颜面协调汉族成人的牙颌特征分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.03.008

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 317-323.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.03.008

颜面协调汉族成人的牙颌特征分析

陈思悦¹(), 李思彤¹, 顾恺隽¹, 杜常欣¹, 朱妍菲¹, 郑朝²(), 周璟³(), 何颖⁴(), 朱敏¹()

^1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔颅颌面科正颌正畸中心，上海交通大学口腔医学院，国家口腔医学中心，国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心，上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海市口腔医学研究所，上海 200011
^2.天津医科大学口腔医院正畸科，天津 300070
^3.上海健康医学院医学技术学院，上海 201318
^4.北京大学口腔医院特诊科，北京 100081

收稿日期:2024-09-02 接受日期:2024-11-28 出版日期:2025-03-28 发布日期:2025-03-28
通讯作者: 朱　敏，主任医师，博士；电子信箱：zminnie@126.com
何　颖，副主任医师，博士；电子信箱：kqheying@163.com
周　璟，讲，硕士；电子信箱：hanxin_1219@126.com
郑　朝，副主任医师，博士；电子信箱：zheng-zhao@139.com。
作者简介:陈思悦（1998—），女，住院医师，硕士生；电子信箱：ninmenc@163.com。
基金资助:
科技基础资源调查专项(2018FY101000);国家自然科学基金(52103312)

Analysis of dentofacial characteristics in Han Chinese adults with facial harmony

CHEN Siyue¹(), LI Sitong¹, GU Kaijun¹, DU Changxin¹, ZHU Yanfei¹, ZHENG Chao²(), ZHOU Jing³(), HE Ying⁴(), ZHU Min¹()

^1.Centre of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
^2.Department of Orthodontics, Hospital of Stomatological, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070
^3.College of Medical Technology, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China
^4.Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2024-09-02 Accepted:2024-11-28 Online:2025-03-28 Published:2025-03-28
Contact: ZHU Min, E-mail: zminnie@126.com
HE Ying, E-mail: kqheying@163.com
ZHOU Jing, E-mail: hanxin_1219@126.com
ZHENG Chao, E-mail: zheng-zhao@139.com.
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China(2018FY101000);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52103312)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的·建立中国18~25岁颜面协调汉族人群Downs分析法头影测量正常值，并分析其性别特征及地域特征。方法·采用分层抽样，在中国7个自然地理区域分别进行受试者招募，筛选3万余人，最终共纳入883例符合要求的颜面协调者。收集受试者的基本资料，拍摄头颅定位侧位片，采用Downs分析法（使用解剖耳点）测量硬组织数据，并比较牙颌结构的性别差异及地区差异。结果·颌凸角、上下牙槽座角、下颌平面角以及平面角，这4项硬组织指标的性别差异具有统计学意义（P<0.001）。其中女性颌凸角、下颌平面角、平面角皆大于男性，上下牙槽座角小于男性；上下中切牙角、下中切牙-平面角、下中切牙-下颌平面角及上中切牙凸距这几项牙性指标的性别差异无统计学意义。Downs分析法10项指标的测量结果皆显示出地区差异，但部分地区之间也有共通特征。东北、华东、华南三个沿海地区的面角较小，下颌平面角、颌凸角、平面角及上中切牙凸距偏大，即相较于内陆地区，沿海地区的颜面协调者颏部靠后，下颌陡度更大，上前牙位置更靠前，硬组织轮廓有更凸的倾向。结论·中国颜面协调汉族成人牙颌结构存在性别差异，且该差异主要表现在骨组织指标上。各地区有独有的牙颌特征，也有部分共同特征。临床诊疗需考虑到这些特点以制定个性化治疗方案。

关键词: 头影测量, 协调颜面, 汉族, 成人, 正常

Abstract:

Objective ·To establish Downs cephalometric norms for the Han Chinese aged 18‒25 with harmonious faces, and to analyze gender and regional characteristics. Methods ·A stratified sampling approach was used to recruit participants from seven geographic regions across China. Over 30 000 volunteers were screened, and 883 participants with harmonious faces were ultimately included. Basic demographic data were collected, and lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken. Hard tissue measurements were performed with Downs analysis (using anatomical porion). The data were then statistically analyzed to compare gender and regional differences in dentofacial structures. Results ·The gender differences in the four hard tissue measurements, the angle of convexity, A-B plane angle, mandibular plane angle, and occlusal plane angle, were statistically significant (P<0.001). Females showed larger values for the angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and occlusal plane angle, but smaller values for the A-B plane angle, compared to males. The gender differences in the interincisal angle, L1 to occlusal plane, L1 to mandibular plane, and U1 to AP plane were not statistically significant. There were regional differences in all 10 measurements of Downs analysis, though some regions shared common features. Specifically, the northeastern, eastern, and southern coastal regions exhibited a smaller facial angle, and larger mandibular plane angle, angle of convexity, occlusal plane angle, and U1 to AP plane. It suggested that, compared to inland regions, individuals from coastal regions tended to have more retrusive chins, steeper mandibular planes, more prominent upper incisors, and more convex hard tissue profiles. Conclusion ·Gender differences exist in the dentofacial hard tissue structures of Han Chinese adults with harmonious faces, primarily in skeletal measurements. Each region has its unique dentofacial characteristics, along with some common features. These differences should be taken into account in clinical diagnosis and treatment for the development of personalized and precise therapeutic strategies.

Key words: cephalometry, harmonious face, Han Chinese people, adult, normal occlusion

中图分类号:

R783.5

陈思悦, 李思彤, 顾恺隽, 杜常欣, 朱妍菲, 郑朝, 周璟, 何颖, 朱敏. 颜面协调汉族成人的牙颌特征分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(3): 317-323.

CHEN Siyue, LI Sitong, GU Kaijun, DU Changxin, ZHU Yanfei, ZHENG Chao, ZHOU Jing, HE Ying, ZHU Min. Analysis of dentofacial characteristics in Han Chinese adults with facial harmony[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2025, 45(3): 317-323.

图/表 5

参考文献 36

1	ELKASEH A, SHAYEB M A, KUDURUTHULLAH S, et al. Cephalometrics of Libyan adults[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(5): 1089-1094.
2	伊帕热·克力木江, 祖丽胡马尔·努尔艾合买提, 迪丽菲热·吐尔洪, 等. 新疆地区与广东地区正常人群X线头影测量Arnett分析比较[J]. 中国美容医学, 2020, 29(8): 112-119.
	YIPARE K, ZULIHUMAER N, DILIFEIRE T, et al. Arnett cephalometry analysis and comparison of normal occlusion in Xinjiang and Guangdong[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2020, 29(8): 112-119.
3	LE L N, DO T T, LE P K V, et al. Norms of soft tissue cephalometric in the 18‒25 age demography in Vietnam[J]. J Orthod Sci, 2023, 12: 35.
4	宇克莉, 张兴华, 程智, 等. 中国不同人群的头面部特征及其差异[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(4): 574-585.
	YU K L, ZHANG X H, CHENG Z, et al. Head and facial characteristics and their differences among different peoples in China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(4): 574-585.
5	宋晴阳, 宇克莉, 郑连斌, 等. 藏缅语族彝语支7个族群成人的头面部特征[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(6): 73-80.
	SONG Q Y, YU K L, ZHENG L F, et al. Head and facial characteristics of seven ethnic groups in Yi language branch of Tibeto-Burman languages[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 41(6): 73-80.
6	郭杰, 王春玲, 陈扬熙. 山东地区成人正常颅颌面X线头影测量[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2004, 42(4): 466-468.
	GUO J, WANG C L, CHEN Y X. Cephalometric study of normal occlusion for adults of Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Science), 2004, 42(4): 466-468.
7	徐频频, 林燕, 刘小敏. 浙江丽水畲族、汉族青少年Downs头影测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5): 509-512.
	XU P P, LI Y, LIU X M. Downs cephalometric analysis between juveniles of She and Han nationality in Lishui area of Zhejiang province[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(5): 509-512.
8	李远远, 赵丙姣, 兰庭超, 等. 中国年轻成人正常 X线头影测量研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(4): 211-213, 214.
	LI Y Y, ZHAO B J, LAN T C, et al. Cephalometic analysis of Chinese young adults with normal occlusions[J]. Journal of Clinical Stomatology, 2016, 32(4): 211-213, 214.
9	吴雁格, 刘家琦, 张真真, 等. 恒牙列X线头影测量127项指标正常值研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(9): 797-804.
	WU Y G, LIU J Q, ZHANG Z Z, et al. Establishment of 127 indexes of permanent dentition cephalometric norm[J]. Stomatology, 2021, 41(9): 797-804.
10	戴宁, 孙蕙, 李蓉, 等. 西安地区正常成人颅颌面结构头影测量分析[J]. 中国美容医学, 2010, 19(10): 1522-1524.
	DAI N, SUN H, LI R, et al. Cephalometric study of adults with normal occlusion in Xi′an using Steiner method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2010, 19(10): 1522-1524.
11	郑艳, 车锋哲. 中国延边地区朝鲜族正常成人Downs分析法正常值的建立[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(1): 90-93.
	ZHENG Y, CHE F Z. Cephalometric study with Downs analysis on normal occlusion of Korean adults in China[J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2010, 26(1): 90-93.
12	沈云娟, 陈慧霞, 许晓聪. 常州地区正常青少年X线头影测量研究(一)[J]. 口腔医学, 2009, 29(1): 41-42.
	SHEN Y J, CHEN H X, XU X C. Cephlalometric study of adolescents with normal occlusion in Changzhou city (one)[J]. Stomatology, 2009, 29(1): 41-42.
13	阎秀林, 丁伟忠, 张扬. 不同耳点对头影测量值的影响及其相关因素分析[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2008, 1(12): 730-731.
	YAN X L, DING W Z, ZHANG Y. The effects of anatomical porion and mechanical porion on cephalometric measurements and influencing factors in the location relationships of different porions[J].Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2008, 1(12): 730-731.
14	田乃学, 卢海平, 刘怡. 临床X线头影测量学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021: 159-160
	TIAN N X, LU H P, LIU Y. Clinical X-ray cephalometry[M]. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2021: 159-160.
15	傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 69-83.
	FU M K. Textbook of orthodontics[M]. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2007: 69-83.
16	赵志河. 口腔正畸学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020: 62-72.
	ZHAO Z H. Orthodontics[M]. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2020: 62-72.
17	陈扬熙. 口腔正畸学: 基础、技术与临床[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 217-224.
	CHEN Y X. Orthodontics foudation, technology and clinical[M]. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2012: 217-224.
18	朱梦婷, 马艳, 庞光明. 颏部审美评价方式的研究进展[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(3): 197-202.
	ZHU M T, MA Y, PANG G M. Research Progress of Chin Aesthetic Evaluation Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2023, 32(3):197-202.
19	张若芳, 厉松, 张丁. 机械耳点与解剖耳点的二维差异及其对头影测量的影响[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2010, 18(3): 155-157.
	ZHANG R F, LI S, ZHANG D. Two dimensional position difference between meachanial porion and anatomical porion and its effect on cephalometry[J]. Beijing Journal of Stomatology, 2010, 18(3): 155-157.
20	SHRINIVAS K A, SUDHAKAR S S, KANNAN G, et al. Predictive equation for construction of anatomic porion with machine porion as reference point[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2023, 24(4): 257-260.
21	陈扬熙, 张德福. 哈尔滨市100名正常儿童侧貌的X线头影测量研究[J]. 中华口腔科杂志, 1985, 20(1): 45-48.
	CHEN Y X, ZHANG D F. Cephalometric study on the profiles of 100 normal occlusion children in harbin city[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 1985, 20(1): 45-48.
22	关慧娟, 卢青波, 庞梓萌, 等. 青少年安氏Ⅱ类2分类错畸形非拔牙矫治前后面下部软硬组织的变化[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(7): 610-614.
	GUAN H J, LU Q B, PANG Z M, et al. Changes in soft and hard tissues in the lower face of adolescents with class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion treated using a non-extraction protocol[J]. Journal of China Medical University, 2020, 49(7): 610-614.
23	关玲, 王培军, 张晔, 等. 哈尔滨地区成人个体化头影测量浮动正常值[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2009, 25(3): 358-360.
	GUAN L, WANG P J, ZHANG Y, et al. Individual cephalometric floating norms for Harbin adult[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2009, 25(3): 358-360.
24	李浙杭, 张芳, 段余峰, 等. 长沙地区汉族正常颅颌面硬组织的三维测量[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 43(1): 58-67.
	LI Z H, ZHANG F, DUAN Y F. et al. Three dimensional measurement of craniofacial hard tissues for the Han nationality with normal occlusion in Changsha area[J]. Journal of Central South University (Medical Science), 2018, 43(1): 58-67.
25	ABUTAYYEM H, ALSHAMSI A, QUADRI M F A. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in emirati population: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2021, 14: 2863-2869.
26	OUÉDRAOGO Y, BENYAHIA H, DIOUF J S, et al. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population[J]. Int Orthod, 2019, 17(1): 136-142.
27	HO T T T, LUONG Q T. Dental-craniofacial characteristics of southern Vietnamese people with well-balanced face on cephalometric films and its comparison with caucasians and northern Vietnamese population[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2021, 11(3): 316-323.
28	张琳, 于舒婷, 张苗苗. 应用Ricketts分析法研究哈尔滨地区正常锥形束CT[J]. 中国美容医学, 2019, 28(1): 115-118.
	ZHANG L, YU S T, ZHANG M M. Study on CBCT of normal occlusion in Harbin area by ricketts method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2019, 28(1): 115-118.
29	祖丽胡马尔·努尔艾合买提, 迪丽菲热·吐尔洪, 巴哈尔尼萨·热扎克, 等. 乌鲁木齐地区成人正常人群X线头影测量Arnett分析研究[J]. 中国美容医学, 2019, 28(9): 110-115.
	ZULIHUMAER N, DILIFEIRE T, BAHAERNISA R, et al. Arnett cephalometric analysis of adults with normal occlusion in Urumqi[J]. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 2019, 28(9): 110-115.
30	RAKHSHAN V, GHORBANYJAVADPOUR F. Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 23(2): 167-178.
31	王新昱, 徐建光. 安徽地区正常人群颅颌面部的三维头影测量[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2023, 58(1): 145-150.
	WANG X Y, XU J G. Three-dimensional cephalometric measurement of craniofacial hard tissues with normal occlusion in Anhui area[J]. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui, 2023, 58(1): 145-150.
32	PIOMBINO P, ESPOSITO E, COMMITTERI U, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness measurement method and relationship with BMI, age and sex[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 124(4): 101420.
33	AL-TAEE R, AL-SAEDI A I L, NAHIDH M. Does body mass index affect soft tissue facial anthropometric measurements?[J]. Int J Morphol, 2021, 39(2): 520-526.
34	KARSLI N, TUHAN KUTLU E. Effect of body mass index on soft tissues in adolescents with skeletal class Ⅰ and normal facial height[J]. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e16196.
35	CHAIMONGKHOL T, MAHAKKANUKRAUH P. The facial soft tissue thickness related facial reconstruction by ultrasonographic imaging: a review[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2022, 337: 111365.
36	中国营养学会肥胖防控分会, 中国营养学会临床营养分会, 中华预防医学会行为健康分会, 等. 中国居民肥胖防治专家共识[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(5): 609-626.
	Chinese Nutrition Society Obesity Prevention and Control Section, Chinese Nutrition Society Clinical Nutrition Section, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association Behavioral Health Section, et al. Expert consensus on obesity prevention and treatment in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2022, 43(5): 609-626.

Measurement	Overall (n=883)	Female (n=599)	Male (n=284)	P value
FH-NP/(°)	89.83±2.67	89.73±2.54	90.05±2.92	0.106
NA-AP/(°)	3.89±4.35	4.69±4.04	2.21±4.50	<0.001
AB-NP/(°)	-4.88±2.53	-5.19±2.38	-4.23±2.73	<0.001
MP-FH/(°)	21.98±4.91	22.50±4.62	20.88±5.31	<0.001
SGn-FH/(°)	60.17±2.87	60.09±2.79	60.35±3.02	0.195
OP-FH/(°)	6.55±3.65	7.07±3.30	5.45±4.08	<0.001
U1-L1/(°)	127.74±8.17	127.78±8.30	127.63±7.88	0.800
L1-OP/(°)	111.66±5.58	111.64±5.67	111.68±5.40	0.932
L1-MP/(°)	96.24±6.28	96.24±6.19	96.24±6.49	0.987
U1-AP/mm	6.25±1.97	6.26±1.95	6.21±2.01	0.698

Measurement	Overall (n=883)	Female (n=599)	Male (n=284)	P value
FH-NP/(°)	89.83±2.67	89.73±2.54	90.05±2.92	0.106
NA-AP/(°)	3.89±4.35	4.69±4.04	2.21±4.50	<0.001
AB-NP/(°)	-4.88±2.53	-5.19±2.38	-4.23±2.73	<0.001
MP-FH/(°)	21.98±4.91	22.50±4.62	20.88±5.31	<0.001
SGn-FH/(°)	60.17±2.87	60.09±2.79	60.35±3.02	0.195
OP-FH/(°)	6.55±3.65	7.07±3.30	5.45±4.08	<0.001
U1-L1/(°)	127.74±8.17	127.78±8.30	127.63±7.88	0.800
L1-OP/(°)	111.66±5.58	111.64±5.67	111.68±5.40	0.932
L1-MP/(°)	96.24±6.28	96.24±6.19	96.24±6.49	0.987
U1-AP/mm	6.25±1.97	6.26±1.95	6.21±2.01	0.698

Measurement	Region of China							P value
Measurement	Northeast (n=150)	East (n=207)	Central (n=153)	North (n=94)	South (n=54)	Northwest (n=56)	Southwest (n=169)	P value
FH-NP/(°)	89.49±2.52	89.33±2.70	90.00±2.45	90.08±2.46	88.70±2.46	89.60±2.56	90.91±2.83	<0.001
NA-AP/(°)	4.72±4.64	4.66±4.20	3.28±4.25	3.22±4.36	3.67±3.96	3.20±3.59	3.44±4.51	0.002
AB-NP/(°)	-5.61±2.72	-5.13±2.72	-4.65±2.34	-4.75±2.57	-4.26±2.35	-4.70±1.87	-4.48±2.37	0.001
MP-FH/(°)	23.62±5.10	22.62±4.67	21.57±4.27	22.05±4.77	23.82±4.53	21.58±4.95	19.61±4.82	<0.001
SGn-FH/(°)	60.79±2.76	60.61±2.82	59.94±2.45	60.19±2.38	61.38±2.80	60.86±3.25	58.66±2.92	<0.001
OP-FH/(°)	7.72±3.53	6.68±3.70	6.73±3.34	6.05±3.91	7.59±3.11	6.61±3.16	5.10±3.64	<0.001
U1-L1/(°)	127.71±8.60	127.16±8.77	130.00±6.77	126.59±8.30	126.99±8.61	128.77±8.65	126.94±7.46	0.007
L1-OP/(°)	111.07±5.55	112.47±6.04	110.21±4.75	112.17±5.56	112.11±5.83	111.59±6.31	112.09±5.16	0.005
L1-MP/(°)	95.18±6.53	96.58±6.81	95.38±5.31	96.19±6.27	95.88±6.82	96.62±6.67	97.56±5.70	0.016
U1-AP/mm	6.21±2.18	6.54±2.08	5.88±1.62	6.68±1.96	6.58±2.07	5.94±1.85	5.99±1.84	0.002

Measurement	Region of China							P value
Measurement	Northeast (n=150)	East (n=207)	Central (n=153)	North (n=94)	South (n=54)	Northwest (n=56)	Southwest (n=169)	P value
FH-NP/(°)	89.49±2.52	89.33±2.70	90.00±2.45	90.08±2.46	88.70±2.46	89.60±2.56	90.91±2.83	<0.001
NA-AP/(°)	4.72±4.64	4.66±4.20	3.28±4.25	3.22±4.36	3.67±3.96	3.20±3.59	3.44±4.51	0.002
AB-NP/(°)	-5.61±2.72	-5.13±2.72	-4.65±2.34	-4.75±2.57	-4.26±2.35	-4.70±1.87	-4.48±2.37	0.001
MP-FH/(°)	23.62±5.10	22.62±4.67	21.57±4.27	22.05±4.77	23.82±4.53	21.58±4.95	19.61±4.82	<0.001
SGn-FH/(°)	60.79±2.76	60.61±2.82	59.94±2.45	60.19±2.38	61.38±2.80	60.86±3.25	58.66±2.92	<0.001
OP-FH/(°)	7.72±3.53	6.68±3.70	6.73±3.34	6.05±3.91	7.59±3.11	6.61±3.16	5.10±3.64	<0.001
U1-L1/(°)	127.71±8.60	127.16±8.77	130.00±6.77	126.59±8.30	126.99±8.61	128.77±8.65	126.94±7.46	0.007
L1-OP/(°)	111.07±5.55	112.47±6.04	110.21±4.75	112.17±5.56	112.11±5.83	111.59±6.31	112.09±5.16	0.005
L1-MP/(°)	95.18±6.53	96.58±6.81	95.38±5.31	96.19±6.27	95.88±6.82	96.62±6.67	97.56±5.70	0.016
U1-AP/mm	6.21±2.18	6.54±2.08	5.88±1.62	6.68±1.96	6.58±2.07	5.94±1.85	5.99±1.84	0.002

[1]	窦嘉琪, 高洁, 卞晓玲, 王凤, 代庆刚, 吴轶群. 伴有PAX9突变非综合征型先天缺牙患者的牙颌面表型研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 687-693.
[2]	张娟, 葛晓旭, 张荣, 蒋伏松, 蒋燕燕, 李鸣, 李甜甜, 刘婵薇, 陈亚婷, 刘丽梅. 青少年的成人起病型糖尿病家系NEUROD1基因突变的筛查与功能解析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(10): 1255-1261.
[3]	曾令鹏，张庆，关晏星，刘少正，陈庆杰，张青. 成人梅克尔憩室并发症的诊断和手术治疗[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 40(2): 242-.
[4]	庞杰，徐飞，李璨. 锌指蛋白ZBTB22基因单核苷酸多态性与中国汉族人群精神分裂症的关联研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(2): 147-.
[5]	龚寅，谢玉峰，束蓉 . 上海汉族青年牙龈生物型的 CBCT 检测#br#[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(8): 1111-.
[6]	施永恒,龙满美,刘强,陈晓宇 . 9 例成人横纹肌肉瘤的临床病理学分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(7): 1015-.
[7]	涂洋，王然，郭茹茹，王苏丽，扶琼，吕良敬 . 成人斯蒂尔病继发巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(6): 780-.
[8]	陈婕，王浩然，方超，刘敏 . 正常成人脑垂体的高分辨率磁共振成像研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(5): 670-.
[9]	徐璐，吴荣琴，吕坚，黄军斌，唐佳琳，陈兴时，陈冲. 儿童失神癫痫的事件相关脑电位N400实验研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(5): 699-.
[10]	郭艾，刘纯. 从TPOAb阳性值探讨妊娠期甲状腺功能正常取值范围[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(12): 1740-.
[11]	张荣，刘丽梅. 羧基酯脂肪酶与糖尿病和胰腺外分泌疾病相关性的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(4): 585-.
[12]	高枚春，陆钦池. 成人嗜血细胞性淋巴组织增生症伴中枢神经系统受累系统分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(11): 1671-.
[13]	袁敏杰，李京波，魏盟，等. 窦性心率震荡及心率变异性在急性冠脉综合征患者预后评估中的应用价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 34(4): 507-.
[14]	蔡正元, 樊莹, 孙晓东, 等. 傅立叶光学相干断层扫描测量黄斑区节细胞复合体和视网膜神经纤维层的可重复性研究[J]. , 2012, 32(2): 207-.
[15]	陈兴时, 唐云翔, 徐一峰, 等. 错误监控功能检测方法的建立与应用[J]. , 2011, 31(11): 1612-.

颜面协调汉族成人的牙颌特征分析

Analysis of dentofacial characteristics in Han Chinese adults with facial harmony

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics