Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.06.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective ·To evaluate the dentofacial phenotype in non-syndromic tooth agenesis (NSTA) patients with paired box gene 9 (PAX9) mutation. Methods ·Patients with NSTA who visited the Department of Second Dental Center of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, between January 2016 and December 2023 received whole-exome sequencing to screen PAX9 mutation. The location and number of missing teeth were evaluated by oral pantomography, and dentofacial deformities were evaluated by X-ray cephalometrics. Results ·Seven patients with PAX9 mutation were included in the study, including 3 males (42.9%) and 4 females (57.1%). The patients were 7?31 years old at first visit, with a mean age of (19.7±8.0) years old. All the 7 patients were PAX9 heterozygotes, of which 4 were missense and 3 were frameshift. The average number of missing teeth was 15.9±2.9. The number of missing teeth in maxilla (9.6±2.6) was slightly higher than that in mandible (6.3±2.4) (P=0.030). Maxillary second molar (100.0%), maxillary canine (85.7%) and mandibular second premolar (85.7%) were the three most common missing teeth, while mandibular lateral incisor (14.3%) and mandibular canine (14.3%) were the two least missing teeth. Patients with frameshift mutation had more missing teeth (18.3±2.1) than those with missense mutation (14.0±1.8) (P=0.032). X-ray cephalometrics analysis results showed that the angle sella-nasion-subspinale (SNA), angle nasion-subspinale-subspinale-porion (NA-Apo) and sella-nasion (S-N) in adult patients with PAX9 mutation were significantly lower than the normal reference values, suggesting a shorter anterior cranial base and maxillary length. The frankfort horizontal plane-nasion-porion (FH-NPo) was higher than the reference value, and the Y-axis was lower than the reference value, indicating a more prognathic mandible. The angle subspinale-nasion-supramental (ANB) was lower than the reference value, indicating a skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The angle upper central incisor-nasion-subspinale (angle U1-NA) was higher than the reference value, indicating a lip inclination of maxillary central incisor. The angle lower central incisor-mandibular plane (IMPA) and lower central incisor-nasion-supramental (L1-NB) were lower than the reference values, indicating a retroclination of the mandibular central incisor, and crossbite in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Conclusion ·The dentofacial phenotype of PAX9-mutated patients with NSTA is reported comprehensively. It is helpful to improve the understanding of the role of PAX9 in human maxillofacial development.

Key words: paired box gene 9 (PAX9), dentofacial deformities, X-ray cephalometrics, non-syndromic tooth agenesis, skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion

CLC Number:

DOU Jiaqi, GAO Jie, BIAN Xiaoling, WANG Feng, DAI Qinggang, WU Yiqun. Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(6): 687-693.

Figures/Tables 5

TrendMD

References 44

1	POLDER B J, VAN′T HOF M A, VAN DER LINDEN F P, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2004, 32(3): 217-226.
2	KHALAF K, MISKELLY J, VOGE E, et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthod, 2014, 41(4): 299-316.
3	VASTARDIS H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(6): 650-656.
4	LAN R, WU Y Q, DAI Q G, et al. Gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in syndromes with tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2023, 29(6): 2401-2408.
5	YU K, DOU J Q, HUANG W, et al. Expanding the genetic spectrum of tooth agenesis using whole-exome sequencing[J]. Clin Genet, 2022, 102(6): 503-516.
6	YU M, WONG S W, HAN D, et al. Genetic analysis: Wnt and other pathways in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2019, 25(3): 646-651.
7	SANDHU M, MALIK P, SAHA R. Multiple dental and skeletal abnormalities in an individual with Filippi syndrome[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2013, 2013: 845405.
8	TUNA E B, MARŞAN G, GENÇAY K, et al. Craniofacial and dental characteristics of Kabuki syndrome: nine years cephalometric follow-up[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2012, 36(4): 393-400.
9	GUNASHEKHAR M, HAMEED M S, BOKHARI S K. Oral and dental manifestations in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: report of a rare case[J]. Prim Dent Care, 2012, 19(1): 35-38.
10	VERMA L, PASSI S, GAUBA K. Brachman de Lange syndrome[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2010, 1(4): 268-270.
11	ERCAL D, SAY B. Cerebro-oculo-nasal syndrome: another case and review of the literature[J]. Clin Dysmorphol, 1998, 7(2): 139-141.
12	吴钊仪, 岳海棠, 李健, 等. KMT2D基因新发双突变致歌舞伎面谱综合征的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
	WU Z Y, YUE H T, LI J, et al. Two novel and de novo KMT2D mutations on the same allele cause Kabuki syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
13	FOURNIER B P, BRUNEAU M H, TOUPENAY S, et al. Patterns of dental agenesis highlight the nature of the causative mutated genes[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(12): 1306-1316.
14	SARKAR T, RANJAN P, KANATHUR S, et al. An in vitro and computational validation of a novel loss-of-functional mutation in PAX9 associated with non-syndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Mol Genet Genomics, 2023, 298(1): 183-199.
15	BHOL C S, PATIL S, SAHU B B, et al. The clinical significance and correlative signaling pathways of paired box gene 9 in development and carcinogenesis[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1876(1): 188561.
16	PETERS H, NEUBÜSER A, BALLING R. Pax genes and organogenesis: Pax9 meets tooth development[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(Suppl 1): 38-43.
17	CHU K Y, WANG Y L, CHEN J T, et al. PAX9 mutations and genetic synergism in familial tooth agenesis[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2023, 1524(1): 87-96.
18	LI R, CHEN Z, YU Q, et al. The function and regulatory network of Pax9 gene in palate development[J]. J Dent Res, 2019, 98(3): 277-287.
19	NAKATOMI M, LUDWIG K U, KNAPP M, et al. Msx1 deficiency interacts with hypoxia and induces a morphogenetic regulation during mouse lip development[J]. Development, 2020, 147(21): dev189175.
20	BONCZEK O, KREJCI P, IZAKOVICOVA-HOLLA L, et al. Tooth agenesis: what do we know and is there a connection to cancer?[J]. Clin Genet, 2021, 99(4): 493-502.
21	KAUSHAL K, KIM E J, TYAGI A, et al. Genome-wide screening for deubiquitinase subfamily identifies ubiquitin-specific protease 49 as a novel regulator of odontogenesis[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2022, 29(9): 1689-1704.
22	RAHMAN M M, LAI Y C, HUSNA A A, et al. Micro RNA transcriptome profile in canine oral melanoma[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(19): 4832.
23	LAN Y, XU J Y, JIANG R L. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of palatogenesis[J]. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2015, 115: 59-84.
24	JIA S H, ZHOU J, D'SOUZA R N. Pax9's dual roles in modulating Wnt signaling during murine palatogenesis[J]. Dev Dyn, 2020, 249(10): 1274-1284.
25	PETERS H, NEUBÜSER A, KRATOCHWIL K, et al. Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities[J]. Genes Dev, 1998, 12(17): 2735-2747.
26	KIST R, GREALLY E, PETERS H. Derivation of a mouse model for conditional inactivation of Pax9[J]. Genesis, 2007, 45(7): 460-464.
27	BONCZEK O, BALCAR V J, ŠERÝ O. PAX9 gene mutations and tooth agenesis: a review[J]. Clin Genet, 2017, 92(5): 467-476.
28	WANG Y, GROPPE J C, WU J F, et al. Pathogenic mechanisms of tooth agenesis linked to paired domain mutations in human PAX9[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2009, 18(15): 2863-2874.
29	INTARAK N, TONGCHAIRATI K, TERMTEERAPORNPIMOL K, et al. Tooth agenesis patterns and variants in PAX9: a systematic review[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2023, 59: 129-137.
30	LIU H C, LIU H B, SU L X, et al. Four novel PAX9 variants and the PAX9-related non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(15): 8142.
31	WONG S W, HAN D, ZHANG H, et al. Nine novel PAX9 mutations and a distinct tooth agenesis genotype-phenotype[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(2): 155-162.
32	FAUZI N H, ARDINI Y D, ZAINUDDIN Z, et al. A review on non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with PAX9 mutations[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2018, 54(1): 30-36.
33	LEE Y J, LEE Y J, KIM Y J, et al. Novel PAX9 mutations causing isolated oligodontia[J]. J Pers Med, 2024, 14(2): 191.
34	LEI R, QIU X L, HAN Y, et al. Identification and functional study of a novel variant of PAX9 causing tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/odi.14937.
35	ZHOU M Q, ZHANG H, CAMHI H, et al. Analyses of oligodontia phenotypes and genetic etiologies[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2021, 13(1): 32.
36	JARA-ESPEJO M, HAWKINS M T R, FOGALLI G B, et al. Folding stability of Pax9 intronic G-quadruplex correlates with relative molar size in eutherians[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2021, 38(5): 1860-1873.
37	MOSS M L, SALENTIJN L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth[J]. Am J Orthod, 1969, 55(6): 566-577.
38	WISTH P J, THUNHOLD K, BÖE O E. The craniofacial morphology of individuals with hypodontia[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1974, 32(4): 281-290.
39	ROALD K L, WISTH P J, BØE O E. Changes in cranio-facial morphology of individuals with hypodontia between the ages of 9 and 16[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1982, 40(2): 65-74.
40	SARNÄS K V, RUNE B. The facial profile in advanced hypodontia: a mixed longitudinal study of 141 children[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1983, 5(2): 133-143.
41	OGAARD B, KROGSTAD O. Craniofacial structure and soft tissue profile in patients with severe hypodontia[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 108(5): 472-477.
42	BEN-BASSAT Y, BRIN I. Skeletodental patterns in patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(5): 521-525.
43	ENDO T, YOSHINO S, OZOE R, et al. Association of advanced hypodontia and craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients[J]. Odontology, 2004, 92(1): 48-53.
44	BJÖRK A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1966, 24(2): 109-127.

Patient	Gender	Age/year	Nucleotide change	Amino acid change	Exon	Sub-domain	Zygosity	Type of mutation
1	Male	19	c.305delT	p.I102Tfs*19	2	CSD	Het	Frameshift
2	Female	13	c.C365A	p.S122Y	2	CSD	Het	Missense
3	Female	31	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
4	Male	26	c.189delG	p.G64Afs*21	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
5	Female	23	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
6	Female	19	c.131_134del	p.Q45Yfs*39	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
7	Male	7	c.G337A	p.D113N	2	CSD	Het	Missense

Patient	Gender	Age/year	Nucleotide change	Amino acid change	Exon	Sub-domain	Zygosity	Type of mutation
1	Male	19	c.305delT	p.I102Tfs*19	2	CSD	Het	Frameshift
2	Female	13	c.C365A	p.S122Y	2	CSD	Het	Missense
3	Female	31	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
4	Male	26	c.189delG	p.G64Afs*21	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
5	Female	23	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
6	Female	19	c.131_134del	p.Q45Yfs*39	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
7	Male	7	c.G337A	p.D113N	2	CSD	Het	Missense

Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Underage PAX9-mutated patients		Classical norm
Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Patient 2	Patient 7	Classical norm
SNA/(°)	75.3±4.1	80.5	79.3	82.8±4.1
NA-APo(convexity)/(°)	-17.8±11.0	-25.0	-5.8	6.0±4.4
S-N/mm	62.3±2.4	62.5	60.9	71.0±3.0
FH-NPo/(°)	95.8±3.5	99.9	92.2	85.4±3.7
Y axis/(°)	53.6±2.9	48.7	55.4	64.0±2.3
ANB/(°)	-6.8±4.7	-9.8	-3.4	2.7±2.0
U1-SN/(°)	111.4±14.7	110.9	109.4	105.7±6.3
Angle U1-NA/(°)	36.1±16.9	30.4	30.1	22.8±5.2
Distance U1-NA/mm	6.6±5.1	5.8	3.7	5.1±2.4
IMPA(L1-MP)/(°)	76.6±13.1	76.2	76.0	96.7±6.4
L1-NB/mm	0.3±2.9	0.7	0.7	6.7±2.1

Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Underage PAX9-mutated patients		Classical norm
Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Patient 2	Patient 7	Classical norm
SNA/(°)	75.3±4.1	80.5	79.3	82.8±4.1
NA-APo(convexity)/(°)	-17.8±11.0	-25.0	-5.8	6.0±4.4
S-N/mm	62.3±2.4	62.5	60.9	71.0±3.0
FH-NPo/(°)	95.8±3.5	99.9	92.2	85.4±3.7
Y axis/(°)	53.6±2.9	48.7	55.4	64.0±2.3
ANB/(°)	-6.8±4.7	-9.8	-3.4	2.7±2.0
U1-SN/(°)	111.4±14.7	110.9	109.4	105.7±6.3
Angle U1-NA/(°)	36.1±16.9	30.4	30.1	22.8±5.2
Distance U1-NA/mm	6.6±5.1	5.8	3.7	5.1±2.4
IMPA(L1-MP)/(°)	76.6±13.1	76.2	76.0	96.7±6.4
L1-NB/mm	0.3±2.9	0.7	0.7	6.7±2.1

[1]	JIANG Lingyong. Status and advances in the mechanism research on dento-maxillofacial skeletal abnormalities [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(6): 663-675.
[2]	SUN Siyuan, LIU Yuanqi, CUI Yiwen, HUANG Zihan, MEI Li, DAI Qinggang, JIANG Lingyong. Generation and validation of the conditional osteoblast-specific retinoic acid signaling inhibition mouse model [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(6): 676-686.
[3]	LAN Rong, DAI Qinggang, YU Kang, BIAN Xiaoling, YE Lijuan, WU Yiqun, WANG Feng. Congenital tooth agenesis-related EDAR variants and pedigree analysis of HED patients with two variants [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(6): 694-701.
[4]	LI Huxiao, LI Xiaotian, ZHAO Xuri, ZHANG Huanyu, ZHOU Wei, SONG Zhongchen. Effects of gingipain extract on the biological characteristics of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell HN6 [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(2): 161-168.
[5]	WAN Teng, JIANG Tengfei, ZHU Min, WANG Xudong. Application and accuracy assessment of a novel 3D-printed osteotomy guide in anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(1): 43-49.
[6]	ZHU Xiaochen, XIE Xinyi, ZHAO Xuri, XU Lina, HE Zhiyan, ZHOU Wei. Construction and characterization of mice with conditional knockout of Stat3 gene in microglia [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(6): 689-698.
[7]	WANG Sijie, SI Jiaping, ZHOU Yu, LUO Dingwen, GAO Lu, CHEN Xiaoyan. Progress in morphology of temporomandibular joints in different sagittal skeletal patterns [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 648-654.
[8]	YANG Haixia, XU Lili, WANG Bocheng, CHEN Minjie. Evaluation of clinical effect of manipulation on masticatory muscle pain guided by MRI [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 540-544.
[9]	YU Leilei, RUAN Hong, XIA Di, HE Meijuan, SUN Mingyuan, ZHENG Jisi. Application effect of home-based rehabilitation program led by self-efficacy theory after temporomandibular joint disk repositioning [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 532-539.
[10]	XIE Xinyi, ZHOU Wei, QIU Che, SHEN Hui, SONG Zhongchen. Changes in serum Th17/Treg-related cytokine levels in periodontitis patients with Alzheimer′s disease [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 600-605.
[11]	LU Yifan, ZHANG Weiqian, YU Chuangqi. Clinical analysis and ultrasound study of allergy-related obstructive parotitis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 519-523.
[12]	CHEN Xuzhuo, MAO Yi, YUAN Dan, ZHANG Shanyong, YANG Chi. Development and application of Chinese customized total temporomandibular joint prosthesis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 524-531.
[13]	WU Jiongrui, GAO Yiming. Cone-beam CT analysis of anatomical structure of maxillary sinus arteries [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(2): 201-207.
[14]	ZHU Yue, GU Jiaying, DAI Jiewen. Effect of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 on traumatic heterotopic ossification around temporomandibular joint [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(12): 1649-1655.
[15]	WU Mei, LIANG Yanjing, HOU Lili. Evaluation tools for speech function after oral cancer surgery: a scoping review [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(12): 1720-1728.