目的·汉化恐惧自我问卷（Fear of Self Questionnaire，FSQ），并在中国大学生群体中检验中文版FSQ的信效度。方法·遵循标准的问卷翻译模型，将英文版FSQ翻译为中文并进行文化调试。选择2021年12月—2022年1月就读于上海市某综合类大学的3个理工类学院的396名大学生为被试。使用一般资料问卷、中文版FSQ、中文版自我同一性量表（Ego Identity Scale，EIS）、中文版自我接纳问卷（Self Acceptance Questionnaire，SAQ）和中文版强迫信念问卷（Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-44，OBQ-44）对上述大学生进行施测。采用项目分析、内部一致性信度、分半信度、重测信度、效标效度、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析对中文版FSQ进行检验。结果·初测回收有效问卷386份，重测回收有效问卷163份。中文版FSQ 的20个条目均通过了项目分析检验，所有条目予以保留。该问卷的内部一致性信度、分半信度和重测信度分别为0.931、0.869、0.736，总体达到测量学要求。问卷的效标效度检验结果良好，中文版FSQ总分与3个效标问卷（中文版EIS、中文版SAQ和中文版OBQ-44）总分均相关（r=-0.279，P=0.000；r=-0.568，P=0.000；r=0.418，P=0.000）。探索性因素分析的结果显示，中文版FSQ包含自我害怕、自我确保和自我质疑共3个因子。验证性因素分析的结果显示，中文版FSQ的三因子结构方程模型的各项指标均拟合良好：χ²/df=2.790、CFI=0.862、GFI=0.834、AGFI=0.791、RMSEA =0.090、TLI=0.843、NFI=0.802。结论·该研究汉化的中文版FSQ在中国大学生群体中的信效度良好，可用于测量该群体的恐惧自我水平。

Objective ·To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Fear of Self Questionnaire (FSQ) among Chinese university students. Methods ·Based on the standard questionnaire translation model, the English version of FSQ was translated into Chinese and the cultural debugging was conducted. A total of 396 students from three science and engineering majors of a comprehensive university in Shanghai from December 2021 to January 2022 were tested with the general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of FSQ, the Chinese version of Ego Identity Scale (EIS), the Chinese version of Self Acceptance Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Chinese version of Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44). The Chinese version of FSQ was tested by item analysis, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of FSQ were tested by item analysis, internal consistency reliability, split half reliability, retest reliability, criterion validity, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results ·A total of 386 valid questionnaires were recovered in the initial test, and 163 valid questionnaires were recovered in the retest. A total of 20 items in the Chinese version of FSQ passed the item analysis test, and all items were retained. The internal consistency reliability, split half reliability and retest reliability of the Chinese version of FSQ were 0.931, 0.869 and 0.736, respectively, which met the requirements of metrology. The criterion validity of the Chinese version of FSQ was good, and the total score of the Chinese version of FSQ was significantly correlated with the total score of the three criterion validity questionnaires [Chinese version of EIS (r=-0.279, P=0.000), Chinese version of SAQ (r=-0.568, P=0.000) and Chinese version of OBQ-44 (r=0.418, P=0.000)]. The exploratory factor analysis of the Chinese version of FSQ showed that the questionnaire contained three factors: self fear, self assurance and self questioning. The confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese version of FSQ showed that the indicators of the three-factor structural equation model fitted well, including χ²/df = 2.790, CFI=0.862, GFI=0.834, AGFI=0.791, RMSEA=0.090, TLI=0.843, NFI=0.802. Conclusion ·The Chinese version of FSQ in this study has good reliability and validity among Chinese university students, and can be used to measure the level of feared self of this group.