收稿日期: 2021-11-18
录用日期: 2022-01-10
网络出版日期: 2022-04-28
基金资助
国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1002800);国家自然科学基金(82171669);上海交通大学“交大之星”(STAR)计划重大项目(20210201)
Analysis of risk factors of hysterectomy caused by intractable postpartum hemorrhage
Received date: 2021-11-18
Accepted date: 2022-01-10
Online published: 2022-04-28
Supported by
National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC1002800);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82171669);Shanghai Jiao Tong University Trans-Med Awards Research (Major Project)(20210201)
目的·探讨难治性产后出血导致产科急症子宫切除的危险因素以及相关预防措施。方法·回顾性分析2014年1月—2020年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院收治的110 934例产妇的临床资料。根据收治时间,选择其中2015—2017年段(n=48 984)和2018—2020年段(n=45 262)的产妇为研究对象,分析其产科急症子宫切除发生率的情况;选择其中发生难治性产后出血的108例产妇为研究对象,根据是否行子宫切除,将其分为子宫切除组(n=22)与子宫保留组(n=86),采用单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归模型对该2组患者的临床资料进行比较分析,并探究产科急症子宫切除的危险因素。结果·与2015—2017年段相比,2018—2020年段的产科急症子宫切除发生率下降(P=0.039);与子宫保留组相比,子宫切除组患者的年龄偏大,孕次≥2次、单胎妊娠、发生妊娠合并症(前置胎盘、胎盘植入、瘢痕子宫等)、羊水栓塞者的占比均较高,产后出血量更大(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,患者的年龄、产后出血量均是难治性产后出血导致产科急症子宫切除的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论·难治性产后出血产妇的年龄越高、出血量越大,越容易导致产科急症子宫切除的发生。临床上需尽早开展监测并进行干预,以降低该类患者产科急症子宫切除的发生率。
胡佳宁 , 张锦文 , 刘晓瑞 , 陈彩莲 , 林羿 . 难治性产后出血导致子宫切除的危险因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(4) : 409 -414 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.04.002
·To investigate the risk factors and related preventive measures of intractable postpartum hemorrhage which leads to emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
·The clinical data of 110 934 pregnant women treated in the International Peace Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2014 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the treated time, pregnant women in the 2015?2017 year-period (n=48 984) and 2018?2020 year-period (n=45 262) were selected as the research objects to analyze the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Besides, a total of 108 pregnant women with intractable postpartum hemorrhage were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into the uterine-removed group (n=22) and the uterine-preserved group (n=86) according to whether they had hysterectomy. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression model, and the risk factors of emergency peripartum hysterectomy were explored.
·Compared with the 2015?2017 year-period, the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy decreased in the 2018?2020 year-period (P=0.039). Meanwhile, compared with the uterine-preserved group, the pregnant women in the uterine-removed group were older, with more than 2 pregnancies, monocyesis, pregnancy complications (placenta previa, placenta implantation, scarred uterus, etc.), amniotic fluid embolism and greater postpartum hemorrhage (all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the patients' age and the volume of postpartum hemorrhage were independent risk factors for emergency peripartum hysterectomy caused by intractable postpartum hemorrhage (P<0.05).
·The older the patients with intractable postpartum hemorrhage, the greater volume of postpartum hemorrhage, which is easy to lead to emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Clinical monitoring and intervention should be carried out as soon as possible to reduce the patients' incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
1 | SERGENT F, RESCH B, VERSPYCK E, et al. Intractable postpartum haemorrhages: where is the place of vascular ligations, emergency peripartum hysterectomy or arterial embolization?[J]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 2004, 32(4): 320-329. |
2 | JIN R, GUO Y N, CHEN Y. Risk factors associated with emergency peripartum hysterectomy[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014, 127(5): 900-904. |
3 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 产后出血预防与处理指南(2014)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(9): 641-646. |
4 | 李春荣, 赵顺霞, 张朋睿, 等. 国家全面两孩政策实施后生育第二孩产妇的临床特点分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(3): 343-347. |
5 | TRIUNFO S, FERRAZZANI S, VOLPE M, et al. Old and novel insights into emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a time-trend analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2020, 301(5): 1159-1165. |
6 | CAMPBELL S M, CORCORAN P, MANNING E, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy incidence, risk factors and clinical characteristics in Ireland[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biol, 2016, 207: 56-61. |
7 | CHEN M, ZHANG L, WEI Q, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy between 2009 and 2010 in Sichuan, China[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013, 120(2): 183-186. |
8 | ZHANG Y L, YAN J Y, HAN Q, et al. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy for life-threatening postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(45): e8443. |
9 | SILVER R M. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 126(3): 654-668. |
10 | ROUSTAEI Z, VEHVIL?INEN-JULKUNEN K, TUOMAINEN T P, et al. The effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa: a register-based cohort study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biol, 2018, 227: 1-7. |
11 | 李红玲. 产科急症子宫切除术在抢救产科大出血中的应用[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(23): 63-65. |
12 | 潘剑芳. 凶险性前置胎盘合并产后出血的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(10): 1802-1804. |
13 | HOUGH A, SHAKUR-STILL H, ROBERTS I, et al. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths among 18 942 women with postpartum hemorrhage: analysis of perinatal outcomes in the WOMAN trial[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 153(1): 146-153. |
14 | TAHAOGLU A E, BALSAK D, TOGRUL C, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: our experience[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2016, 185(4): 833-838. |
15 | KAZI S. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a great obstetric challenge[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2018, 34(6): 1567-1570. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |