论著 · 基础研究

色甘酸钠灌胃对葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的BALB/c小鼠溃疡性结肠炎模型的影响

  • 戈伊芹 ,
  • 黄雨霁 ,
  • 李玮泽 ,
  • 李延宁 ,
  • 李莉
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院检验科,上海 200080
戈伊芹(1997—),女,硕士生;电子信箱:976098334@qq.com
李 莉,电子信箱:annylish@126.com

收稿日期: 2022-05-15

  录用日期: 2022-09-13

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-02

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(81871267);上海市科委重点生物医药项目(19441904300)

Effect of intragastric treatment of sodium cromoglycate on dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in BALB/c mice

  • Yiqin GE ,
  • Yuji HUANG ,
  • Weize LI ,
  • Yanning LI ,
  • Li LI
Expand
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
LI Li, E-mail: annylish@126.com.

Received date: 2022-05-15

  Accepted date: 2022-09-13

  Online published: 2022-12-02

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81871267);Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality of Scientific and Technological Research(19441904300)

摘要

目的·通过使用肥大细胞膜稳定剂色甘酸钠(sodium cromoglycate,Crom)稳定肥大细胞来探究其在小鼠溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis,UC)造模过程中的作用。方法·将15只小鼠分为空白组(n=5)、模型组(n=5)和Crom组(n=5)共3组。空白组小鼠自由饮用双蒸水7 d;模型组小鼠自由饮用3%葡聚糖硫酸钠(dextran sulfate sodium,DSS)溶液7 d,构建溃疡性结肠炎模型;Crom组小鼠在饮用3% DSS溶液的第3日(即造模中期)灌胃服用Crom溶液。比较空白组、模型组和Crom组小鼠的体质量改变和疾病活动指数(disease activity index,DAI)的变化,利用苏木精-伊红染色和甲苯胺蓝染色观察小鼠肠组织的病理情况和肥大细胞数量,并利用流式细胞仪检测小鼠脾脏免疫细胞的浸润情况。3组间差异比较采用单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA),进一步组间比较采用最小显著性差异法(least-significant difference,LSD)。结果·与空白组相比,模型组小鼠重度便血,肠道病理显示有大量炎症性浸润,体质量下降严重(P=0.005),DAI评分升高明显(P=0.001),结肠长度明显缩短(P=0.003),且甲苯胺蓝染色显示肠道中肥大细胞数量增多(P=0.000)。与模型组相比,Crom组小鼠的便血减少,结肠长度有所增加(P=0.013);且肠道病理显示,其炎症情况较模型组有所改善,肥大细胞数量较模型组减少(P=0.000)。结论·色甘酸钠灌胃可减轻小鼠溃疡性结肠炎炎症反应,间接表明肥大细胞参与了溃疡性结肠炎的发病。

本文引用格式

戈伊芹 , 黄雨霁 , 李玮泽 , 李延宁 , 李莉 . 色甘酸钠灌胃对葡聚糖硫酸钠诱导的BALB/c小鼠溃疡性结肠炎模型的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(10) : 1375 -1382 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.10.002

Abstract

Objective ·To explore the role of mast cell membrane stabilizer sodium cromoglycate (Crom) in the modeling of ulcerative colitis (UC) in mice. Methods ·Mice were divided into 3 groups, i.e.control group (n=5), dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) group (n=5) and DSS+Crom group (n=5). Mice in the control group drank water for 7 d, and mice in the DSS group drank 3% DSS for 7 d to establish UC model. Meanwhile, mice in the DSS+Crom group were treated with Crom since the 3rd day during the establishment of UC. The changes of body mass and disease activity index (DAI) scores among the three groups were compared. Hematoxylin-eosin staining (H-E staining) and toluidine blue staining were used to observe the histopathology injury and the number of mast cells in colon tissues. Flow cytometry was used to detect the immune cell infiltration of spleen. Differences among the three groups were compared by using one-way ANOVA. Least significant difference (LSD) was used to further compare the differences between each two groups. Results ·Compared with the control group, the mice in the DSS group had severe hematochezia and intestinal barrier injury, the body weight of the mice in the DSS group decreased significantly (P=0.005), the DAI score increased significantly (P=0.001), the colon length shortened significantly (P=0.003), and toluidine blue staining showed that the number of mast cells in the intestine increased (P=0.000). Moreover, compared with the DSS group, the blood in the stool of the mice in the DSS+Crom group decreased, and the colon length increased (P=0.013); the intestinal pathology showed that the inflammation was improved, and the number of mast cells was reduced (P=0.000). Conclusion ·Stabilizing mast cells with sodium cromoglycate could effectively reduce colon inflammation of mice in UC, which indirectly indicates that mast cells participate in the pathogenesis of UC.

参考文献

1 WINDSOR J W, KAPLAN G G. Evolving epidemiology of IBD[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2019, 21(8): 40.
2 金怀亮, 张建华. 1990—2017年中国人群炎性肠病发病率及患病率变化趋势[J]. 湖北医药学院学报, 2021, 40(2): 187-189, 196.
2 JIN H L, ZHANG J H. Trend of incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in Chinese from 1990 to 2017[J].J Hubei Univ Med, 2021, 40(2): 187-189, 196.
3 KAPLAN G G. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 12(12): 720-727.
4 LEI Y, CHEN Y, LIN Z Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of key biomarkers, immune infiltration and potential therapeutic agents for ulcerative colitis[J]. Life Sci, 2020, 260: 118437.
5 BISCHOFF S C. Mast cells in gastrointestinal disorders[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2016, 778: 139-145.
6 HAMILTON M J, SINNAMON M J, LYNG G D, et al. Essential role for mast cell tryptase in acute experimental colitis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(1): 290-295.
7 HANSBRO P M, HAMILTON M J, FRICKER M, et al. Importance of mast cell Prss31/transmembrane tryptase/tryptase-γ in lung function and experimental chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and colitis[J]. J Biol Chem, 2014, 289(26): 18214-18227.
8 MINUTELLO K, GUPTA V. Cromolyn Sodium [M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publshing, 2022.
9 孙洁, 袁勇, 辛露, 等. 复方色甘酸钠鼻喷雾剂治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2006, 12(6): 432-435.
9 SUN J, YUAN Y, XIN L, et al. Study on therapeutic effect of complex prescription cromolyn sodium nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis[J]. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Skull Base Surg, 2006, 12(6): 432-435.
10 STRAUSS R A. Nasal cromolyn in the treatment of rhinitis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2020, 8(8): 2841-2842.
11 张远超, 张亦田. 依美斯汀联合色甘酸钠治疗过敏性结膜炎的疗效分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2017, 11(19): 134-135.
11 ZHANG Y C, ZHANG Y T. Efficacy of emedastine and sodium cromoglycate in allergic conjunctivitis[J]. Chin J Mod Drug Appl, 2017, 11(19): 134-135.
12 李慧萍. 地塞米松联合色甘酸钠治疗过敏性结膜炎的临床观察[J]. 大家健康(中旬版), 2018, 12(5): 42-43.
12 LI H P. Clinical observation of dexamethasone combined with sodium cromoglycate in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis[J]. For all health, 2018, 12(5): 42-43.
13 郑秀丽, 聂淑英, 马圆圆, 等. 易激胶囊联合色甘酸钠治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征45例临床观察[J]. 河北中医, 2013, 35(4): 578-580.
13 ZHENG X L, NIE S Y, MA Y Y, et al. Treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome by combined therapy of Yiji capsule and sodium cromoglycate[J]. Hebei J TCM, 2013, 35(4): 578-580.
14 赵亚妮, 李瑶, 张妍, 等. 葡聚糖硫酸钠不同给药方式建立小鼠溃疡性结肠炎模型[J]. 实验动物与比较医学, 2021, 41(1): 33-39.
14 ZHAO Y Z, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Establishment of ulcerative colitis model in mice by different drug delivery methods of dextran sodium sulfate[J]. Lab Anim Comp Med, 2021, 41(1): 33-39.
15 CHASSAING B, AITKEN J D, MALLESHAPPA M, et al. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice[J]. Curr Protoc Immunol, 2014, 104(1): 15.25.1-15.25.14.
16 OKAYASU I, HATAKEYAMA S, YAMADA M, et al. A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice[J]. Gastroenterology, 1990, 98(3): 694-702.
17 EKSTR?M G M. Oxazolone-induced colitis in rats: effects of budesonide, cyclosporin A, and 5-aminosalicylic acid[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1998, 33(2): 174-179.
18 DA SILVA E Z M, JAMUR M C, OLIVER C. Mast cell function: a new vision of an old cell[J]. J Histochem Cytochem, 2014, 62(10): 698-738.
19 CHURCH M K, KOLKHIR P, METZ M, et al. The role and relevance of mast cells in urticaria[J]. Immunol Rev, 2018, 282(1): 232-247.
20 NEUMANN D, SEIFERT R. The therapeutic potential of histamine receptor ligands in inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2014, 91(1): 12-17.
21 BOECKXSTAENS G. Mast cells and inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2015, 25: 45-49.
22 NOLTE H, SPJELDNAES N, KRUSE A, et al. Histamine release from gut mast cells from patients with inflammatory bowel diseases[J]. Gut, 1990, 31(7): 791-794.
23 PLANELL N, LOZANO J J, MORA-BUCH R, et al. Transcriptional analysis of the intestinal mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis in remission reveals lasting epithelial cell alterations[J]. Gut, 2013, 62(7): 967-976.
24 JACOB C, YANG P C, DARMOUL D, et al. Mast cell tryptase controls paracellular permeability of the intestine. Role of protease-activated receptor 2 and β-arrestins[J]. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280(36): 31936-31948.
25 SKAPER S D, FACCI L, ZUSSO M, et al. Neuroinflammation, mast cells, and Glia: dangerous liaisons[J]. Neuroscientist, 2017, 23(5): 478-498.
26 CARDAMONE C, PARENTE R, FEO G D, et al. Mast cells as effector cells of innate immunity and regulators of adaptive immunity[J]. Immunol Lett, 2016, 178: 10-14.
27 METCALFE D D, BARAM D, MEKORI Y A. Mast cells[J]. Physiol Rev, 1997, 77(4): 1033-1079.
28 ZHANG T, FINN D F, BARLOW J W, et al. Mast cell stabilisers[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2016, 778: 158-168.
文章导航

/