论著 · 临床研究

18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT显像在中高危前列腺癌初始分期中的应用价值

  • 严叶青 ,
  • 梁胜 ,
  • 杨斌 ,
  • 邹仁健 ,
  • 马玉飞 ,
  • 蔡利生 ,
  • 王辉 ,
  • 傅宏亮
展开
  • 1.上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院核医学科,上海 ;200092
    2.同济大学附属第十人民医院泌尿外科,上海 200072
    3.美国国立卫生研究院,贝塞斯达 20816,美国
严叶青(1997—),女,硕士生;电子信箱:yanyeqing97@163.com
傅宏亮,电子信箱:fuhongliang@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2023-03-02

  录用日期: 2023-05-18

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年基金(82001856)

Role of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in initial stage of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

  • Yeqing YAN ,
  • Sheng LIANG ,
  • Bin YANG ,
  • Renjian ZOU ,
  • Yufei MA ,
  • Lisheng CAI ,
  • Hui WANG ,
  • Hongliang FU
Expand
  • 1.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
    2.Department of Urology, Tenth People′s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
    3.National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20816, USA
FU Hongliang, E-mail: fuhongliang@hotmail.com.

Received date: 2023-03-02

  Accepted date: 2023-05-18

  Online published: 2023-07-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82001856)

摘要

目的·评估18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT在中高风险前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者初始分期中的应用价值。方法·对2017年9月至2022年6月在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院就诊的67例中高危PCa患者采用18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT进行初步分期;患者在18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT检查前2周内接受常规成像(conventional imaging,CI),包括多参数磁共振成像(multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging,mp-MRI)和全身骨显像(bone scintigraphy,BS),其中25例患者同期进行了18F-FDG PET/CT检查。评估18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT对初始分期的灵敏度(sensitivity,SEN)、特异度(specificity,SPEC)、阳性预测值(positive predictive value,PPV)、阴性预测值(negative predictive value,NPV)及准确率(accuracy,ACU),并将结果与18F-FDG PET/CT、mp-MRI和BS的结果进行对比。以术后病理的T、N分期结果及临床随访的骨转移结果为参考标准进行Kappa一致性检验,分析18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT及CI在诊断原发灶累及范围、区域淋巴结转移、骨转移方面与参考标准的一致性,计算Kappa系数,并进行比较。结果·在67例PCa患者中,38例接受了根治性前列腺切除术并且有完整的病理学诊断资料,其中分别有27例和1例患者同时接受了区域淋巴结清扫术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术,以病理结果作为诊断金标准。mp-MRI和18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT诊断包膜内病灶的检出率均为100%,诊断双侧腺叶内病灶的SEN分别为26.3%和63.2%,SPEC均为75.0%。与病理结果进行Kappa一致性检验,结果显示18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT诊断包膜外侵犯(extraprostatic extension,EPE)、精囊腺侵犯(seminal vesicle invasion,SVI)、膀胱颈侵犯(bladder neck invasion,BNI)的一致性均高于mp-MRI。Fisher确切概率法显示,2种检查方法诊断EPE、SVI的SEN(P=0.226,P=0.491)和SPEC(P=1.000,P=0.342),以及诊断BNI的SEN(均P=1.000)比较,差异均无统计学意义。在诊断淋巴结转移方面,基于淋巴结数量分析,18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT与病理结果的一致性高于mp-MRI(Kappa系数分别为0.555和0.137);Fisher确切概率法提示2种检查方法的SEN和SPEC差异均无统计学意义(P=0.562,P=0.829)。基于患者分析,18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT与病理结果一致性高于mp-MRI(Kappa系数分别为0.850和0.313);两者SEN比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。在诊断骨转移方面,基于骨病灶数量分析,18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT与随访结果的一致性高于BS(Kappa系数分别为0.500和0.299);Fisher确切概率法提示2种检查方法的SEN比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.219)。基于患者分析,18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT与随访结果的一致性高于BS(Kappa系数分别为0.953和0.766);两者的SEN比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT检测后,21例(31.3%)患者的风险分层上升,1例(1.5%)风险分层下降;32例(47.8%)患者的初始分期改变,其中27例(40.3%)上调,5例(7.5%)下调。结论·18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT在诊断中高风险PCa患者的双侧腺叶内病灶、EPE、SVI、区域淋巴结转移及骨转移方面,相比CI具有一定的优势,并在此基础上改变了部分患者临床分期及转移状态的诊断。

本文引用格式

严叶青 , 梁胜 , 杨斌 , 邹仁健 , 马玉飞 , 蔡利生 , 王辉 , 傅宏亮 . 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT显像在中高危前列腺癌初始分期中的应用价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023 , 43(7) : 873 -881 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.07.009

Abstract

Objective ·To evaluate the role of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in the initial stage of patients with moderate and high risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods ·A total of 67 patients with moderate and high risk PCa who were treated in Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from September 2017 to June 2022 were initially staged by 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT. Conventional imaging (CI), including multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS), were performed within two weeks before 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT. Twenty-five patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at the same time. The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACU) of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in the initial stage were evaluated, and the results were compared with those of 18F-FDG PET/CT, mp-MRI and BS. The consistency of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and CI in terms of primary lesion, regional lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis was evaluated by Kappa consistency test refering to the postoperative pathological T and N staging results and bone metastasis results of clinical follow-up. Kappa coefficient was calculated and compared. Results ·Of the 67 patients with PCa, 38 patients underwent radical prostatectomy and had completed pathological data, with 27 patients undergoing regional lymphadenectomy and 1 patient undergoing expanded pelvic lymphadenectomy at the same time. The pathological results were obtained as gold standard. The detection rates of mp-MRI and 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing intrathecal lesions were both 100%. The SENs in diagnosing bilateral intralobular lesions were 26.3% and 63.2%, respctively; the SPECs were both 75.0%.The Kappa consistency test showed that the consistency of 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosis of extracapsular extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and bladder neck invasion (BNI) was higher than that of mp-MRI. Fisher′s exact test showed that there were no statistically significant differences in SEN (P=0.226, P=0.491) and SPEC (P=1.000, P=0.342) between the two methods for diagnosing EPE and SVI, as well as SEN (P=1.000) for diagnosing BNI. In terms of diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, based on the analysis of lymph node numbers, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and pathological results was higher than that of mp-MRI (Kappa coefficients of 0.555 and 0.137, respectively). Fisher′s exact test showed that there were no statistically significant differences in SEN and SPEC between the two examination methods (P=0.562, P=0.829). Based on the patients, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and pathological results was higher than that of mp-MRI (Kappa coefficients of 0.850 and 0.313, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=1.000). In terms of diagnosis of bone metastasis, based on the analysis of bone lesion numbers, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and clinical follow-up results was higher than that of BS (Kappa coefficients of 0.500 and 0.299, respectively). Fisher′s exact test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=0.219). Based on the patients, the consistency between 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT and clinical follow-up results was higher than that of BS (Kappa coefficients of 0.953 and 0.766, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in SEN between the two methods (P=1.000). The risks of 21 patients (31.3%) were increased after 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT detection, with 1 patient (1.5%) decreasing. The initial stage of 32 cases (47.8%) were changed after 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT detection, with 27 cases (40.3%) upstaged and 5 cases (7.5%) downstaged. Conclusion ·18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT is superior to CI in the diagnosis of bilateral intralobular lesions, EPE, SVI, regional lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis in intermediate and high risk PCa, and on this basis, the diagnosis of clinical stage and metastatic status of some patients has been changed.

