论著 · 临床研究

乳腺癌脑转移患者的临床病理特征及预后的影响因素分析

  • 苏俊澄 ,
  • 王禹铮 ,
  • 唐雷 ,
  • 徐迎春 ,
  • 张凤春
展开
  • 1.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院肿瘤科,上海 200127
    2.上海交通大学医学院苏州九龙医院肿瘤科,苏州 215127
苏俊澄(2000—),男,本科生;电子信箱:1612003896@qq.com第一联系人:(唐雷、徐迎春并列第一作者)
唐 雷(1982—),电子信箱:Bobbytang_1982@163.com
徐迎春(1976—),电子信箱:xiaoxu2384@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-04-15

  录用日期: 2022-07-02

  网络出版日期: 2023-01-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(81301858);苏州市科技计划项目(SYS201404);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20181186)

Clinical and pathological characteristics as well as prognostic analysis of breast cancer patients with brain metastases

  • Juncheng SU ,
  • Yuzheng WANG ,
  • Lei TANG ,
  • Yingchun XU ,
  • Fengchun ZHANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
    2.Department of Oncology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou 215127, China
TANG Lei, E-mail: Bobbytang_1982@163.com.
XU Yingchun, E-mail: xiaoxu2384@163.com

Received date: 2022-04-15

  Accepted date: 2022-07-02

  Online published: 2023-01-04

Supported by

National Nature Science Foundation of China(81301858);Suzhou Science and Technology Project(SYS201404);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20181186)

摘要

目的·探究乳腺癌脑转移患者的临床病理特征、预后情况及可能的影响因素。方法·选择2007年1月—2021年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的女性乳腺癌脑转移患者75例。通过临床电子病历收集患者的临床病理特征,并于随访期间收集患者的脑转移后总生存期(overall survival after brain metastases,OSBM)。采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC curve,ROC曲线)评估各项生化指标对OSBM的预测效能。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析不同临床病理特征与患者OSBM的相关性,并在此基础上对具有统计学意义的因素进一步行Cox比例风险回归分析, 以确定独立影响因素。结果·75例患者的OSBM为11.0(5.0,24.0)个月。ROC曲线的结果显示,糖类抗原125(carbohydrate antigen125,CA125)对OSBM具有较好的预测效果,其最佳截断值为22.3 U/mL。Kaplan-Meier生存分析的结果显示,初发转移为脑转移(P=0.046)、脑转移治疗期间颅外病灶发生进展(P=0.042)、脑转移灶仅累及小脑幕一侧(P=0.013)、CA125水平<22.3 U/mL(P=0.000)、接受过局部治疗(P=0.034)改良分级预后评估(modified Graded Prognostic Assessment,mGPA)>1分(P=0.001)的患者的OSBM更长。Cox比例风险回归分析显示,脑转移灶同时累及小脑幕两侧或累及脑膜(P=0.029)、CA125水平≥22.3 U/mL(P=0.005)为OSBM的危险因素,mGPA>1分(P=0.033)为其保护因素。结论·乳腺癌脑转移灶的位置、确诊脑转移时患者的CA125水平以及mGPA评分是影响预后的重要因素。

本文引用格式

苏俊澄 , 王禹铮 , 唐雷 , 徐迎春 , 张凤春 . 乳腺癌脑转移患者的临床病理特征及预后的影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 42(11) : 1562 -1568 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.11.007

Abstract

Objective ·To explore clinical and pathological characteristics, prognosis and potential related factors of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Methods ·Seventy-five female breast cancer patients with brain metastases admitted to Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2007 to December 2021 were selected. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients were collected through clinical electronic cases, and the overall survival after brain metastases (OSBM) of the patients was collected during the follow-up period. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of different biochemical factors on OSBM. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the correlation between different clinical and pathological characteristics and patients' OSBM. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was further performed on statistically significant factors to determine independent influencing factors. Results ·The OSBM of 75 patients was 11.0 (5.0, 24.0) months. The results of ROC curve showed that carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) had a good prediction effect on OSBM, and its best cut-off value was 22.3 U/mL. The results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients whose first metastatic site was brain (P=0.046), whose extracranial disease status was progressed (P=0.042), whose brain metastasis involved one side of tentorium (P=0.013), whose CA125 level<22.3 U/mL (P=0.000), whose treatment methods incladed regional therapy (P=0.034) and whose modified Graded Prognostic Assessment (mGPA) score>1 (P=0.001), had longer OSBM. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that brain metastasis involving both sides of tentorium or meningeal (P=0.029), and CA125 level≥22.3 U/mL (P=0.005) were the risk factors for OSBM, and mGPA score>1 (P=0.033) was the protective factor. Conclusion ·The position of brain metastases in breast cancer, the level of CA125 and the mGPA score are important factors affecting the prognosis of patients.

参考文献

1 SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, FUCHS H E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2022, 72(1): 7-33.
2 国家肿瘤质控中心乳腺癌专家委员会, 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤药物临床研究专业委员会. 中国晚期乳腺癌规范诊疗指南(2020版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(10): 781-797.
2 Breast Cancer Expert Committee of National Cancer Quality Control Center, Breast Cancer Expert Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association, Cancer Drug Clinical Research Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association. Guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer in China (2020 Edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2020, 42(10): 781-797.
3 MILLS M N, FIGURA N B, ARRINGTON J A, et al. Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2020, 180(2): 279-300.
4 GASPAR L, SCOTT C, ROTMAN M, et al. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 37(4): 745-751.
5 WELTMAN E, SALVAJOLI J V, BRANDT R A, et al. Radiosurgery for brain metastases: a score index for predicting prognosis[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 46(5): 1155-1161.
6 LORENZONI J, DEVRIENDT D, MASSAGER N, et al. Radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases: estimation of patient eligibility using three stratification systems[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 60(1): 218-224.
7 SPERDUTO C M, WATANABE Y, MULLAN J, et al. A validation study of a new prognostic index for patients with brain metastases: the Graded Prognostic Assessment[J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 109 Suppl: 87-89.
8 SPERDUTO P W, KASED N, ROBERGE D, et al. Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(4): 419-425.
9 SPERDUTO P W, MESKO S, LI J, et al. Beyond an updated graded prognostic assessment (Breast GPA): a prognostic index and trends in treatment and survival in breast cancer brain metastases from 1985 to today[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2020, 107(2): 334-343.
10 HOSONAGA M, SAYA H, ARIMA Y. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying brain metastasis of breast cancer[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2020, 39(3): 711-720.
11 ZAGAR T M, VAN SWEARINGEN A E, KAIDAR-PERSON O, et al. Multidisciplinary management of breast cancer brain metastases[J]. Oncology (Williston Park), 2016, 30(10): 923-933.
12 ASSI H I, MAHMOUD T, SAADEH F S, et al. Management of leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 172: 151-159.
13 ETHIER J L, DESAUTELS D, TEMPLETON A, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2017, 19(1): 2.
14 LI J X, LIU L Y, FENG Z W, et al. Tumor markers CA15-3, CA125, CEA and breast cancer survival by molecular subtype: a cohort study[J]. Breast Cancer, 2020, 27(4): 621-630.
15 ZENG Y C, WU R, WANG S L, et al. Serum CA125 level predicts prognosis in patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer before and after treatment of whole-brain radiotherapy[J]. Med Oncol, 2014, 31(7): 48.
16 WANG H, SHEN L H, GENG J H, et al. Prognostic value of cancer antigen-125 for lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastasis: a random survival forest prognostic model[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 5670.
17 张佳玲, 张凤春, 徐迎春. 乳腺癌脑转移系统治疗的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(5): 671-677.
17 ZHANG J L, ZHANG F C, XU Y C. Research progress in the systemic treatment for breast cancer with brain metastasis[J]. J Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ (Med Sci), 2021, 41(5): 671-677.
文章导航

/