Cone-beam CT measurement of root canal diameter and taper for mandibular first molar

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.05.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective ·To analyze the root canal diameter and taper of mandibular first molars using cone-beam CT (CBCT), investigate age-related changes in these parameters, and propose optimized clinical protocols for root canal preparation. Methods ·From October 2022 to October 2023, CBCT images of 240 healthy mandibular first molars (120 three-canal type cases and 120 four-canal type cases) were collected from patients aged 20‒59 years at the Stomatology Center, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine. The three-canal type and the four-canal type samples were respectively divided into four age groups (20‒29, 30‒39, 40‒49, and 50‒59 years), with 30 cases in each group. Root canal length was measured, and buccolingual and mesiodistal diameters were recorded at four levels (coronal, middle, apical, and foramen). The tapers of the coronal 1/3, middle 1/3, and apical 1/3 segments were calculated in both buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Differences among the age groups were compared. Results ·The buccolingual diameters of all root canals exceeded the corresponding mesiodistal diameters. At several levels of most root canals, the diameters in the <50-year-old groups were significantly larger than those in the 50‒59-year-old group (P<0.05). The buccolingual tapers exceeded the corresponding mesiodistal tapers in all root canals of mandibular first molars. The mean mesiodistal tapers in different age groups ranged from 0.07 to 0.34 in the coronal 1/3 segment, 0.03 to 0.09 in the middle 1/3 segment, and 0.05 to 0.11 in the apical 1/3 segment. At several levels of most root canals, the tapers in the <50-year-old groups were significantly larger than those in the 50‒59-year-old group (P<0.05). Conclusion ·Mandibular first molars exhibit age-related narrowing of root canal diameter and reduced taper in individuals aged ≥50 years. For initial apical file selection, #15 files are recommended for the distal canals in the three-canal type, while #10 files are advised for all other canals in the three-canal type and all canals in the four-canal type. For patients aged 50 years or older, the files for the distal canals in the three-canal type can be adjusted to #10, and the files for the mesiobuccal and distallingual canals in the four-canal type to #8. Regarding preparation taper, a 0.08-taper orifice opener is recommended for the coronal 1/3 segment. During mid-lower segment preparation, 0.04-taper master apical files are suggested for the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals in the three-canal type and the mesiolingual and distallingual canals in the four-canal type, 0.06-taper files for the distal canals in the three-canal type and the mesiobuccal canals in the four-canal type, and 0.08-taper files for the distobuccal canals in the four-canal type. Root canal obturation is recommended to be performed using vertical compaction with large-taper gutta-percha cones combined with bioceramic sealer.

Key words: mandibular first molar, root canal diameter, root canal taper, cone-beam CT (CBCT), age-related change, root canal therapy, root canal preparation, root canal filling

CLC Number:

R781.3

LI Wenmiao, XING Li, PAN Yingyu, HUANG Ying, YANG Guofang, LIU Deda. Cone-beam CT measurement of root canal diameter and taper for mandibular first molar[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2025, 45(5): 597-604.

Figures/Tables 9

TrendMD

References 16

1	JAKOVLJEVIC A, NIKOLIC N, JACIMOVIC J, et al. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and conventional nonsurgical root canal treatment in general adult population: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies published between 2012 and 2020[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(10): 1371-1386.e8.
2	岳林, 韩怡. 第一恒磨牙根尖区根管自然锥度的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 20-23.
	YUE L, HAN Y. Physical morphology of the root canal taper in the apical region of human permanent first molars[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 20-23.
3	张迎. 山东地区人群第一恒磨牙根管原始锥度及横截面形态的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2016.
	ZHANG Y. A study of root canal taper and cross-section morphology of the permanent first molar[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2016.
4	KUCHER M, DANNEMANN M, MODLER N, et al. An automated measurement method for the endodontic working width of lower molars by means of parametric models using cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(11): 1790-1795.
5	潘莉, 章润贞, 李颂. 13~23岁下颌第二前磨牙单根管锥度的初步研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2010, 28(2): 162-165, 169.
	PAN L, ZHANG R Z, LI S. An in vitro study on taper of single root canal of mandibular second premolars of 13‒23 year-old people[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2010, 28(2): 162-165, 169.
6	周学东. 牙体牙髓病学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020: 218.
	ZHOU X D. Operative dentistry and endodontics[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2020: 218.
7	张麒麟, 李军, 李姝慧. 根管预备机用镍钛锉的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(6): 663-669.
	ZHANG Q L, LI J, LI S H. Research progress on nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation machine[J]. International Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 49(6): 663-669.
8	单姗, 张文欣, 葛久禹, 等. 应用锥形束CT对下颌第一磨牙近颊根管壁厚度相关影响因素的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(8): 779-783.
	SHAN S, ZHANG W X, GE J Y, et al. Analysis of related factors affecting the thickness of mesiobuccal root canal wall of mandibular first molars using CBCT[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(8): 779-783.
9	陈滨, 李峰. 根管预备器械在根管壁微裂治疗中的应用进展[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2021, 27(5): 52-53.
	CHEN B, LI F. The application of root canal preparation instrument in the treatment of root canal wall microfissure[J]. China Medical Device Information, 2021, 27(5): 52-53.
10	DE-DEUS G, RODRIGUES E A, LEE J K, et al. Taper 0.06 versus taper 0.04: the impact on the danger zone[J]. J Endod, 2023, 49(5): 536-543.
11	MACEDO F P G, SOARES A J, MARCELIANO-ALVES M F V, et al. The effect of root canal preparation tapers on planktonic bacteria and biofilm reduction in the apical third: a correlative microtomography and microbiological laboratory study[J]. Int Endod J, 2024, 57(6): 700-712.
12	苗静. 不同形态牙齿镍钛器械预备及充填后力学性能分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古医科大学, 2019.
	MIAO J. Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium dental instruments with different shapes after preparation and filling[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Medical University, 2019.
13	DOĞANAY YILDIZ E, FIDAN M E, SAKARYA R E, et al. The effect of taper and apical preparation size on fracture resistance of roots[J]. Aust Endod J, 2021, 47(1): 67-72.
14	ALIMADADI H, ASNAASHARI M, NASERI M, et al. Effect of apical size and taper on the efficacy of root canal disinfection with LED photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to irrigation with sodium hypochlorite[J]. J Lasers Med Sci, 2021, 12: e58.
15	颜愈佳, 邹玲. 生物陶瓷类根管封闭剂的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(5): 578-585.
	YAN Y J, ZOU L. Research progress on bioceramic root canal sealer[J]. International Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 49(5): 578-585.
16	孙莉青, 郭宜青, 杨爱华, 等. 3种根管充填方法对不同类型根管根尖封闭性的影响研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(6): 629-634.
	SUN L Q, GUO Y Q, YANG A H, et al. Study on apical sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques for different types of root canals[J]. International Journal of Stomatology, 2021, 48(6): 629-634.

Root canal type	Gender	Group				Total
Root canal type	Gender	20‒29 years	30‒39 years	40‒49 years	50‒59 years	Total
Three-canal type (n=120)	Male/n(%)	16 (53.3)	20 (66.7)	12 (40.0)	16 (53.3)	64 (53.3)
	Female/n(%)	14 (46.7)	10 (33.3)	18 (60.0)	14 (46.7)	56 (46.7)
Four-canal type (n=120)	Male/n(%)	9 (30.0)	14 (46.7)	14 (46.7)	20 (66.7)	57 (47.5)
	Female/n(%)	21 (70.0)	16 (53.3)	16 (53.3)	10 (33.3)	63 (52.5)

Root canal type	Gender	Group				Total
Root canal type	Gender	20‒29 years	30‒39 years	40‒49 years	50‒59 years	Total
Three-canal type (n=120)	Male/n(%)	16 (53.3)	20 (66.7)	12 (40.0)	16 (53.3)	64 (53.3)
	Female/n(%)	14 (46.7)	10 (33.3)	18 (60.0)	14 (46.7)	56 (46.7)
Four-canal type (n=120)	Male/n(%)	9 (30.0)	14 (46.7)	14 (46.7)	20 (66.7)	57 (47.5)
	Female/n(%)	21 (70.0)	16 (53.3)	16 (53.3)	10 (33.3)	63 (52.5)

Level	Diameter	Three-canal type (n=120)			Four-canal type (n=120)
Level	Diameter	MB	ML	D	MB	ML	DB	DL
Coronal	Buccolingual/mm	1.60±0.46	1.47±0.47^①	3.79±0.69^②	1.65±0.47	1.46±0.48^③	1.95±0.80	1.49±0.64
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.92±0.29	0.85±0.30	1.78±0.61^④	0.95±0.35^⑤	0.85±0.26^③	0.93±0.35	0.85±0.37
Middle	Buccolingual/mm	0.83±0.29	0.81±0.29	2.40±0.64	0.82±0.27^⑥	0.80±0.26	1.09±0.45	0.77±0.30
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.51±0.14	0.52±0.16	0.75±0.23	0.57±0.18	0.49±0.16	0.67±0.25	0.48±0.18^⑦
Apical	Buccolingual/mm	0.60±0.24	0.56±0.23	1.22±0.49	0.56±0.20	0.54±0.20	0.69±0.31	0.46±0.19
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.37±0.12	0.35±0.13^⑧	0.51±0.14	0.37±0.12	0.36±0.13	0.42±0.15	0.33±0.15^④
Foramen	Buccolingual/mm	0.17±0.08	0.17±0.09	0.27±0.13	0.16±0.08	0.17±0.08	0.19±0.09^⑨	0.16±0.08
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.11±0.06	0.10±0.06	0.16±0.07	0.10±0.05	0.11±0.06^⑩	0.12±0.06	0.10±0.05

Level	Diameter	Three-canal type (n=120)			Four-canal type (n=120)
Level	Diameter	MB	ML	D	MB	ML	DB	DL
Coronal	Buccolingual/mm	1.60±0.46	1.47±0.47^①	3.79±0.69^②	1.65±0.47	1.46±0.48^③	1.95±0.80	1.49±0.64
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.92±0.29	0.85±0.30	1.78±0.61^④	0.95±0.35^⑤	0.85±0.26^③	0.93±0.35	0.85±0.37
Middle	Buccolingual/mm	0.83±0.29	0.81±0.29	2.40±0.64	0.82±0.27^⑥	0.80±0.26	1.09±0.45	0.77±0.30
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.51±0.14	0.52±0.16	0.75±0.23	0.57±0.18	0.49±0.16	0.67±0.25	0.48±0.18^⑦
Apical	Buccolingual/mm	0.60±0.24	0.56±0.23	1.22±0.49	0.56±0.20	0.54±0.20	0.69±0.31	0.46±0.19
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.37±0.12	0.35±0.13^⑧	0.51±0.14	0.37±0.12	0.36±0.13	0.42±0.15	0.33±0.15^④
Foramen	Buccolingual/mm	0.17±0.08	0.17±0.09	0.27±0.13	0.16±0.08	0.17±0.08	0.19±0.09^⑨	0.16±0.08
	Mesiodistal/mm	0.11±0.06	0.10±0.06	0.16±0.07	0.10±0.05	0.11±0.06^⑩	0.12±0.06	0.10±0.05

Root canal type	Root canal	Mesiodistal diameter/mm
Root canal type	Root canal	Mean value	20‒29 years	30‒39 years	40‒49 years	50‒59 years
Three-canal type	MB	0.11±0.06	0.14±0.12	0.14±0.11	0.11±0.06	0.11±0.05
	ML	0.10±0.06	0.11±0.07	0.10±0.07	0.10±0.05	0.10±0.06
	D	0.16±0.07	0.17±0.07	0.17±0.07	0.15±0.08	0.14±0.06
Four-canal type	MB	0.10±0.05	0.11±0.05	0.11±0.05	0.10±0.05	0.09±0.06
	ML	0.11±0.06	0.11±0.05	0.14±0.08	0.10±0.06	0.11±0.05
	DB	0.12±0.06	0.11±0.06	0.13±0.07	0.13±0.06	0.10±0.06
	DL	0.10±0.05	0.10±0.05	0.10±0.06	0.11±0.07	0.08±0.04