收稿日期: 2022-05-31
录用日期: 2022-11-28
网络出版日期: 2022-12-28
Effect of lidocaine on median effective dose of esketamine for children undergoing circumcision
Received date: 2022-05-31
Accepted date: 2022-11-28
Online published: 2022-12-28
目的·探索利多卡因联用对行包皮环切术所需艾司氯胺酮半数有效量(median effective dose,ED50)的影响,评估其对儿童心血管的稳定性。方法·采用序贯法纳入上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心2021年4月—6月在艾司氯胺酮静脉麻醉下行包皮环切术的3~7岁患儿,艾司氯胺酮给药后静脉注射0.5%利多卡因1.5 mg/kg再行手术,计算与利多卡因联用时行儿童包皮环切术所需的艾司氯胺酮ED50,并观察患儿用药后的起效时间、苏醒时间、生命体征[心率、脉氧饱和度(SpO2)、平均动脉压]变化以及不良反应。使用Dixon法取交叉点数据计算艾司氯胺酮ED50,使用概率回归法计算艾司氯胺酮ED50、95%有效剂量(ED95)及其95%可信区间。组间一般资料的比较使用单因素ANOVA,组间起效时间、苏醒时间、各时间节点(静脉注射咪达唑仑后3 min、静脉注射艾司氯胺酮后3 min、手术切皮、手术结束)的生命体征(心率、SpO2、平均动脉压)的比较使用独立样本t检验;各组所需的艾司氯胺酮ED50的比较使用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果·艾司氯胺酮与利多卡因联用时,行包皮环切术所需ED50为1.55 mg/kg(95%CI 1.47~1.63)。与前期开展的艾司氯胺酮单药用于儿童包皮环切术的研究数据[ED50 =1.90 mg/kg(95% CI 1.75~2.05)]相比,两者联用时行包皮环切术所需的艾司氯胺酮ED50显著降低(P=0.001),术中的平均动脉压均显著低于艾司氯胺酮单药组(P=0.000,P=0.004,P=0.010)。两药联用时对心率无明显影响,部分患儿的SpO2有一过性降低。结论·艾司氯胺酮与利多卡因联用能够显著降低儿童包皮环切术所需的艾司氯胺酮ED50,术中血压更平稳,但对呼吸可能存在一过性抑制。
李波 , 朱明 , 郑吉建 . 利多卡因联用对行包皮环切术患儿所需艾司氯胺酮半数有效量的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(12) : 1706 -1711 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.12.008
Objective ·To evaluate the median effective dose (ED50) and cardiovascular stability of esketamine in combination with lidocaine for pediatric patients undergoing circumcision. Methods ·Children aged 3?7 years selected for circumcision between April and June 2021 in Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinewere enrolled in this study. All children enrolled were administrated 0.5% lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously after anesthesia was induced by esketamine. The ED50 of esketamine required for children undergoing circumcision was determined by Dixon's up-and-down method, which calculated the mean of the crossover midpoints. Additionally, ED50 and ED95 of esketamine were estimated by probit regression. Onset time, wake-up time, vital signs including heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation and mean artery pressure, and adverse events were recorded. Differences in age, weight of the patients between the two groups were compared by one-way ANOVA. Differences in onset time, wake-up time, and vital signs including heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and mean arterial pressure in each time point between the two groups were compared by using the independent samples t-test. The ED50 values of esketamine was compared between the two groups by Mann-Whitney U test. Results ·When administrated in combination with lidocaine, the ED50 of esketamine for children undergoing circumcision was 1.55 mg/kg (95% CI 1.47?1.63). Compared to the data of our previous study, the ED50 of esketamine required for children undergoing circumcision in combination with lidocaine was significantly lower than that of esketamine solo agent [ED50 =1.90 mg/kg (95% CI 1.75?2.05)] (P=0.001). The mean arterial pressure of children pretreated with lidocaine was significantly lower than that of esketamine solo agent at each time point during the surgery (P=0.000, P=0.004, P=0.010), and no significant effect on heart rate was observed. A transient decrease in SpO2 was observed when esketamine was used in combination with lidocaine. Conclusion ·Anesthesia induced by esketamine combined with lidocaine can significantly reduce the ED50 of esketamine required for pediatric patients undergoing circumcision, and better stability of blood pressure is achieved. However, transient respiratory depression should be noted.
Key words: esketamine; lidocaine; children; circumcision; median effective dose
1 | PELTONIEMI M A, HAGELBERG N M, OLKKOLA K T, et al. Ketamine: a review of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in anesthesia and pain therapy[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2016, 55(9): 1059-1077. |
2 | 李波, 朱明, 但颖之, 等. 艾司氯胺酮单药或联合小剂量阿片类药物用于儿童包皮环切术的半数有效剂量研究[J]. 上海医学, 2021, 44(3): 177-182. |
2 | LI B, ZHU M, DAN Y Z, et al. Median effective dose of esketamine solo or in combination with low-dose opioids for pediatric patients undergoing circumcision[J]. Shanghai Med J, 2021, 44(3): 177-182. |
3 | TRIMMEL H, HELBOK R, STAUDINGER T, et al. S(+)-ketamine: current trends in emergency and intensive care medicine[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2018, 130(9/10): 356-366. |
4 | BEAUSSIER M, DELBOS A, MAURICE-SZAMBURSKI A, et al. Perioperative use of intravenous lidocaine[J]. Drugs, 2018, 78(12): 1229-1246. |
5 | G?RGES M, ZHOU G H, BRANT R, et al. Sequential allocation trial design in anesthesia: an introduction to methods, modeling, and clinical applications[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2017, 27(3): 240-247. |
6 | PACE N L, STYLIANOU M P. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research[J]. Anesthesiology, 2007, 107(1): 144-152. |
7 | YU Q, LIU Y, SUN M, et al. Median effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine sedation for transthoracic echocardiography in pediatric patients with noncyanotic congenital heart disease: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2017, 27(11): 1108-1114. |
8 | BATKO I, KO?CIELNIAK-MERAK B, TOMASIK P J, et al. Lidocaine reduces sevoflurane consumption and improves recovery profile in children undergoing major spine surgery[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2020, 26: e919971. |
9 | HASHEMIAN A M, ZAMANI MOGHADAM DOLOO H, SAADATFAR M, et al. Effects of intravenous administration of fentanyl and lidocaine on hemodynamic responses following endotracheal intubation[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2018, 36(2): 197-201. |
10 | MAHJOUBIFARD M, HEIDARI M, DAHMARDEH M, et al. Comparison of dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and fentanyl in attenuation hemodynamic response of laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J]. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2020, 2020: 4814037. |
11 | GILBERT C R A, HANSON I R, BROWN A B, et al. Intravenous use of xylocaine[J]. Curr Res Anesth Analg, 1951, 30(6): 301-313. |
12 | VAN DER WAL S E I, VAN DEN HEUVEL S A S, RADEMA S A, et al. The in vitro mechanisms and in vivo efficacy of intravenous lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain[J]. Eur J Pain, 2016, 20(5): 655-674. |
13 | LEE I W S, SCHRAAG S. The use of intravenous lidocaine in perioperative medicine: anaesthetic, analgesic and immune-modulatory aspects[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12): 3543. |
14 | EIPE N, GUPTA S, PENNING J. Intravenous lidocaine for acute pain: an evidence-based clinical update[J]. BJA Educ, 2016, 16(9): 292-298. |
15 | CUI W H, LI Y P, LI S R, et al. Systemic administration of lidocaine reduces morphine requirements and postoperative pain of patients undergoing thoracic surgery after propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010, 27(1): 41-46. |
16 | BAJRACHARYA J L, SUBEDI A, POKHAREL K, et al. The effect of intraoperative lidocaine versus esmolol infusion on postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2019, 19(1): 198. |
17 | HWANG W J, MOON Y E, CHO S J, et al. The effect of a continuous infusion of low-dose esmolol on the requirement for remifentanil during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2013, 25(1): 36-41. |
18 | ASOUHIDOU I, TRIKOUPI A. Esmolol reduces anesthetic requirements thereby facilitating early extubation; a prospective controlled study in patients undergoing intracranial surgery[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2015, 15: 172. |
19 | WATTS R, THIRUVENKATARAJAN V, CALVERT M, et al. The effect of perioperative esmolol on early postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2017, 33(1): 28-39. |
20 | NAIR A. Esmolol: an avoidable agent for intraoperative use as an antinociceptive[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2019, 44(6): 683. |
21 | SOTO G, NARANJO GONZáLEZ M, CALERO F. Intravenous lidocaine infusion[J]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed), 2018, 65(5): 269-274. |
22 | DE OLIVEIRA K, EIPE N. Intravenous lidocaine for acute pain: a single-institution retrospective study[J]. Drugs Real World Outcomes, 2020, 7(3): 205-212. |
23 | YU J S, LOUER R, LUTFI R, et al. Adjuvant lidocaine to a propofol-ketamine-based sedation regimen for bone marrow aspirates and biopsy in the pediatric population[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2021, 180(1): 73-80. |
24 | FLORES-GONZáLEZ J C, ESTALELLA-MENDOZA A, RODRíGUEZ-CAMPOY P, et al. Topical pharyngeal lidocaine reduces respiratory adverse events during upper gastrointestinal endoscopies under ketamine sedation in children[J]. Paediatr Drugs, 2019, 21(1): 25-31. |
25 | KRAUSS B, GREEN S M. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children[J]. Lancet, 2006, 367(9512): 766-780. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |