giant cell tumor of the pelvis: a systematic review[J]. Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(2):102-107.
12 Angelini A, Drago G, Trovarelli G, et al. Infection after surgical resection for pelvic bone tumors: an analysis of 270 patients from one institution[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):349-359.
13 Xiao C, Zhou Y, Zhang W, et al. An acetabular-preserving procedure for pelvic giant cell tumor involving partial acetabulum[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1):200.
14 Rinas AC, Ward WG, Kilpatrick SE. Potential sampling error in fine needle aspiration biopsy of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: a report of 4 cases[J]. Acta Cytol, 2005, 49(5):554-559.
15 Campanacci DA, Scoccianti G, Franchi A, et al. Surgical treatment of central grade 1 chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2013, 14(2):101-107.
文章导航

/