参考文献

1 BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2 顾秀瑛, 郑荣寿, 张思维, 等. 2000—2014年中国肿瘤登记地区前列腺癌发病趋势及年龄变化分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52(6): 586-592.
2 GU X Y, ZHENG R S, ZHANG S W, et al. Analysis on the trend of prostate cancer incidence and age change in cancer registration areas of China, 2000 to 2014[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 52(6): 586-592.
3 TROYER J K, BECKETT M L, WRIGHT G L. Detection and characterization of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in tissue extracts and body fluids[J]. Int J Cancer, 1995, 62(5): 552-558.
4 WRIGHT G L, HALEY C, BECKETT M L, et al. Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues[J]. Urol Oncol, 1995, 1(1): 18-28.
5 AFSHAR-OROMIEH A, MALCHER A, EDER M, et al. Reply to Reske et al.: pet imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 40(6): 971-972.
6 WERNER R A, DERLIN T, LAPA C, et al. 18F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging[J]. Theranostics, 2020, 10(1): 1-16.
7 FDA approves 18F-DCFPyL PET agent in prostate cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2021, 62(8): 11N.
8 KOH W J, ABU-RUSTUM N R, BEAN S, et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2018, 16(2): 170-199.
9 METSER U, ORTEGA C, PERLIS N, et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR [J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(11): 3702-3711.
10 SONNI I, FELKER E R, LENIS A T, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a histopathology gold standard in the detection, intraprostatic localization, and determination of local extension of primary prostate cancer: results from a prospective single-center imaging trial[J]. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(6): 847-854.
11 DONATO P, ROBERTS M J, MORTON A, et al. Improved specificity with 68Ga PSMA PET/CT to detect clinically significant lesions “invisible” on multiparametric MRI of the prostate: a single institution comparative analysis with radical prostatectomy histology[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(1): 20-30.
12 CAGLIC I, SUSHENTSEV N, SHAH N, et al. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy na?ve patients[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2021, 141: 109804.
13 BOESEN L, CHABANOVA E, L?GAGER V, et al. Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(6): 1776-1785.
14 POPI?A C, POPI?A A R, ANDREI A, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with multiparametric-MRI: accuracy and inter-reader agreement [J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2020, 93(2): 150-161.
15 YILMAZ B, TURKAY R, COLAKOGLU Y, et al. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer[J]. Prostate, 2019, 79(9): 1007-1017.
16 KOSEOGLU E, KORDAN Y, KILIC M, et al. Diagnostic ability of Ga-68 PSMA PET to detect dominant and non-dominant tumors, upgrading and adverse pathology in patients with PIRADS 4-5 index lesions undergoing radical prostatectomy[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2021, 24(1): 202-209.
17 UCAR T, GUNDUZ N, DEMIRCI E, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: a retrospective study [J]. Prostate, 2022, 82(15): 1462-1468.
18 ?ELEN S, GüLTEKIN A, ?ZLüLERDEN Y, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-I/T PET-CT and multiparametric MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer patients: a pilot study[J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(9/10): 684-691.
19 ARSLAN A, KARAARSLAN E, LEVENT GüNER A, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of multiparametric prostate MRI versus 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT in the evaluation lymph node involvement and extraprostatic extension[J]. Acad Radiol, 2022, 29(5): 698-704.
20 HOPE T A, EIBER M, ARMSTRONG W R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(11): 1635-1642.
21 MAURER T, GSCHWEND J E, RAUSCHER I, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of 68gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2016, 195(5): 1436-1443.
22 WOO S, SUH C H, KIM S Y, et al. The diagnostic performance of MRI for detection of lymph node metastasis in bladder and prostate cancer: an updated systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(3): W95-w109.
23 BUD?US L, LEYH-BANNURAH S R, SALOMON G, et al. Initial experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 393-396.
24 YUMINAGA Y, ROTHE C, KAM J, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus CT and bone scan for investigation of PSA failure post radical prostatectomy[J]. Asian J Urol, 2021, 8(2): 170-175.
25 PYKA T, OKAMOTO S, DAHLBENDER M, et al. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2016, 43(12): 2114-2121.
26 ACAR E, BEKI? R, POLACK B. Comparison of bone uptake in bone scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT images in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Curr Med Imaging Rev, 2019, 15(6): 589-594.
27 RUSTHOVEN C G, JONES B L, FLAIG T W, et al. Improved survival with prostate radiation in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(24): 2835-2842.
28 SATKUNASIVAM R, KIM A E, DESAI M, et al. Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy vs no local therapy for survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER-medicare analysis[J]. J Urol, 2015, 194(2): 378-385.
29 OST P, REYNDERS D, DECAESTECKER K, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase Ⅱ trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(5): 446-453.
文章导航

/