
JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE) ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 210-216.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.02.013
• Clinical research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qing LIU1(
), Wen CAI2, Rui-qing ZHANG2, Cong LU2, Jia-rong ZHANG2,3(
), Xian-ming XU2
Received:2020-05-18
Online:2021-02-28
Published:2021-02-28
Contact:
Jia-rong ZHANG
E-mail:18101917515@163.com;maggie1974@126.com
Supported by:CLC Number:
Qing LIU, Wen CAI, Rui-qing ZHANG, Cong LU, Jia-rong ZHANG, Xian-ming XU. Value of pregnancy lipid tolerance test in predicting risk of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(2): 210-216.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://xuebao.shsmu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.02.013
| Item | Control group (n=49) | GDM group (n=22) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age/year | 30.6±3.9 | 31.5±4.9 | 0.113 |
| Gravidity/n | 2.1±0.5 | 1.2±1.2 | 0.311 |
| Parity/n | 0.5±0.5 | 0.6±0.7 | 0.576 |
| Birth interval/year | 2.7±3.6 | 2.4±4.2 | 0.717 |
| Prepregnancy BMI/(kg·m-2) | 21.3 (19.7?24.3) | 21.4 (20.8?24.5) | 0.094 |
| Systolic blood pressure/mmHg | 114.1±8.9 | 113.4±8.8 | 0.333 |
| Diastolic blood pressure/mmHg | 68.1±9.6 | 70.1±8.0 | 0.158 |
| GPT/(U·L-1) | 16.4 (12.3?20.4) | 14.8 (11.6?19.4) | 0.907 |
| GOT/(U·L-1) | 16.4 (13.6?18.2) | 15.2 (12.5?24.0) | 0.928 |
Tab 1 Comparison of general characteristics between the two groups
| Item | Control group (n=49) | GDM group (n=22) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age/year | 30.6±3.9 | 31.5±4.9 | 0.113 |
| Gravidity/n | 2.1±0.5 | 1.2±1.2 | 0.311 |
| Parity/n | 0.5±0.5 | 0.6±0.7 | 0.576 |
| Birth interval/year | 2.7±3.6 | 2.4±4.2 | 0.717 |
| Prepregnancy BMI/(kg·m-2) | 21.3 (19.7?24.3) | 21.4 (20.8?24.5) | 0.094 |
| Systolic blood pressure/mmHg | 114.1±8.9 | 113.4±8.8 | 0.333 |
| Diastolic blood pressure/mmHg | 68.1±9.6 | 70.1±8.0 | 0.158 |
| GPT/(U·L-1) | 16.4 (12.3?20.4) | 14.8 (11.6?19.4) | 0.907 |
| GOT/(U·L-1) | 16.4 (13.6?18.2) | 15.2 (12.5?24.0) | 0.928 |
| Variable | Fasting PG/(mmol·L-1) | 1 h PG/(mmol·L-1) | 2 h PG/(mmol·L-1) | HOMA-IR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | |
| Fasting TAG | 0.005 | 0.087 | 0.112 | 0.003 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.2 (4.2?4.8) | 7.7±1.6 | 7.0 (6.1?7.7) | 1.2 (0.8?1.4) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.4?5.0) | 8.5±1.8 | 7.2 (6.4?8.1) | 1.7 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 2 h TAG | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.058 | 0.009 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?7.6) | 7.6±1.4 | 7.0 (6.1?7.6) | 1.2 (0.8?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.6?5.1) | 8.7±1.9 | 7.3 (6.4?7.9) | 1.5 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 4 h TAG | 0.000 | 0.016 | 0.078 | 0.020 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.7±1.4 | 7.0 (6.1?7.7) | 1.2 (0.9?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.5?5.1) | 8.6±1.9 | 7.3 (6.3?8.0) | 1.5 (1.2?2.2) | ||||
| Fasting FFA | 0.311 | 0.401 | 0.067 | 0.306 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.7 (4.3?5.1) | 8.3±1.7 | 7.4 (6.6?7.9) | 1.4 (1.0?2.1) | ||||
| High binary | 4.6 (4.3?4.8) | 8.0±1.8 | 7.0 (6.1?7.6) | 1.2 (0.9?1.7) | ||||
| 2 h FFA | 0.382 | 0.818 | 0.840 | 0.739 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.7 (4.3?5.1) | 8.1±2.0 | 7.1 (6.3?7.7) | 1.3 (0.9?2.0) | ||||
| High binary | 4.6 (4.4?4.8) | 8.1±1.5 | 7.1 (6.3?7.8) | 1.3 (1.0?1.8) | ||||
| 4 h FFA | 0.047 | 0.613 | 0.629 | 0.441 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.5 (4.3?4.9) | 8.0±1.4 | 7.4 (6.6?7.7) | 1.2 (0.9?1.7) | ||||
