基于问题行为理论的低年级大学生社交网络成瘾的影响因素研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.08.002

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 955-962.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.08.002

• 健康的行为心理交叉效应专题 • 上一篇下一篇

基于问题行为理论的低年级大学生社交网络成瘾的影响因素研究

王甦平¹^,²(), 唐华³(), 周栋⁴, 蔡泳⁵(), 龚睿婕⁶()

^1.上海交通大学医学院学科规划处，上海 200025
^2.上海交通大学中国医院发展研究院医学教育研究所，上海 200025
^3.上海交通大学医学院学生工作处，上海 200025
^4.上海交通大学医学院党委宣传部，上海 200025
^5.上海交通大学公共卫生学院，上海 200025
^6.上海市徐汇区疾病预防控制中心，上海 200237

收稿日期:2023-01-13 接受日期:2023-04-03 出版日期:2023-08-28 发布日期:2023-08-28
通讯作者: 蔡泳,龚睿婕 E-mail:wangsuping@shsmu.edu.cn;tanghua@shsmu.edu.cn;caiyong202028@hotmail.com;cynthia-dt@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:王甦平（1985—），女，副研究员，博士；电子信箱：wangsuping@shsmu.edu.cn。为共同第一作者.
唐华（1977—），女，副教授，硕士；电子信箱：tanghua@shsmu.edu.cn。为共同第一作者。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2020YFC2006400);长三角免疫规划领军人才研究项目(CSJP033);上海市疾病预防控制青年骨干人才培养项目(22QNGG16)

Study on factors influencing social network service addiction among junior college students based on problem behavior theory

WANG Suping¹^,²(), TANG Hua³(), ZHOU Dong⁴, CAI Yong⁵(), GONG Ruijie⁶()

^1.Office of Academic Planning and Development, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
^2.Institute of Medical Education, China Hospital Development Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
^3.Department of Student Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
^4.Publicity Office, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
^5.School of Public Health Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
^6.Xuhui District for Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2023-01-13 Accepted:2023-04-03 Online:2023-08-28 Published:2023-08-28
Contact: CAI Yong,GONG Ruijie E-mail:wangsuping@shsmu.edu.cn;tanghua@shsmu.edu.cn;caiyong202028@hotmail.com;cynthia-dt@sjtu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2020YFC2006400);Yangtze River Delta Regional Leading Talents Research Project on Immunization(CSJP033);Key Young Talents Training Program for Shanghai Disease Control and Prevention(22QNGG16)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的·基于问题行为理论，构建结构方程模型，开展对于大学生社交网络成瘾的相关研究。方法·在上海市某高校一、二年级本科生中开展关于大学生社交网络成瘾的横断面问卷调查，采用Logistic回归分析性别、年级、学习压力、自尊、孤独感、抑郁、困顿感、挫败感、人际需求、社会支持、吸烟、饮酒、运动和学习成绩对社交网络成瘾的影响。以问题行为理论为理论框架，构建大学生社交网络成瘾的理论框架模型。结果·60.31%（591/980）的低年级大学生有社交网络成瘾情况。单因素Logistic回归结果显示：抑郁、自尊、孤独感、挫败感、困顿感、社会支持、人际需求、运动和学习成绩对社交网络成瘾有显著影响。研究构建的大学生社交网络成瘾的结构方程模型拟合结果良好［S－Bχ²/df=8.03，拟合指数（goodness-of-fit index，GFI）=0.924，比较拟合指数（comparative fit index，CFI）=0.909，非规范拟合指数（Tucker-Lewis index，TLI）=0.872，近似误差均方根（root mean square error of approximation，RMSEA）=0.096，标准化残差均方根（standardized root mean square residual，SRMR）=0.070］，提示人格系统与社会环境系统之间、人格系统与行为系统之间、社会环境系统与行为系统之间均相互影响（β=1.018，P=0.000；β=0.218，P=0.003；β=0.268，P=0.000）。人格系统和行为系统对社交网络成瘾的影响在统计学上不存在显著性，社会环境系统对社交网络成瘾有显著的正向影响（β=0.481，P=0.001）。结论·人格系统和行为系统通过影响社会环境系统间接影响社交网络成瘾，社会环境系统直接影响社交网络成瘾。对于低年级大学生社交网络成瘾问题，应当充分尊重大学生的特点，从系统3个层面共同入手，降低大学生社交网络成瘾风险。

关键词: 大学生, 社交网络成瘾, 问题行为理论, 结构方程模型

Abstract:

Objective ·To construct a structural equation model based on problem behavior theory to conduct a study on social network addiction among junior college students. Methods ·A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in a college in Shanghai. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of gender, grade, study pressure, self-esteem, loneliness, depression, entrapment, defeat, interpersonal needs, perceived social support, smoking, alcohol, exercise, and academic achievement on social network service addiction. Based on the problem behavior theory, the structural equation model was used to construct a theoretical framework model of social network service addiction of junior college students. Results ·60.31% of the total 980 participants had social network service addiction. The univariate Logistic regression results showed that depression, self-esteem, loneliness, frustration, drowsiness, social support, interpersonal needs, exercise, and academic performance had a significant impact on social network addiction. The structural equation model fitted well [S－Bχ²/df=8.03, goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.924, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.909, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.872, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.096, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.070], suggesting the mutual influence between the personality system and the perceived environment system, between the personality system and the behavioral system, and between the perceived environment system and the behavior system interact (β=1.018, P=0.000; β=0.218, P=0.003; β=0.268, P=0.000). The influence of personality system and behavior system on social network service addiction was not statistically significant, while the perceived environment system had a significant positive impact on social network service addiction (β=0.481, P=0.001). Conclusion ·Personality system and behavior system indirectly affect social network service addiction by influencing perceived environment system, and perceived environment system directly affects social network service addiction. For the problem of social network addiction among lower grade college students, it is necessary to fully respect the characteristics of college students, and work together from three levels of the system to reduce the risk of social network addiction among college students.

Key words: college student, social network service addiction, problem behavior theory, structural equation model

中图分类号:

R179

王甦平, 唐华, 周栋, 蔡泳, 龚睿婕. 基于问题行为理论的低年级大学生社交网络成瘾的影响因素研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 43(8): 955-962.

WANG Suping, TANG Hua, ZHOU Dong, CAI Yong, GONG Ruijie. Study on factors influencing social network service addiction among junior college students based on problem behavior theory[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(8): 955-962.

图/表 4

参考文献 28

1	ANDREASSEN C S, PALLESEN S. Social network site addiction: an overview[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2014, 20(25): 4053-4061.
2	ANDREASSEN C S. Online social network site addiction: a comprehensive review[J]. Curr Addict Rep, 2015, 2(2): 175-184.
3	LA BARBERA D, LA PAGLIA F, VALSAVOIA R. Social network and addiction[J]. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2009, 144: 33-36.
4	KUSS D J, GRIFFITHS M D. Online social networking and addiction: a review of the psychological literature[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2011, 8(9): 3528-3552.
5	PANTIC I. Online social networking and mental health[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2014, 17(10): 652-657.
6	JESSOR R. Risk behavior in adolescence: a psychosocial framework for understanding and action[J]. J Adolesc Health, 1991, 12(8): 597-605.
7	JESSOR R, DONOVAN J E, COSTA F M. Applying problem behavior theory to adolescent health behavior[M]//LEVESQUE R J R. Advancing responsible adolescent development. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017: 495-508.
8	YOON S, KLEINMAN M, MERTZ J, et al. Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook-depression relations[J]. J Affect Disord, 2019, 248: 65-72.
9	WANG P C, LEI L, YU G L, et al. Social networking sites addiction and materialism among Chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model involving depression and need to belong[J]. Front Psychol, 2020, 11: 581274.
10	李亚杰, 李咸志, 余彬, 等. 成都市低年级大学生性知识现状及其影响因素调查[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(3): 244-247.
	LI Y J, LI X Z, YU B, et al. Survey on sexual knowledge and its influencing factors among junior college students in Chengdu city[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Education, 2021, 37(3): 244-247.
11	郑雨佳, 楼超华, 涂晓雯. 上海市3所高校低年级学生吸烟现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(7): 611-614, 619.
	ZHENG Y J, LOU C H, TU X W. Current smoking prevalence and its influencing factors among lower grade students of 3 universities in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Education, 2021, 37(7): 611-614, 619.
12	王甦平, 蔡泳, 朱睿, 等. 青少年社交网络成瘾评估量表初步编制和信效度检验[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(2): 324-326.
	WANG S P, CAI Y, ZHU R, et al. Development of social network addiction tendency scale for adolescents and its reliability and validity[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(2): 324-326.
13	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 增订版. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 279.
	WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Handbook of mental health assessment scales (updated edition) [M]. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1999: 279.
14	HAYS R D, DIMATTEO M R. A short-form measure of loneliness[J]. J Pers Assess, 1987, 51(1): 69-81.
15	MANEA L, GILBODY S, MCMILLAN D. A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression[J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2015, 37(1): 67-75.
16	ZIMET G D, DAHLEM N W, ZIMET S G, et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support[J]. J Pers Assess, 1988, 52(1): 30-41.
17	VAN ORDEN K A, CUKROWICZ K C, WITTE T K, et al. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire[J]. Psychol Assess, 2012, 24(1): 197-215.
18	唐华, 王甦平, 龚睿婕, 等. 挫败感量表对医学生焦虑抑郁态的信效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(1): 84-88.
	TANG H, WANG S P, GONG R J, et al. Reliability and validity of defeat scale on anxiety and depression in medical students[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2019, 39(1): 84-88.
19	龚睿婕, 刘景壹, 王亦晨, 等. 困顿感量表中文版测评医学生的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(5): 393-397.
	GONG R J, LIU J Y, WANG Y C, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese vision of the Entrapment Scale in medical students[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2019, 33(5): 393-397.
20	MACCALLUM R C, BROWNE M W, SUGAWARA H M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling[J]. Psychol Methods, 1996, 1(2): 130-149.
21	HU L T, BENTLER P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Struct Equ Modeling, 1999, 6(1): 1-55.
22	BOLLEN K A, LONG J S. Testing structural equation models[M]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1993.
23	WANG S P, NI Y, GONG R J, et al. Psychosocial syndemic of suicidal ideation: a cross-sectional study among sexually transmitted infection patients in Shanghai, China[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 1314.
24	王昊. 大学生错失恐惧和社交网络成瘾倾向的关系及干预研究[D]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2021.
	WANG H. Study on the relationship and intervention between fear of missing and social network addiction in college students[D]. Kunming: Yunnan Normal University, 2021.
25	严慧兔. 大学生基本心理需要对社交网络成瘾的影响: 错失恐惧的中介作用[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2020.
	YAN H T. The influence of college students' basic psychological needs on social network addiction: the intermediary role of fear of missing out[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2020.
26	CHEN B F, LIU F, DING S S, et al. Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1): 341.
27	XIE W J, KARAN K. Predicting Facebook addiction and state anxiety without Facebook by gender, trait anxiety, Facebook intensity, and different Facebook activities[J]. J Behav Addict, 2019, 8(1): 79-87.
28	KUSS D J, GRIFFITHS M D. Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(3): E311.

Demographic factor	Social networking service addiction/n(%)	OR (95%CI)	P value
Gender
Female	371 (62.77)	1.229 (0.946‒1.596)	0.122
Male	220 (37.23)	Ref.
Grade
Sophomore	281 (47.55)	0.711 (0.549‒0.919)	0.009
Freshman	310 (52.45)	Ref.
Study pressure
General	300 (50.76)	1.181 (0.772‒1.799)	0.441
High	234 (39.59)	1.552 (0.997‒2.410)	0.051
Low	57 (9.98)	Ref.

Demographic factor	Social networking service addiction/n(%)	OR (95%CI)	P value
Gender
Female	371 (62.77)	1.229 (0.946‒1.596)	0.122
Male	220 (37.23)	Ref.
Grade
Sophomore	281 (47.55)	0.711 (0.549‒0.919)	0.009
Freshman	310 (52.45)	Ref.
Study pressure
General	300 (50.76)	1.181 (0.772‒1.799)	0.441
High	234 (39.59)	1.552 (0.997‒2.410)	0.051
Low	57 (9.98)	Ref.

Influencing factor	Social network service addiction/n (%)	OR (95%CI)	P value	Adjusted OR (95%CI)	P value
Personality system
Depression^①
High score (>13.00)	443 (74.96)	3.548 (2.705‒4.669)	0.000	3.614 (2.751‒4.767)	0.000
Low score (≤13.00)	148 (25.04)	Ref.		Ref.
Self-esteem^①
High score (>28.75)	283 (47.88)	0.415 (0.316‒0.542)	0.000	0.419 (0.319‒0.548)	0.000
Low score (≤28.75)	308 (52.12)	Ref.		Ref.
Loneliness^①
High score (>19.00)	145 (24.53)	2.366 (1.666‒3.412)	0.000	2.359 (1.659‒3.406)	0.000
Low score (≤19.00)	446 (75.47)	Ref.		Ref.
Perceived environment system
Entrapment^①
High score (>39.25)	196 (33.16)	3.443 (2.457‒4.904)	0.000	3.459 (2.466‒4.933)	0.000
Low score (≤39.25)	395 (66.84)	Ref.		Ref.
Defeat^①
High score (>39.00)	198 (33.50)	5.096 (3.502‒7.610)	0.000	5.025 (3.451‒7.509)	0.000
Low score (≤39.00)	393 (66.50)	Ref.		Ref.
Perceived social support^①
High score (>61.00)	421 (71.24)	0.682 (0.504‒0.918)	0.012	0.678 (0.500‒0.914)	0.011
Low score (≤61.00)	170 (28.76)	Ref.		Ref.
Interpersonal needs^①
High score (>43.00)	164 (27.75)	1.781 (1.303‒2.455)	0.000	1.747 (1.276‒2.411)	0.000
Low score (≤43.00)	427 (72.25)	Ref.		Ref.
Behavior system
Smoking
Yes	14 (2.37)	2.335 (0.831‒8.286)	0.137	2.340 (0.830‒8.321)	0.137
No	577 (97.63)	Ref.		Ref.
Alcohol
Yes	137 (23.18)	1.243 (0.909‒1.709)	0.176	1.249 (0.912‒1.719)	0.169
No	454 (76.82)	Ref.		Ref.
Exercise
1‒3 per week	325 (54.99)	0.670 (0.495‒0.902)	0.009	0.662 (0.488‒0.892)	0.007
4‒6 per week	37 (6.26)	0.443 (0.264‒0.743)	0.002	0.435 (0.259‒0.731)	0.002
Nearly everyday	27 (4.57)	0.324 (0.185‒0.559)	0.000	0.319 (0.182‒0.552)	0.000
None	202 (3.42)	Ref.		Ref.
Academic performance
General	258 (43.65)	1.454 (1.074‒1.969)	0.016	1.448 (1.068‒1.963)	0.017
Poor	178 (30.12)	1.704 (1.215‒2.398)	0.002	1.701 (1.211‒2.396)	0.002
Good	155 (26.23)	Ref.		Ref.

Influencing factor	Social network service addiction/n (%)	OR (95%CI)	P value	Adjusted OR (95%CI)	P value
Personality system
Depression^①
High score (>13.00)	443 (74.96)	3.548 (2.705‒4.669)	0.000	3.614 (2.751‒4.767)	0.000
Low score (≤13.00)	148 (25.04)	Ref.		Ref.
Self-esteem^①
High score (>28.75)	283 (47.88)	0.415 (0.316‒0.542)	0.000	0.419 (0.319‒0.548)	0.000
Low score (≤28.75)	308 (52.12)	Ref.		Ref.
Loneliness^①
High score (>19.00)	145 (24.53)	2.366 (1.666‒3.412)	0.000	2.359 (1.659‒3.406)	0.000
Low score (≤19.00)	446 (75.47)	Ref.		Ref.
Perceived environment system
Entrapment^①
High score (>39.25)	196 (33.16)	3.443 (2.457‒4.904)	0.000	3.459 (2.466‒4.933)	0.000
Low score (≤39.25)	395 (66.84)	Ref.		Ref.
Defeat^①
High score (>39.00)	198 (33.50)	5.096 (3.502‒7.610)	0.000	5.025 (3.451‒7.509)	0.000
Low score (≤39.00)	393 (66.50)	Ref.		Ref.
Perceived social support^①
High score (>61.00)	421 (71.24)	0.682 (0.504‒0.918)	0.012	0.678 (0.500‒0.914)	0.011
Low score (≤61.00)	170 (28.76)	Ref.		Ref.
Interpersonal needs^①
High score (>43.00)	164 (27.75)	1.781 (1.303‒2.455)	0.000	1.747 (1.276‒2.411)	0.000
Low score (≤43.00)	427 (72.25)	Ref.		Ref.
Behavior system
Smoking
Yes	14 (2.37)	2.335 (0.831‒8.286)	0.137	2.340 (0.830‒8.321)	0.137
No	577 (97.63)	Ref.		Ref.
Alcohol
Yes	137 (23.18)	1.243 (0.909‒1.709)	0.176	1.249 (0.912‒1.719)	0.169
No	454 (76.82)	Ref.		Ref.
Exercise
1‒3 per week	325 (54.99)	0.670 (0.495‒0.902)	0.009	0.662 (0.488‒0.892)	0.007
4‒6 per week	37 (6.26)	0.443 (0.264‒0.743)	0.002	0.435 (0.259‒0.731)	0.002
Nearly everyday	27 (4.57)	0.324 (0.185‒0.559)	0.000	0.319 (0.182‒0.552)	0.000
None	202 (3.42)	Ref.		Ref.
Academic performance
General	258 (43.65)	1.454 (1.074‒1.969)	0.016	1.448 (1.068‒1.963)	0.017
Poor	178 (30.12)	1.704 (1.215‒2.398)	0.002	1.701 (1.211‒2.396)	0.002
Good	155 (26.23)	Ref.		Ref.

[1]	刘津君, 王媛, 吴艳茹, 肖泽萍. 恐惧自我问卷的汉化及其信效度检验[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 42(10): 1441-1447.
[2]	朱梓嫣，郑频频. 上海市大学生烟草使用现状及影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(2): 155-.
[3]	张乔阳，钟娜，张蕾，赵敏，杜江 . 大学生滥用大麻导致精神障碍2例[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(10): 1540-.
[4]	仇琦，房圆，林翔，班春霞，朱敏捷，王涛，肖世富，李霞. 大学生死亡焦虑及其影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(10): 1512-.
[5]	郭雪，刘琴，张帆，等. 三峡库区云阳县农村留守中学生心理弹性影响因素结构方程模型分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 34(5): 731-.
[6]	戈晓华，李劲松，陈海燕，等. 医科大学生的人文关怀能力及影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 34(11): 1672-.
[7]	谢杏利, 邹兵. 主观幸福感在贫困大学生自杀态度与生命意义感中的中介作用[J]. , 2013, 33(1): 78-.
[8]	李娜, 张浩, 王芳, 等. 医学院新生有无自杀意念的人格特征比较[J]. , 2012, 32(3): 352-.
[9]	鲁威, 赵敏. 国内外大学生心理健康研究现状的对比及启示[J]. , 2012, 32(10): 1382-.
[10]	吴平, 陈福国. 上海市高等院校本科生心理健康状况调查[J]. , 2010, 30(8): 906-.
[11]	沈秀华, 蔡威, 陶晔璇, 等. 上海某医学院本科阶段学生体质量指数动态分布及影响因素[J]. , 2009, 29(9): 1107-.

基于问题行为理论的低年级大学生社交网络成瘾的影响因素研究

Study on factors influencing social network service addiction among junior college students based on problem behavior theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 28

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics