上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(2): 188-193 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.02.007

论著 · 临床研究

肝硬化患者胰岛素抵抗的临床分析

石翠翠,, 张洁, 黄鹤鸣, 桑玉尔,, 李光明,

上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院消化科,上海 200092

Clinical analysis of insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis patients

SHI Cuicui,, ZHANG Jie, HUANG Heming, SANG Yuer,, LI Guangming,

Department of Gastroenterology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

通讯作者: 桑玉尔,电子信箱:sangyuer@xinhuamed.com.cn李光明,电子信箱:ligm68@126.com

编委: 吴洋

收稿日期: 2022-09-09   接受日期: 2023-02-09   网络出版日期: 2023-02-28

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金.  82170617

Corresponding authors: SANG Yuer, E-mail:sangyuer@xinhuamed.com.cnLI Guangming, E-mail:ligm68@126.com.

Received: 2022-09-09   Accepted: 2023-02-09   Online: 2023-02-28

作者简介 About authors

石翠翠(1980—),女,主治医师,博士;电子信箱:shicuicui2005@126.com。 E-mail:shicuicui2005@126.com

摘要

目的·探讨肝硬化患者的胰岛素抵抗情况。方法·收集2013年1月—2017年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院住院的肝硬化患者的临床资料。回顾性分析肝硬化患者糖代谢指标,包括空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin A1c,HbA1c)、空腹胰岛素、胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance,HOMA-IR);记录肝硬化患者主要并发症,包括食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血(esophagogastric varices bleeding,EVB)、腹水和肝性脑病(hepatic encephalopathy,HE)。根据肝硬化患者的HOMA-IR,将肝硬化患者分无胰岛素抵抗组(IR≤1.64)和胰岛素抵抗组(IR>1.64),进行各项指标的组间比较。结果·研究共纳入376例肝硬化患者,其中Child-Pugh A级患者162例(43.09%)、B级148例(39.36%)、C级66例(17.55%)。肝硬化主要病因是乙型病毒性肝炎,占43.35%(163例)。376例肝硬化患者中,208例进行了空腹胰岛素水平检测;其中,无胰岛素抵抗组117例(56.25%),胰岛素抵抗组91例(43.75%)。胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)显著高于无胰岛素抵抗组(P=0.000);胰岛素抵抗组中2型糖尿病患者的比例亦高于无胰岛素抵抗组(P=0.001)。胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者的Child-Pugh分数(6.93±1.99)低于无胰岛素抵抗组(7.63±2.20),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.020)。胰岛素抵抗组中Child-Pugh C级的肝硬化患者所占比例显著低于无胰岛素抵抗组(P=0.028)。在肝硬化并发症方面,胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者并发腹水的比例(36.26%)显著低于无胰岛素抵抗组(66.67%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。2组患者并发EVB和HE的比例比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论·肝硬化患者中近半数存在胰岛素抵抗;有胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者BMI偏高,Child C级患者比例较低,较少并发腹水。

