上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(3): 308-313 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.03.006

论著 · 临床研究

产后盆底肌训练对改善盆底功能的效果分析

饶琳,, 张琳娜, 袁嘉琪, 卢邦春,

上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院妇产科,上海 200030

Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on improving pelvic floor function

RAO Lin,, ZHANG Linna, YUAN Jiaqi, LU Bangchun,

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China

通讯作者: 卢邦春,电子信箱:lubangchun@163.com

编委: 崔黎明

收稿日期: 2022-12-12   接受日期: 2023-03-09   网络出版日期: 2023-03-28

基金资助: 上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项项目.  202040232
上海市高水平地方高校创新团队.  SHSMU-ZLCX20210202

Corresponding authors: LU Bangchun, E-mail:lubangchun@163.com.

Received: 2022-12-12   Accepted: 2023-03-09   Online: 2023-03-28

作者简介 About authors

饶 琳(1983—),女,副主任护师,硕士;电子信箱:ireenrao@163.com。 E-mail:ireenrao@163.com

摘要

目的·评价产后1年内盆底肌训练(Kegel训练)对产妇盆底功能康复的作用。方法·选取2020年1—4月在上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院产后6周检查有不同程度尿失禁和/或盆腔器官脱垂的阴道分娩初产妇,分为锻炼组(147例)和对照组(194例)。锻炼组于产后6周开始进行Kegel训练,对照组进行一般的产后健康教育。在产后6周及产后1年,对2组产妇进行一般情况问卷及国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷表简表(International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form,ICIQ-SF)调查,并进行盆底肌力测定和分级(盆底肌力分级>Ⅲ级表明肌力正常);根据盆腔器官脱垂分度法(pelvic organ prolapsed quantitation,POP-Q)定量评估脱垂程度。比较2组产妇的盆底肌力分级、尿失禁评分以及盆底器官脱垂情况,评价盆底肌训练的效果。结果·随访至产后1年,锻炼组和对照组失访数分别为20例和28例。锻炼组产后1年盆底肌力正常的比例显著高于产后6周(56.0% vs 34.7%,P=0.000),尿失禁发生率显著低于产后6周(25.2% vs 36.7%,P=0.040)。对照组产后1年盆底肌力正常的比例显著高于产后6周(43.4% vs 32.5%,P=0.033),尿失禁发生率显著低于产后6周(17.5% vs 28.9%,P=0.011)。产后1年,锻炼组盆底肌力正常的比例高于对照组(56.0% vs 43.4%,P=0.033),盆底肌力好转率高于对照组(50.4% vs 35.5%,P=0.011)。盆腔器官脱垂程度改善率和尿失禁好转率在锻炼组和对照组之间分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论·产后进行盆底肌训练可提高盆底肌力,但对改善产妇盆底功能障碍的效果并不明显;产后1年产妇尿失禁和盆底肌力均有改善,表明盆底肌有自行恢复的机制,但可能需要较长的时间。

关键词: 盆底肌训练 ; 产后 ; 尿失禁 ; 盆腔器官脱垂 ; 盆底肌 ; 自然分娩

Abstract

Objective ·To evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (Kegel training) on the rehabilitation of pelvic floor function within 1 year after delivery. Methods ·From January to April 2020, primiparas with different degrees of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse were selected and divided into exercise group (147 cases) and control group (194 cases). The exercise group received Kegel training at 6 weeks of the postpartum period, while the control group received general postpartum health education only. At 6 weeks and 1 year after delivery, these postpartum women in the two groups were investigated with the general information questionnaire and International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The pelvic floor muscle strength was measured (the pelvic floor muscle strength grade>Ⅲ indicates normal muscle strength). The pelvic organ prolapsed quantitation (POP-Q) score was assigned accordingly. The urinary incontinence score, pelvic floor muscle strength and pelvic floor organ prolapse were compared between the two groups, and the effect of pelvic floor muscle training was evaluated. Results ·In the exercise group, 20 postpartum women lost contact during follow up sections, and 28 women in the control group were unable to be contacted within 1 year. In the exercise group, the proportion of women with normal pelvic floor muscle strength at 1 year postpartum was significantly higher than that at 6 weeks postpartum (56.0% vs 34.7%, P=0.000), and the incidence of incontinence at 1 year postpartum was significantly lower than that at 6 weeks postpartum (25.2% vs 36.7%, P=0.040). In the control group, the proportion of women with normal pelvic floor muscle strength at 1 year postpartum was significantly higher than that at 6 weeks postpartum (43.4% vs 32.5%, P=0.033), and the incidence of incontinence at 1 year postpartum was significantly lower than that at 6 weeks postpartum (17.5% vs 28.9%, P=0.011). At 1 year postpartum, the proportion of women with normal pelvic floor muscle strength in the exercise group was higher than that in the control group (56.0% vs 43.4%, P=0.033). The improvement rate of muscle strength in the exercise group was higher than that in control group (50.4% vs 35.5%, P=0.011). There was no significant difference in the improvement rate of pelvic organ prolapse and frequency of urinary incontinence between the exercise group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion ·Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training can improve pelvic floor muscle strength, but has no significant effect on improving pelvic floor dysfunction in the current samples. The urinary incontinence condition and pelvic floor muscle strength of women improve 1 year after delivery, indicating that there is a mechanism for self recovery of pelvic floor muscle, but it may take a long time.

Keywords: pelvic floor muscle training ; postpartum ; urinary incontinence ; pelvic organ prolapse ; pelvic floor muscle ; natural childbirth

PDF (1279KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

饶琳, 张琳娜, 袁嘉琪, 卢邦春. 产后盆底肌训练对改善盆底功能的效果分析. 上海交通大学学报(医学版)[J], 2023, 43(3): 308-313 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.03.006

RAO Lin, ZHANG Linna, YUAN Jiaqi, LU Bangchun. Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on improving pelvic floor function. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science)[J], 2023, 43(3): 308-313 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.03.006

盆底功能障碍性疾病(pelvic floor dysfunction,PFD)主要包括盆腔器官脱垂(pelvic organ prolapse,POP)和尿失禁(urinary incontinence,UI),是影响女性生活质量的常见病。妊娠和分娩是导致PFD的常见病因。有文献报道,产后UI发病率可高达30%1,一半以上的产妇存在不同程度的POP2-3。妊娠分娩导致盆底肌功能受损可能是UI和POP发生的原因4。产后盆底肌训练(Kegel训练)被认为是产后PFD的一线治疗方法5,但其对PFD是否具有改善作用目前仍不确定。国外已经开展了一些随机对照研究,但结果不一致,存在一定争议16-8。WOODLEY等1认为,Kegel训练对产后UI的治疗效果存在不确定性;SIGURDARDOTTIR等8的研究表明Kegel训练至产后6个月可显著改善产妇的UI情况,但至产后1年效果不明显。在国内,产后康复训练的研究多集中在电刺激生物反馈治疗方面,但该疗法需要特殊设备,且要求产妇反复前往医院治疗,给哺乳期产妇带来不便;此外,该疗法还具有阴道炎或阴道出血等禁忌证。单纯Kegel训练具有便捷、经济、随时可进行的优势。本研究旨在探讨产后1年内行Kegel训练对产妇盆底功能康复的作用,以期为PFD产妇的康复训练提供依据。

1 对象与方法

1.1 研究对象

选取2020年1—4月在上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院产后6周检查发现有不同程度UI和/或POP的阴道分娩初产妇作为研究对象。纳入标准:① 足月、单胎。② 阴道分娩。③ 产后恶露已净。排除标准:① 既往有引产史。② 合并慢性咳嗽、便秘、哮喘等内科疾病。③ 既往盆腔手术史。④ 孕前有POP和UI病史。⑤ 有Ⅲ度及Ⅲ度以上会阴裂伤。退出标准:① 未完成随访中途退出或者信息不全影响判断。② 中途采用其他物理治疗手段。③ 未达到训练标准强度。④ 再次妊娠。本研究在中国临床实验中心(www.chictr.org.cn)注册,注册号:ChiCTR1800017354。

1.2 研究方法

1.2.1 研究分组

于产后6周常规检查时筛选存在PFD情况的产妇,告知产妇可行Kegel训练治疗,但效果有赖于长期观察,且需坚持锻炼1年。将参加Kegel训练并坚持随访1年者,入组为锻炼组;将不参加Kegel训练、仅接受健康宣教者,入组为对照组。对锻炼组产妇进行一对一的Kegel训练口头指导,介绍训练目的、方法、注意事项,观察和阴道触诊检查产妇盆底肌的收缩情况,直至产妇完全掌握盆底肌训练的方法。告知产妇后续每周至少进行3 d的Kegel训练,每日3次,每次15 min或者50次盆底肌收缩,收缩1次至少持续5 s,再放松10 s;并告知在行走、站位、坐位、卧位均可进行训练;产妇每日记录训练日记并且每周在微信上传训练达标情况。为提高依从性,由专人负责微信训练群的管理,每周发布健康科普宣传,提醒产妇进行盆底肌训练3~6个月后再复查康复情况,并叮嘱其继续训练至产后1年。产妇如未达到训练要求(每周至少3 d,每日至少1次Kegel训练8)则退出锻炼组。对照组在产后6周进行盆底功能筛查,同时进行一般的PFD健康宣教,后期不再干预。

1.2.2 观察指标

对入组对象在产后6周和产后1年评估以下指标。

(1)盆底肌力检测分级

根据国际通用的会阴肌力测试法(general report revised urinary grade, GRRUG),由经过专科培训的2名医师进行临床查体并进行盆底肌力分级:盆底肌收缩持续0 s为0级,以此类推,持续5 s或以上为Ⅴ级;其中0~Ⅲ级为肌力异常,Ⅳ~Ⅴ级为肌力正常。

(2)盆腔脏器的脱垂程度

由经过专科培训的2名医师进行临床查体,根据盆腔器官脱垂分度法(pelvic organ prolapsed quantitation,POP-Q)定量评估脱垂程度。检查方法:在安静环境下,受试者排空膀胱后取膀胱截石位于妇科检查床,嘱受试者做Valsalva动作(屏气用力),重复2次。

(3)一般情况及UI评分

采用自编问卷,调查产妇年龄、身高、体质量、文化程度、哺乳时间等基本情况;根据国际尿失禁咨询委员会尿失禁问卷表简表(International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form,ICIQ-SF)对UI情况进行评分。

1.3 统计学方法

采用SPSS 23.0软件进行数据处理。正态分布的定量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用两独立样本t检验;非正态分布的定量资料以MQ1Q3)表示,组间比较采用Man-Whitney U检验。定性资料以n(%)表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

2 结果

2.1 一般临床资料及产后6周产妇PFD情况比较

共纳入341例产妇,其中锻炼组147例,对照组194例。产后1年,锻炼组共有20例退出研究,包括14例未达到锻炼标准,4例因在外地中途退出,1例再次妊娠,1例采用物理治疗;对照组共有28例退出研究,包括21例中途退出(9例无法联系,12例拒绝复诊),2例再次妊娠,3例采用物理治疗,2例资料不全。锻炼组和对照组的失访率分别为13.6%和14.4%。2组产妇的年龄、分娩孕周、孕前体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、孕期增加体质量、新生儿出生体质量、第二产程时长、哺乳时间、文化程度、孕次、会阴侧切率、产钳助产率等指标比较,差异均无统计学意义。结果见表1

表1   2组产妇的一般情况比较

Tab 1  Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of postpartum women

ItemExercise group (n=147)Control group (n=194)t/Z/χ2 valueP value
Age/year30.35±3.1529.95±3.211.1640.245
Gestational length/week39.01±1.1539.11±1.02-0.8470.398
Pre-gestational BMI/(kg·m-2)20.54±2.1720.34±2.240.8180.414
Weight gain/kg15.69±4.3915.50±4.360.4080.684
Neonatal birth weight/g3 366.84±330.853 329.15±393.470.9370.349
Duration of the second stage/min50.00 (31.00, 81.00)55.00 (30.00, 83.25)-0.2450.807
Breast-feeding time/month9.69±3.389.68±3.520.0340.973
Education/n (%)0.0030.999
Secondary education9 (6.1)12 (6.2)
College or university114 (77.6)150 (77.3)
Graduate24 (16.3)32 (16.5)
Gravidity/n (%)3.2500.197
1112 (76.2)138 (71.1)
224 (16.3)46 (23.7)
≥311 (7.5)10 (5.2)
Episiotomy/n (%)1.4160.234
Yes40 (27.2)42 (21.6)
No107 (72.8)152 (78.4)
Perineal laceration/n (%)1.4790.477
041 (27.9)43 (22.1)
84 (57.1)120 (61.9)
22 (15.0)31 (16.0)
Delivery mode/n (%)0.5140.473
Natural delivery129 (87.8)165 (85.1)
Forceps18 (12.2)29 (14.9)

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


产后6周时,比较2组产妇的POP程度、UI发生率、ICIQ-SF评分和盆底肌力强度,其差异均无统计学意义(表2)。

表2   产后6周时2组产妇PFD情况比较

Tab 2  Comparison of PFD at 6 weeks postpartum between the two groups

ParameterExercise group (n=147)Control group (n=194)χ2 /Z valueP value
POP stage/n (%)5.4140.067
Grade 023 (15.6)36 (18.6)
Grade 168 (46.3)107 (55.1)
Grade 256 (38.1)51 (26.3)
Muscle strength/n (%)0.1850.728
>Ⅲ51 (34.7)63 (32.5)
≤Ⅲ96 (65.3)131 (67.5)
UI/n (%)2.3700.124
No93 (63.3)138 (71.1)
Yes54 (36.7)56 (28.9)
ICIQ-SF score0 (0, 4.00)0 (0, 3.35)-1.4930.136

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2 产后12组产妇PFD改善情况比较

产后1年时,锻炼组肌力正常(盆底肌力分级>Ⅲ级)比例为56.0%,高于对照组的43.4%,2组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.033);锻炼组肌力好转率为50.4%,高于对照组的35.5%,2组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.011)。2组产妇之间POP-Q分度、POP好转率、UI发生率和ICIQ-SF评分,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结果见表3

表3   产后12组产妇PFD改善情况比较

Tab 3  Change of PFD after 1 year postpartum between the two groups

ParameterExercise group (n=127)Control group (n=166)χ2 /Z valueP value
POP stage change/n (%)0.8140.367
Better30 (23.6)32 (19.3)
No better97 (76.4)134 (80.7)
POP stage/n (%)0.9330.627
Grade 019 (15.0)32 (19.3)
Grade 167 (52.8)83 (50.0)
Grade 241 (32.2)51 (30.7)
Muscle strength/n (%)4.5230.033
>Ⅲ71 (56.0)72 (43.4)
≤Ⅲ56 (44.0)94 (56.6)
Muscle strength change/n (%)6.5160.011
Better64 (50.4)59 (35.5)
No better63 (49.6)107 (64.5)
UI/n (%)2.6060.106
No95 (74.8)137 (82.5)
Yes32 (25.2)29 (17.5)
ICIQ-SF score0 (0, 3.00)0 (0, 2.00)-1.7300.084

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2组产妇在产后6周和产后1年比较,盆底肌力随着时间的变化均显著提高,UI发生率也显著下降。锻炼组盆底肌力正常比例从产后6周的34.7%提高到产后1年的56.0%,前后比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);UI发生率从产后6周的36.7%下降到产后1年的25.2%,前后比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.040)。对照组盆底肌力正常比例从产后6周的32.5%提高到产后1年的43.4%,前后比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.033);UI发生率从产后6周的28.9%下降到产后1年的17.5%,前后比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.011)。结果见表4

表4   2组产后6周和产后1PFD情况比较

Tab 4  Comparison of PFD between 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum in the two groups

ParameterExercise groupControl group

6 weeks postpartum

(n=147)

1 year postpartum

(n=127)

χ2 valueP value

6 weeks postpartum

(n=194)

1 year postpartum

(n=166)

χ2 valueP value
POP stage/n (%)1.2550.5341.0960.578
Grade 023 (15.6)19 (15.0)36 (18.6)32 (19.3)
Grade 168 (46.3)67 (52.8)107 (55.1)83 (50.0)
Grade 256 (38.1)41 (32.2)51 (26.3)51 (30.7)
Muscle strength/n (%)12.4110.0004.5340.033
>Ⅲ51 (34.7)71 (56.0)63 (32.5)72 (43.4)
≤Ⅲ96 (65.3)56 (44.0)131 (67.5)94 (56.6)
UI/n (%)4.2120.0406.4410.011
No93 (63.3)95 (74.8)138 (71.1)137 (82.5)
Yes54 (36.7)32 (25.2)56 (28.9)29 (17.5)

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3 讨论

1948年美国妇产科医师KEGEL提出Kegel训练法,最初报道利用该方法治愈了64例UI患者9。此后该治疗手段逐渐被推广到包括POP在内的所有PFD患者。对于Kegel训练的效果已经有较多的前瞻性研究,但结论却存在很大争议16-8。其中患者依从性差和训练强度不一致可能是导致不同研究结果差异较大的原因。有报道8显示只有26%的产妇在产后1年仍能坚持每周3 d的提肛运动。本研究采用微信群组模式管理锻炼组10,每日提醒产妇锻炼,这种密切的联系与沟通能较好地提高产妇的依从性;至产后1年每周坚持提肛运动3 d的产妇达到86.4%(127/147),且失访率较低。为避免样本偏差导致数据误差,本研究未纳入未达到锻炼标准次数及锻炼量的产妇,从而保证锻炼组产妇均为Kegel训练达标者,以减少案例偏差的影响。

既往有研究11-12表明,盆底肌锻炼可改善产后UI症状。而一项meta分析1提示,产后盆底肌训练对产后6~12个月UI的改善作用不明显。也有研究8认为盆底肌锻炼在产后6个月内对UI的改善有显著作用,但是随访到产后12个月未见明显作用,原因可能是随着时间的推移能够持续进行提肛运动的产妇数量显著下降。本研究结果显示,锻炼组和对照组比较,UI发生率和ICIQ-SF评分差异均无统计学意义,提示Kegel训练在本研究中未能显著改善UI的情况,其原因有待后续研究进一步探讨。未来仍需要更科学地确定产妇执行Kegel训练的强度、密度、依从性。此外,因考虑到产后6个月内产妇较繁忙,可能导致随访困难,故本研究未在产后6个月内进行随访。

一些对非孕产妇POP患者的研究13-14结果提示,盆底肌锻炼可改善脱垂相关功能症状,对POP-Q分度的改善也有作用。但是一项多中心随机对照研究15表明,盆底肌锻炼只能改善症状,对POP的解剖复位的作用并不明显。虽然一些对中老年POP患者的研究15表明提肛运动可以改善脱垂症状,但是这不一定适用于孕产妇。国外学者对产妇POP的研究6-716结果显示,提肛运动对改善脱垂症状和POP-Q分度均无明显效果。本研究也获得了同样的结果,即产后12个月锻炼组和对照组之间脱垂程度好转率和POP-Q分度差异均无统计学意义。产妇在养育照看婴儿的过程中可能产生诸多躯体和精神症状,这些可能混淆脱垂引起的症状,并且轻度脱垂通常也无症状,故本研究未对POP症状进行调查比较。笔者认为提肛运动主要是锻炼盆底肌,提高肌力强度,而POP是黏膜、肌肉、筋膜、韧带等多种组织过度牵拉所致,单纯提高盆底肌强度可能并不能达到治疗PFD的效果。

目前多项研究7-81117提示通过盆底肌训练可以提高盆底肌肌力强度。本研究也得出了相似的结论,显示锻炼组盆底肌力改善情况明显好于对照组。值得一提的是,本研究结果显示2组产妇产后1年盆底肌力均有显著提高,UI发生率均显著减低,与既往研究18-19结果一致;这提示盆底肌可能有自行恢复的机制,部分存在UI和盆底肌力较弱的产妇在产后1年相关症状也可自行恢复。该康复机制是否与孕产次、年龄、失禁程度、盆底肌强弱及Kegel训练强度和密度有关,还需进一步大样本研究。

本研究不足之处在于非随机对照研究,可能存在选择上的偏倚,也缺少更多时间点的随访。产后盆底肌训练是无侵入性且经济的操作,是产后骨盆底肌复原的首选方式,但其对初产妇及经产妇PFD的治疗效果及Kegel训练干预所需的有效剂量还需要多中心、大样本的随机对照研究继续探讨。

作者贡献声明

饶琳、卢邦春负责研究设计、论文写作和修改,张琳娜、袁嘉琪、卢邦春负责产妇随访、数据整理以及统计。所有作者均阅读并同意了最终稿件的提交。

RAO Lin and LU Bangchun participated in the design of the study, writing and revision of the manuscript. ZHANG Linna, YUAN Jiaqi and LU Bangchun participated in maternal follow-up, data collection and statistics. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.

利益冲突声明

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

参考文献

WOODLEY S J, LAWRENSON P, BOYLE R, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 5: CD007471.

[本文引用: 5]

BUMP R C, NORTON P A. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 1998, 25(4): 723-746.

[本文引用: 1]

卢邦春, 张琳娜, 张晨, 等. 初产妇产后早期盆腔器官脱垂的高危因素分析[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2018, 45(5): 553-556.

[本文引用: 1]

LU B C, ZHANG L N, ZHANG C, et al. Risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse for unipara after vaginal delivery in early postpartum[J]. Journal of International Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 45(5): 553-556.

[本文引用: 1]

DIEZ-ITZA I, ARRUE M, IBAÑEZ L, et al. Postpartum impairment of pelvic floor muscle function: factors involved and association with prolapse[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(12): 1505-1511.

[本文引用: 1]

ABRAMS P, ANDERSSON K E, APOSTOLIDIS A, et al. 6th international consultation on incontinence. recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2018, 37(7): 2271-2272.

[本文引用: 1]

BØ K, HILDE G, STÆR-JENSEN J, et al. Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized trial of primiparous women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(1): 38.e1-38.e7.

[本文引用: 3]

SCHÜTZE S, HEINLOTH M, UHDE M, et al. The effect of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor function and sexuality postpartum. A randomized study including 300 primiparous[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 306(3): 785-793.

[本文引用: 2]

SIGURDARDOTTIR T, STEINGRIMSDOTTIR T, GEIRSSON R T, et al. Can postpartum pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary and anal incontinence? A assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(3): 247.e1-247.e8.

[本文引用: 7]

KEGEL A H. Stress incontinence and genital relaxation; a nonsurgical method of increasing the tone of sphincters and their supporting structures[J]. Ciba Clin Symp, 1952, 4(2): 35-51.

[本文引用: 1]

范国荣, 薄海欣, 庞红霞, 等. 群组管理模式对产后尿失禁患者盆底肌功能锻炼依从性的影响[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017, 33(3): 187-190.

[本文引用: 1]

FANG G R, BO H X, PANG H X, et al. Effect of group management mode on compliance of pelvic floor function exercise for patients with postpartum urinary incontinence[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2017, 33(3): 187-190.

[本文引用: 1]

GAGNON L H, BOUCHER J, ROBERT M. Impact of pelvic floor muscle training in the postpartum period[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(2): 255-260.

[本文引用: 2]

高悦. 盆底肌功能训练对产后尿失禁的意义分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2022, 17(16): 186-188.

[本文引用: 1]

GAO Y. Analysis of the significance of pelvic floor muscle function training on postpartum urinary incontinence[J]. China Practical Medicine, 2022, 17(16): 186-188.

[本文引用: 1]

STÜPP L, RESENDE A P M, OLIVEIRA E, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(10): 1233-1239.

[本文引用: 1]

BRAEKKEN I H, MAJIDA M, ENGH M E, et al. Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 203(2): 170.e1-170.e7.

[本文引用: 1]

HAGEN S, STARK D, GLAZENER C, et al. Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9919): 796-806.

[本文引用: 2]

KOLBERG TENNFJORD M, HILDE G, STAER-JENSEN J, et al. Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on vaginal symptoms and sexual dysfunction-secondary analysis of a randomised trial[J]. BJOG, 2016, 123(4): 634-642.

[本文引用: 1]

张珂, 王澜静, 焦玲洁, 等. 不同盆底康复疗法在改善产后盆底肌力的作用[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2016, 32(8): 623-626.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG K, WANG L J, JIAO L J, et al. The different methods of pelvic floor reconstruction in improving function of postpartum pelvic floor muscle[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2016, 32(8): 623-626.

[本文引用: 1]

AHLUND S, NORDGREN B, WILANDER E L, et al. Is home-based pelvic floor muscle training effective in treatment of urinary incontinence after birth in primiparous women? A randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(8): 909-915.

[本文引用: 1]

ELENSKAIA K, THAKAR R, SULTAN A H, et al. The effect of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(11): 1421-1427.

[本文引用: 1]

/