Basic research

Optimization of optimal printing parameters and composition ratio of dental crown and bridge resin based on digital light processing technology

  • LIU Junlong ,
  • MA Jiayin ,
  • ZHAO Zhe ,
  • XIONG Yaoyang ,
  • ZHENG Yuanli
Expand
  • 1.Department of First Dental Clinic, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
    2.Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
    3.School of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China
ZHENG Yuanli, E-mail: zhengyuanli2017@163.com.
XIONG Yaoyang, E-mail: yaoyang_x@163.com.
ZHAO Zhe, E-mail: zhezhao@sit.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-11-26

  Accepted date: 2025-03-05

  Online published: 2025-07-28

Supported by

Health Industry Clinical Research Special Project of Shanghai Health Commission(202440008);Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(23ZR1453600)

Abstract

Objective ·To fabricate a 3D-printed dental crown and bridge resin slurry using digital light processing (DLP) technology, investigate the influence of different printing parameters on its mechanical properties, determine the optimal printing parameters, and optimize the composition ratio of DLP-printed crown and bridge resin. Methods ·Based on the viscosity characteristics of the mixture, the optimal ratio of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) to poly (propylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PPGDMA) was explored. After silanizing silicon dioxide (SiO2), it was mixed with UDMA, PPGDMA, and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl bis (p-tolyl) phosphine oxide (TMO) to prepare DLP-printed dental crown and bridge resin slurries with different solid contents, and their rheological properties were tested. The Beer-Lambert equation was used to calculate the light penetration depth and critical exposure energy of the printing slurry. Based on these values, different exposure intensities, exposure times, post-curing times, and layer thicknesses were set respectively to carry out a series of printing experiments. By comparing and analyzing the flexural strength of the products under different printing parameters, the optimal printing parameter combination was screened out. Results ·Viscosity tests showed that the optimal UDMA-to-PPGDMA ratio was 6∶4. The rheological behavior of printing slurries with different solid contents was tested, and the results showed that the DLP-printed dental crown and bridge resin with a solid content of 22% exhibited the best printing performance. According to the Beer-Lambert analysis, the light penetration depth Dp of the printing slurry was 119.79 μm, and the critical exposure energy Ec was 25.54 mJ/cm2. When the exposure intensity was 20 mW/cm², the flexural strength reached a maximum of (132.39±8.92) MPa, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The flexural results of different exposure times showed that the flexural strength could reach (131.73±9.43) MPa when the single-layer exposure time was 3.0 s, and there was no significant difference when the exposure time was further increased. The flexural results of different post-curing times showed that when the post-curing time reached 30 min, there was no significant relationship between the flexural strength value and the increase in post-curing time. Regarding the influence of different layer thicknesses on the flexural performance, the test results showed that when the layer thickness was 50 μm, the result was the best, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion ·Based on viscosity and rheological tests, a DLP-printable crown and bridge resin slurry was successfully developed. The optimal printing parameters were determined through statistical analysis of flexural strength: exposure intensity of 20 mW/cm², exposure time of 3.0 s, post-curing time of 30 min, and a layer thickness of 50 μm.

Cite this article

LIU Junlong , MA Jiayin , ZHAO Zhe , XIONG Yaoyang , ZHENG Yuanli . Optimization of optimal printing parameters and composition ratio of dental crown and bridge resin based on digital light processing technology[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2025 , 45(7) : 858 -865 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.07.007

References

[1] STANSBURY J W, IDACAVAGE M J. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(1): 54-64.
[2] REVILLA-LEóN M, MEYERS M J, ZANDINEJAD A, et al. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019, 31(1): 51-57.
[3] ALHARBI N, OSMAN R, WISMEIJER D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(6): 760-767.
[4] LING L, TAREMI N, MALYALA R. A novel low-shrinkage resin for 3D printing[J]. J Dent, 2022, 118: 103957.
[5] EMAMI N, SJ?DAHL M, S?DERHOLM K M. How filler properties, filler fraction, sample thickness and light source affect light attenuation in particulate filled resin composites[J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(8): 721-730.
[6] CRAIG R G, PEYTON F A. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin[J]. J Dent Res, 1958, 37(4): 710-718.
[7] LI Z H, WANG J J, CHEN H Y, et al. Synthesis of ZnO nanorod-decorated graphene oxide for application in dental resin composites[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2023, 9(5): 2706-2715.
[8] WALTERS N J, XIA W, SALIH V, et al. Poly(propylene glycol) and urethane dimethacrylates improve conversion of dental composites and reveal complexity of cytocompatibility testing[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(2): 264-277.
[9] PROTOPAPA P, KONTONASAKI E, BIKIARIS D, et al. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for fixed interim prostheses with nanodiamonds[J]. Dent Mater J, 2011, 30(2): 222-231.
[10] AI M, DU Z Y, ZHU S Q, et al. Composite resin reinforced with silver nanoparticles-laden hydroxyapatite nanowires for dental application[J]. Dent Mater, 2017, 33(1): 12-22.
[11] PERSSON C, UNOSSON E, AJAXON I, et al. Nano grain sized zirconia-silica glass ceramics for dental applications[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2012, 32(16): 4105-4110.
[12] KUMAR P, KUMAR V, KUMAR R, et al. Fabrication and characterization of ZrO2 incorporated SiO2-CaO-P2O5 bioactive glass scaffolds[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 109: 103854.
[13] DELLA BONA A, CANTELLI V, BRITTO V T, et al. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review[J]. Dent Mater, 2021, 37(2): 336-350.
[14] OSMAN R B, ALHARBI N, WISMEIJER D. Build angle: does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology?[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2017, 30(2): 182-188.
[15] CHAIJAREENONT P, TAKAHASHI H, NISHIYAMA N, et al. Effect of different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane on the flexural properties and wear resistance of alumina reinforced PMMA[J]. Dent Mater J, 2012, 31(4): 623-628.
[16] LEE T, KIM J H, NG C S, et al. Prediction of curing depth dependence on CNT nanofiller dispersion for vat photopolymerization 3D printing[J]. Chem Eng J, 2024, 482: 149110.
[17] VAN N R. The future of dental devices is digital[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(1): 3-12.
[18] BRAIAN M, JIMBO R, WENNERBERG A. Production tolerance of additive manufactured polymeric objects for clinical applications[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(7): 853-861.
[19] PAR M, MOHN D, ATTIN T,et al. Polymerization shrinkage behaviour of resin composites functionalized with unsilanized bioactive glass fillers[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 15237.
[20] MOSZNER N, SALZ U. New developments of polymeric dental composites[J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2001, 26(4): 535-576.
[21] YAO Y X, CUI H B, WANG W Q, et al. High performance dental zirconia ceramics fabricated by vat photopolymerization based on aqueous suspension[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2024, 44(16): 116795.
[22] GAD M M, FOUDA S M, ABUALSAUD R, et al. Strength and surface properties of a 3D-printed denture base polymer[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022, 31(5): 412-418.
[23] KHAN S B, LI N, LIANG J H, et al. Influence of exposure period and angle alteration on the flexural resilience and mechanical attributes of photosensitive resin[J]. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2022, 12(15): 2566.
[24] GU Y, DUAN W Y, WANG T C, et al. Additive manufacturing of Al2O3 ceramic core with applicable microstructure and mechanical properties via digital light processing of high solid loading slurry[J]. Ceram Int, 2023, 49(15): 25216-25224.
Outlines

/