| High binary | 4.7 (4.5?5.0) | 8.3±2.0 | 6.9 (6.3?2.1) | 1.4 (1.0?2.1) | ||||
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.003 | 0.218 | 0.505 | 0.015 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.9±1.7 | 7.1 (6.0?7.8) | 1.2 (0.8?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.4?5.0) | 8.4±1.7 | 7.2 (6.4?7.9) | 1.5 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.002 | 0.178 | 0.490 | 0.011 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.8±1.7 | 7.1 (6.0?7.7) | 1.2 (0.8?1.5) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.5?5.0) | 8.4±1.8 | 7.1 (6.3?7.9) | 1.6 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.001 | 0.284 | 0.936 | 0.008 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.9±1.7 | 7.1 (6.1?7.8) | 1.1 (0.8?1.4) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.5?5.0) | 8.4±1.7 | 7.2 (6.3?7.8) | 1.6 (1.2?2.1) | ||||
Tab 2 Comparison of blood glucose and HOMA-IR in different OLTT groups
| Variable | Fasting PG/(mmol·L-1) | 1 h PG/(mmol·L-1) | 2 h PG/(mmol·L-1) | HOMA-IR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | M(P25?P75) | P value | |
| Fasting TAG | 0.005 | 0.087 | 0.112 | 0.003 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.2 (4.2?4.8) | 7.7±1.6 | 7.0 (6.1?7.7) | 1.2 (0.8?1.4) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.4?5.0) | 8.5±1.8 | 7.2 (6.4?8.1) | 1.7 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 2 h TAG | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.058 | 0.009 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?7.6) | 7.6±1.4 | 7.0 (6.1?7.6) | 1.2 (0.8?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.6?5.1) | 8.7±1.9 | 7.3 (6.4?7.9) | 1.5 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 4 h TAG | 0.000 | 0.016 | 0.078 | 0.020 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.7±1.4 | 7.0 (6.1?7.7) | 1.2 (0.9?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.5?5.1) | 8.6±1.9 | 7.3 (6.3?8.0) | 1.5 (1.2?2.2) | ||||
| Fasting FFA | 0.311 | 0.401 | 0.067 | 0.306 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.7 (4.3?5.1) | 8.3±1.7 | 7.4 (6.6?7.9) | 1.4 (1.0?2.1) | ||||
| High binary | 4.6 (4.3?4.8) | 8.0±1.8 | 7.0 (6.1?7.6) | 1.2 (0.9?1.7) | ||||
| 2 h FFA | 0.382 | 0.818 | 0.840 | 0.739 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.7 (4.3?5.1) | 8.1±2.0 | 7.1 (6.3?7.7) | 1.3 (0.9?2.0) | ||||
| High binary | 4.6 (4.4?4.8) | 8.1±1.5 | 7.1 (6.3?7.8) | 1.3 (1.0?1.8) | ||||
| 4 h FFA | 0.047 | 0.613 | 0.629 | 0.441 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.5 (4.3?4.9) | 8.0±1.4 | 7.4 (6.6?7.7) | 1.2 (0.9?1.7) | ||||
| High binary | 4.7 (4.5?5.0) | 8.3±2.0 | 6.9 (6.3?2.1) | 1.4 (1.0?2.1) | ||||
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.003 | 0.218 | 0.505 | 0.015 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.9±1.7 | 7.1 (6.0?7.8) | 1.2 (0.8?1.6) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.4?5.0) | 8.4±1.7 | 7.2 (6.4?7.9) | 1.5 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.002 | 0.178 | 0.490 | 0.011 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.8±1.7 | 7.1 (6.0?7.7) | 1.2 (0.8?1.5) | ||||
| High binary | 4.9 (4.5?5.0) | 8.4±1.8 | 7.1 (6.3?7.9) | 1.6 (1.1?2.2) | ||||
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.001 | 0.284 | 0.936 | 0.008 | ||||
| Low binary | 4.4 (4.2?4.7) | 7.9±1.7 | 7.1 (6.1?7.8) | 1.1 (0.8?1.4) | ||||
| High binary | 4.8 (4.5?5.0) | 8.4±1.7 | 7.2 (6.3?7.8) | 1.6 (1.2?2.1) | ||||
| Variable | GDM /n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Fasting TAG | 0.144 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.9) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.9) | |
| 2 h TAG | 0.003 | |
| Low binary | 5 (14.2) | |
| High binary | 17 (47.2) | |
| 4 h TAG | 0.008 | |
| Low binary | 6 (16.7) | |
| High binary | 16 (45.7) | |
| Fasting FFA | 0.311 | |
| Low binary | 13 (37.1) | |
| High binary | 9 (25.0) | |
| 2 h FFA | 0.382 | |
| Low binary | 12 (34.3) | |
| High binary | 10 (27.7) | |
| 4 h FFA | 0.047 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.8) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.8) | |
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.003 | |
| Low binary | 6 (17.1) | |
| High binary | 16 (44.4) | |
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.002 | |
| Low binary | 6 (16.7) | |
| High binary | 16 (45.7) | |
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.001 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.8) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.9) |
Tab 3 Comparison of incidence of GDM in pregnant women with different TAG, FFA and sd-LDL levels
| Variable | GDM /n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Fasting TAG | 0.144 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.9) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.9) | |
| 2 h TAG | 0.003 | |
| Low binary | 5 (14.2) | |
| High binary | 17 (47.2) | |
| 4 h TAG | 0.008 | |
| Low binary | 6 (16.7) | |
| High binary | 16 (45.7) | |
| Fasting FFA | 0.311 | |
| Low binary | 13 (37.1) | |
| High binary | 9 (25.0) | |
| 2 h FFA | 0.382 | |
| Low binary | 12 (34.3) | |
| High binary | 10 (27.7) | |
| 4 h FFA | 0.047 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.8) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.8) | |
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.003 | |
| Low binary | 6 (17.1) | |
| High binary | 16 (44.4) | |
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.002 | |
| Low binary | 6 (16.7) | |
| High binary | 16 (45.7) | |
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.001 | |
| Low binary | 8 (22.8) | |
| High binary | 14 (38.9) |
| OLTT | AUC | Standard error | P value | Best diagnostic value | Sensitivity/% | Specificity/% | 95%CI(AUC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting TAG | 0.701 | 0.065 | 0.007 | 1.690 | 86.0 | 44.9 | 0.573?0.829 |
| 2 h TAG | 0.681 | 0.068 | 0.015 | 2.795 | 77.3 | 61.2 | 0.548?0.814 |
| 4 h TAG | 0.662 | 0.069 | 0.030 | 2.250 | 86.4 | 49.0 | 0.527?0.798 |
| Fasting FFA | 0.494 | 0.077 | 0.941 | - | - | - | 0.343?0.645 |
| 2 h FFA | 0.487 | 0.070 | 0.857 | - | - | - | 0.350?0.623 |
| 4 h FFA | 0.670 | 0.068 | 0.023 | 0.915 | 54.5 | 79.6 | 0.537?0.802 |
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.701 | 0.069 | 0.007 | 28.555 | 86.4 | 49.0 | 0.565?0.837 |
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.713 | 0.068 | 0.004 | 34.580 | 72.7 | 63.3 | 0.579?0.847 |
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.702 | 0.069 | 0.007 | 44.730 | 50.0 | 85.7 | 0.567?0.838 |
Tab 4 Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of each index for GDM
| OLTT | AUC | Standard error | P value | Best diagnostic value | Sensitivity/% | Specificity/% | 95%CI(AUC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting TAG | 0.701 | 0.065 | 0.007 | 1.690 | 86.0 | 44.9 | 0.573?0.829 |
| 2 h TAG | 0.681 | 0.068 | 0.015 | 2.795 | 77.3 | 61.2 | 0.548?0.814 |
| 4 h TAG | 0.662 | 0.069 | 0.030 | 2.250 | 86.4 | 49.0 | 0.527?0.798 |
| Fasting FFA | 0.494 | 0.077 | 0.941 | - | - | - | 0.343?0.645 |
| 2 h FFA | 0.487 | 0.070 | 0.857 | - | - | - | 0.350?0.623 |
| 4 h FFA | 0.670 | 0.068 | 0.023 | 0.915 | 54.5 | 79.6 | 0.537?0.802 |
| Fasting sd-LDL | 0.701 | 0.069 | 0.007 | 28.555 | 86.4 | 49.0 | 0.565?0.837 |
| 2 h sd-LDL | 0.713 | 0.068 | 0.004 | 34.580 | 72.7 | 63.3 | 0.579?0.847 |
| 4 h sd-LDL | 0.702 | 0.069 | 0.007 | 44.730 | 50.0 | 85.7 | 0.567?0.838 |
| 1 | Pratley RE, Weyer C. The role of impaired early insulin secretion in the pathogenesis of Type Ⅱ diabetes mellitus [J]. Diabetologia,2001, 44(8): 929-945. |
| 2 | Aslam M, Aggarwal S, Sharma KK, et al. Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia predicts development of insulin resistance glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(1): e0145730. |
| 3 | Morentin Gutierrez P, Yates J, Nilsson C, et al. Evolving data analysis of an oral lipid tolerance test toward the standard for the oral glucose tolerance test: cross species modeling effects of AZD7687 on plasma triacylglycerol[J]. Pharmacol Res Perspect, 2019, 7(2): e00465. |
| 4 | Patsch JR, Miesenböck G, Hopferwieser T, et al. Relation of triglyceride metabolism and coronary artery disease. Studies in the postprandial state [J]. Arterioscler Thromb, 1992, 12(11): 1336-1345. |
| 5 | 窦攀, 张涵, 杨慧霞. 结合«中国居民膳食营养素参考摄入量(2013版)»和妊娠合并糖尿病相关指南解读妊娠期能量[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2015, 18(8): 582-585. |
| 6 | 杨慧霞, 徐先明, 王子莲,等. 妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014) [J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2014, 17(8): 537-545. |
| 7 | Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, et al. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women[J]. JAMA, 2007, 298(3): 299-308. |
| 8 | 田丰, 王亚婷, 刘玲. 非空腹血脂指标的临床应用[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2017, 45(2): 104-107. |
| 9 | Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Nordestgaard BG. Fasting and nonfasting lipid levels: influence of normal food intake on lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk prediction[J]. Circulation, 2008, 118(20): 2047-2056. |
| 10 | 熊芳, 王宗保, 唐朝克. 富含甘油三酯脂蛋白代谢及其在动脉粥样硬化中的作用 [J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2019, 27(1): 81-86. |
| 11 | Adamska E, Ostrowska L, Gościk J, et al. Intake of meals containing high levels of carbohydrates or high levels of unsaturated fatty acids induces postprandial dysmetabolism in young overweight/obese men[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015:147196. |
| 12 | van Hees AMJ, Saris WHM, Dallinga-Thie GM, et al. Fasting and postprandial remnant-like particle cholesterol concentrations in obese participants are associated with plasma triglycerides, insulin resistance, and body fat distribution[J]. J Nutr, 2008, 138(12): 2399-2405. |
| 13 | 郑媛媛, 翟桂荣. 妊娠与血脂代谢异常的探究[J]. 医学综述, 2013, 19(21): 3874-3876. |
| 14 | 宋庆雷, 李欣. 妊娠期糖尿病胰岛素抵抗与铁蛋白及游离脂肪酸的相关性研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(3): 320-321, 324. |
| 15 | 彭峰, 林金秀, 曾开淇, 等. 胰岛素抵抗在肥胖患者餐后甘油三酯代谢中的作用[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2003, 42(9): 647-648. |
| 16 | 卞华, 高鑫. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病与2型糖尿病[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2016, 8(9): 516-519. |
| 17 | 王莹, 白凤琴, 周尧. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清胎球蛋白 A、胰岛素抵抗指数水平及其临床意义研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(9): 1986-1988. |
| 18 | Gentile M, Peluso R, di Minno MND, et al. Association between small dense LDL and sub-clinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016, 35(8): 2023-2029. |
| 19 | Qiu C, Rudra C, Austin MA, et al. Association of gestational diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size[J]. Physiol Res, 2007, 56(5): 571-578. |
| 20 | Ryckman KK, Spracklen CN, Smith CJ, et al. Maternal lipid levels during pregnancy and gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJOG, 2015, 122(5): 643-651. |
| 21 | Ghodke B, Pusukuru R, Mehta V. Association of lipid profile in pregnancy with preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm delivery[J]. Cureus, 2017, 9(7): e1420. |
| 22 | Vidakovic AJ, Jaddoe VW, Voortman T, et al. Maternal plasma polyunsaturated fatty acid levels during pregnancy and childhood lipid and insulin levels[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2017, 27(1): 78-85. |
| [1] | LIU Qianruo, FANG Zichen, WU Yuhan, ZHONG Xianxin, GUO Muhe, JIA Jie. Research progress in the relationship between gut microbia and its metabolites and gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(5): 641-647. |
| [2] | ZHANG Yue, QU Lei, GU Qin, ZHU Yiqing, MA Liying, SUN Wenguang. Effect of continuous positive urine ketone body on clinical outcomes of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and newborn [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(3): 314-319. |
| [3] | WANG Jie, WU Hui, LU Lingpeng, YANG Kefeng, ZHU Jie, ZHOU Hengyi, YAO Die, GAO Ya, FENG Yuting, LIU Yuhong, JIA Jie. Dynamic changes in gut microbiota of women with gestational diabetes mellitus and the correlation with blood glucose, blood lipid and diet [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(9): 1336-1346. |
| [4] | HE Zhijie, HE Jinchun, ZHANG Yanpei, WANG Yaodong, WANG Zhanke. Analysis of lipoprotein subclasses of family with familial hypertriglyceridemia based on VAP method [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(4): 482-489. |
| [5] | Qin GU, Yingqian XIA, Yiqing ZHU, Liying MA, Lei QU, Wenguang SUN. Analysis of the effects of individualized one-day outpatient diet guidance on glycemic control, body weight gain rate and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2022, 42(2): 185-191. |
| [6] | YANG Kefeng, JIA Jie, DING Tianze, ZHANG Shuo, LI Xinyi, ZHU Jie, LIU Yuhong, LU Lingpeng, WU Hui. Association of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and mercury during pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(12): 1739-1744. |
| [7] | Dan WU, Li-ping GE. Research progress of DNA methylation in gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(8): 1120-1124. |
| [8] | Yue-hua TU, Xiao-jin WANG, Bing-shun WANG. Effects of individualized nutritional standard meal intervention on the prevention of gestational diabetes in overweight and obese pregnant women [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(3): 360-365. |
| [9] | Ya-jie ZHU, Hui LIN, Xi CHEN, Yi-ran ZHAO, Xin-mei LIU, He-feng HUANG. Change of cortisol level in umbilical cord blood of neonates delivered by gestational diabetes mellitus mothers and its influence on offspring health [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(1): 49-54. |
| [10] | GAO Wei1, WANG Xue-jiao2, ZHEN Qin2, DING Xiao-ying2, XU Huan-bai2, WANG Yu-fan2, PENG Yong-de2. Analysis of risk factors of decreased heart rate variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. , 2019, 39(6): 629-. |
| [11] | WANG Lei-lei1, TAO Ye-xuan2. Differences of intestinal flora between gestational diabetes mellitus pregnant women and healthy pregnant women [J]. , 2019, 39(11): 1300-. |
| [12] | GU Ting-ting, LAI Dong-mei. Research progress on the correlation between gut microbiota and obstetrics and gynecology diseases [J]. , 2018, 38(8): 967-. |
| [13] | PENG Hai-yan, LI Hua-ping. Influence of high glucose on PRKAA1 expression and proliferation of trophoblast cells [J]. , 2018, 38(3): 299-. |
| [14] | ZHENG Zhong, SUN Yuan-yuan, XIA Liang, GUO Yang, FENG Yan-mei. Research progress on the relationship between sudden sensorineural hearing loss and serum lipids [J]. , 2017, 37(6): 859-. |
| [15] | ZHOU Li, GAO Jing, CHEN Chen . Feasibility analysis of triglyceride as a surrogate marker for insulin resistance in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome [J]. , 2017, 37(1): 60-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||