收稿日期: 2024-06-18
录用日期: 2024-08-27
网络出版日期: 2024-12-28
基金资助
无锡市新吴区新瑞医院院级科研项目(2024YJYB004)
Research on the characteristics of 18F-FDG PET/CT in mantle cell lymphoma and the discrimination between cellular morphological variants
Received date: 2024-06-18
Accepted date: 2024-08-27
Online published: 2024-12-28
Supported by
Wuxi Xinwu District Xinrui Hospital Scientific Research Project(2024YJYB004)
目的·分析18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描技术(18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography,18F-FDG PET/CT)对于套细胞淋巴瘤(mantle cell lymphoma,MCL)的显像特点和诊断价值,并探索其在区分MCL经典型与侵袭性变型中的应用。方法·回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院116例经病理学确诊的初诊MCL患者的18F-FDG PET/CT显像及临床资料,分析淋巴结内外病灶的显像特点,评估18F-FDG PET/CT在诊断MCL骨髓和胃肠道浸润中的准确性,并分析经典型和侵袭性变型MCL的18F-FDG PET/CT特征及临床特征之间的差异。结果·116例患者中,100.0%的患者在18F-FDG PET/CT显像中有阳性表现,99.1%的患者有淋巴结异常,85.3%的患者有结外侵犯,其中脾脏、咽淋巴环、骨髓、胃肠道是最常见的结外侵犯部位。与骨髓穿刺结果比较,18F-FDG PET/CT对MCL骨髓侵犯的灵敏度、特异度以及准确率分别为43.4%、91.5%和66.0%。与胃镜、肠镜的活检结果比较,18F-FDG PET/CT对胃、肠道浸润的灵敏度分别为100.0%、94.1%,特异度分别为75.0%、100.0%,准确率分别为92.9%、94.7%。最大标准化摄取值(maximum standardized uptake value,SUVmax)和Ki-67指数在MCL经典型与侵袭性变型间差异显著,且SUVmax与Ki-67指数呈正相关。以SUVmax为10.4作为诊断阈值时,区分MCL经典型及侵袭性变型的灵敏度为73.9%,特异度为77.4%,AUC值为0.797。结论·18F-FDG PET/CT对MCL患者结内外病变具有较高的检出率,在骨髓浸润的诊断中具有较高的特异度,在胃肠道浸润的诊断中灵敏度和特异度均较高,可为MCL骨髓和胃肠道浸润提供非侵入性的、比较可靠的诊断信息,但仍不足以代替病理学检查。SUVmax与Ki-67指数呈正相关。应用SUVmax可以有效区分MCL经典型和侵袭性变型;当SUVmax>10.4时,侵袭性变型可能性更高,否则为经典型;SUVmax可为MCL的治疗策略的选择提供潜在帮助。
任怡璇 , 陈诚 , 蔡铭慈 , 陈嘉敏 , 杨欣欣 , 王超 , 林晓珠 , 程澍 , 江旭峰 , 陈东旭 . 套细胞淋巴瘤在18F-FDG PET/CT中的显像特征及细胞形态学分型[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2024 , 44(12) : 1561 -1569 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.12.009
Objective ·To analyze the imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and explore its application to distinguishing between classic and aggressive variants of MCL. Methods ·A retrospective analysis was conducted on the 18F-FDG PET/CT images and clinical data of 116 pathologically confirmed, newly diagnosed MCL patients. The imaging features of intra- and extra-nodal lesions were summarized. The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing bone marrow and gastrointestinal involvement in MCL was evaluated. Furthermore, differences in 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and clinical characteristics between the classic and aggressive variants of MCL were analyzed. Results ·Among the 116 patients, 100.0% showed positive findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT, with 99.1% exhibiting abnormal lymph nodes and 85.3% having extra-nodal involvement. The most common extra-nodal sites were the spleen, Waldeyer's ring, bone marrow, and gastrointestinal tract. Compared with bone marrow aspiration results, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in MCL were 43.4%, 91.5%, and 66.0%, respectively. When compared with endoscopic biopsy results, the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting gastric and intestinal involvement was 100.0% and 94.1%, respectively, with specificity of 75.0% and 100.0%, and accuracy of 92.9% and 94.7%, respectively. There were significant differences in the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Ki-67 index between the classic and aggressive variants of MCL, with SUVmax positively correlated with Ki-67 index. By using SUVmax > 10.4 as the diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between the classic and aggressive variants of MCL were 73.9% and 77.4%, respectively, with an AUC value of 0.797. Conclusion ·18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrates a high detection rate for both intra- and extra-nodal lesions in MCL patients. It exhibits high specificity in diagnosing bone marrow involvement and high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing gastrointestinal involvement, providing reliable non-invasive diagnostic information for MCL bone marrow and gastrointestinal involvement. However, it is not a substitute for pathological examination. Additionally, the positive correlation between SUVmax and Ki-67 index allows SUVmax to effectively differentiate between the classic and aggressive variants of MCL, with a higher SUVmax (>10.4) indicating a higher likelihood of the aggressive variant. These findings have clinical implications for treatment planning and prognosis assessment.