关键词: 肝硬化 ; 胰岛素抵抗 ; 胰岛素抵抗指数 ; Child-Pugh分级

Abstract

Objective ·To investigate the insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis patients. Methods ·Patients with liver cirrhosis from Xinhua Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine in 2013‒2017 were retrospectively assessed. Biochemical indexes, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting insulin and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), were collected. The complications of liver cirrhosis were recorded, including esophagogastric varices bleeding (EVB), ascites and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). According to HOMA-IR value, the liver cirrhosis patients were divided into non-insulin resistance group (IR≤1.64) and insulin resistance group (IR>1.64). Various indicators were compared between the two groups. Results ·A total of 376 patients with liver cirrhosis were included in this study. The proportions of Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B and Child-Pugh C were 162 (43.09%), 148 (39.36%), and 66 (17.55%), respectively. The main cause of liver cirrhosis was hepatitis B virus infection 163 (43.35%). Fasting insulin levels were measured in 208 of 376 liver cirrhosis patients. Among them, 117 patients (56.25%) had no insulin resistance and 91 patients (43.75%) had insulin resistance. The body mass index (BMI) of liver cirrhosis patients in the insulin resistance group was significantly higher than that in the non-insulin resistance group (P=0.000), and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the former was also higher (P=0.001). The scores of Child-Pugh in patients with liver cirrhosis in the insulin resistance group were lower than those in the non-insulin resistance group, and the difference in Child-Pugh score was statistically significant (6.93±1.99 vs 7.63±2.20, P=0.020). The proportion of Child-Pugh C grade in the insulin resistance group was significantly lower than that in the patients without insulin resistance (P=0.028). The prevalence of ascites in cirrhotic patients with insulin resistance was significantly lower than that in cirrhotic patients without insulin resistance (36.26% vs 66.67%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of EVB and HE between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion ·Nearly half of patients with liver cirrhosis are associated with insulin resistance. Compared with no-insulin resistance patients, cirrhotic patients with insulin resistance have a higher BMI, lower percentage of Child-Pugh C, and fewer ascites prevalence.

Keywords: liver cirrhosis ; insulin resistance ; homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ; Child-Pugh classification

PDF (1364KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

石翠翠, 张洁, 黄鹤鸣, 桑玉尔, 李光明. 肝硬化患者胰岛素抵抗的临床分析. 上海交通大学学报(医学版)[J], 2023, 43(2): 188-193 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.02.007

SHI Cuicui, ZHANG Jie, HUANG Heming, SANG Yuer, LI Guangming. Clinical analysis of insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis patients. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science)[J], 2023, 43(2): 188-193 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.02.007

肝脏是机体维持血糖水平相对稳定的重要器官,具有糖原合成和分解的能力。肝硬化是各种病因导致肝脏发生弥漫性纤维化和再生结节,是各种慢性肝病的终末期阶段。肝硬化可导致机体的糖代谢紊乱,同时,糖代谢紊乱又加重肝硬化病情。研究1-3发现,60%~80%的肝硬化患者存在糖耐量异常,约30%的肝硬化患者有糖尿病。CHAO等1发现,乙型肝炎(乙肝)肝硬化患者存在一定程度的糖代谢异常和胰岛素抵抗,Child-Pugh分级越高,糖代谢异常和胰岛素抵抗越明显。此外,糖尿病与肝硬化的不良结局有关3-5。2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes,T2DM)促进肝细胞肝癌的发生和发展,加剧肝移植后的不良预后,早期预防或改善T2DM与肝硬化的良好预后密切相关。

肝硬化患者出现糖尿病可能与胰岛素抵抗密切相关6-7。胰岛素抵抗是T2DM的一个重要发病机制,是各种原因导致的正常剂量的胰岛素作用于机体后产生的生物学效应低于预期水平,葡萄糖摄取和利用的效率下降,导致血糖升高,机体代偿性地分泌过多胰岛素,产生高胰岛素血症,以维持血糖的稳定8。胰岛素抵抗是肝脏脂肪变性的独立危险因素9-10。肝硬化患者存在胰岛素抵抗的可能机制包括:门静脉血流降低,胰岛素摄取减少,导致高胰岛素血症;肝细胞、肌肉细胞、脂肪细胞的胰岛素受体数量和亲和力下降,降低了外周胰岛素作用11。胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance,HOMA-IR)是用于评价个体胰岛素抵抗水平的指标。国际上多项研究以HOMA-IR˃1.64为界,判断肝硬化患者是否存在胰岛素抵抗,即HOMA-IR˃1.64提示存在胰岛素抵抗12

肝硬化患者的胰岛素抵抗情况尚未完全阐明,还有待进一步研究13-14。本研究通过回顾性分析肝硬化患者的糖代谢指标,根据胰岛素抵抗指数是否大于1.64,将肝硬化患者划分为有胰岛素抵抗和无胰岛素抵抗2组,分析2组肝硬化患者的基本情况,以及2组患者在肝硬化并发症等方面的差异,从而探讨肝硬化患者中的胰岛素抵抗情况。

1 资料与方法

1.1 研究对象

收集自2013年1月—2017年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院消化科住院的376例肝硬化患者的病例资料。其中,乙肝肝硬化163例(43.35%)、隐源性肝硬化71例(18.88%)、酒精性肝硬化42例(11.17%)、乙肝或丙型肝炎(丙肝)合并酒精性肝硬化35例(9.31%)、自身免疫性肝硬化28例(7.45%)、丙肝肝硬化14例(3.72%)、血吸虫性肝硬化14例(3.72%)和非酒精性脂肪肝(non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,NAFLD)相关肝硬化9例(2.39%)。纳入标准:患者年龄>18岁;经临床、实验室、影像学或组织学诊断,确诊为肝硬化。排除标准:存在垂体、胰腺、肾、甲状腺疾病所致的继发性高血糖症;近1周内使用过糖皮质激素。

1.2 方法

1.2.1 临床资料收集

通过电子病历系统对研究对象的信息进行提取和分析。收集患者的一般情况,包括性别、年龄、身高、体质量、吸烟及饮酒史,以及是否合并T2DM和高血压。计算患者的体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)。

收集肝硬化患者的各项糖代谢指标,包括空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin A1c,HbA1c)、空腹胰岛素。计算肝硬化患者的HOMA-IR。

收集肝功能、凝血常规、肾功能等实验室指标。记录患者的肝硬化病因和本次住院期间并发症,包括食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血(gastroesophageal variceal bleeding,EVB)、腹水和肝性脑病(hepatic encephalopathy,HE)。

1.2.2 病例分组

根据肝硬化患者的HOMA-IR值,将肝硬化患者分为无胰岛素抵抗组(IR≤1.64)和胰岛素抵抗组(IR>1.64),比较2组患者的糖代谢指标等。结合患者的总胆红素、血清白蛋白、凝血酶原时间,以及腹水和HE情况,计算Child-Pugh评分和Child-Pugh分级。根据患者的Child-Pugh分级,将肝硬化患者分为Child-Pugh A级、B级和C级。

1.3 统计学分析

采用SPSS 19.0统计学软件进行数据分析。符合正态分布的定量资料用x±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;不符合正态分布的资料,2组比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。定性资料的组间比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

2 结果

2.1 肝硬化患者总体情况

共纳入376例肝硬化患者,平均年龄(61.88±12.15)岁,男性228例(60.64%)。患者平均BMI为(23.50±3.86)kg/m2

Child-Pugh A级、B级和C级患者分别为162例(43.09%)、148例(39.36%)和66例(17.55%),Child-Pugh分数平均为7.44±2.22。肝硬化患者中有T2DM的患者为116例(30.85%)。肝硬化患者FBG平均为(6.27±2.59)mmol/L,HbA1c为(5.77±1.52)%,空腹胰岛素浓度为(7.67±7.00)nIU/L,HOMA-IR为2.39±3.41。

肝硬化患者并发症中,腹水的发生率最高(198例,52.66%),其次是EVB(174例,46.28%),HE发生率较低(23例,6.12%)。

208例患者(55.32%)进行了空腹胰岛素水平检测。根据HOMA-IR分组,胰岛素抵抗组91例(43.75%),无胰岛素抵抗组117例(56.25%)。胰岛素抵抗组的BMI显著高于无胰岛素抵抗组(P=0.000),前者T2DM患者的比例亦高于后者(P=0.001)。详见表1

表1   有无胰岛素抵抗2组之间临床资料的比较

Tab 1  Comparison of basic information between the groups with and without insulin resistance

ItemIR ≤ 1.64 (n=117)IR > 1.64 (n=91)P value
Age/year63.23±12.3861.48±11.110.290
BMI/(kg·m-2)22.05±3.5025.64±3.650.000
Male/n (%)74 (63.25)45 (49.45)0.049
Smoke/n (%)42 (35.90)31 (34.07)0.880
Alcohol/n (%)29 (24.79)22 (24.18)>0.990
T2DM/n (%)30 (25.64)44 (48.35)0.001
Hypertension/n (%)28 (23.93)29 (31.87)0.210
Child-Pugh grade
Child-Pugh A/n(%)47 (40.17)49 (53.85)0.070
Child-Pugh B /n(%)43 (36.75)32 (35.16)0.880
Child-Pugh C/n(%)27 (23.08)10 (10.99)0.028
Child-Pugh score7.63±2.206.93±1.990.020
FBG/(mmol·L-1)5.44±1.717.58±3.240.000
HbA1c/%5.43±1.026.54±2.310.000
Fasting insulin/(mIU·L-1)4.06±1.8712.32±8.390.000
HOMA-IR0.94±0.394.25±4.510.000
Complication
EVB/n(%)51 (43.59)40 (43.96)>0.990
Ascites/n(%)78 (66.67)33 (36.26)0.000
HE/n(%)7 (5.98)5 (5.49)>0.990

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2 有无胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者临床指标比较

有胰岛素抵抗和无胰岛素抵抗的2组肝硬化患者FBG、HbA1c以及空腹胰岛素水平比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000),详见表1

胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者发生EVB的比例与无胰岛素抵抗组接近,分别为43.96%和43.59%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者发生腹水的比例显著低于无胰岛素抵抗组(36.26% vs 66.67%,P=0.000)。2组患者发生HE的比例比较,差异无统计学意义(5.49% vs 5.98%,P>0.05)。

胰岛素抵抗组肝硬化患者的Child-Pugh分数低于无胰岛素抵抗组,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.020);胰岛素抵抗组Child-Pugh C级患者占比显著低于无胰岛素抵抗组(P=0.028)。详见表1

2.3 不同Child-Pugh分级的肝硬化患者糖代谢情况比较

进一步分析Child-Pugh A、B和C级肝硬化患者的糖代谢指标,详见表2。Child-Pugh C级患者各项糖代谢指标均低于Child-Pugh A级患者;3组之间的FBG、空腹胰岛素、HOMA-IR比较,差异均具有统计学意义;HbA1c在3组之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.350)。

表2   不同Child-Pugh分级肝硬化患者的糖代谢指标比较

Tab 2  Comparison of glucose metabolism indexes of liver cirrhosis patients with different Child-Pugh grades

ItemChild-Pugh A (n=162)Child-Pugh B (n=148)Child-Pugh C (n=66)P value
FBG/(mmol·L-1)6.59±2.826.79±2.884.98±1.260.002
HbA1c/%5.98±1.415.69±1.175.45±2.270.350
Fasting insulin/(mIU·L-1)9.04±8.366.49±5.265.62±5.750.010
HOMA-IR3.02±4.472.01±2.111.54±1.680.038

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.4 隐源性肝硬化患者与其他病因肝硬化患者的糖代谢情况比较

将71例隐源性肝硬化患者的糖代谢指标与305例其他类型肝硬化患者进行比较,结果显示(表3):2组患者在FBG、HbA1c、空腹胰岛素水平和HOMA-IR上的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

表3   隐源性肝硬化与其他类型肝硬化患者的糖代谢指标比较

Tab 3  Comparison of glucose metabolism indexes between patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis and those with cirrhosis of other etiologies

ItemCryptogenic cirrhosis (n=71)Cirrhosis of the other etiologies (n=305)P value
FBG/(mmol·L-1)6.47±2.696.22±2.570.464
HbA1c/%5.95±2.285.73±1.290.287
Fasting insulin/(mIU·L-1)6.69±5.667.95±7.340.277
HOMA-IR2.25±3.092.43±3.510.746

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3 讨论

本研究根据HOMA-IR是否大于1.64,将肝硬化患者划分为有胰岛素抵抗组和无胰岛素抵抗组。结果显示:肝硬化患者中,有胰岛素抵抗的患者比例为43.75%;与无胰岛素抵抗组相比,有胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者BMI较高,Child-Pugh C级患者比例较低,较少合并腹水;2组患者合并EVB和HE的比例无显著差异。

糖代谢紊乱在肝硬化患者中普遍存在15。肝硬化患者往往伴有脾功能亢进、营养不良、血红蛋白水平降低。因此,HbA1c并不能准确反映肝硬化患者的近期血糖情况。HOMA-IR具有操作简单、价格低廉、对患者无损伤等优点,且其与金标准——高胰岛素正葡萄糖钳夹(hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp,HEC)的胰岛素敏感性/抵抗具有良好的相关性。这种良好的相关性在糖尿病人群中同样存在,故HOMA-IR在肝硬化患者胰岛素抵抗研究中广泛使用16。HOMA-IR数值越高,提示胰岛素抵抗越严重。研究12发现,在肝硬化患者中,HOMA-IR˃1.64提示该类患者存在显著的胰岛素抵抗。本研究以稳态指数HOMA-IR是否大于1.64为标准,分析肝硬化患者的胰岛素抵抗情况。结果显示,有胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者BMI显著高于无胰岛素抵抗的患者,提示体质量与糖代谢紊乱和胰岛素抵抗密切相关17

既往有研究纳入乙肝肝硬化患者,进行口服葡萄糖耐量(oral glucose tolerance test,OGTT)、胰岛素释放试验18,发现乙肝肝硬化患者胰岛素释放较正常对照组有延迟,并且胰岛素水平与Child-Pugh分级呈正相关。乙肝肝硬化患者肝损伤越严重,糖代谢异常和胰岛素抵抗越明显,可能由炎症反应介导19。需要注意的是,我们的回顾性研究发现Child-Pugh分级与胰岛素抵抗程度并非呈正比,胰岛素抵抗患者中Child-Pugh C级患者比例反而较低。可能的原因是,存在胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者,往往合并T2DM,这类患者接受降糖治疗会影响其FBG、空腹胰岛素水平,从而影响HOMA-IR数值。此外,随着肝硬化病情进展,肝脏功能显著下降,肝糖原合成减少,外周血糖水平也显著降低,这在Child-Pugh C级患者中更常见。临床中,我们亦发现Child-Pugh C级患者中糖代谢紊乱更加明显,更容易出现低血糖。肝硬化伴胰岛素抵抗患者合并腹水的比例较低,这可能与胰岛素抵抗患者中Child-Pugh A级患者较多有关。伴有胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者合并EVB及HE的比例并没有显著升高,这与既往的研究结果一致20

本研究存在一定局限性。首先,本研究纳入病例较少,可能导致结果产生一定偏倚;其次,本研究是一项回顾性研究,糖代谢紊乱和胰岛素抵抗对肝硬化病情及其并发症的影响,还需要进一步的动态随访。

综上所述,肝硬化患者中近半数存在胰岛素抵抗,有胰岛素抵抗的肝硬化患者往往BMI升高,Child-Pugh C级少见,较少合并腹水。

作者贡献声明

李光明、桑玉尔参与了实验设计;石翠翠、桑玉尔、李光明参与了论文的写作和修改;石翠翠、桑玉尔参与了数据分析;张洁、黄鹤鸣、石翠翠参与了数据收集。所有作者均阅读并同意了最终稿件的提交。

AUTHOR's CONTRIBUTIONS

The study was designed by LI Guangming and SANG Yuer. The manuscript was drafted and revised by SHI Cuicui, SANG Yuer and LI Guangming. The data analysis was conducted by SHI Cuicui and SANG Yuer. ZHANG Jie, HUANG Heming and SHI Cuicui participated in the data collection. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.

利益冲突声明

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

参考文献

CHAO L T, WU C F, SUNG F Y, et al. Insulin, glucose and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in male hepatitis B carriers: results from 17-year follow-up of a population-based cohort[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2011, 32(6): 876-881.

[本文引用: 2]

SINGAL A K, AYOOLA A E. Prevalence and factors affecting occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi patients with chronic liver disease[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(3): 118-121.

HUNG C H, WANG J H, HU T H, et al. Insulin resistance is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C infection[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(18): 2265-2271.

[本文引用: 2]

PANG Y, KARTSONAKI C, TURNBULL I, et al. Diabetes, plasma glucose, and incidence of fatty liver, cirrhosis, and liver cancer: a prospective study of 0.5 million people[J]. Hepatology, 2018, 68(4): 1308-1318.

LIU T L, TROGDON J, WEINBERGER M, et al. Diabetes is associated with clinical decompensation events in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2016, 61(11): 3335-3345.

[本文引用: 1]

ANTY R, ANTY R, IANNELLI A, et al. A new composite model including metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and cytokeratin-18 for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patients[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2010, 32(11/12): 1315-1322.

[本文引用: 1]

BHAGAT V, MINDIKOGLU A L, NUDO C G, et al. Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus patients with cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease[J]. Liver Transpl, 2009, 15(12): 1814-1820.

[本文引用: 1]

PETERSEN M C, SHULMAN G I. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance[J]. Physiol Rev, 2018, 98(4): 2133-2223.

[本文引用: 1]

ESLAM M, SANYAL A J, GEORGE J, et al. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(7): 1999-2014.e1.

[本文引用: 1]

KITADE H, CHEN G, NI Y, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance: new insights and potential new treatments[J]. Nutrients, 2017, 9(4): E387.

[本文引用: 1]

孙志梅, 齐亚娟. 胰岛素信号通路与胰岛素抵抗[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(52): 62-63.

[本文引用: 1]

SUN Z M, QI Y J.Insulin signaling pathway and insulin resistance[J].World's Latest Medical Information Digest, 2019, 19(52): 62-63.

[本文引用: 1]

HARDEEP S D, NAVIDA B, DEVINDER S M.Prevalence of insulin resistance in cirrhosis of liver[J]. Int J Adv Med, 2018, 5(2): 375.

[本文引用: 2]

GORAL V, ATALAY R, KUCUKONER M. Insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2010, 57(98): 309-315.

[本文引用: 1]

YAGMUR E, WEISKIRCHEN R, GRESSNER A M, et al. Insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis is not associated with circulating retinol-binding protein 4[J]. Diabetes Care, 2007, 30(5): 1168-1172.

[本文引用: 1]

GHARAVI A, HAJAGHA M A, ZIAEE A, et al. Investigation of insulin resistance in patients with liver cirrhosis and its relationship with severity of disease[J].J Qazvin Univ Med Sci, 2008, 12(1): 27-34.

[本文引用: 1]

中华医学会糖尿病学分会胰岛素抵抗学组(筹). 胰岛素抵抗评估方法和应用的专家指导意见[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(6): 377-385.

[本文引用: 1]

Insulin Resistance Group of Diabetics Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Expert guidance on methods and application of insulin resistance assessment[J].Chinese Journal of Diabetes,2018,10(6):377-385.

[本文引用: 1]

PETTA S, CAMMÀ C, DI MARCO V, et al. Hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance are associated with severe fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HBV or HCV infection[J]. Liver Int, 2011, 31(4): 507-515.

[本文引用: 1]

GUO C H, SUN T T, WENG X D, et al. The investigation of glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in subjects of chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015, 8(10): 13381-13386.

[本文引用: 1]

刘丽, 江颖仪, 刘景. 不同Child-Pugh分级慢性乙型肝炎肝硬化患者糖代谢、胰岛素分泌情况及其与炎症反应的相关性分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(2): 324-328.

[本文引用: 1]

LIU L, JIANG Y Y, LIU J.Glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in patients with chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis of different Child-Pugh grades and their association with inflammatory response[J].Journal of Clinical Hepatobiliary Disease, 2020, 36(2): 324-328.

[本文引用: 1]

ALSEBAEY A, ELHELBAWY M. Insulin resistance is not a risk factor for oesophageal varices development in hepatitis C[J]. Trop Doct, 2019, 49(4): 281-285.

[本文引用: 1]

/