上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版） >

2021 , Vol. 41 >Issue 12: 1573 - 1578

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.12.005

临床护理专题

脑转移瘤症状评估量表的汉化及信度和效度检验

  • 邱娴 ,
  • 朱唯一 ,
  • 赵鹏 ,
  • 潘斯俭 ,
  • 孙伯民 ,
  • 吴蓓雯
展开
  • 1.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院护理部，上海 200025
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院神经外科，功能神经外科中心，上海 200025
    3.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院伽玛刀治疗科，济南 250021
邱 娴（1985—），女，主管护师，硕士；电子信箱：qx21605@rjh.com.cn。
赵鹏，电子信箱：zpjny@163.com。#为共同通信作者。
吴蓓雯，电子信箱：gaoan2005@yahoo.com.cn

收稿日期: 2021-05-13

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-28

基金资助

上海市教育委员会护理高原学科项目(Hlgy1804kyx);2019上海市“医苑新星”青年医学人才培养资助计划

收起

Cross-cultural adaptation,reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist

  • Xian QIU ,
  • Wei-yi ZHU ,
  • Peng ZHAO ,
  • Si-jian PAN ,
  • Bo-min SUN ,
  • Bei-wen WU
Expand
  • 1.Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2.Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    3.Gamma Knife Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China
ZHAO Peng, E-mail: zpjny@163.com. #Co-corresponding authors.
WU Bei-wen, E-mail: gaoan2005@yahoo.com.cn

Received date: 2021-05-13

  Online published: 2021-01-28

Supported by

Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaoyuan Nursing Grant Support(Hlgy1804kyx);2019 New Star Plan of Medical Circle in Shanghai

Fold

摘要

目的·对英文版脑转移瘤症状评估量表（Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist，BMSC）进行汉化并检验其信度和效度。方法·遵循Brislin模型对英文版BMSC进行翻译和跨文化调适，形成中文版BMSC。于2017年1月—2019年6月，采用便利抽样选取上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院神经外科功能神经外科中心和山东第一医科大学附属省立医院伽玛刀治疗科符合纳入标准的239例脑转移瘤患者进行调查。采用Cronbach's α 系数评价量表的内部一致性，采用组内相关系数（intra-class correlation coefficient，ICC）评价量表的重测信度，分别采用条目水平的内容效度指数（item-level content validity index，I-CVI）、量表平均内容效度指数（scale-level average content validity index，S-CVI/Ave）评价量表的内容效度。计算中文版BMSC的效应值（effective size，ES）以评价量表的反应度，分别采用基于校标法和基于分布法的最小临床重要差异（minimal clinical important difference，MCID）值分析BMSC评分。结果·中文版BMSC的Cronbach's α系数为0.85，重测信度ICC为0.72，I-CVI为0.8~1.0，S-CVI/Ave为0.97。伽玛刀治疗前后BMSC评分的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），BMSC评分的ES为0.01~0.35；基于校标法获得BMSC评分的MCID值介于0.07~1.28，基于分布法获得的MCID值介于0.01~0.60。结论·中文版BMSC具有较好的信度和效度。

关键词： 脑转移瘤; 症状; 量表; 信度; 效度

本文引用格式

邱娴 , 朱唯一 , 赵鹏 , 潘斯俭 , 孙伯民 , 吴蓓雯 . 脑转移瘤症状评估量表的汉化及信度和效度检验[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2021 , 41(12) : 1573 -1578 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.12.005

Abstract

Objective

·To translate the English version of Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist (BMSC) into Chinese version and test its reliability and validity.

Methods

·The translation and adaption of BMSC for the Chinese population were generated by Brislin translation and back-translation model. From January 2017 to June 2019, a sample of 239 brain metastases patients matched with the inclusion criteria were selected via convenience sampling from the Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and Gamma Knife Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. The Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the retest reliability. The item-related content validity index (ICV) and the scale-level average content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) were applied to assess the content validity of the Chinese version of BMSC. The effective size (ES) was calculated to evaluate the responsiveness of the Chinese version of BMSC, and the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of the Chinese version of BMSC was evaluated by using anchor-based approach and distribution-based approach respectively.

Results

·The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of BMSC was 0.85, and the ICC reflecting retest reliability was 0.72. The I-CVI was 0.8?1.0, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.97. The scores of the Chinese version of BMSC before and after gamma knife treatment showed significant differences (P<0.05), and the ES of the Chinese version of BMSC was 0.01?0.35. The MCID value of BMSC score obtained by anchor-based method was 0.07?1.28, and the value obtained by distribution-based method was 0.01?0.60.

Conclusion

·The Chinese version of BMSC has good validity and reliability.

Key words： brain metastases; symptom; scale; reliability; validity

参考文献

1 Kaal EC, Ni?l CG, Vecht CJ. Therapeutic management of brain metastasis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2005, 4(5): 289-298.
2 赵东海, 杜汉强,王嘉嘉,等. 伽玛刀治疗对脑转移瘤病人认知功能及生活质量影响的研究[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2020, 25(5): 205-208.
3 Bezjaka A. Adam J, Barton R.et al. Symptom response after palliative radiotherapy for patients with brain metastases[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38(4): 487-496.
4 Rodin D, Banihashemi B, Wang L, et al. The Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist as a novel tool for symptom measurement in patients with brain metastases undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy[J]. Curr Oncol, 2016, 23(3): e239-e247.
5 孙振球. 医学统计学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010: 273.
6 Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970, 1(3): 185-216.
7 Hays RD, Hadorn D. Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension[J]. Qual Life Res, 1992, 1(1): 73-75.
8 Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes[J]. J clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(2): 102-109.
9 Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. App Nurs Res, 1992, 5:194-197.
10 张方圆, 沈傲梅, 马婷婷,等. 中国癌症症状管理实践指南计划书[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(1): 8-12.
11 唐华, 王甦平, 龚睿婕, 等. 挫败感量表对医学生焦虑抑郁态的信效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(1): 84-88.
12 Teke F, Bucaktepe P, K?br?sl? E, et al. Quality of life, psychological burden, and sleep quality in patients with brain metastasis undergoing whole brain radiation therapy[J]. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2016, 20(5): AE-A2.
13 Good P, Pinkerton R, Bowler S, et al. Impact of opioid therapy on sleep and respiratory patterns in adults with advanced cancer receiving palliative care[J]. J pain Symptom Manage, 2018, 55(3): 962-967.
14 Davidson JR, MacLean AW, Brundage MD, et al. Sleep disturbance in cancer patients[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2002, 54(9): 1309-1321.
15 Willis KD, Ravyts SG, Lanoye A, et al. Sleep disturbance in primary brain tumor: prevalence, risk factors, and patient preferences[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06476-3.
16 戴海崎, 张锋, 陈雪枫. 心理与教育测量[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2008: 59-65.
17 刘砚燕. 患者报告结局测量信息系统:儿童报告版和父母报告版癌症相关简表的测量学研究[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2016.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