1 | ARMITAGE J O, LONGO D L. Mantle-cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(26): 2495-2506. |
2 | 中国抗癌协会血液肿瘤专业委员会, 中华医学会血液学分会, 中国临床肿瘤学会淋巴瘤专家委员会. 套细胞淋巴瘤诊断与治疗中国指南 (2022年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 2022, 43(7): 529-536. |
2 | Hematology Oncology Committee of China Anti-cancer Association, The Society of Hematology at Chinese Medical Association, Union for China Lymphoma Investigator at Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. The guideline of the diagnosis and treatment of mantle cell lymphoma in China (2022) [J].Chinese Journal of Hematology, 2022, 43(7): 529-536. |
3 | 李燕玲, 秦小琪, 马艳萍. 套细胞淋巴瘤发病机制的研究进展[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2024, 36(1): 73-76. |
3 | LI Y L, QIN X Q, MA Y P. Progress of the pathogenesis in mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Cancer Research and Clinic, 2024, 36(1): 73-76. |
4 | WU M, LI Y, HUANG H Q, et al. Initial treatment patterns and survival outcomes of mantle cell lymphoma patients managed at Chinese academic centers in the rituximab era: a real-world study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 770988. |
5 | ABRISQUETA P, SCOTT D W, SLACK G W, et al. Observation as the initial management strategy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(10): 2489-2495. |
6 | DREYLING M, KLAPPER W, RULE S. Blastoid and pleomorphic mantle cell lymphoma: still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge![J]. Blood, 2018, 132(26): 2722-2729. |
7 | GERSON J N, HANDORF E, VILLA D, et al. Outcomes of patients with blastoid and pleomorphic variant mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Blood Adv, 2023, 7(24): 7393-7401. |
8 | GOUILL S L, D?UGOSZ-DANECKA M, RULE S, et al. Final results and overall survival data from a phase Ⅱ study of acalabrutinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma, including those with poor prognostic factors[J]. Haematologica, 2024, 109(1): 343-350. |
9 | ZANONI L, BEZZI D, NANNI C, et al. PET/CT in non-hodgkin lymphoma: an update[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 2023, 53(3): 320-351. |
10 | SWERDLOW S H, CAMPO E, PILERI S A, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms[J]. Blood, 2016, 127(20): 2375-2390. |
11 | LAMBERT L, BURGETOVA A, TRNENY M, et al. The diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI in the staging of lymphomas in adult patients compared to PET/CT and enhanced reference standard-systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(2): 1558-1570. |
12 | JU S H, LEE S E, YI S, et al. Transcriptomic characteristics according to tumor size and SUVmax in papillary thyroid cancer patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 11005. |
13 | ALBANO D, TREGLIA G, GAZZILLI M, et al. 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2020, 20(7): 422-430. |
14 | ALAVI A, SHRIKANTHAN S, AYDIN A, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography findings in mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2011, 11(3): 261-266. |
15 | ALBANO D, FERRO P, BOSIO G, et al. Diagnostic and clinical impact of staging 18F-FDG PET/CT in mantle-cell lymphoma: a two-center experience[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2019, 19(8): e457-e464. |
16 | O?A-ORTIZ F M, SáNCHEZ-DEL MONTE J, RAMíREZ-SOLíS M E, et al. Mantle cell lymphoma with involvement of the digestive tract[J]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed), 2019, 84(4): 434-441. |
17 | HOSEIN P J, PASTORINI V H, PAES F M, et al. Utility of positron emission tomography scans in mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Am J Hematol, 2011, 86(10): 841-845. |
18 | SKRYPETS T, FERRARI C, NASSI L, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT cannot substitute endoscopy in the staging of gastrointestinal involvement in mantle cell lymphoma. A retrospective multi-center cohort analysis[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(2): 123. |
19 | LOVINFOSSE P, HUSTINX R. The role of PET imaging in inflammatory bowel diseases: state-of-the-art review[J]. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 66(3): 206-217. |
20 | BIEG C, MONGELLI F, PETERLI R, et al. Simplified dual time point FDG-PET/computed tomography for determining dignity of pancreatic lesions[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2020, 41(7): 682-687. |
21 | JIANG H, LI A, JI Z Y, et al. Role of radiomics-based baseline PET/CT imaging in lymphoma: diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2022, 24(4): 537-549. |
22 | 吴江, 朱虹, 王新刚, 等. 淋巴瘤脾脏浸润的18F-FDG PET/CT表现[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(6): 1157-1160. |
22 | WU J, ZHU H, WANG X G, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT manifestations of spleen infiltration of lymphoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2012, 28(6): 1157-1160. |
23 | LIU Y Y. Clinical significance of diffusely increased splenic uptake on FDG-PET[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2009, 30(10): 763-769. |
24 | PICARDI M, SORICELLI A, GRIMALDI F, et al. Fused FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT detects occult subdiaphragmatic involvement of Hodgkin's lymphoma thereby identifying patients requiring six cycles of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and consolidation radiation of spleen[J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22(3): 671-680. |
25 | SCHOLTENS A M, VERBERNE H J. FDG uptake in marrow and spleen: what does it mean?: Importance of clinical context in the interpretation of FDG uptake in marrow and spleen in infective endocarditis[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2021, 28(6): 2543-2544. |
26 | LI H L, WANG X H, ZHANG L F, et al. Correlations between maximum standardized uptake value measured via 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and clinical variables and biochemical indicators in adult lymphoma[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2019, 15(7): 1581-1588. |
27 | NISHIOKA A, URESHINO H, ANDO T, et al. Three coexisting lymphomas in a single patient: composite lymphoma derived from a common germinal center B-cell precursor and unrelated discordant lymphoma[J]. Int J Hematol, 2018, 107(6): 703-708. |
28 | PARRY E M, ROULLAND S, OKOSUN J. DLBCL arising from indolent lymphomas: how are they different?[J]. Semin Hematol, 2023, 60(5): 277-284. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |