上海交通大学学报（医学版）

›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 458-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2011.04.017

• 论著（临床研究） • 上一篇    下一篇

超声射频信号血管内中膜分析和高分辨率超声评价儿童颈动脉内中膜厚度的比较研究

金 晔1, 陈亚青1, 汤庆娅2, 李文英1, 蒋 珺1   

  1. 上海交通大学 医学院附属新华医院 1.超声中心, 2.临床营养中心, 上海 200092
  • 出版日期:2011-04-28 发布日期:2011-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 陈亚青, 电子信箱: joychen1266@126.com。
  • 作者简介:金 晔(1970—), 女, 副主任医师, 硕士；电子信箱: jinye2006@hotmail.com。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市卫生局基金（2009062）

Comparison of quality intima-media thickness and high-resolution ultrasound in evaluation of carotid intima-media thickness in children

JIN Ye1, CHEN Ya-qing1, TANG Qing-ya2, LI Wen-ying1, JIANG Jun1   

  1. 1.Department of Medical Ultrasound, 2.Clinical Nutrition Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Online:2011-04-28 Published:2011-04-28
  • Supported by:

    Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau Foundation, 2009062

PDF (PC)

1462

摘要：

目的 比较高分辨率超声和超声射频信号血管内中膜分析（QIMT）技术测量儿童颈动脉内中膜厚度（IMT）的可靠性。方法 两名超声科医师分别应用操作者徒手测量法和QIMT技术测量32名儿童的双侧颈动脉IMT。结果 QIMT技术和操作者徒手测量法测量颈动脉IMT的均差(MD)，在检查者间比较，左侧为－0.00 和－0.09 mm，右侧为－0.01和－0.11 mm；组内相关系数(ICC) 在检查者间比较，分别为左侧0.808和0.335；右侧0.875和0.415。Bland-Altman分析显示，QIMT技术有较好的一致性，优于操作者徒手测量法。结论 在规范的测量条件下，QIMT技术的检查结果具有较好的一致性，可准确测量颈动脉IMT。

关键词: 颈动脉内中膜厚度, 超声射频信号血管内中膜分析, 重复性, 均差, 组内相关系数, Bland-Altman图

Abstract:

Objective To compare the reliability of high-resolution ultrasound and quality intima-media thickness (QIMT) in evaluation of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in children. Methods Bilateral carotid IMT measurements were conducted in 32 children by two doctors of Department of Medical Ultrasound with QIMT and high-resolution ultrasound. Results The mean differences of carotid IMT of QIMT were -0.00 mm for the left and -0.01 mm for the right, and those of high-resolution ultrasound were -0.09 mm for the left and -0.11 mm for the right. The intra-class coefficients of highresolution ultrasound were 0.335 for the left and 0.415 for the right, and those of QIMT were 0.808 for the left and 0.875 for the right. Bland-Altman analysis indicated better interobserver reproducibility for QIMT. Conclusion Under standardized measurement conditions, QIMT may yield favourable interobserver reproducibility, and can measure carotid IMT accurately.

Key words: carotid intima-media thickness, quality intima-media thickness, reproducibility, mean difference, intra-class coefficient, Bland-Altman plot