上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 107-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2020.01.017

• 论著·公共卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

城乡结合社区老年人健康促进生活方式与社会支持、自我效能感相关性研究

栾 伟1, 2*,朱 珠2*,朱冬平2,葛文静2,朱群妹3,蒋燕勤2,李 劲2,姜安丽1   

  1. 1.海军军医大学护理学院,上海200433;2.上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院南院,上海201112;3.上海市闵行区浦江社区卫生服务中心,上海201112
  • 出版日期:2020-01-28 发布日期:2020-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 姜安丽,电子信箱:aljiang00@sina.com。
  • 作者简介:栾 伟(1979—),女,副主任护师,硕士;电子信箱:luanwei_renji@126.com。朱 珠(1986—),女,护师,学士;电子信箱:zhuzhu_renji@126.com。*为共同第一作者。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生和计划生育委员会面上项目(201540086)。

Relationship of health promotion lifestyle with social support and self-efficacy of the elderly in urban-rural communities

LUAN Wei, ZHU Zhu, ZHU Dong-ping, GE Wen-jing, ZHU Qun-mei, JIANG Yan-qing, LI Jin, JIANG An-li   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; 2. Renji Hospital South Campus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201112, China; 3. Pujiang Community Health Service Center, Minhang District, Shanghai 201112, China
  • Online:2020-01-28 Published:2020-03-05
  • Supported by:
    Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (201540086).

摘要: 目的·了解上海市某城乡结合社区老年人的健康促进生活方式的现状,并探讨其与社会支持、自我效能感的相关性。方法·采用整群抽样法,对上海市闵行区浦江镇某社区符合条件的984名老年人进行一般情况、社会支持评定量表、一般自我效能感量表和健康促进生活方式量表(Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile Ⅱ,HPLP Ⅱ)的问卷调查。结果·该社区老年人社会支持总分为40.51±5.92,一般自我效能感总分为2.35±0.58,健康促进生活方式总分为120.44±22.75;社会支持评定量表总分及主观支持、对支持的利用度2项维度的得分,一般自我效能感量表总分均与HPLPⅡ量表各维度得分及总分呈正相关(PⅡ量表总分预测能力较强的因素依次为一般自我效能感量表总分>社会支持评定量表总分>子女数>对支持的利用度得分。结论·城乡结合社区老年人健康促进生活方式水平有待提高,其中营养维度的得分最高,运动锻炼维度得分最低;可以通过改善社会支持以及加强自我效能感的方式来提高社区老年人健康促进行为及健康水平。

关键词: 积极老龄化, 城乡结合社区, 老年人, 社会支持, 自我效能感, 健康促进生活方式

Abstract:

Objective · To investigate the health promoting lifestyle of the elderly in one urban-rural community in Shanghai, and explore its relationship with social support and self-efficacy. Methods · Using cluster sampling method, 984 senior citizens in a community of Pujiang Town, Minhang District, Shanghai were investigated with general situation, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile Ⅱ (HPLPⅡ ). Results · The total score of social support was 40.51±5.92. The total score of general self-efficacy was 2.35±0.58. The total score of health-promoting lifestyle was 120.44±22.75. The total score of SSRS, subjective support and utilization of support, and the total score of GSES were positively correlated with the scores of all dimensions and total scores of HPLPⅡ(PConclusion · The level of health promoting lifestyle of the elderly in the urban-rural community needs to be improved. Among them, the score of nutrition dimension is the highest, and the score of exercise dimension is the lowest. The health promotion behavior and health level of the elderly in the community can be improvedimproving social support and self-efficacy.

Key words: active aging, urban-rural communities, elderly people, social support, self-efficacy, health promotion lifestyle