
收稿日期: 2025-03-10
录用日期: 2025-05-19
网络出版日期: 2025-09-30
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(82370187);上海交通大学医学院“双百人”项目(20230013)
Clinicopathologic characteristics, gene mutation profile, and prognostic analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with lung involvement
Received date: 2025-03-10
Accepted date: 2025-05-19
Online published: 2025-09-30
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82370187);“Two-hundred Talents” Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(20230013)
目的·探究肺受累弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,DLBCL)的临床病理特征、基因突变谱及真实世界生存预后。方法·纳入2003年8月至2022年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院初诊且经病理检查确诊为DLBCL并伴有肺受累的110例患者的临床资料,进行临床特征分析。对其中88例接受利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星/表柔比星、长春新碱及泼尼松(rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin/epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisone,R-CHOP)为基础一线治疗方案的患者进行疗效评估、生存分析及单因素、多因素预后分析。共74例患者接受了55个淋巴瘤相关基因的靶向DNA测序和基因突变评估。结果·110例患者中,>60岁72例(65.5%),女性52例(47.3%),Ann Arbor分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期92例(83.6%),美国东部肿瘤协作组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,ECOG)评分≥2分20例(18.2%),乳酸脱氢酶(lactate dehydrogenase,LDH)水平升高75例(68.2%),结外器官受累数目≥2个79例(71.8%),生发中心B细胞亚型32例(31.4%),双表达淋巴瘤22例(26.8%),双打击淋巴瘤4例(4.6%)。在接受以R-CHOP为基础的一线治疗方案的患者中,客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)为68.2%,5年无进展生存(progression free survival,PFS)率为43.7%,5年总生存(overall survival,OS)率为65.4%。单因素分析显示,LDH升高及ECOG评分≥2为肺受累DLBCL患者PFS及OS的不良预后因素;在高频突变中,PIM1及CD79B基因突变为患者PFS的不良预后因素。多因素分析显示,LDH升高为肺受累DLBCL患者PFS(HR=2.47,95%CI 1.28~4.77)及OS(HR=2.71,95%CI 1.21~6.07)的独立不良预后因素。靶向测序结果表明,PIM1(25.7%)、MYD88(24.3%)、TP53(18.9%)、CD79B(17.6%)、KMT2D(17.6%)、TNFAIP3(16.2%)为突变频率超过15%的高频突变。结论·LDH升高为肺受累DLBCL患者PFS及OS的独立不良预后因素;肺受累DLBCL患者中PIM1、MYD88、TP53、CD79B、KMT2D、TNFAIP3等基因突变频率较高。
陈思远 , 施晴 , 付迪 , 王黎 , 程澍 , 许彭鹏 , 赵维莅 . 肺受累弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤临床病理特征、基因突变谱及预后分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2025 , 45(9) : 1214 -1220 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.09.013
Objective ·To investigate the clinicopathologic features, gene mutation profile, and real-world survival prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with pulmonary involvement. Methods ·The clinical data of 110 patients with newly diagnosed, pathologically confirmed DLBCL and pulmonary involvement at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, between August 2003 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Evaluation of the efficacy of treatment, survival analyses, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in 88 patients who received a first-line regimen based on rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin/epirubicine, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). A total of 74 patients underwent targeted DNA sequencing of 55 lymphoma-related genes and were evaluated for mutations. Results ·Among the 110 patients, 72 (65.5%) were >60 years old, 52 (47.3%) were female, 92 (83.6%) presented with Ann Arbor stage Ⅲ‒Ⅳ, 20 (18.2%) had ECOG scores≥2, 75 (68.2%) had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, 79 (71.8%) had ≥2 extranodal involvements, 32 (31.4%) were classified as germinal center B-cell subtype, 22 (26.8%) were diagnosed with double expressor lymphoma, and 4 (4.6%) with double-hit lymphoma. Among the patients treated with R-CHOP-based first-line regimens, the objective response rate (ORR) was 68.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 43.7%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 65.4%. Univariate analysis showed that elevated LDH and ECOG score≥2 were poor prognostic factors for PFS and OS, and mutations in PIM1 and CD79B were poor prognostic factors for PFS among high-frequency mutations. Multivariate analysis showed that elevated LDH was an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS (HR=2.47, 95%CI 1.28‒4.77) and OS (HR=2.71, 95%CI 1.21‒6.07). Targeted sequencing results showed that PIM1 (25.7%), MYD88 (24.3%), TP53 (18.9%), CD79B (17.6%), KMT2D (17.6%), and TNFAIP3 (16.2%) were the high-frequency mutations with mutation rates over 15%. Conclusion ·Elevated LDH is an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS and OS in DLBCL with pulmonary involvement. Mutations in PIM1, MYD88, TP53, CD79B, KMT2D, and TNFAIP3 are frequently observed in this population.
Key words: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); lung; gene mutation; prognosis
| [1] | SEHN L H, SALLES G. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 384(9): 842-858. |
| [2] | OLLILA T A, OLSZEWSKI A J. Extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma: molecular features, prognosis, and risk of central nervous system recurrence[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2018, 19(8): 38. |
| [3] | LI S Y, YOUNG K H, MEDEIROS L J. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Pathology, 2018, 50(1): 74-87. |
| [4] | MIAN M, WASLE I, GRITSCH S, et al. B cell lymphoma with lung involvement: what is it about?[J]. Acta Haematol, 2015, 133(2): 221-225. |
| [5] | REQUENA E D A, OCROSPOMA D V, RUIZ J S, et al. Primary pulmonary lymphoma in Peru[J]. Ecancermedicalscience, 2023, 17: 1559. |
| [6] | SWERDLOW S H, CAMPO E, PILERI S A, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms[J]. Blood, 2016, 127(20): 2375-2390. |
| [7] | CHESON B D, FISHER R I, BARRINGTON S F, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(27): 3059-3068. |
| [8] | YAO D, ZHANG L, WU P L, et al. Clinical and misdiagnosed analysis of primary pulmonary lymphoma: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Cancer, 2018, 18(1): 281. |
| [9] | PARISSIS H. Forty years literature review of primary lung lymphoma[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011, 6: 23. |
| [10] | SHEN R, XU P P, WANG N, et al. Influence of oncogenic mutations and tumor microenvironment alterations on extranodal invasion in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Clin Transl Med, 2020, 10(7): e221. |
| [11] | ZHANG H L, LU Y X, ZHANG T T, et al. PIM1 genetic alterations associated with distinct molecular profiles, phenotypes and drug responses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Clin Transl Med, 2022, 12(4): e808. |
| [12] | XIE Z C, QIN Y, CHEN X R, et al. Deciphering the prognostic significance of MYD88 and CD79B mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: insights into treatment outcomes[J]. Target Oncol, 2024, 19(3): 383-400. |
| [13] | DENG T, ZHANG S Y, XIAO M, et al. A single-centre, real-world study of BTK inhibitors for the initial treatment of MYD88 mut/CD79B mut diffuse large B-cell lymphoma[J]. Cancer Med, 2024, 13(4): e7005. |
| [14] | DU K X, WU Y F, HUA W, et al. Identify truly high-risk TP53-mutated diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients and explore the underlying biological mechanisms[J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2024, 22(1): 401. |
| [15] | ZHANG M C, TIAN S, FU D, et al. Genetic subtype-guided immunochemotherapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: the randomized GUIDANCE-01 trial[J]. Cancer Cell, 2023, 41(10): 1705-1716.e5. |
| [16] | LIU Q X, ZHU Y, YI H M, et al. KMT2D mutations promoted tumor progression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma through altering tumor-induced regulatory T cell trafficking via FBXW7-NOTCH-MYC/TGF-β1 axis[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2024, 20(10): 3972-3985. |
| [17] | LUO C, ZHANG R, GUO R, et al. Integrated computational analysis identifies therapeutic targets with dual action in cancer cells and T cells[J]. Immunity, 2025, 58(3): 745-765.e9. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |