上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版）

• 论著（公共卫生） • 上一篇    下一篇

公立医院经济性目标与公益性目标监管分析——基于共同代理理论的研究

刘自敏1，张昕竹2,3，孟天广4   

  1. 1.西南大学经济管理学院， 重庆 400716； 2.江西财经大学规制与竞争研究中心， 南昌 330013； 3.中国社会科学院规制与竞争研究中心， 北京 100732； 4.清华大学政治学系， 北京 100083
  • 出版日期:2015-01-28 发布日期:2015-01-29
  • 作者简介:刘自敏（1981—）， 男， 副教授， 博士; 电子信箱: ziminliu@126.com。
  • 基金资助:

    重庆市人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目（14SKB049）；中央高校基本科研项目（SWU1409124, SWU1409404）

Analysis of regulation of economic and public welfare objectives of public hospitals based on common agency theory

LIU Zi-min1, ZHANG Xin-zhu2,3, MENG Tian-guang4   

  1. 1.College of Economics and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China； 2.Research Center for Regulation and Competition, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China; 3.Research Center for Regulation and Competition, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100732, China； 4.Department of Politics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Online:2015-01-28 Published:2015-01-29
  • Supported by:

    Project of Chongqing Humanities and Social Sciences Key Research Base, 14SKB049; Fundamental Research Project of the Central Universities of China, SWU1409124, SWU1409404

PDF (PC)

1002

摘要：

目的 分析我国公立医院监管中经济性监管与公益性监管失衡的原因，提出解决公立医院多委托人共同代理难题、平衡经济性监管与公益性监管的可行措施。方法 利用多委托人共同代理理论对公立医院监管体系及监管者目标进行分析，比较公立医院经济性目标与公益性目标下监管者们不合作但同时行动、各自先后序贯行动、相互合作等4类行为的收益及福利。结果 不同行为模式对公立医院实现监管者各自目标及社会总福利产生不同的影响。两类监管者合作能够实现社会福利最大化；两类监管者不合作但是同时行动时，代理人利用监管者的不合作获取最高的利润；两类监管者不合作且先后序贯行动时，先行动的监管者利用自己的先动优势，获取高的收益。结论 通过多个规制者之间的合作可以实现社会福利最大化。医疗改革中，政府应该采取措施促使多个监管者合作，促进不同规制机构的沟通与协调，措施包括自我协调、第三方协调及统一的大部制等。

关键词: 公立医院改革, 共同代理, 经济性监管, 公益性监管, 监管模式

Abstract:

Objective To analyze reasons of the imbalance between economic supervision and public welfare supervision of public hospitals and to propose applicable measures for solving the problem of common agency of multi-clients and balancing the economic supervision and public welfare supervision. Methods The theory of common agency of multi-clients was adopted to analyze the supervision system and objectives of supervisors. The benefit and welfare of 4 activities, i.e. supervisors act with cooperation, supervisors act simultaneously without cooperation, supervisors of economic supervision act first, and supervisors of public welfare supervision act first, were compared. Results Different action modes had different effects on achieving objectives of supervisors and total social welfare. Cooperation of both supervisors could maximize the social welfare. Simultaneous actions of supervisors without cooperation caused agents obtaining maximum benefits by taking advantage of the in-cooperation of supervisors. Sequential actions of supervisors without cooperation caused supervisors who acted first obtaining maximum benefits. Conclusion Cooperation of multi-supervisors can maximize the social welfare. The government should take measures to promote the cooperation of supervisors and improve the communication and coordination among different regulatory institutions during the course of health care reform, including self coordination, third-part coordination, and super-ministry system.

Key words: public hospital reform, common agency, economic regulation, public welfare regulation, regulation model