JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE) ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1573-1578.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.12.005

Previous Articles    

Cross-cultural adaptation,reliability and validity testing of the Chinese version of Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist

Xian QIU1,2(), Wei-yi ZHU1, Peng ZHAO3(), Si-jian PAN2, Bo-min SUN2, Bei-wen WU1()   

  1. 1.Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2.Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    3.Gamma Knife Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China
  • Received:2021-05-13 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2022-01-28
  • Contact: Peng ZHAO,Bei-wen WU E-mail:qx21605@rjh.com.cn;zpjny@163.com;gaoan2005@yahoo.com.cn
  • Supported by:
    Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaoyuan Nursing Grant Support(Hlgy1804kyx);2019 New Star Plan of Medical Circle in Shanghai

Abstract: Objective

·To translate the English version of Brain Metastases Symptom Checklist (BMSC) into Chinese version and test its reliability and validity.

Methods

·The translation and adaption of BMSC for the Chinese population were generated by Brislin translation and back-translation model. From January 2017 to June 2019, a sample of 239 brain metastases patients matched with the inclusion criteria were selected via convenience sampling from the Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and Gamma Knife Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. The Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the retest reliability. The item-related content validity index (ICV) and the scale-level average content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) were applied to assess the content validity of the Chinese version of BMSC. The effective size (ES) was calculated to evaluate the responsiveness of the Chinese version of BMSC, and the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of the Chinese version of BMSC was evaluated by using anchor-based approach and distribution-based approach respectively.

Results

·The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of BMSC was 0.85, and the ICC reflecting retest reliability was 0.72. The I-CVI was 0.8?1.0, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.97. The scores of the Chinese version of BMSC before and after gamma knife treatment showed significant differences (P<0.05), and the ES of the Chinese version of BMSC was 0.01?0.35. The MCID value of BMSC score obtained by anchor-based method was 0.07?1.28, and the value obtained by distribution-based method was 0.01?0.60.

Conclusion

·The Chinese version of BMSC has good validity and reliability.

Key words: brain metastases, symptom, scale, reliability, validity

CLC Number: