›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 975-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2011.07.023

• 论著(临床研究) • 上一篇    下一篇

前列地尔对严重烧伤患者血栓前状态的影响

马 玉1, 袁克俭1, 杨惠忠1, 乔 亮1, 王学锋2   

  1. 上海交通大学 |医学院附属瑞金医院 1.灼伤整形科; 2.临床输血科, 上海 200025
  • 出版日期:2011-07-28 发布日期:2011-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 袁克俭, 电子信箱: yuankejian@126.com。
  • 作者简介:马 玉(1983—), 女, 硕士生;电子信箱: mayu2011@163.com。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市教委基金(06BZ037)

Effects of liposome prostaglandin E1 on prethrombotic state of patients with severe burn

MA Yu1, YUAN Ke-jian1, YANG Hui-zhong1, QIAO Liang1, WANG Xue-feng2   

  1. 1.Department of Burns, 2.Department of Clinical Blood Transfusion, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Online:2011-07-28 Published:2011-07-27
  • Supported by:

    Shanghai Education Committee Foundation, 06BZ037

摘要:

目的 观察严重烧伤早期应用前列地尔(Lipo-PGE1)对患者血栓前状态的影响。方法 25例烧伤总面积≥50%总体表面积(TBSA) 和(或)Ⅲ度烧伤面积≥20%TBSA的严重烧伤患者经随机双盲法入选Lipo-PGE1组(n=15)和对照组(n=10),两组患者入院后均给予常规治疗,Lipo-PGE1组加用Lipo-PGE110 μg静脉推注(1次/d,连用7 d)。分别于烧伤后1、2、3、7、14 d采集血样,测定抗凝血酶抗原(AT:Ag)、抗凝血酶活性(AT:A)、蛋白C活性(PC:A)、蛋白S活性(PS:A)、血小板表面P选择素(P-sel)、可溶性纤维蛋白单体复合物(SFMC)、纤溶酶-抗纤溶酶复合物(PAP)。运用凝血分析仪描记血栓弹力图(TEG),对Lipo-PGE1组患者用药前后的TEG各项参数进行分析,评估凝血功能。结果 两组患者烧伤后不同时间点的AT:Ag、AT:A、PC:A、PS:A、SFMC和PAP比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);烧伤后3、7 d,LipoPGE1组血小板表面P-sel表达显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。TEG参数分析结果显示:Lipo-PGE1组用药前后的凝血活酶生成时间分别为(3.77±0.90)min和(4.98±0.72)min,用药后较用药前明显延迟(P<0.05)。结论 严重烧伤早期应用Lipo-PGE1可以有效改善患者的血栓前状态。

关键词: 前列地尔, 严重烧伤, 血栓前状态

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effects of liposome prostaglandin E1 (Lipo-PGE1) on prethrombotic state of patients with severe burn. Methods Twenty-five patients with severe burn whose total burn area≥ 50% total body surface area(TBSA) and/or burn area of degree Ⅲ≥ 20% TBSA were randomly divided into Lipo-PGE1 group (n=15) and control group (n=10). Patients in both groups were given conventional treatment after admission, and those in Lipo-PGE1 group were managed with intravenous injection of Lipo-PGE1 (10 μg once a day for 7 d). Blood samples were collected 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 7 d and 14 d after burn, and antithrombin antigen (AT:Ag), antithrombin activity (AT:A), protein C activity (PC:A), protein S activity (PS:A), P-selectin (P-sel), soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC) and plasmin-α2-antiplasmin complex (PAP) were determined. Thromboelastogram (TEG) was recorded with coagulation analyzer, and the parameters of TEG in Lipo-PGE1 group were compared before and after treatment to assess the coagulation function. ResultsThere was no significant difference in AT:Ag, AT:A, PC:A, PS:A, SFMC and PAP between tow groups at different time points after burn (P>0.05). The expression of P-sel in Lipo-PGE1 group was significantly lower than that in control group 3 d and 7 d after burn (P<0.05). Analysis of TEG parameters revealed that the thromboplastin generation time was (3.77±0.90) min before treatment and (4.98±0.72) min after treatment in Lipo-PGE1 group, and the latter was significantly longer than the former (P<0.05). Conclusion Early application of Lipo-PGE1 after severe burn may effectively improve the prethrombotic state.

Key words: liposome prostaglandin E1, severe burn, prethrombotic state