伴有PAX9突变非综合征型先天缺牙患者的牙颌面表型研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.06.003

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 687-693.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.06.003

伴有PAX9突变非综合征型先天缺牙患者的牙颌面表型研究

窦嘉琪(), 高洁, 卞晓玲, 王凤, 代庆刚(), 吴轶群()

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔第二门诊部，上海交通大学口腔医学院，国家口腔医学中心，国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心，上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海市口腔医学研究所，上海 201999

收稿日期:2024-02-29 接受日期:2024-03-27 出版日期:2024-06-28 发布日期:2024-06-28
通讯作者: 代庆刚,吴轶群 E-mail:doujiaqi2017@sjtu.edu.cn;daiqinggang@126.com;yiqunwu@hotmail.com
作者简介:窦嘉琪（1999—），男，博士生；电子信箱：doujiaqi2017@sjtu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(82271004);上海市自然科学基金(21ZR1436900);海南省自然科学基金(824MS152);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院生物样本库(YBKB202101);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院罕见病注册登记项目(SH9H-2023-T492-2);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院研究型医师(2022yxyjxys-wf);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院“交叉”研究基金项目(JYJC202305)

Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation

DOU Jiaqi(), GAO Jie, BIAN Xiaoling, WANG Feng, DAI Qinggang(), WU Yiqun()

Department of 2nd Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 201999, China

Received:2024-02-29 Accepted:2024-03-27 Online:2024-06-28 Published:2024-06-28
Contact: DAI Qinggang,WU Yiqun E-mail:doujiaqi2017@sjtu.edu.cn;daiqinggang@126.com;yiqunwu@hotmail.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82271004);Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(21ZR1436900);Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation(824MS152);Project of Biobank of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(YBKB202101);Rare Disease Registration Platform of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(SH9H-2023-T492-2);Project of Research Physician of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(2022yxyjxys-wf);“Cross” Project Cooperation Fund of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(JYJC202305)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的·评估配对盒基因9（paired box gene 9，PAX9）突变非综合征型先天缺牙（non-syndromic tooth agenesis，NSTA）患者的牙颌面表型。方法·对2016年1月—2023年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔第二门诊部就诊的NSTA患者进行全外显子组测序，筛查PAX9突变患者。对筛查到的患者采用曲面体层摄影片评估缺牙的位置和数目，采用X射线头影测量评估患者的牙颌面畸形情况。结果·7例PAX9突变的NSTA患者纳入研究，男性3例（42.9%），女性4例（57.1%）。患者首诊年龄7~31岁，平均（19.7±8.0）岁。7例患者均携带PAX9杂合突变，其中4例为错义突变，3例为移码突变。平均缺失恒牙（15.9±2.9）颗，上颌缺失数［（9.6±2.6）颗］略多于下颌［（6.3±2.4）颗］（P=0.030）。上颌第二磨牙（100.0%）、上颌尖牙（85.7%）、下颌第二前磨牙（85.7%）为最常见的缺失位点，下颌侧切牙（14.3%）、下颌尖牙（14.3%）为最少缺失的位点。移码突变的患者缺牙数［（18.3±2.1）颗］多于错义突变［（14.0±1.8）颗］（P=0.032）。X射线头影测量结果显示：PAX9突变成年患者上牙槽座角（angle sella-nasion-subspinale，SNA）、颌凸角（angle nasion-subspinale-subspinale-porion，NA-APo）和前颅底长度（sella-nasion，S-N）均明显小于正常参考范围，提示上颌后缩，前颅底矢状向发育不足；面角（frankfort horizontal plane-nasion-porion，FH-NPo）大于参考值、Y轴角（Y axis）小于参考值，提示下颌前伸；上/下牙槽座角（angle subspinale-nasion-supramental，ANB）小于参考值，提示骨性Ⅲ类错畸形；上中切牙角（angle upper central incisor-nasion-subspinale，angle U1-NA）大于参考值，提示上中切牙唇倾；下中切牙-下颌平面角（angle lower central incisor-mandibular plane，IMPA）、下中切牙凸度（lower central incisor-nasion-supramental，L1-NB）小于参考值，提示下中切牙舌倾，上下前牙反倾向。结论·较为全面地报道了PAX9突变NSTA患者的牙颌面表型，有利于进一步理解PAX9在人类颌面部发育中的作用。

关键词: 配对盒基因9, 牙颌面畸形, X射线头影测量, 非综合征型先天缺牙, 骨性Ⅲ类错畸形

Abstract:

Objective ·To evaluate the dentofacial phenotype in non-syndromic tooth agenesis (NSTA) patients with paired box gene 9 (PAX9) mutation. Methods ·Patients with NSTA who visited the Department of Second Dental Center of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, between January 2016 and December 2023 received whole-exome sequencing to screen PAX9 mutation. The location and number of missing teeth were evaluated by oral pantomography, and dentofacial deformities were evaluated by X-ray cephalometrics. Results ·Seven patients with PAX9 mutation were included in the study, including 3 males (42.9%) and 4 females (57.1%). The patients were 7?31 years old at first visit, with a mean age of (19.7±8.0) years old. All the 7 patients were PAX9 heterozygotes, of which 4 were missense and 3 were frameshift. The average number of missing teeth was 15.9±2.9. The number of missing teeth in maxilla (9.6±2.6) was slightly higher than that in mandible (6.3±2.4) (P=0.030). Maxillary second molar (100.0%), maxillary canine (85.7%) and mandibular second premolar (85.7%) were the three most common missing teeth, while mandibular lateral incisor (14.3%) and mandibular canine (14.3%) were the two least missing teeth. Patients with frameshift mutation had more missing teeth (18.3±2.1) than those with missense mutation (14.0±1.8) (P=0.032). X-ray cephalometrics analysis results showed that the angle sella-nasion-subspinale (SNA), angle nasion-subspinale-subspinale-porion (NA-Apo) and sella-nasion (S-N) in adult patients with PAX9 mutation were significantly lower than the normal reference values, suggesting a shorter anterior cranial base and maxillary length. The frankfort horizontal plane-nasion-porion (FH-NPo) was higher than the reference value, and the Y-axis was lower than the reference value, indicating a more prognathic mandible. The angle subspinale-nasion-supramental (ANB) was lower than the reference value, indicating a skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion. The angle upper central incisor-nasion-subspinale (angle U1-NA) was higher than the reference value, indicating a lip inclination of maxillary central incisor. The angle lower central incisor-mandibular plane (IMPA) and lower central incisor-nasion-supramental (L1-NB) were lower than the reference values, indicating a retroclination of the mandibular central incisor, and crossbite in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Conclusion ·The dentofacial phenotype of PAX9-mutated patients with NSTA is reported comprehensively. It is helpful to improve the understanding of the role of PAX9 in human maxillofacial development.

Key words: paired box gene 9 (PAX9), dentofacial deformities, X-ray cephalometrics, non-syndromic tooth agenesis, skeletal angle Ⅲ malocclusion

中图分类号:

窦嘉琪, 高洁, 卞晓玲, 王凤, 代庆刚, 吴轶群. 伴有PAX9突变非综合征型先天缺牙患者的牙颌面表型研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 687-693.

DOU Jiaqi, GAO Jie, BIAN Xiaoling, WANG Feng, DAI Qinggang, WU Yiqun. Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(6): 687-693.

图/表 5

表1 PAX9 突变NSTA患者的一般信息和突变总结

Tab 1 General information and summary of NSTA patients with PAX9 mutation

Patient	Gender	Age/year	Nucleotide change	Amino acid change	Exon	Sub-domain	Zygosity	Type of mutation
1	Male	19	c.305delT	p.I102Tfs*19	2	CSD	Het	Frameshift
2	Female	13	c.C365A	p.S122Y	2	CSD	Het	Missense
3	Female	31	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
4	Male	26	c.189delG	p.G64Afs*21	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
5	Female	23	c.G151A	p.G51S	2	NSD	Het	Missense
6	Female	19	c.131_134del	p.Q45Yfs*39	2	NSD	Het	Frameshift
7	Male	7	c.G337A	p.D113N	2	CSD	Het	Missense

图1 PAX9 突变NSTA患者的突变位点分布示意图Note： A.A.—amino acid. N-terminus, 1?5; paired DNA-binding domain (PD), 6?131; N-terminal subdomain (NSD), 6?63; linking peptide (LP), 64?81; C-terminal subdomain (CSD), 82?131; octapeptide motif (OM), 168?189.

Fig 1 Distribution of variants in NSTA patients with PAX9 mutation

图2 PAX9 突变NSTA患者的缺牙模式Note： The prevalence of missing teeth is presented as a heat map. The darker the red, the higher the frequency of missing; the darker the blue, the lower the frequency of missing. White background represent missing frequency close to the average missing frequency of all sites in the dentition (56.6%). Max—maxilla; Mand—mandible; Mo2—the second molar; Mo1—the first molar; PM2—the second premolar; PM1—the first premolar; Ca—canine; LI—lateral incisor; CI—central incisor.

Fig 2 Pattern of missing teeth in PAX9-mutated NSTA patients

表2 PAX9 突变患者的X射线头影测量参数与经典正常值对比

Tab 2 Comparison between X-ray cephalometrics analysis parameters of patients with PAX9 mutation and classical norms

Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Underage PAX9-mutated patients		Classical norm
Parameter	Adult PAX9-mutated patients	Patient 2	Patient 7	Classical norm
SNA/(°)	75.3±4.1	80.5	79.3	82.8±4.1
NA-APo(convexity)/(°)	-17.8±11.0	-25.0	-5.8	6.0±4.4
S-N/mm	62.3±2.4	62.5	60.9	71.0±3.0
FH-NPo/(°)	95.8±3.5	99.9	92.2	85.4±3.7
Y axis/(°)	53.6±2.9	48.7	55.4	64.0±2.3
ANB/(°)	-6.8±4.7	-9.8	-3.4	2.7±2.0
U1-SN/(°)	111.4±14.7	110.9	109.4	105.7±6.3
Angle U1-NA/(°)	36.1±16.9	30.4	30.1	22.8±5.2
Distance U1-NA/mm	6.6±5.1	5.8	3.7	5.1±2.4
IMPA(L1-MP)/(°)	76.6±13.1	76.2	76.0	96.7±6.4
L1-NB/mm	0.3±2.9	0.7	0.7	6.7±2.1

图3 1例典型成年 PAX9 突变患者的侧位X射线头影测量片和头影测量标志点Note： S—sella; N—nasion; Or—orbitale; A—subspinale; B—supramental; Gn—gnathion; Go—gonion; Po—porion.

Fig 3 Lateral X-ray cephalometric projection and cephalometic landmarks of a typical PAX9-mutated patient

参考文献 44

1	POLDER B J, VAN′T HOF M A, VAN DER LINDEN F P, et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2004, 32(3): 217-226.
2	KHALAF K, MISKELLY J, VOGE E, et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthod, 2014, 41(4): 299-316.
3	VASTARDIS H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 117(6): 650-656.
4	LAN R, WU Y Q, DAI Q G, et al. Gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in syndromes with tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2023, 29(6): 2401-2408.
5	YU K, DOU J Q, HUANG W, et al. Expanding the genetic spectrum of tooth agenesis using whole-exome sequencing[J]. Clin Genet, 2022, 102(6): 503-516.
6	YU M, WONG S W, HAN D, et al. Genetic analysis: Wnt and other pathways in nonsyndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2019, 25(3): 646-651.
7	SANDHU M, MALIK P, SAHA R. Multiple dental and skeletal abnormalities in an individual with Filippi syndrome[J]. Case Rep Dent, 2013, 2013: 845405.
8	TUNA E B, MARŞAN G, GENÇAY K, et al. Craniofacial and dental characteristics of Kabuki syndrome: nine years cephalometric follow-up[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2012, 36(4): 393-400.
9	GUNASHEKHAR M, HAMEED M S, BOKHARI S K. Oral and dental manifestations in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: report of a rare case[J]. Prim Dent Care, 2012, 19(1): 35-38.
10	VERMA L, PASSI S, GAUBA K. Brachman de Lange syndrome[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2010, 1(4): 268-270.
11	ERCAL D, SAY B. Cerebro-oculo-nasal syndrome: another case and review of the literature[J]. Clin Dysmorphol, 1998, 7(2): 139-141.
12	吴钊仪, 岳海棠, 李健, 等. KMT2D基因新发双突变致歌舞伎面谱综合征的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
	WU Z Y, YUE H T, LI J, et al. Two novel and de novo KMT2D mutations on the same allele cause Kabuki syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 58(8): 809-814.
13	FOURNIER B P, BRUNEAU M H, TOUPENAY S, et al. Patterns of dental agenesis highlight the nature of the causative mutated genes[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(12): 1306-1316.
14	SARKAR T, RANJAN P, KANATHUR S, et al. An in vitro and computational validation of a novel loss-of-functional mutation in PAX9 associated with non-syndromic tooth agenesis[J]. Mol Genet Genomics, 2023, 298(1): 183-199.
15	BHOL C S, PATIL S, SAHU B B, et al. The clinical significance and correlative signaling pathways of paired box gene 9 in development and carcinogenesis[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1876(1): 188561.
16	PETERS H, NEUBÜSER A, BALLING R. Pax genes and organogenesis: Pax9 meets tooth development[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(Suppl 1): 38-43.
17	CHU K Y, WANG Y L, CHEN J T, et al. PAX9 mutations and genetic synergism in familial tooth agenesis[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2023, 1524(1): 87-96.
18	LI R, CHEN Z, YU Q, et al. The function and regulatory network of Pax9 gene in palate development[J]. J Dent Res, 2019, 98(3): 277-287.
19	NAKATOMI M, LUDWIG K U, KNAPP M, et al. Msx1 deficiency interacts with hypoxia and induces a morphogenetic regulation during mouse lip development[J]. Development, 2020, 147(21): dev189175.
20	BONCZEK O, KREJCI P, IZAKOVICOVA-HOLLA L, et al. Tooth agenesis: what do we know and is there a connection to cancer?[J]. Clin Genet, 2021, 99(4): 493-502.
21	KAUSHAL K, KIM E J, TYAGI A, et al. Genome-wide screening for deubiquitinase subfamily identifies ubiquitin-specific protease 49 as a novel regulator of odontogenesis[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2022, 29(9): 1689-1704.
22	RAHMAN M M, LAI Y C, HUSNA A A, et al. Micro RNA transcriptome profile in canine oral melanoma[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(19): 4832.
23	LAN Y, XU J Y, JIANG R L. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of palatogenesis[J]. Curr Top Dev Biol, 2015, 115: 59-84.
24	JIA S H, ZHOU J, D'SOUZA R N. Pax9's dual roles in modulating Wnt signaling during murine palatogenesis[J]. Dev Dyn, 2020, 249(10): 1274-1284.
25	PETERS H, NEUBÜSER A, KRATOCHWIL K, et al. Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities[J]. Genes Dev, 1998, 12(17): 2735-2747.
26	KIST R, GREALLY E, PETERS H. Derivation of a mouse model for conditional inactivation of Pax9[J]. Genesis, 2007, 45(7): 460-464.
27	BONCZEK O, BALCAR V J, ŠERÝ O. PAX9 gene mutations and tooth agenesis: a review[J]. Clin Genet, 2017, 92(5): 467-476.
28	WANG Y, GROPPE J C, WU J F, et al. Pathogenic mechanisms of tooth agenesis linked to paired domain mutations in human PAX9[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2009, 18(15): 2863-2874.
29	INTARAK N, TONGCHAIRATI K, TERMTEERAPORNPIMOL K, et al. Tooth agenesis patterns and variants in PAX9: a systematic review[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2023, 59: 129-137.
30	LIU H C, LIU H B, SU L X, et al. Four novel PAX9 variants and the PAX9-related non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(15): 8142.
31	WONG S W, HAN D, ZHANG H, et al. Nine novel PAX9 mutations and a distinct tooth agenesis genotype-phenotype[J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(2): 155-162.
32	FAUZI N H, ARDINI Y D, ZAINUDDIN Z, et al. A review on non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with PAX9 mutations[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2018, 54(1): 30-36.
33	LEE Y J, LEE Y J, KIM Y J, et al. Novel PAX9 mutations causing isolated oligodontia[J]. J Pers Med, 2024, 14(2): 191.
34	LEI R, QIU X L, HAN Y, et al. Identification and functional study of a novel variant of PAX9 causing tooth agenesis[J]. Oral Dis, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/odi.14937.
35	ZHOU M Q, ZHANG H, CAMHI H, et al. Analyses of oligodontia phenotypes and genetic etiologies[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2021, 13(1): 32.
36	JARA-ESPEJO M, HAWKINS M T R, FOGALLI G B, et al. Folding stability of Pax9 intronic G-quadruplex correlates with relative molar size in eutherians[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2021, 38(5): 1860-1873.
37	MOSS M L, SALENTIJN L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth[J]. Am J Orthod, 1969, 55(6): 566-577.
38	WISTH P J, THUNHOLD K, BÖE O E. The craniofacial morphology of individuals with hypodontia[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1974, 32(4): 281-290.
39	ROALD K L, WISTH P J, BØE O E. Changes in cranio-facial morphology of individuals with hypodontia between the ages of 9 and 16[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1982, 40(2): 65-74.
40	SARNÄS K V, RUNE B. The facial profile in advanced hypodontia: a mixed longitudinal study of 141 children[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1983, 5(2): 133-143.
41	OGAARD B, KROGSTAD O. Craniofacial structure and soft tissue profile in patients with severe hypodontia[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 108(5): 472-477.
42	BEN-BASSAT Y, BRIN I. Skeletodental patterns in patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124(5): 521-525.
43	ENDO T, YOSHINO S, OZOE R, et al. Association of advanced hypodontia and craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients[J]. Odontology, 2004, 92(1): 48-53.
44	BJÖRK A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 1966, 24(2): 109-127.

[1]	江凌勇. 牙颌面骨畸形机制研究的现状与发展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 663-675.
[2]	孙思远, 刘媛琪, 崔怡雯, 黄紫晗, 梅李, 代庆刚, 江凌勇. 成骨细胞条件性视黄酸信号失活小鼠模型的构建与验证[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 676-686.
[3]	兰嵘, 代庆刚, 喻康, 卞晓玲, 叶丽娟, 吴轶群, 王凤. 先天缺牙相关EDAR基因突变报道及携带双突变位点的HED家系分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 694-701.
[4]	李虎虓, 李笑甜, 赵旭日, 张桓瑜, 周薇, 宋忠臣. 牙龈素提取物对口腔鳞癌细胞HN6生物学特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(2): 161-168.
[5]	万腾, 姜腾飞, 朱敏, 王旭东. 3D打印导板在上颌骨前段牵引成骨中的应用及精度测量[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(1): 43-49.
[6]	朱晓晨, 谢欣宜, 赵旭日, 徐丽娜, 何智妍, 周薇. 小胶质细胞Stat3基因条件性敲除小鼠的构建及鉴定[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(6): 689-698.
[7]	王思婕, 斯佳萍, 周宇, 骆定雯, 高璐, 陈小燕. 不同矢状骨面型颞下颌关节形态的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 648-654.
[8]	杨海霞, 徐丽丽, 王博成, 陈敏洁. 磁共振引导的咀嚼肌疼痛放松训练疗效评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 540-544.
[9]	俞蕾蕾, 阮洪, 夏滴, 何美娟, 孙明媛, 郑吉驷. 自我效能理论主导的居家康复方案在颞下颌关节盘复位术后的应用效果[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 532-539.
[10]	谢欣宜, 周薇, 邱澈, 沈慧, 宋忠臣. 伴阿尔茨海默病牙周炎患者血清Th17/Treg相关细胞因子水平变化研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 600-605.
[11]	陆一凡, 张蔚蒨, 俞创奇. 过敏相关阻塞性腮腺炎的临床分析及超声研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 519-523.
[12]	陈旭卓, 毛懿, 袁丹, 张善勇, 杨驰. 国产定制型全颞下颌关节假体的研发与应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 524-531.
[13]	吴炯睿, 高益鸣. 上颌窦动脉解剖结构的锥形术计算机断层扫描分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(2): 201-207.
[14]	朱悦, 顾佳颖, 代杰文. 瞬时受体电位香草素受体4型通道蛋白在创伤性颞下颌关节异位骨化发生中的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 42(12): 1649-1655.
[15]	吴媚, 梁妍景, 侯黎莉. 口腔癌术后言语功能的评估工具：一项范围综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 42(12): 1720-1728.

伴有PAX9突变非综合征型先天缺牙患者的牙颌面表型研究

Dentofacial phenotype of non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients with PAX9 mutation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics