上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版） >

2023 , Vol. 43 >Issue 5: 606 - 610

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.05.011

论著 · 临床研究

儿童首发精神分裂症患者和正常儿童前脉冲抑制的对照研究

  • 徐晓君 ,
  • 叶敏捷 ,
  • 王玉城 ,
  • 王文霞 ,
  • 钱胜 ,
  • 叶丹弟 ,
  • 潘乐乐 ,
  • 胡欣 ,
  • 尹晓莉 ,
  • 李美花 ,
  • 林光耀
展开
  • 1.温州医科大学附属康宁医院公共卫生科，浙江省精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心，温州 325007
    2.上海市静安区精神卫生中心老年科，上海 200436
徐晓君（1980—），女，主治医师，学士；电子信箱：562058107@qq.com。
叶敏捷，电子信箱：minjieye@163.com。
王玉城，电子信箱：284382038@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-01-03

  录用日期: 2023-02-22

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-11

基金资助

浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2023KY306)

收起

A comparative study of prepulse inhibition in children with first episode schizophrenia and normal children

  • Xiaojun XU ,
  • Minjie YE ,
  • Yuchen WANG ,
  • Wenxia WANG ,
  • Sheng QIAN ,
  • Dandi YE ,
  • Lele PAN ,
  • Xin HU ,
  • Xiaoli YIN ,
  • Meihua LI ,
  • Guangyao LING
Expand
  • 1.Department of Public Health, The Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorder, Wenzhou 325007, China
    2.Department of Geriatrics, Jingan District Mental Health Center, Shanghai 200436, China
YE Minjie, E-mail: minjieye@163.com.
WANG Yucheng, E-mail: 284382038@qq.com.

Received date: 2023-01-03

  Accepted date: 2023-02-22

  Online published: 2023-07-11

Supported by

Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan of Zhejiang Province(2023KY306)

Fold

摘要

目的·采用前脉冲抑制（prepulse inhibition，PI）新技术评价儿童首发精神分裂症（childhood onset schizophrenia，COS）患者感觉门控及其变异特点。方法·应用事件相关电位仪，采用单独强刺激和弱刺激+强刺激范式，对56例COS患者和38名正常儿童（normal children，NC）进行PI检测，并用阳性和阴性症状量表（Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale，PANSS）、社会功能缺陷筛选量表（Social Disability Screening Schedule，SDSS）、社会支持量表（Social Adjustment Rating Scale，SSRS）、家庭负担会谈量表（Family Interview Schedule，FIS）等4个量表对COS患者进行综合评估。结果·比对上述量表形成的社会客观支持度与社会支持量标准值［（8±2）分］，COS组数值为（10±3）分，两者差异具有统计学意义（P=0.007）。未发现PI与PANSS量表总分、各因子分的相关性（均P>0.05）。COS组比NC组单独强刺激的惊跳反射潜伏期延长［NC组为（86±11）ms，COS组为（97±13）ms，P=0.001］。COS组比NC组弱刺激+强刺激的惊跳反射波幅增高，潜伏期延长［NC组波幅为（39±12）μV，COS组波幅为（47±21）μV，P=0.007；NC组潜伏期为（84±17）ms，COS组（97±20）ms，P=0.003］。COS组PI抑制率低于NC组［NC组抑制率为（66±32）%，COS组抑制率为（43±37）%，P=0.000］。结论·COS患者同成人精神分裂症一样存在PI异常。PI变化可能是反映COS患者激越情绪变化的生物学标记的结果。

关键词： 精神分裂症; 儿童; 前脉冲抑制; 生物学标记

本文引用格式

徐晓君 , 叶敏捷 , 王玉城 , 王文霞 , 钱胜 , 叶丹弟 , 潘乐乐 , 胡欣 , 尹晓莉 , 李美花 , 林光耀 . 儿童首发精神分裂症患者和正常儿童前脉冲抑制的对照研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023 , 43(5) : 606 -610 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.05.011

Abstract

Objective ·To explore the characteristics of sensory gating and its variation in children with first episode schizophrenia (COS) by using a new technique of prepulse suppression (PI). Methods ·By using the ERP recording and analysis system of brain products, PI was detected in 56 patients with COS and 38 healthy children (NC) using the paradigm of single strong stimulus and weak stimulus+strong stimulus. The patients′ performance was comprehensively evaluated with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS), Social Adjustment Rating Scale (SSRS), and Family Interview Schedule (FIS). Results ·The social objective support formed by summing up the above scales was compared with the quantitative stanard of social support [the standard of social support scale was (8±2) points, and the value of COS group was (10±3) points], and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.007). No correlation was found between PI and PANSS total score and each factor score (all P>0.05). The latency of startle reflex in the COS group was longer than that in the NC group [the NC group was (86±11) ms, the COS group was (97±13) ms, P=0.001]. In the COS group, the amplitude of startle reflex of weak stimulus+strong stimulus was higher, and the latency was longer than that of the NC group [NC group: (39±12) μV, COS group (47±21) μV, P=0.007; the latency of the normal group was (84±17) ms, and that of the COS group was (97±20) ms, P=0.003]. PI inhibition rate in the COS group was lower than that in the NC group [(66±32) % in the NC group, (43±37) % in the COS group, P=0.000]. Conclusion ·COS patients have the same PI abnormality as adult schizophrenia. The change of PI inhibition may be the result of biological markers reflecting the change of agitated emotion in COS patients.

Key words： schizophrenia; children; prepulse inhibition (PI); biological markers (BM)

参考文献

1 苏林雁. 儿童精神病学[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2014: 377-381.
1 SU L Y. Child psychiatry[M]. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 2014: 377-381.
2 陈冲, 王红星, 陈兴时, 等. 惊跳反射弱刺激抑制及P50在精神分裂症中的应用[J]. 神经病学与神经康复学杂志, 2009, 6(4): 277-279.
2 CHEN C, WANG H X, CHEN X S, et al. Application of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex and P50 in patients with schizophrenia[J]. Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, 2007(1): 55-59.
3 KOHL S, HEEKEREN K, KLOSTERK?TTER J, et al. Prepulse inhibition in psychiatric disorders: apart from schizophrenia[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2013, 47(4): 445-452.
4 GóMEZ-NIETO R, HORMIGO S, LóPEZ D E. Prepulse inhibition of the auditory startle reflex assessment as a hallmark of brainstem sensorimotor gating mechanisms[J]. Brain Sci, 2020, 10(9): 639.
5 吴荣琴, 宋立升, 吕坚, 等. 首发未服药精神分裂症患者的惊跳反射弱刺激抑制和P50检测[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(11): 823-826.
5 WU R Q, SONG L S, LV J, et al. Prepulse inhibition of startle reflex in schizophrenics and healthy adults[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2015, 95(11): 823-826.
6 万晓娜, 蒋廷云, 江丽云, 等. 首发精神分裂症患者及其一级亲属感觉门控P50研究[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2007, 33(9): 544-547.
6 WAN X N, JIANG T Y, JIANG L Y, et al. Studies on the auditory sensory gating potential P50 in the first-episode schizophrenics and their first-degree relatives[J]. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 2007, 33(9): 544-547.
7 王东, 朱孔美, 谭淑平, 等. 稳定期慢性精神分裂症患者听觉感觉门控诱发电位P50特点[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(7): 556-560.
7 WANG D, ZHU K M, TAN S P, et al. P50 auditory sensory gating in inpatients with stable chronic schizophrenia[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2011, 25(7): 556-560.
8 沈渔邨. 精神病学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 707-708.
8 SHEN Y C. Psychiatry[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2009: 707-708.
9 张明园, 何燕玲. 精神科评定量表手册[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2015: 81-202.
9 ZHANG M Y, HE Y L. Handbook of psychiatric assessment scale[M]. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 2015: 81-202.
10 张明岛, 陈兴时. 脑诱发电位学[M]. 第3版. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 1995: 311-333.
10 ZHANG M D, CHEN X S. Brain evoked potentials[M]. 3rd ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 1995: 311-333.
11 PICTON T W, BENTIN S, BERG P, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria[J]. Psychophysiology, 2000, 37(2): 127-152.
12 VAN DEN BUUSE M, GARNER B, KOCH M. Neurodevelopmental animal models of schizophrenia: effects on prepulse inhibition[J]. Curr Mol Med, 2003, 3(5): 459-471.
13 BRAFF D L, LIGHT G A. The use of neurophysiological endophenotypes to understand the genetic basis of schizophrenia[J]. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2005, 7(2): 125-135.
14 张明岛, 陈兴时, 王继军. 精神科应用脑电生理技术的循证医学研究进展[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2006, 39(4): 250-251.
14 ZHANG M D, CHEN X S, WANG J J. Research progress of evidence-based medicine in the application of electrophysiological techniques in psychiatry[J]. Chinese Journal of Psychiatry, 2006, 39(4): 250-251.
15 孔凡群, 田爽. 难治性精神分裂症患者动态监测感觉门控P50的价值及其与PPI的相关性研究[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2019, 32(4): 291-293.
15 KONG F Q, TIAN S. The value of dynamic monitoring of sensory gating P50 in patients with refractory schizophrenia and its correlation with PPI[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2019, 32(4): 291-293.
16 陈兴时, 张明岛, 王红星, 等. 首发精神分裂症患者的感觉门抑制[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2005, 85(49): 3457-3459.
16 CHEN X S, ZHANG M D, WANG H X, et al. Sensory gating of patients with first-episode schizophrenia[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2005, 85(49): 3457-3459.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