专题报道(医改效果评估)

深化医药卫生体制改革中间绩效评估研究

展开
  • 1.上海交通大学 公共卫生学院, 上海 200025;2.上海申康医院发展中心, 上海 200041
李妍婷(1988—), 女, 硕士生;电子信箱: hightingli@gmail.com。

网络出版日期: 2011-03-01

基金资助

国家发展和改革委员会社会发展司项目(2009HR01)

Study on intermediate performance indicators of deepening medical and health system reform

Expand
  • 1.School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China;2.Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai 200041, China

Online published: 2011-03-01

Supported by

Foundation from National Development and Reform Commission of China, 2009HR01

摘要

目的 阐述深化医药卫生体制改革评估研究所得出的第二层中间绩效指标的设立并提出政策意见。方法 通过文献评阅,借鉴经济合作与发展组织成员国家对卫生系统的评估框架,研究《中共中央国务院关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见》和《医药卫生体制改革近期重点实施方案(2009—2011年)》2个文件,采用德尔菲专家咨询法从质量、效率和可及性3个方面设立中间绩效指标并进行筛选。结果 筛选确定8个中间绩效指标及其权重。结论 专家认为新医改的质量、效率和可及性都至关重要;而患者则比较重视质量和经济负担。

本文引用格式

李妍婷, 赵 明, 丁 蕾, 等 . 深化医药卫生体制改革中间绩效评估研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2011 , 31(2) : 144 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2011.02.006

Abstract

Objective To explain the set-up of the intermediate performance indicators in the whole evaluation indicator system of the deepening medical and health system reform. Methods Through literature review, the frame adopted by members of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in evaluating health system was referred, the related documents of the Central People's Government of China were studied, and the intermediate performance indicators were selected through Delphi method from the aspects of quality, efficiency and accessibility. Results Eight intermediate performance indicators and weight were determined. Conclusion Experts pay equal attention to quality, efficiency and accessibility of new health reform, while patients focus more on quality and costs.

文章导航

/