磁共振引导的咀嚼肌疼痛放松训练疗效评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.05.004

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 540-544.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.05.004

• 口腔外科专题 • 上一篇

磁共振引导的咀嚼肌疼痛放松训练疗效评估

杨海霞¹(), 徐丽丽¹, 王博成², 陈敏洁³()

^1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院康复医学科，上海 200011
^2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院放射科，上海 200011
^3.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔外科，上海交通大学口腔医学院，国家口腔医学中心，国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心，上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海 200011

收稿日期:2023-04-24 接受日期:2023-05-02 出版日期:2023-05-28 发布日期:2023-07-11
通讯作者: 陈敏洁 E-mail:yanghaixia721@sina.com;chenmj_9hospital@126.com
作者简介:杨海霞(1986—)，女，主管治疗师，硕士生；电子信箱：yanghaixia721@sina.com。

Evaluation of clinical effect of manipulation on masticatory muscle pain guided by MRI

YANG Haixia¹(), XU Lili¹, WANG Bocheng², CHEN Minjie³()

^1.Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
^2.Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
^3.Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2023-04-24 Accepted:2023-05-02 Online:2023-05-28 Published:2023-07-11
Contact: CHEN Minjie E-mail:yanghaixia721@sina.com;chenmj_9hospital@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的·应用磁共振成像（magnetic resonance imaging，MRI）的Dixon技术评估非结构错乱的颞下颌关节紊乱病（temporomandibular joint disorder，TMD）的咀嚼肌疼痛患者的肌肉改变，并评价MRI引导的物理手法治疗咀嚼肌疼痛的临床疗效。方法·连续纳入自2021年6月—2022年9月就诊于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔外科、首次诊断为TMD肌筋膜疼痛（不伴有盘移位）的患者共29例。收集到增强MRI的Dixon序列并进行手法治疗的患者9例。治疗前，利用DICOM Viewer工作站获得9例患者的Dixon图像咀嚼肌疼痛区域值（Z1）、同侧非疼痛区域值（Z2）和对侧对应咀嚼肌区域值（Z3）。依据工作站获得的咀嚼肌异常区域，针对性地进行手法放松治疗。治疗后1~4周进行随访，对比治疗前后主动最大张口度（maximum mouth opening，MMO）和疼痛视觉评分（visual analogue scale，VAS）指标，并评价临床疗效。结果·Dixon序列Z2均值为66.23±32.90，Z3均值为66.27±33.87；而咀嚼肌疼痛区域Z1为131.94±83.99，明显高于Z2和Z3。手法治疗在改善MMO、VAS等方面有明显效果，有效率达88.89%。结论·Dixon序列的影像表现与临床主诉的疼痛点具有很大的相关性，MRI引导的手法放松治疗对改善非结构错乱的颞下颌关节紊乱病的张口度和疼痛有明显疗效。

关键词: 颞下颌关节紊乱病, 咀嚼肌, 疼痛, 磁共振, 手法治疗

Abstract:

Objective ·To assess muscle changes of patients of temporomandibular joint disorder with nonstructural disorder by using the Dixon technique for MRI of masticatory muscle, and evaluate the clinical effect of manipulation on masticatory muscle pain guided by MRI. Methods ·A total of 29 patients with TMD masticatory muscle pain (without disc displacement) who were diagnosed for the first time in the Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June 2021 to September 2022 were included. Among them, 9 cases who were assessed with Dixon technique for MRI of masticatory muscle were collected and treated by manipulation. Before treatment, the DICOM Viewer workstation was used to compare the value of masticatory muscle pain area (Z1), the value of ipsilateral non-pain area (Z2) and the value of contralateral corresponding masticatory muscle area (Z3) in Dixon image. Manipulation therapy was performed according to the area of abnormal threshold. Follow-up was performed for 1-4 weeks after treatment, the active maximum mouth opening (MMO) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after treatment were compared, and the value of masticatory muscle pain area in Dixon image after treatment was obtained again to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Results ·The mean value of Z2 and Z3 in Dixon was (66.23±32.90) and (66.27±33.87), while Z1 in masticatory muscle pain region was (131.94±83.99), which was significantly higher than Z2 and Z3. Manipulation therapy showed significant improvement in MMO and VAS, and the effective rate was 88.89%. Conclusion ·There is a significant correlation between the imaging findings of Dixon technique for MRI and the pain points of the masticatory muscle reported by the clinical complaints. The manipulation therapy guided by Dixon technique for MRI has a significant effect on improving the degree of mouth opening and pain.

Key words: temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), masticatory muscle, pain, magnetic resonance imaging, manipulation

中图分类号:

R783.9

杨海霞, 徐丽丽, 王博成, 陈敏洁. 磁共振引导的咀嚼肌疼痛放松训练疗效评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(5): 540-544.

YANG Haixia, XU Lili, WANG Bocheng, CHEN Minjie. Evaluation of clinical effect of manipulation on masticatory muscle pain guided by MRI[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 540-544.

图/表 4

参考文献 22

1	MAÍSA S G, MARCELE J P, CÉLIA M R. Temporomandibular disorders in fibromyalgia syndrome: a short-communication[J]. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, 2015, 55(2): 189-194.
2	HARKINS S, LINFORD J, COHEN J, et al. Administration of clonazepam in the treatment of TMD and associated myo-fascial pain: a double-blind pilot study[J]. J Craniomandib Disord, 1991, 5(3): 179-186.
3	VENANCIO R A, ALENCAR F J, ZAMPERINI C. Botulinum toxin, lidocaine, and dry-needling injections in patients with myofascial pain and headaches[J]. Cranio, 2009, 27(1): 46-53.
4	AL-ANI Z, GRAY R J, DAVIES S J, et al. Stabilization splint therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain: a systematic review[J]. J Dent Educ, 2005, 69(11): 1242-1250.
5	VENEZIAN G C, DA S M, MAZZETTO R G, et al. Low level laser effects on pain to palpation and electromyographic activity in TMD patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study[J]. Cranio, 2010, 28(2): 84-91.
6	DE L A, STAPPAERTS K, PAPY S. Consueling and physical therapy as treatment for myofascial pain of the masticatory system[J]. J Orofac Pain, 2003, 17(1): 42-49.
7	LEE Y H, LEE K M,AUH Q S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of the relationship between whiplash injury and temporomandibular disorders[J]. Front Neurol, 2017, 8, 725.
8	MS S, WALDMAN H, KRINGS B, et al. Effect of curcumin supplementation on exercise-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, muscle damage, and muscle soreness[J]. J Diet Suppl, 2020; 17(4): 401-414.
9	VAN D J, PENNATI F, HANSEN H H, et al. Respiratory muscle imaging by ultrasound and MRI in neuromuscular disorders[J]. Eur Respir J, 2021, 58(5): 2100137.
10	MARTEL-DUGUECH L, ALONSO-PÉREZ J, BASCUÑANA H, et al. Intramuscular fatty infiltration and physical function in controlled acromegaly[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2021, 185(1): 167-177.
11	CHANDOLA H C, CHAKRABORTY A. Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndrome:a dillema[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2009, 53(5): 575-581.
12	DELGADO E V, ROMERO J C, ESCODA C G. Myofascial pain syndrome associated with trigger points: a literature review. (I): Epidemiology, clinical treatment and etiopathogeny[J]. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009, 14(10):e494-e498.
13	VELLY A M, GORNITSKY M, PHILIPPE P. Contributing factors to chronic myofascial pain: a case-control study[J]. Pain, 2003, 104(3): 491-499.
14	ARIJI Y, SAKUMA S, IZUMI M, et al. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with myofascial pain[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2004, 98: 334-41.
15	BAKKE M, THOMSEN C E, VILMANN A, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of the swelling of the human masseter muscle after static and dynamic activity[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1996, 41: 133-40.
16	YUTAKA N, HIDEYOSHI N, TAKAHUMI H I. The relationship between masseter muscle pain and T2 values in temporomandibular joint disorders[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2018,126(4): 349-354.
17	DIXON W T. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging[J]. Radiology,1984, 153: 189-194.
18	MEDLICOTT M S, HARRIS S R. A systematic review of the effectiveness of exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, relaxation training, and biofeedback in the management of temporomandibular disorder[J]. Phys Ther, 2006, 86: 955-973.
19	SESSLE B J. Neural mechanisms and pathways in craniofacial pain[J]. Can J NeurolSci, 1999, 26(suppl 3): S7-S11.
20	GERI T, VICECONTI A, MINACCI M, et al. Manual therapy: exploiting the role of human touch. Musculoskelet Sci Pract[J]. 2019, 44: 102044.
21	GYER G, MICHAEL J, INKLEBARGER J, et al. Spinal manipulation therapy: is it all about the brain? A current review of the neurophysiological effects of manipulation[J]. J Integr Med, 2019, 17(5): 328-337.
22	URBAŃSKI P, TRYBULEC B, PIHUT M. The Application of Manual Techniques in Masticatory Muscles Relaxation as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(24): 12970.

Case No.	Tender area of masticatory muscle	Z
Case No.	Tender area of masticatory muscle	Z1	Z2	Z3
1	Left coronoid process	124.00	82.70	83.16
2	Right coronoid process	323.39	112.79	115.87
3	Left maxillary tuberosity	80.63	34.08	34.62
4	Right superior segment of masseter	213.55	108.51	107.27
5	Left middle segment of masseter	77.07	52.85	52.85
6	Right inferior segment of masseter	154.34	87.40	87.45
7	Right temporal region	115.10	72.45	74.36
8	Left inferior segment of masseter	41.26	25.55	24.49
9	Right superior segment of masseter	58.07	19.73	16.72
Mean value		131.94±83.99	66.23±32.90	66.27±33.87

Case No.	Tender area of masticatory muscle	Z
Case No.	Tender area of masticatory muscle	Z1	Z2	Z3
1	Left coronoid process	124.00	82.70	83.16
2	Right coronoid process	323.39	112.79	115.87
3	Left maxillary tuberosity	80.63	34.08	34.62
4	Right superior segment of masseter	213.55	108.51	107.27
5	Left middle segment of masseter	77.07	52.85	52.85
6	Right inferior segment of masseter	154.34	87.40	87.45
7	Right temporal region	115.10	72.45	74.36
8	Left inferior segment of masseter	41.26	25.55	24.49
9	Right superior segment of masseter	58.07	19.73	16.72
Mean value		131.94±83.99	66.23±32.90	66.27±33.87

Case No.	MMO/mm		VAS/score		Efficacy evaluation
Case No.	Before	After	Before	After	Efficacy evaluation
1	21	38	6	2	good
2	15	30	7	4	good
3	26	35	7	4	good
4	19	38	6	2	good
5	24	35	5	1	good
6	31	39	4	2	good
7	36	40	3	2	poor
8	25	35	5	2	good
9	24	37	0	0	excellent
Mean value	24.56±5.87	36.33±2.83	4.78±2.10	2.11±1.20

Case No.	MMO/mm		VAS/score		Efficacy evaluation
Case No.	Before	After	Before	After	Efficacy evaluation
1	21	38	6	2	good
2	15	30	7	4	good
3	26	35	7	4	good
4	19	38	6	2	good
5	24	35	5	1	good
6	31	39	4	2	good
7	36	40	3	2	poor
8	25	35	5	2	good
9	24	37	0	0	excellent
Mean value	24.56±5.87	36.33±2.83	4.78±2.10	2.11±1.20

[1]	张晨, 郭其辉, 范青. 强迫症患者大脑形态学特征研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(4): 480-486.
[2]	刘辰骏, 尹博浩, 孙辉, 张伟. 非侵入性影像学技术在骨质疏松症中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(3): 385-390.
[3]	吴兵, 李小敏, 柳思宇, 赵露露, 武文, 郝永强, 艾松涛. 改良3D打印病理切片盒在骨肿瘤病理拼接中的应用初探[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(2): 180-187.
[4]	柳思宇, 吴兵, 李小敏, 赵露露, 陈骏, 艾松涛. 弥散加权成像对隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤术前规划的价值初探[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 42(8): 1095-1102.
[5]	陈立奇, 薛卓维, 吴氢凯. 基于磁共振成像的女性盆底器官三维数字模型重建的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 42(3): 381-386.
[6]	王学宏, 陈旭卓, 毛懿, 沈达, 张善勇. 青少年不同发育阶段颞下颌关节盘锚固术后复发率的差异[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(2): 173-177.
[7]	王亦欢, 李若坤, 种欢欢, 严福华. 钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在肝细胞癌生物学行为评估中的应用进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(1): 130-134.
[8]	陈翠, 金叶, 王琳, 李红丽, 万财凤, 姜立新. 30例乳腺化生性癌的多种影像学对比分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(1): 70-76.
[9]	王子涵, 沈杰, 罗艳. 复合脊神经阻滞用于单孔胸腔镜下肺段/叶切除术的镇痛效果[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(8): 1062-1067.
[10]	刘子豪, 唐文芳, 王辉. 儿童脑肿瘤氨基酸PET显像的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(7): 949-952.
[11]	王凤乔, 庄蕾, 张富军. 儿童疼痛记忆的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(4): 546-549.
[12]	胡培堃, 何杰, 吴连明, 葛恒, 许建荣, 卜军. ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者微血管阻塞对左室功能及预后的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(2): 173-179.
[13]	冯泽豪, 柴烨子, 苏璇, 孙宝航行, 刘启明, 姜萌, 卜军. 体质量指数对系统性红斑狼疮患者心肌累及的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(2): 180-186.
[14]	柴烨子, 姜萌, 卜军. 体质量指数和肥厚型心肌病患者左心室结构和功能相关性的心血管磁共振成像研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(12): 1636-1641.
[15]	董建勋, 魏莱, 何杰, 孔令璁, 葛恒, 卜军. 心脏磁共振评估左心室机械不同步的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(12): 1698-1702.

磁共振引导的咀嚼肌疼痛放松训练疗效评估

Evaluation of clinical effect of manipulation on masticatory muscle pain guided by MRI

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics