收稿日期: 2022-06-13
录用日期: 2022-08-21
网络出版日期: 2022-09-28
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(81825001);上海市科学技术委员会科学基金(19XD1422100)
Immune inhibitory receptor LILRB2 enhances SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated immune inflammation
Received date: 2022-06-13
Accepted date: 2022-08-21
Online published: 2022-09-28
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81825001);Scientific Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(19XD1422100)
目的·探究免疫抑制性受体白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体亚家族B成员2(leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B member 2,LILRB2)在新型冠状(新冠)病毒感染所导致的免疫细胞炎症因子释放中的作用及机制,为新冠病毒肺炎治疗提供潜在靶点。方法·收集包含刺突蛋白胞外段(S-ECD)的细胞上清液,分别使用Western blotting及流式细胞术检测上清液中蛋白表达情况及活性;通过流式细胞术及免疫共沉淀技术检测该上清液中S-ECD与LILRB2的结合;用刺突蛋白处理人单核细胞系THP1或人外周血单个核细胞(peripheral blood mononuclear cell,PBMC),24 h后收集细胞,使用实时定量PCR技术检测相关炎症因子基因mRNA水平改变,同时使用酶联免疫吸附法检测细胞培养液中白细胞介素6(interleukin-6,IL-6)及IL-1β含量;将siLILRB2通过Lipofectamine 3000试剂转染至人外周血CD33+髓系细胞中,24 h后使用流式细胞术检测基因干扰效果;在对照组及LILRB2敲低的CD33+髓系细胞中加入刺突蛋白培养24 h,使用酶联免疫吸附试剂盒检测细胞培养液中IL-6的含量变化。结果·实验成功构建可分泌具有生物活性的新冠病毒S-ECD的293T细胞转染体系;免疫共沉淀实验显示刺突蛋白与LILRB2蛋白存在相互作用,且流式细胞术结果提示刺突蛋白胞外段能够与细胞表面的LILRB2结合;与对照组相比,经刺突蛋白处理24 h的THP1细胞中IL-6、IL-8、精氨酸酶(arginase 1)及IL-2基因表达水平均有明显上调(均P<0.05);PBMC经刺突蛋白处理24 h后,IL-6、转化生长因子-β(transforming growth factor-β,TGF-β)、IL-8、IL-10及IL-1β的mRNA水平均显著上升(均P<0.05);酶联免疫吸附实验结果显示,在PBMC培养液中加入刺突蛋白能够提高上清液中IL-6及IL-1β的浓度(均P<0.05);使用S-ECD或刺突蛋白处理CD33+髓系细胞,IL-1β及IL-6含量随之升高(均P<0.05);并且过表达LILRB2的THP1细胞经刺突蛋白刺激后展现了更强的IL-6分泌能力(P<0.05);流式细胞术检测结果显示,2条siRNA均能敲低CD33+髓系细胞中的LILRB2,且siLILRB2-1敲除效果更好;LILRB2缺失后,刺突蛋白则不能促进CD33+髓系细胞的IL-6分泌。结论·新冠病毒刺突蛋白通过与细胞表面分子LILRB2结合,引起髓系细胞释放IL-6、IL-1β等炎症因子,导致患者出现细胞因子释放综合征。
关键词: 新型冠状病毒; 刺突蛋白; 白细胞免疫球蛋白样受体亚家族B成员2; 炎症因子; 髓系细胞
杨文倩 , 陈迟琪 , 赵路 , 曹力元 , 夏一秋 , 卢智刚 , 郑俊克 . 免疫抑制性受体LILRB2促进新型冠状病毒刺突蛋白介导的炎症过程[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(9) : 1188 -1196 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.09.005
Objective ·To explore the possible roles of immune inhibitory receptor leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor subfamily B member 2 (LILRB2) in the immune inflammation after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and provide a potential therapeutic way for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods ·The supernatants containing the extracellular domain of spike protein (S-ECD) were collected, and the detection of the protein expression and activity in the conditional medium by Western blotting and flow cytometric analysis was followed by. The binding of S-ECD with LILRB2 was measured by co-immunoprecipitation and flow cytometric analysis. The mRNA expression levels of several inflammation genes in a human mononuclear cell line (THP1) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were measured after spike protein stimulation for 24 h by quantitative RT-PCR. The protein levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in the conditional medium were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The siLILRB2 was transferred into CD33+ myeloid cells purified from human peripheral blood with Lipofectamine 3000 reagents. The knockdown efficiency was detected 24 h after transfection by flow cytometric analysis. The difference in the protein levels of IL-6 between the control cells and LILRB2-knocked-down cells after spike protein treatment was evaluated by ELISA. Results ·The study established a transfection system with 293T cells by which the SARS-CoV-2 S-ECD could be secreted to supernatants with normal biological activities. The interaction and the binding of spike protein with LILRB2 were evaluated by a co-immunoprecipitation assay and flow cytometric analysis, respectively. The mRNA expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, arginase 1 and IL-2 in THP1 cells were significantly up-regulated 24 h after spike protein treatment compared to the control cells (all P<0.05). Consistently, the mRNA levels of IL-6, transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β), IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1β in PBMC were notably increased after spike protein stimulation (all P<0.05). In addition, spike protein could also induce the release of IL-6 and IL-1β in PBMC as measured by ELISA (all P<0.05). More importantly, spike protein was able to increase the secretion of IL-1β and IL-6 by CD33+ myeloid cells 24 h after treatment (both P<0.05). LILRB2-overexpressing THP1 cells produced more IL-6 24 h after treatment with spike protein than the control cells (P<0.05). Two siRNAs could efficiently down-regulate the expression of LILRB2 in CD33+ cells as evaluated by flow cytometric analysis. Consistently, spike protein had no effect on the IL-6 secretion to supernatant from LILRB2-knockdown CD33+ myeloid cells. Conclusion ·SARS-CoV-2 can induce cytokine release syndrome by inflammatory factors, such as IL-6 and IL-1β, released by myeloid cells through spike protein binding to LILRB2.
1 | V'KOVSKI P, KRATZEL A, STEINER S, et al. Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021, 19(3): 155-170. |
2 | YAO H, SONG Y, CHEN Y, et al. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus[J]. Cell, 2020, 183(3): 730-738.e13. |
3 | WALLS A C, PARK Y J, TORTORICI M A, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein[J]. Cell, 2020, 181(2): 281-292.e6. |
4 | HOFFMANN M, KLEINE-WEBER H, SCHROEDER S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor[J]. Cell, 2020, 181(2): 271-280.e8. |
5 | YAN R, ZHANG Y, LI Y, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6485): 1444-1448. |
6 | BENTON D J, WROBEL A G, XU P, et al. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion[J]. Nature, 2020, 588(7837): 327-330. |
7 | WANG Q, ZHANG Y, WU L, et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2[J]. Cell, 2020, 181(4): 894-904. e9. |
8 | ZANG R, GOMEZ CASTRO M F, MCCUNE B T, et al. TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 promote SARS-CoV-2 infection of human small intestinal enterocytes[J]. Sci Immunol, 2020, 5(47): eabc3582. |
9 | WANG K, CHEN W, ZHANG Z, et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020, 5(1): 283. |
10 | MORNIROLI D, GIANNì M L, CONSALES A, et al. Human sialome and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an understated correlation?[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11: 1480. |
11 | CANTUTI-CASTELVETRI L, OJHA R, PEDRO L D, et al. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6518): 856-860. |
12 | YANG X, YU Y, XU J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2020, 8(5): 475-481. |
13 | XU Z, SHI L, WANG Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2020, 8(4): 420-422. |
14 | SOY M, KESER G, ATAGüNDüZ P. Pathogenesis and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19[J]. Turk J Biol, 2021, 45(4): 372-389. |
15 | LI G, FAN Y, LAI Y, et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(4): 424-432. |
16 | LU Q, LIU J, ZHAO S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 exacerbates proinflammatory responses in myeloid cells through C-type lectin receptors and Tweety family member 2[J]. Immunity, 2021, 54(6): 1304-1319.e9. |
17 | CHEN H M, VAN DER TOUW W, WANG Y S, et al. Blocking immunoinhibitory receptor LILRB2 reprograms tumor-associated myeloid cells and promotes antitumor immunity[J]. J Clin Invest, 2018, 128(12): 5647-5662. |
18 | GU Y, CAO J, ZHANG X, et al. Receptome profiling identifies KREMEN1 and ASGR1 as alternative functional receptors of SARS-CoV-2[J]. Cell Res, 2022, 32(1): 24-37. |
19 | BOST P, GILADI A, LIU Y, et al. Host-viral infection maps reveal signatures of severe COVID-19 patients[J]. Cell, 2020, 181(7): 1475-1488.e12. |
20 | TANAKA T, NARAZAKI M, KISHIMOTO T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2014, 6(10): a016295. |
21 | VABRET N, BRITTON G J, GRUBER C, et al. Immunology of COVID-19: current state of the science[J]. Immunity, 2020, 52(6): 910-941. |
22 | GONG J, DONG H, XIA Q S, et al. Correlation analysis between disease severity and inflammation-related parameters in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2020, 20(1): 963. |
23 | EVEREST H, STEVENSON-LEGGETT P, BAILEY D, et al. Known cellular and receptor interactions of animal and human coronaviruses: a review[J]. Viruses, 2022, 14(2): 351. |
24 | WANG W, TANG J, WEI F. Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(4): 441-447. |
25 | COSTELA-RUIZ V J, ILLESCAS-MONTES R, PUERTA-PUERTA J M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection: the role of cytokines in COVID-19 disease[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2020, 54: 62-75. |
26 | GUBERNATOROVA E O, GORSHKOVA E A, POLINOVA A I, et al. IL-6: relevance for immunopathology of SARS-CoV-2[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2020, 53: 13-24. |
27 | POTERE N, BATTICCIOTTO A, VECCHIé A, et al. The role of IL-6 and IL-6 blockade in COVID-19[J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2021, 17(6): 601-618. |
28 | DERAKHSHANI A, HEMMAT N, ASADZADEH Z, et al. Arginase 1 (Arg1) as an up-regulated gene in COVID-19 patients: a promising marker in COVID-19 immunopathy[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(5): 1051. |
29 | ZUO J, DOWELL A C, PEARCE H, et al. Robust SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity is maintained at 6 months following primary infection[J]. Nat Immunol, 2021, 22(5): 620-626. |
30 | JONES S A, HUNTER C A. Is IL-6 a key cytokine target for therapy in COVID-19?[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2021, 21(6): 337-339. |
31 | FERREIRA-GOMES M, KRUGLOV A, DUREK P, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in severe COVID-19 induces a TGF-β-dominated chronic immune response that does not target itself[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 1961. |
32 | KUDO T, HAYASHI Y, KUNIEDA K, et al. Persistent intrathecal interleukin-8 production in a patient with SARS-CoV-2-related encephalopathy presenting aphasia: a case report[J]. BMC Neurol, 2021, 21(1): 426. |
33 | HAN H, MA Q F, LI C, et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2020, 9(1): 1123-1130. |
34 | TRIPATHY A S, VISHWAKARMA S, TRIMBAKE D, et al. Pro-inflammatory CXCL-10, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6: biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 infection[J]. Arch Virol, 2021, 166(12): 3301-3310. |
35 | GIAMARELLOS-BOURBOULIS E J, NETEA M G, ROVINA N, et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2020, 27(6): 992-1000.e3. |
36 | MOORE J B, JUNE C H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19[J]. Science, 2020, 368(6490): 473-474. |
37 | LUO P, LIU Y, QIU L, et al. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: a single center experience[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(7): 814-818. |
38 | GAUTRET P, LAGIER J C, PAROLA P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2020, 56(1): 105949. |
39 | WU D, YANG X O. TH17 responses in cytokine storm of COVID-19: an emerging target of JAK2 inhibitor fedratinib[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2020, 53(3): 368-370. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |