口腔外科专题

改良位点保留法拔除复杂下颌阻生第三磨牙对临床成骨愈合的作用初探

  • 陆叶平 ,
  • 陈敏洁
展开
  • 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔外科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011
陆叶平 (1996—),男,住院医师,硕士生;电子信箱:1074420260@qq.com
陈敏洁,电子信箱:chenmj_sbu@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-02-16

  录用日期: 2022-04-18

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-19

Efficacy of modified ridge preservation on socket healing after mandibular third molar extractions

  • Yeping LU ,
  • Minjie CHEN
Expand
  • Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University;National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
CHEN Minjie, E-mail: chenmj_sub@163.com.

Received date: 2022-02-16

  Accepted date: 2022-04-18

  Online published: 2022-08-19

摘要

目的·评估拔除低位骨埋伏下颌第三磨牙(M3)时,阻生齿上方牙槽骨顶壁的保留对同侧第二磨牙(M2)远中成骨的临床效果。方法·选取2020年8月—2021年8月于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔外科行低位骨埋伏阻生齿位点保留法拔除术拔除M3的患者19例为试验组,以接受传统拔牙术式的8例患者为对照组,分别于术后1周、3个月和6个月时对患者进行随访。随访时记录患者术后感染、神经损伤等情况;对术区M2进行口内临床检查,包括冷热刺激痛、牙体叩诊结果、松动度。在术后3个月和6个月时测量牙周袋探诊深度(probing depth,PD)以及临床附着水平(clinical attachment level,CAL)等;同时拍摄锥形束 CT,并通过CS3DImaging软件重建和测量同侧M2远中牙槽骨缺损深度(osseous defect depth, ODD)。结果·所有患者术后均未发生感染及神经损伤等并发症。2组患者术后6个月时M2远中颊侧PD、CAL及ODD较其术后3个月时均有明显改善(均P<0.05);同时,试验组在术后随访的各阶段分别与对照组比较,该3项指标差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论·低位骨埋伏阻生齿上方牙槽骨顶壁的保留,对于同侧第二磨牙远中侧成骨具有显著的促进作用。

本文引用格式

陆叶平 , 陈敏洁 . 改良位点保留法拔除复杂下颌阻生第三磨牙对临床成骨愈合的作用初探[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(6) : 729 -734 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.06.006

Abstract

Objective

·To evaluate the efficacy of the preservation of alveolar crest in situ for regeneration of periodontal osseous defect distal to the mandibular second molar (M2) after mandibular third molar extractions.

Methods

·After screening by evaluation, a total of 19 patients were enrolled and accepted the mandibular third molar extractions with modified ridge preservation at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from August 2020 to August 2021. Meanwhile, 8 cases of traditional tooth extraction were included in the control group. All the patients were followed up at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after operation. Postoperative symptoms including pain, swelling and nerve injury were also recorded in detail. Intraoral clinical examination was performed on M2, including cold and heat stimulation, tooth percussion results and looseness. Osseous defect depth (ODD) on the disto-buccal aspect of M2 was taken as the primary outcome variable. Probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were taken as the secondary outcome variables during the follow-up period. In the meantime, all the patients received cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the data were analyzed and reconstructed for the measurement of ODD through CS3DImaging software.

Results

·No obvious postoperative complications such as infection or never injury were found in any patient. The PD, CAL and ODD on the disto-buccal aspect of M2 at 6 months after operation in the two groups were both improved compared with those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05 for all). Furthermore, all the data in the experimental group were lower than those of the control group at any time of the follow-up (P<0.05 for all).

Conclusion

·Modified ridge preservation has a notable improvement in regeneration of periodontal osseous defect distal to the M2 after mandibular third molar extractions.

参考文献

1 KUGELBERG C F. Impacted lower third molars and periodontal health. An epidemiological, methodological, retrospective and prospective clinical, study[J]. Swed Dent J Suppl, 1990, 68: 1-52.
2 TRYBEK G, ANIKO-W?ODARCZYK M, JARO? A. Assessment of electrosensitivity of the pulp of the mandibular second molar after surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(16) : 3614.
3 ARENAZ-BUA J, LUACES-REY R, SIRONVALLE-SOLIVA S, et al. A comparative study of platelet-rich plasma, hydroxyapatite, demineralized bone matrix and autologous bone to promote bone regeneration after mandibular impacted third molar extraction[J]. Med Oral, 2010, 15(3): e483-e489.
4 BARBATO L, KALEMAJ Z, BUTI J, et al. Effect of surgical intervention for removal of mandibular third molar on periodontal healing of adjacent mandibular second molar: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontol, 2016, 87(3): 291-302.
5 SAMMARTINO G, TIA M, MARENZI G, et al. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in periodontal defect treatment after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(6): 766-770.
6 JUNG R E, IOANNIDIS A, H?MMERLE C H F, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Periodontol, 2000, 2018, 77(1): 165-175.
7 戈旌, 杨驰, 郑家伟, 等. 阻生第三磨牙拔除术后自体骨回植第二磨牙远中骨缺损的单中心随机对照临床研究[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2017, 15(4): 334-340.
7 GE J,YANG C, ZHENG J W, et al. Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Chin J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 15(4): 334-340.
8 ZHOU J, HONG H Y, ZHOU H, et al. Orthodontic extraction of a high-risk impacted mandibular third molar contacting the inferior alveolar nerve, with the aid of a ramus mini-screw[J]. Quintessence Int, 2021, 52(6): 538-546.
9 DAWARE S N, BALAKRISHNA R, DEOGADE S C, et al. Assessment of postoperative discomfort and nerve injuries after surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a prospective study[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2021, 10(4): 1712-1717.
10 Couso-Queiruga E, Mansouri C J, Alade A A, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy.[J]. J Periodontol, 2022.DOI: 10.1002/JPER.22-0030.
11 Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, et al. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology: is it still a “gold standard”? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2017, 3(1): 23.
12 梁德凤, 周鑫才, 李艳芬, 等. 自体骨即刻移植对阻生第三磨牙拔除术后第二磨牙远中骨质缺损的疗效分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2019, 39(7): 624-627, 631.
12 LIANG D F, ZHOU X C, LI Y F, et al. Effect of autogenous bone graft on distal bone defect of the second molar after the extraction of the impacted third molar[J]. Stomatology, 2019, 39(7): 624-627, 631.
13 Elgali I, Omar O,Dahlin C, et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2017, 125(5) : 315-337.
14 I??K G, YüCE M ?, KO?AK-TOPBA? N, et al. Guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement using bovine-derived xenograft with and without liquid platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(9): 5563-5575.
文章导航

/