上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2025, 45(1): 113-121 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.01.014

综述

孕期超加工食品摄入与妊娠结局关系的研究进展

糜小扬,1,2, 丁莹1,2, 陈奕静3, 贾洁,1,2,4

1.上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院临床营养科,上海 200092

2.上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院临床营养系,上海 200025

3.上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院医学检验技术系,上海 200025

4.上海市小儿消化与营养重点实验室,上海 200092

Research progress in the relationship between ultra-processed food intake and pregnancy outcomes

MI Xiaoyang,1,2, DING Ying1,2, CHEN Yijing3, JIA Jie,1,2,4

1.Department of Clinical Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

2.Department of Clinical Nutrition, College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

3.Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

4.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Digestion and Nutrition, Shanghai 200092, China

通讯作者: 贾 洁,副教授,博士;电子信箱:jiejia@shsmu.edu.cn

编委: 邵碧云

收稿日期: 2024-07-04   接受日期: 2024-11-20   网络出版日期: 2025-01-28

基金资助: 上海交通大学医学院大学生创新训练计划.  S202410248550

Corresponding authors: JIA Jie, E-mail:jiejia@shsmu.edu.cn.

Received: 2024-07-04   Accepted: 2024-11-20   Online: 2025-01-28

作者简介 About authors

糜小扬(2003—),女,本科生;电子信箱:15021302508@163.com。 E-mail:15021302508@163.com

摘要

近年来超加工食品(ultra-processed foods,UPFs)在全球范围内消费量迅速增长。UPFs是NOVA分类体系中描述的第四类食品:为工业配方食品,完全或主要由从食物中提取的物质(油、脂肪、糖、淀粉和蛋白质等)、来自食物成分的衍生物(氢化脂肪和改性淀粉等)或多种食品添加剂制成;制造技术包括挤压、成型和预煎炸等。作为高能量密度食品,UPFs通常具有高糖、脂肪和盐,低膳食纤维、蛋白质、维生素和矿物质的特点,营养密度较低。多项研究显示UPFs高摄入能够增加多种慢性疾病的发生风险。孕期营养是影响妊娠结局的重要因素,孕期均衡且充分的营养摄入能够保障母婴的健康。UPFs营养密度有限,孕期对其的高摄入可能不利于母婴健康,但孕期UPFs摄入影响母婴健康的研究有限。该文针对UPFs对妊娠结局影响的相关文献进行了综述,旨在为深入研究UPFs对孕期健康的影响以及进行个性化膳食指导提供研究依据。

关键词: 超加工食品 ; NOVA分类 ; 孕期营养 ; 妊娠结局

Abstract

In recent years, the global consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has increased. UPFs are classified as the fourth group of food in the NOVA classification system: industrially formulated foods made entirely or mostly from substances extracted from foods (oils, fats, sugar, starch, proteins, etc), derivatives of food constituents (hydrogenated fats, modified starches, etc), or multiple food additives. Common manufacturing techniques include extrusion, moulding, and pre-frying. As high-energy-density foods, UPFs are typically characterized by high levels of sugar, fat, and salt, and low levels of dietary fiber, protein, vitamins, and minerals, resulting in low nutrient density. Studies have shown that a high intake of UPFs increases the risk of various chronic diseases. Nutrition during pregnancy is a crucial factor influencing pregnancy outcomes, and balanced and adequate nutrient intake is essential for the health of both the mother and child. Given that UPFs have limited nutritional density, high intake during pregnancy may be detrimental to maternal and infant health. However, the impact of consuming UPFs during pregnancy on maternal and infant health is not extensively studied. This article reviews the literature on the effects of UPFs on pregnancy outcomes, aiming to provide a foundation for further research and personalized dietary guidance.

Keywords: ultra-processed food ; NOVA classification ; gestational nutrition ; pregnancy outcomes

PDF (1401KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

糜小扬, 丁莹, 陈奕静, 贾洁. 孕期超加工食品摄入与妊娠结局关系的研究进展. 上海交通大学学报(医学版)[J], 2025, 45(1): 113-121 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.01.014

MI Xiaoyang, DING Ying, CHEN Yijing, JIA Jie. Research progress in the relationship between ultra-processed food intake and pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science)[J], 2025, 45(1): 113-121 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2025.01.014

近年来,食品加工业发展迅速。与此同时,人们对食品安全以及食品对健康的影响十分关注,如何从种类繁多的加工食品中合理选择、如何制定合理的食品政策都需要较为充足的研究证据。NOVA分类作为新兴的食品分类体系将食品分为4类:① 未加工和最低限度加工食品。② 经加工的烹饪用佐料。③ 加工食品。④ 超加工食品(ultra-processed foods,UPFs)1。近年来全球范围内的UPFs消费量显著增长,然而,UPFs被研究证明可能对健康有广泛的负面影响。妊娠期的食物种类和营养素摄入水平影响母体和胎儿的健康,是决定妊娠结局的重要因素。本文针对孕期UPFs摄入对妊娠结局影响的研究进展综述如下。

1 UPFs概述

1.1 NOVA分类与UPFs

2010年巴西营养学家MONTEIRO Carlos提出了NOVA分类,2016年对其进行修订和补充。NOVA分类属于新兴的食品分类,对食品有较具体的标准,能够较全面地覆盖各类食品,且有可行性;相比于欧洲、美国、墨西哥和危地马拉等提出的食品分类,其应用前景更广泛2。近年来,NOVA分类已被广泛应用于食品加工程度的评价,其根据加工的目的和程度将食物分为4组,包括未加工或最低限度加工食品、经加工的烹饪用作料、加工食品和UPFs,考虑了在食品制造过程中使用的所有物理、生物和化学方法,包括食品添加剂的种类。

其中,未加工或最低限度加工食品指未经加工或利用物理方法进行最低限度加工的食品,包括新鲜蔬菜水果,谷薯类如大米、红薯,豆类如黄豆,冷冻畜禽肉、海鲜,鸡蛋,新鲜的巴氏杀菌奶、未添加蔗糖的新鲜酸奶,无添加糖的新鲜蔬菜水果汁,小麦研磨而成的面粉,饮用水、矿泉水,只用面粉和水所制面食,烹饪用香草或香料,不含糖和盐的坚果、种子等。经加工的烹饪用佐料指对单一天然食品成分的提取和纯化,可用于家庭或餐厅烹饪用的配料,或加工食品制造商的配方中使用的配料,如糖、盐、黄油、植物油、牛油、猪油、玉米糖浆、玉米淀粉等。加工食品指混合第2类烹饪成分的第1类食品,并采用罐装、瓶装保存的食品,如含糖或盐的坚果或种子,添加糖的果汁,腌制及熏制的肉、鱼,新鲜且无其他添加的面包或奶酪等。UPFs则是经过复杂加工,含有多种食物提取物和各类添加剂的工业配方食品,包括:碳酸饮料、牛奶饮料、运动饮料等以“饮料”命名的饮品;包装零食,如薯片、饼干等;包装糕点、面包、蛋糕;早餐麦片、谷物、能量棒;人造黄油等涂抹物;即食酱料如番茄酱;水果味酸奶;重组肉制品如香肠、鸡块、热狗、汉堡肉等;方便面;加热即食食品和预制菜,如披萨、馅饼等1

1.2 UPFs的消费现状

UPFs因为其保存期长、价格低廉、无需复杂烹饪的特点,在世界范围内广泛普及。从2013年到2016年,印度城市居民UPFs的消费量增长了6%3;2001年到2018年,美国的UPFs平均摄入量占能量比从53.5%增加到57.0%4;2015年至2019年,UPFs一直是澳大利亚人主要购买的食品,能量占比高达55%,具体食品包括包装面包、巧克力、糖果、饼干、冰淇淋等5;从1990到2010年,西班牙居民UPFs的消费量占食物消费比从11.0%增长到31.7%,与此同时添加糖在食物中比例从8.4%上升至13.0%6,人均消费量在1.4~5.3份/d7;在拉丁美洲国家,UPFs的消费量仍在迅速上升8。近年来,加工型食物同样成为了中国居民食物摄入的重要组成部分。根据研究,中国的人均UPFs消费量从2012年的62 g/d增长至2016年的174 g/d,实现了近3倍的增长9

研究显示多个西方国家的儿童和青少年群体的UPFs消费量也普遍较高10。巴西3~4岁儿童UPFs摄入占总能量的41.8%~43.4%,6~8岁儿童UPFs摄入占总能量的47.7%~49.2%11,46.2%的青少年每周摄入UPFs超过3次12。在过去的20年里,美国2~19岁的人群中UPFs摄入的总卡路里百分比从61.4%增长至67.0%,非西班牙裔黑人青年从62.2%上升到72.5%,墨西哥裔美国青年从55.8%上升到63.5%13

妊娠期妇女中,研究关注各人口学统计量,如年龄、孕前身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、受教育水平、家庭收入、产次等,但尚缺乏有规模的专项研究。有研究发现,经产妇易以富含UPFs的“西方饮食模式”为主14。其他研究指出孕期UPFs摄入与产妇年龄、教育程度呈负相关,与孕前BMI和吸烟呈正相关15。然而,尚缺乏针对不同国家、地区妊娠期妇女孕期UPFs摄入变化趋势的研究。

1.3 UPFs对健康的影响

UPFs通常是高能量密度的食品,具有高糖、脂肪和盐,低膳食纤维、蛋白质、维生素和矿物质的特点1,促使大量研究探讨UPFs摄入量与多种疾病的关联性。有关UPFs的研究主要关注其与慢性疾病和全因死亡率的关联。研究16表明UPFs摄入与患肥胖和超重的风险呈正相关[OR=1.26,95%CI:(1.10,1.45)];SROUR等17的研究表明每增加10%的UPFs摄入,患2型糖尿病的风险将显著增加[HR=1.13,95%CI:(1.01,1.27)]。另有研究发现UPFs摄入与心血管代谢综合征18、慢性肾病19和非酒精性脂肪肝20等疾病风险呈正相关。

2 孕期UPFs与孕期营养及妊娠结局关系的研究

孕期营养是健康妊娠的重要影响因素,关系到妊娠期妇女自身的健康和胎儿生长发育情况。DOHaD学说强调母体妊娠时期的身体状况、营养状况以及生活习惯,都在持续影响胎儿的生存环境,从而影响儿童时期的发育状况,乃至成人期部分疾病的发病率21。多项研究证实孕期营养与其他人群所需营养要求不同,且不合理的孕期营养与多种不良妊娠结局相关,如妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)、大于胎龄或小于胎龄儿、早产等22。孕期营养同样需要关注孕期UPFs摄入情况,在食品加工层面改善妊娠期食品选择及膳食结构,促进母婴健康结局。

目前孕期UPFs摄入对妊娠期妇女及胎儿影响的结论尚不一致。我们检索到17篇文献,其中10篇针对孕期UPFs摄入,7篇探讨涉及富含UPFs的孕期膳食模式,包括“西方饮食模式”等。表1列举了纳入讨论的17项研究。

表1   UPFs摄入对妊娠结局的影响

Tab 1  Effect of intake of UPFs on gestational outcomes

Author

Year

Country

Study

design

Outcome

Number

(Case)

Dietary

Investigation

tool

UPF

consumption

OR

(95%CI or P value)

Covariate
MARTIN[23]

2015

USA

CohortPreterm birth3 143 (364)FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.53

(1.02, 2.30)

Maternal age, race, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level, marital status, parity, family income, smoking status in the first 6 months of pregnancy and energy intake
ENGLUND-ÖGGE[24]

2014

Norway

CohortPreterm birth66 000 (3 505)FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

HR=1.12

(1.01, 1.25)

P>0.05

Maternal history of previous preterm delivery, maternal age, height, pre-pregnancy BMI, marital status, parity, smoking, education level, family income, and total energy intake
ENGLUND-ÖGGE[25]

2012

Norway

CohortPreterm birth

60 761

(3 281)

MoBa

FFQ

Sugar

-sweetened beverages

maximum

vs

minimum

Artificially sweetened

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.11

(1.00, 1.24)

OR=1.25

(1.08, 1.45)

Maternal history of previous preterm delivery, maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, marital status, parity, smoking, education level and total energy intake
RODRIGUES[26]

2020

Brazil

Cross

-sectional

LBW

99

(13)

Form of food consumption markers in the food and nutrition surveillance system

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.46

(1.02, 2.10)

Maternal age, marital status, education level, per capita income, prenatal weight, final fetal weight, increase in gestational age and gestational age, type of delivery, number of pregnancies
FERREIRA[27]

2022

Brazil

Cross

-sectional

LBW

260

(8)

FFQ

Dietary pattern 3

(rich in ultra-processed foods)

OR=1.27

(1.11, 1.45)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, marital status, family income and parity
VIEIRA E SOUZA[28]

2022

Brazil

Cross

-sectional

LBW

626

(43)

FFQ

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.72

(1.09, 2.70)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, percapita income, marital status, gestational weight gain, parity, number of prenatal consultations, smoking and physical activity level
SCHRUBBE[29]

2024

Brazil

CohortLGA

214

(22)

24hDietary Rcall

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.03

(1.00, 1.06)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race, education level, family income, marital status, parity, smoking and alcohol consumption
ROCHA[30]

2022

Brazil

Cross

-sectional

SGA

300

(17)

FFQ

UPF energy proportion>2.06%

vs

<0.31%

OR=10.4

(1.33, 8090)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, total energy intake, education level, family income, marital status, parity, smoking, alcohol consumption and race
VICTOR[31]

2023

Brazil

Cross

-sectional

SGA

LBW

2 632 314

(186 206/188 450)

/

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=1.04

(1.02, 1.06)

OR=1.13

(1.11, 1.16)

Maternal age, marital status, education level, gestational age, number of prenatal appointments, newborn gender and race
LEONE[32]

2021

Spain

CohortGDM

3 730

(186)

FFQ

<3 servings/d

vs

>4.5servings/d

OR=1.10

P=0.82

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, smoking, physical activity, family history of diabetes, parity, time spent watching TV, hypertension, nutritional therapy and total energy intake
LAMYIAN[33]

2017

Iran

CohortGDM

1 026

(71)

FFQ

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=2.12

(1.12, 5.43)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, history of GDM, smoking, drug use and total energy intake
YISAHAK[34]

2022

USA

Cohort

GDM

PE

1 948

(85/63)

FFQ

maximum

vs

minimum

OR=0.68

(0.44, 1.05)

OR=0.99

P=0.85

OR=1.33

P=0.63

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race, family income, education level, marital status, parity, physical activity, sleep duration and total energy intake
SEDAGHAT[14]

2017

Iran

Case -controlGDM

388

(122)

FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

OR=1.68

(1.04, 2.27)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational age, education level, socioeconomic status, smoking, family history of diabetes and supplement use
ASADI[35]

2019

Iran

Case -controlGDM

278

(130)

FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

OR=1.50

(0.74, 3.03)

P=0.2

Maternal age, physical activity level, family history of diabetes, pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, occupational status, history of fetal macrosomia and total energy intake
DONAZAR-EZCURRA[36]

2018

Spain

CohortGDM

3 396

(172)

FFQSoft drink intake > 400 g/w

OR=2.03

(1.25, 3.31)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, family history of diabetes, smoking, total energy intake, physical activity, parity, fast food intake, adherence to Mediterranean dietary patterns, alcohol intake, multiple pregnancies and cardiovascular disease/hypertension
BRANTSAETER[15]

2009

Norway

CohortPE

23 423

(1 267)

FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

OR=1.21

(1.03, 1.42)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education level, smoking, pre-pregnancy hypertension status, dietary supplement use and total energy intake
IKEM[37]

2019

Danmark

Cohort

Gestationalhypertension

PE

55 139

(5 491)

FFQ

Western

dietary

pattern

Gestational

hypertension

OR=1.18

(1.05, 1.33)

PE OR=1.40

(1.11, 1.76)

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, smoking, physical activity level, paired sociodemographic status, total energy intake and previous history of hypertension

Note: BMI, body mass index; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; LBW, low birth weight; LGA, large for gestational age; PE, preeclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age.

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.1 早产

早产是5岁以下婴幼儿发病与死亡的重要原因。胎龄越小,死亡率越高,存活后的残障(如脑瘫、智力低下、支气管肺发育不良、视力障碍等)发生率也越高38。母体的营养状况与早产的发生率有关39。MARTIN等23的研究显示,孕期以炸鸡、炸薯条、汉堡、芝士通心粉、加工肉类、饼干、冰淇淋等食物为主的膳食模式与增加早产风险显著相关[OR= 1.53,95%CI:(1.02,2.30)]。然而,ENGLUND-ÖGGE等24发现以咸味零食、甜食和加工肉制品为主的“西方饮食模式”与早产并无关联。

含有天然或人工甜味剂的含糖饮料属于典型的UPF。针对含糖饮料摄入的研究25表明,高人工甜味剂饮料摄入量与早产显著相关[OR=1.11,95%CI:(1.00,1.24)],而每天饮用1份含糖饮料也与早产风险增加相关[OR=1.25,95%CI:(1.08,1.45)]。其中,根据分娩时间分层,高人工甜味剂饮料摄入量与晚期早产风险相关[OR=1.14,95%CI:(1.00,1.29)],含糖饮料摄入量与早期早产风险相关[OR=1.75,95%CI:(1.13,2.73)]。摄入含糖饮料引起的血糖升高,与多种炎症因子分泌增加相关,从而可能增加早产风险。人工甜味剂也可能对孕期代谢产生不良影响,如阿斯巴甜可能在代谢过程中产生甲醇,而研究证明甲醇可减少灵长类动物的妊娠时间,可能导致早产40

2.2 低出生体质量

低出生体质量(low birth weight,LBW)指出生体质量小于或等于2 500 g,与儿童时期和生命远期的健康密切相关。LBW严重的婴儿更容易患上慢性疾病和认知障碍,并显著增加远期非胰岛素依赖糖尿病的患病风险41。全球范围的LBW患病率为14.6%,2015年约有2 050万婴儿出生时患有LBW,其中91.0%发生在发展中国家42。孕期营养不均衡可能增加LBW的风险。RODRIGUES等26的研究显示,孕期高UPFs摄入显著增加新生儿LBW的风险,主要涉及加工肉制品(香肠)和甜食[OR=1.46,95%CI:(1.02,2.10)]。

FERREIRA等27的研究发现,以属于UPFs的加工肉类和精制谷物为主的孕期膳食模式与新生儿LBW的风险增加有关[OR=1.27,95%CI:(1.11,1.45)]。而有研究28发现,校正各混杂因素前,孕期高UPFs摄入与LBW风险显著相关[OR=1.72,95%CI:(1.09,2.70)],但校正后两者之间无显著相关性,可能与复杂的人口统计学信息和环境因素有关。

2.3 小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿

小于胎龄儿(small for gestational age,SGA)指出生体质量低于同胎龄儿平均体质量的第10百分位或2SD的婴儿。流行病学调查显示,我国SGA发病率为6.61%,国外SGA发病率为6.7%~12.9%43。SGA属于各种围产期疾病发生的高危群体,易出现生长发育和神经发育迟缓,同时多种远期代谢性疾病、心血管疾病的风险显著增加43。大于胎龄儿(large for gestational age,LGA)是指出生体质量大于同胎龄平均体质量的第90百分位数的新生儿44。研究表明,LGA会增加肩难产、新生儿低血糖以及延长住院时间的风险,同时还会增加成年时期患肥胖、2型糖尿病、心血管疾病、骨肿瘤等疾病的风险45。孕期不均衡的营养将影响胎儿的宫内发育,造成SGA或LGA。

孕期高UPFs摄入对SGA或LGA的影响结论不一致。根据SCHRUBBE等29的研究,孕期高UPFs摄入会显著增加LGA的风险[OR=1.03,95%CI:(1.00,1.068)]。VICTOR等31发现孕期UPFs高摄入组相比低摄入组SGA[OR=1.04,95%CI:(1.02,1.06)]和LBW[OR=1.13,95%CI:(1.11,1.16)]的风险均显著增加。然而根据ROCHA等30的研究,孕期高UPFs摄入与SGA的风险显著相关[OR=10.4,95%CI:(1.33,8090)]。值得注意的是,SCHRUBBE等29和ROCHA等30纳入的样本数均较小(22名和17名),需要后续大样本量研究补充结果。

2.4 妊娠期糖尿病

妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)是指妊娠前糖代谢正常或者有潜在糖耐量消退,妊娠期才出现的糖尿病。临床特征主要表现为高血糖和胰岛素抵抗。据国际糖尿病联合会(International Diabetes Federation,IDF)统计,全球GDM的发病率约为14%。我国GDM的发病率在近年来快速增加至11.91%46。GDM患病与早产、胎儿窘迫、胎膜早破、巨大儿、新生儿低血糖等不良妊娠结局有关47,其中羊水过多、早产、产后出血的发生风险分别是正常孕妇的2.12、1.78和1.25倍48。患GDM女性及其后代在远期发生心脏代谢紊乱的风险增加49。GDM导致的宫内高血糖环境促使胎儿发生长期影响代谢的适应性改变,导致儿童期肥胖及成人期2型糖尿病的风险增加21

孕期UPFs摄入与GDM发生相关性的研究结论尚不一致。LEONE等32发现孕期UPFs摄入量与GDM患病风险无显著关联。然而,在大于30岁的女性中,孕期UPFs摄入增加,能够显著增加GDM风险[OR=2.05,95%CI:(1.03,4.07)]。YISAHAK等34的研究同样表明孕期UPFs摄入与GDM风险不存在显著关联。此外,LAMYIAN等33分析了属于典型UPFs的快餐食品,在调整混杂因素后,发现高UPFs摄入导致GDM风险显著增加[OR=2.12,95%CI:(1.12,5.43)]。但没有发现单一食物,如炸薯条、汉堡等,与GDM发生显著相关。

在针对孕期富含UPFs的饮食模式的研究中,SEDAGHAT等14发现,在调整混杂因素后,以糖果、果酱、蛋黄酱、软饮料、咸味零食等UPFs为主的“西方饮食模式”与GDM风险增加显著相关[OR=1.68,95%CI:(1.04,2.27)]。ASADI等35发现,以含糖饮料、精制谷物产品、快餐、咸零食、糖果和饼干、蛋黄酱等UPFs为主的“西方饮食模式”与GDM风险无显著关联。

含糖饮料和无糖饮料均属于UPFs,但两者的摄入对患GDM的影响不一致36。女性每周摄入400 mL以上的含糖饮料会导致孕期患GDM的风险显著增加[OR=2.03,95%CI:(1.25,3.31)],而无糖饮料摄入无显著影响。针对无糖饮料摄入是否能增加孕期女性的健康风险,研究结果不一致25,具体影响及机制可能与所用甜味剂类型有关,有待进一步研究。

2.5 妊娠期高血压

妊娠期高血压疾病是世界范围内引起产妇死亡的重要原因,全球的流行率为每10万名育龄妇女中有116人50。妊娠期高血压包括慢性高血压、白大褂高血压、隐性高血压、妊娠高血压和先兆子痫。大量研究关注先兆子痫,探讨其与各影响因素的相关性,以探索可能的预防措施。先兆子痫或子痫前期指妊娠后期出现高血压,伴或不伴有蛋白尿,同时可能存在全身水肿。先兆子痫可致胎儿生长受限、胎盘早剥、早产、母体全身多系统功能损伤等不良妊娠结局51。研究显示子痫前期在瑞典和中国的患病率相似,分别是2.8%和2.2%,但在瑞典多为轻度病例,中国则多为严重病例,且产次和BMI对患病有显著影响。同时,中国的子痫前期的死产率几乎是瑞典的10倍52。孕期营养作为影响因素,其与先兆子痫的关联值得进一步研究。YISAHAK等34在轻度和严重妊娠期高血压人群中均未观察到与孕期UPFs摄入的显著关联,也可能与人群规模较小有关。

在针对孕期富含UPFs的饮食模式的研究中,BRANTSAETER等15发现,孕期摄入大量加工肉类、咸味零食和甜饮料等UPFs的女性患子痫前期的风险显著增加[OR=1.21,95%CI:(1.03,1.42)]。在IKEM等37的研究中,以炸薯条、混合肉、人造黄油和白面包等UPFs为主的“西方饮食模式”与妊娠期高血压[OR=1.18,95%CI:(1.05,1.33)]和子痫前期[OR=1.40,95%CI:(1.11,1.76)]患病率显著增加有关。这些研究结论较为一致。

3 孕期UPFs摄入致不良妊娠结局的可能机制

孕期UPFs摄入对各妊娠结局影响的机制尚在探索中,可能与UPFs的营养成分构成、所含添加剂或包装材料有关。UPFs通常是高能量密度的食品,富含精制碳水化合物、饱和脂肪、添加糖和钠,但膳食纤维、蛋白质、维生素和矿物质往往不足1。UPFs摄入导致的慢性过量的碳水化合物摄入可能会诱导脂肪组织的扩张,并有利于异位脂肪沉积到肝脏和骨骼肌中,从而导致胰岛素抵抗。UPFs中富含饱和脂肪,摄入过多能够诱导胎盘氧化应激和血管失调,增加不良妊娠结局的风险33。UPFs因其营养特点具有促炎潜能,长期食用可能产生慢性低度炎症状态53,不利于宫内胎儿的健康。同时,UPFs会破坏肠-脑轴饱腹感信号传导,促进能量过量摄入54,导致肥胖的风险增加,使得宫内环境发生不良改变21。UPFs所含的添加剂如亚硝酸盐会导致胰岛β-细胞受损等一系列不良影响14,增加不良妊娠结局的风险。此外,用于UPFs的包装材料含有的化学成分,如邻苯二甲酸盐和双酚A,被认为对肥胖、胰岛素抵抗和糖尿病具有促进作用55,可能对妊娠产生不良影响。研究表明,高UPFs摄入与邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物增加显著相关56

4 总结与展望

近年来全球多个国家UPFs的消费量都在迅速增长。本文综述了孕期UPFs摄入对包括早产、LBW、SGA或LGA、GDM和妊娠期高血压在内的妊娠结局的影响,发现孕期高UPFs摄入可以作为早产的危险因素,富含UPFs的孕期膳食模式能够显著增加LBW和先兆子痫的风险,但对SGA或LGA以及GDM的影响结论不一致。这可能与协变量选择和校正、分层分析的策略、样本量、UPFs具体涉及种类等因素相关。孕期UPFs摄入与不良妊娠结局关联的剂量-反应关系尚未明确。现有UPFs研究从单一食品(含甜味剂的饮料和快餐食品)、单纯UPFs摄入和富含UPFs的膳食模式等几个角度开展分析,其中,膳食模式主要通过主成分分析获得,以评估各类食物摄入情况对某具体模式的贡献。许多研究关注的“西方饮食模式”主要包括加工肉类、各类甜食和快餐食品,但不同研究之间的变异程度较大,缺少标准的定义。此外,鲜有研究关注UPFs实际的营养密度,也可能造成潜在的错误分类57。随着全球代谢性疾病发生率的逐年升高,以及食品加工技术的进步,未来研究需要进一步明确和完善基于不同生命周期和不同国家及其饮食文化的UPFs分类标准,扩大不同人群的研究范围,从而促进相关政策和膳食指南的制定,帮助不同饮食文化背景下的消费者选择更合理的个性化饮食消费和搭配。

作者贡献声明

糜小扬负责论文的撰写和修改,丁莹、陈奕静参与论文初稿的撰写和总体校对,贾洁负责写作指导和论文审阅。所有作者均阅读并同意了最终稿件的提交。

AUTHOR's CONTRIBUTIONS

MI Xiaoyang was responsible for the writing and revision of the paper, DING Ying and CHEN Yijing participated in the writing and proofreading of the first draft of the paper, and JIA Jie was responsible for writing guidance and paper review. All authors have read and agreed to the submission of the final manuscript.

利益冲突声明

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors declare no relevant conflict of interests.

参考文献

MONTEIRO C A, CANNON G, LEVY R B, et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them[J]. Public Health Nutr, 2019, 22(5): 936-941.

[本文引用: 4]

MOODIE R, BENNETT E, KWONG E J L, et al. Ultra-processed profits: the political economy of countering the global spread of ultra-processed foods - A synthesis review on the market and political practices of transnational food corporations and strategic public health responses[J]. Int J Health Policy Manag, 2021, 10(12): 968-982.

[本文引用: 1]

TAK M, LAW C, GREEN R, et al. Processed foods purchase profiles in urban India in 2013 and 2016: a cluster and multivariate analysis[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(10): e062254.

[本文引用: 1]

JUUL F, PAREKH N, MARTINEZ-STEELE E, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2022, 115(1): 211-221.

[本文引用: 1]

COYLE D H, HUANG L P, SHAHID M, et al. Socio-economic difference in purchases of ultra-processed foods in Australia: an analysis of a nationally representative household grocery purchasing panel[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2022, 19(1): 148.

[本文引用: 1]

LATASA P, LOUZADA M L D C, STEELE E M, et al. Added sugars and ultra-processed foods in Spanish households (1990-2010)[J]. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2018, 72(10): 1404-1412.

[本文引用: 1]

RICO-CAMPÀ A, MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLEZ M A, ALVAREZ-ALVAREZ I, et al. Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality: Sun prospective cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2019, 365: l1949.

[本文引用: 1]

MONTEIRO C A, CANNON G, MOUBARAC J C, et al. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing[J]. Public Health Nutr, 2018, 21(1): 5-17.

[本文引用: 1]

MONTEIRO C A, MOUBARAC J C, CANNON G, et al. Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system[J]. Obes Rev, 2013, 14(Suppl 2): 21-28.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG Y, GIOVANNUCCI E L. Ultra-processed foods and health: a comprehensive review[J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2023, 63(31): 10836-10848.

[本文引用: 1]

RAUBER F, CAMPAGNOLO P D B, HOFFMAN D J, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children′s lipid profiles: a longitudinal study[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2015, 25(1): 116-122.

[本文引用: 1]

MELO I S V, COSTA C A C B, SANTOS J V L D, et al. Consumption of minimally processed food is inversely associated with excess weight in adolescents living in an underdeveloped city[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(11): e0188401.

[本文引用: 1]

SALOMÉ M, ARRAZAT L, WANG J H, et al. Contrary to ultra-processed foods, the consumption of unprocessed or minimally processed foods is associated with favorable patterns of protein intake, diet quality and lower cardiometabolic risk in French adults (INCA3)[J]. Eur J Nutr, 2021, 60(7): 4055-4067.

[本文引用: 1]

SEDAGHAT F, AKHOONDAN M, EHTESHAMI M, et al. Maternal dietary patterns and gestational diabetes risk: a case-control study[J]. J Diabetes Res, 2017, 2017: 5173926.

[本文引用: 4]

BRANTSAETER A L, HAUGEN M, SAMUELSEN S O, et al. A dietary pattern characterized by high intake of vegetables, fruits, and vegetable oils is associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia in nulliparous pregnant Norwegian women[J]. J Nutr, 2009, 139(6): 1162-1168.

[本文引用: 3]

DE DEUS MENDONÇA R, PIMENTA A M, GEA A, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2016, 104(5): 1433-1440.

[本文引用: 1]

SROUR B, FEZEU L K, KESSE-GUYOT E, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes among participants of the NutriNet-santé prospective cohort[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2020, 180(2): 283-291.

[本文引用: 1]

NASREDDINE L, TAMIM H, ITANI L, et al. A minimally processed dietary pattern is associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome among Lebanese adults[J]. Public Health Nutr, 2018, 21(1): 160-171.

[本文引用: 1]

DU S T, KIM H, CREWS D C, et al. Association between ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of incident CKD: a prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2022, 80(5): 589-598.e1.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG S M, GAN S N, ZHANG Q, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Tianjin Chronic Low-grade Systemic Inflammation and Health Cohort Study[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2022, 51(1): 237-249.

[本文引用: 1]

杨慧霞, 段涛. 健康与疾病的发育起源: DOHaD在中国[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013: 294.

[本文引用: 3]

YANG H X, DUAN T. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease: DOHaD in China[M]. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2013: 294.

[本文引用: 3]

MARSHALL N E, ABRAMS B, BARBOUR L A, et al. The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: lifelong consequences[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 226(5): 607-632.

[本文引用: 1]

MARTIN C L, SOTRES-ALVAREZ D, SIEGA-RIZ A M. Maternal dietary patterns during the second trimester are associated with preterm birth[J]. J Nutr, 2015, 145(8): 1857-1864.

[本文引用: 2]

ENGLUND-ÖGGE L, BRANTSAETER A L, SENGPIEL V, et al. Maternal dietary patterns and preterm delivery: results from large prospective cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2014, 348: g1446.

[本文引用: 2]

ENGLUND-ÖGGE L, BRANTSÆTER A L, HAUGEN M, et al. Association between intake of artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages and preterm delivery: a large prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2012, 96(3): 552-559.

[本文引用: 3]

RODRIGUES B, AZEREDO V, SILVA A. Relationship between food consumption of pregnant women and birth weight of newborns[J]. Rev Chil Nutr, 2020, 47(1): 80-88.

[本文引用: 2]

FERREIRA L B, LOBO C V, DO CARMO A S, et al. Dietary patterns during pregnancy and their association with gestational weight gain and anthropometric measurements at birth[J]. Matern Child Health J, 2022, 26(7): 1464-1472.

[本文引用: 2]

VIEIRA E SOUZA R C, MIRANDA C, MAIA DE SOUSA T, et al. Effect of ultra-processed foods consumption and some lifestyle factors during pregnancy on baby′s anthropometric measurements at birth[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 15(1): 44.

[本文引用: 2]

SCHRUBBE V, SILVA D L F, ALMEIDA C C B, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption during pregnancy and newborn weight[J]. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant, 2024, 24: e20230189.

[本文引用: 3]

ROCHA G G, ANDRADE-SILVA A, ALVES-SANTOS N H, et al. Association between maternal dietary intake classified according to its degree of processing and sex-specific birth weight for gestational age[J]. Rev Nutr, 2022, 35: e210197.

[本文引用: 3]

VICTOR A, GOTINE A R M, FALCÃO I R, et al. Association between food environments and fetal growth in pregnant Brazilian women[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2023, 23(1): 661.

[本文引用: 2]

LEONE A, MARTÍNEZ-GONZÁLEZ M Á, CRAIG W, et al. Pre-gestational consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of gestational diabetes in a Mediterranean cohort. the SUN project[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(7): 2202.

[本文引用: 2]

LAMYIAN M, HOSSEINPOUR-NIAZI S, MIRMIRAN P, et al. Pre-pregnancy fast food consumption is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus among tehranian women[J]. Nutrients, 2017, 9(3): 216.

[本文引用: 3]

YISAHAK S F, HINKLE S N, MUMFORD S L, et al. Periconceptional and first trimester ultraprocessed food intake and maternal cardiometabolic outcomes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2022, 45(9): 2028-2036.

[本文引用: 3]

ASADI M, SHAHZEIDI M, NADJARZADEH A, et al. The relationship between pre-pregnancy dietary patterns adherence and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Iran: a case-control study[J]. Nutr Diet, 2019, 76(5): 597-603.

[本文引用: 2]

DONAZAR-EZCURRA M, BURGO C L D, MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ M A, et al. Soft drink consumption and gestational diabetes risk in the SUN project[J]. Clin Nutr, 2018, 37(2): 638-645.

[本文引用: 2]

IKEM E, HALLDORSSON T I, BIRGISDÓTTIR B E, et al. Dietary patterns and the risk of pregnancy-associated hypertension in the Danish National Birth Cohort: a prospective longitudinal study[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(5): 663-673.

[本文引用: 2]

胡娅莉. 降低早产发生率: 我们面临的任务[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2023, 39(2): 131-133.

[本文引用: 1]

HU Y L. Reducing preterm birth rate in China: a task facing us[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 39(2): 131-133.

[本文引用: 1]

GOLDENBERG R L, CULHANE J F, IAMS J D, et al. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth[J]. Lancet, 2008, 371(9606): 75-84.

[本文引用: 1]

BURBACHER T M, GRANT K S, SHEN D D, et al. Chronic maternal methanol inhalation in nonhuman Primates (Macaca fascicularis): reproductive performance and birth outcome[J]. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2004, 26(5): 639-650.

[本文引用: 1]

HASSAN S, JAHANFAR S, INUNGU J, et al. Low birth weight as a predictor of adverse health outcomes during adulthood in twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Syst Rev, 2021, 10(1): 186.

[本文引用: 1]

SHEN L P, WANG J, DUAN Y F, et al. Prevalence of low birth weight and macrosomia estimates based on heaping adjustment method in China[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 15016.

[本文引用: 1]

张懿敏, 邵树铭, 张晓蕊. 小于胎龄儿神经发育结局的研究进展[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2023, 57(6): 935-940.

[本文引用: 2]

ZHANG Y M, SHAO S M, ZHANG X R. Research progress on neurodevelopmental outcomes of small for gestational age infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2023, 57(6): 935-940.

[本文引用: 2]

SHINOHARA S, AMEMIYA A, TAKIZAWA M. Association between false positive glucose challenge test results and large-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(2): e034627.

[本文引用: 1]

张澳, 苏敏仪, 郑丽娟, 等. 妊娠中期口服葡萄糖耐量试验异常模式与大于胎龄儿的关联分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2024(3):184-191.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG A, SU M Y, ZHENG L J, et al. Association between abnormal oral glucose tolerance test patterns in the second trimester and large for gestational age newborns[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024(3): 184-191.

[本文引用: 1]

JUAN J, YANG H X. Prevalence, prevention, and lifestyle intervention of gestational diabetes mellitus in China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(24): 9517.

[本文引用: 1]

YE W R, LUO C, HUANG J, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2022, 377: e067946.

[本文引用: 1]

索冬梅, 郭绮棱, 罗彩红, 等. 6230例GDM临床危险因素分析及妊娠和分娩结局观察[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2019, 30(4): 442-447.

[本文引用: 1]

SUO D M, GUO Q L, LUO C H, et al. Clinical risk factors analysis and pregnancy and childbirth outcomes observation in 6230 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Research on maternal and child health in China, 2019, 30(4): 442-447.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHU Y Y, ZHANG C L. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective[J]. Curr Diabetes Rep, 2016, 16(1): 7.

[本文引用: 1]

WU P, GREEN M, MYERS J. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy[J]. BMJ, 2023, 381: e071653.

[本文引用: 1]

ZHANG H G, YANG L, QIAO Z X, et al. Effect of gestational hypertension on fetal growth restriction, endocrine and cardiovascular disorders[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(4): 1048-1049.

[本文引用: 1]

YANG Y Y, RAY I L, ZHU J, et al. Preeclampsia prevalence, risk factors, and pregnancy outcomes in Sweden and China[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(5): e218401.

[本文引用: 1]

SILVA C A, SANTOS I D S, SHIVAPPA N, et al. The role of food processing in the inflammatory potential of diet during pregnancy[J]. Rev Saude Publica, 2019, 53: 113.

[本文引用: 1]

吕嘉乐, 刘芳华, 吴琪俊, 等. 超加工食品摄入与成人超重和肥胖关系研究进展[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(11): 1691-1694.

[本文引用: 1]

LV J L, LIU F H, WU Q J, et al. Progress in researches on association of ultra-processed foods with adult overweight and obesity[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2021, 37(11): 1691-1694.

[本文引用: 1]

ROLFO A, NUZZO A M, AMICIS R D, et al. Fetal-maternal exposure to endocrine disruptors: correlation with diet intake and pregnancy outcomes[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(6): 1744.

[本文引用: 1]

BAKER B H, MELOUGH M M, PAQUETTE A G, et al. Ultra-processed and fast food consumption, exposure to phthalates during pregnancy, and socioeconomic disparities in phthalate exposures[J]. Environ Int, 2024, 183: 108427.

[本文引用: 1]

GUPTA S, HAWK T, AGGARWAL A, et al. Characterizing ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density, and cost[J]. Front Nutr, 2019, 6: 70.

[本文引用: 1]

/