Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 1423-1429.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.11.010
• Clinical research • Previous Articles
TAI Rui(), FANG Fang(), MAO Jingjue, ZHOU Xia
Received:
2023-06-26
Accepted:
2023-10-12
Online:
2023-11-28
Published:
2023-11-28
Contact:
FANG Fang
E-mail:realltairui@163.com;fang_fang0604@163.com
Supported by:
CLC Number:
TAI Rui, FANG Fang, MAO Jingjue, ZHOU Xia. Analysis of influencing factors of adaptation level in patients with permanent enterostomy[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(11): 1423-1429.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://xuebao.shsmu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.11.010
Characteristic variable | Sample size/n (%) | OAI-20/point | Statistical value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age/year | 0.038 | 0.845 | ||
<60 | 68 (26.2) | 42.51±11.78 | ||
≥60 | 192 (73.8) | 42.20±11.39 | ||
Gender | 0.113 | 0.737 | ||
Male | 164 (63.1) | 42.10±11.27 | ||
Female | 96 (36.9) | 42.59±11.85 | ||
Registered residence | 14.803 | 0.001 | ||
City | 141 (54.2) | 45.38±10.94 | ||
Town | 59 (22.7) | 40.78±11.11 | ||
Country | 60 (23.1) | 36.47±10.61 | ||
Education | 1.318 | 0.270 | ||
Junior high school and below | 142 (54.6) | 41.33±11.26 | ||
Technical secondary school/senior high school | 95 (36.5) | 41.05±10.83 | ||
Junior college and above | 23 (8.9) | 42.87±11.88 | ||
Marital status | 1.585 | 0.209 | ||
Married | 245 (94.2) | 42.50±11.51 | ||
Single and others | 15 (5.8) | 38.67±10.41 | ||
Children | 0.210 | 0.647 | ||
Yes | 251 (96.5) | 42.34±11.56 | ||
No | 9 (3.5) | 40.56±8.75 | ||
Work | 0.281 | 0.839 | ||
In service | 5 (1.9) | 42.40±7.27 | ||
Sick leave | 92 (35.4) | 42.26±11.90 | ||
Jobless | 73 (28.1) | 41.37±10.94 | ||
Retired | 90 (34.6) | 43.03±11.72 | ||
Family monthly income/yuan | 19.090 | 0.000 | ||
<10 000 | 110 (42.3) | 38.77±11.23 | ||
≥10 000 | 150 (57.7) | 44.85±10.98 | ||
Payment | 1.436 | 0.232 | ||
URBMI | 174 (66.9) | 42.88±12.44 | ||
NCMS | 86 (33.1) | 41.07±9.13 | ||
Ostomy-related complications | 47.045 | 0.000 | ||
No | 239 (91.9) | 43.93±10.40 | ||
Yes | 31 (8.1) | 30.06±11.74 |
Tab 1 Results of univariate analysis of level of stoma adaptation in patients with permanent enterostomy (n=260)
Characteristic variable | Sample size/n (%) | OAI-20/point | Statistical value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age/year | 0.038 | 0.845 | ||
<60 | 68 (26.2) | 42.51±11.78 | ||
≥60 | 192 (73.8) | 42.20±11.39 | ||
Gender | 0.113 | 0.737 | ||
Male | 164 (63.1) | 42.10±11.27 | ||
Female | 96 (36.9) | 42.59±11.85 | ||
Registered residence | 14.803 | 0.001 | ||
City | 141 (54.2) | 45.38±10.94 | ||
Town | 59 (22.7) | 40.78±11.11 | ||
Country | 60 (23.1) | 36.47±10.61 | ||
Education | 1.318 | 0.270 | ||
Junior high school and below | 142 (54.6) | 41.33±11.26 | ||
Technical secondary school/senior high school | 95 (36.5) | 41.05±10.83 | ||
Junior college and above | 23 (8.9) | 42.87±11.88 | ||
Marital status | 1.585 | 0.209 | ||
Married | 245 (94.2) | 42.50±11.51 | ||
Single and others | 15 (5.8) | 38.67±10.41 | ||
Children | 0.210 | 0.647 | ||
Yes | 251 (96.5) | 42.34±11.56 | ||
No | 9 (3.5) | 40.56±8.75 | ||
Work | 0.281 | 0.839 | ||
In service | 5 (1.9) | 42.40±7.27 | ||
Sick leave | 92 (35.4) | 42.26±11.90 | ||
Jobless | 73 (28.1) | 41.37±10.94 | ||
Retired | 90 (34.6) | 43.03±11.72 | ||
Family monthly income/yuan | 19.090 | 0.000 | ||
<10 000 | 110 (42.3) | 38.77±11.23 | ||
≥10 000 | 150 (57.7) | 44.85±10.98 | ||
Payment | 1.436 | 0.232 | ||
URBMI | 174 (66.9) | 42.88±12.44 | ||
NCMS | 86 (33.1) | 41.07±9.13 | ||
Ostomy-related complications | 47.045 | 0.000 | ||
No | 239 (91.9) | 43.93±10.40 | ||
Yes | 31 (8.1) | 30.06±11.74 |
Variable OAI-20 | Acceptance | Anxious preoccupation | Social life attitude | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
HADS | -0.421 | 0.000 | -0.363 | 0.000 | -0.333 | 0.000 | -0.391 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Anxiety | -0.431 | 0.000 | -0.379 | 0.000 | -0.355 | 0.000 | -0.409 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Depression | -0.351 | 0.000 | -0.302 | 0.000 | -0.269 | 0.000 | -0.324 | 0.000 |
SSS | 0.690 | 0.000 | 0.661 | 0.000 | 0.645 | 0.000 | 0.713 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Stoma care self-efficacy | 0.691 | 0.000 | 0.661 | 0.000 | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.705 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Social functional self-efficacy | 0.662 | 0.000 | 0.363 | 0.000 | 0.637 | 0.000 | 0.696 | 0.000 |
BIS | -0.548 | 0.000 | -0.541 | 0.000 | -0.523 | 0.000 | -0.523 | 0.000 |
RDAS | 0.658 | 0.000 | 0.565 | 0.000 | 0.576 | 0.000 | 0.645 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Marital consistency | 0.620 | 0.000 | 0.528 | 0.000 | 0.539 | 0.000 | 0.605 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Marital satisfaction | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.569 | 0.000 | 0.573 | 0.000 | 0.635 | 0.000 |
Factor3: Marital cohesion | 0.548 | 0.000 | 0.438 | 0.000 | 0.466 | 0.000 | 0.524 | 0.000 |
Tab 2 Results of correlation analysis of stoma adaptation level and HADS, SSI, BIS, and RDAS scores (n=260)
Variable OAI-20 | Acceptance | Anxious preoccupation | Social life attitude | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
HADS | -0.421 | 0.000 | -0.363 | 0.000 | -0.333 | 0.000 | -0.391 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Anxiety | -0.431 | 0.000 | -0.379 | 0.000 | -0.355 | 0.000 | -0.409 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Depression | -0.351 | 0.000 | -0.302 | 0.000 | -0.269 | 0.000 | -0.324 | 0.000 |
SSS | 0.690 | 0.000 | 0.661 | 0.000 | 0.645 | 0.000 | 0.713 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Stoma care self-efficacy | 0.691 | 0.000 | 0.661 | 0.000 | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.705 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Social functional self-efficacy | 0.662 | 0.000 | 0.363 | 0.000 | 0.637 | 0.000 | 0.696 | 0.000 |
BIS | -0.548 | 0.000 | -0.541 | 0.000 | -0.523 | 0.000 | -0.523 | 0.000 |
RDAS | 0.658 | 0.000 | 0.565 | 0.000 | 0.576 | 0.000 | 0.645 | 0.000 |
Factor1: Marital consistency | 0.620 | 0.000 | 0.528 | 0.000 | 0.539 | 0.000 | 0.605 | 0.000 |
Factor2: Marital satisfaction | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.569 | 0.000 | 0.573 | 0.000 | 0.635 | 0.000 |
Factor3: Marital cohesion | 0.548 | 0.000 | 0.438 | 0.000 | 0.466 | 0.000 | 0.524 | 0.000 |
Independent variable | Assignment |
---|---|
Registered residence | City=1, Town=2, Country=3 |
Family monthly income | <10 000 yuan=0, ≥10 000 yuan=1 |
Ostomy-related complications | No=0, Yes=1 |
Tab 3 Independent variable assignment for multivariate analysis of the level of stoma adaptation in patients with permanent enterostomy
Independent variable | Assignment |
---|---|
Registered residence | City=1, Town=2, Country=3 |
Family monthly income | <10 000 yuan=0, ≥10 000 yuan=1 |
Ostomy-related complications | No=0, Yes=1 |
Variable | Partial regression coefficient | Standard error | Standardized regression coefficient | t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 10.090 | 3.135 | ‒ | 3.219 | 0.001 |
Ostomy-related complications | -4.902 | 1.522 | -0.139 | -3.220 | 0.001 |
Anxiety | -0.392 | 0.148 | -0.116 | -2.644 | 0.009 |
Stoma care self-efficacy | 0.546 | 0.063 | 0.421 | 8.701 | 0.000 |
Marital satisfaction | 1.157 | 0.159 | 0.344 | 7.280 | 0.000 |
Tab 4 Results of multiple linear regression analysis of the level of stoma adaptation in patients with permanent enterostomy (n=252)
Variable | Partial regression coefficient | Standard error | Standardized regression coefficient | t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 10.090 | 3.135 | ‒ | 3.219 | 0.001 |
Ostomy-related complications | -4.902 | 1.522 | -0.139 | -3.220 | 0.001 |
Anxiety | -0.392 | 0.148 | -0.116 | -2.644 | 0.009 |
Stoma care self-efficacy | 0.546 | 0.063 | 0.421 | 8.701 | 0.000 |
Marital satisfaction | 1.157 | 0.159 | 0.344 | 7.280 | 0.000 |
1 | SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, GODING SAUER A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(3): 145-164. |
2 | 顾晋, 汪建平.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023版)[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 602-630. |
GU J, WANG J P. Chinese protocol of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer of the National Health Commission (2023 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2023, 43(6): 602-630. | |
3 | CHEN W Q, ZHENG R S, BAADE P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132. |
4 | GARG P K, GOEL A, SHARMA S, et al. Protective diversion stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Visc Med, 2019, 35(3): 156-160. |
5 | SZPILEWSKA K, JUZWISZYN J, BOLANOWSKA Z, et al. Acceptance of disease and the quality of life in patients with enteric stoma[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2018, 90(1): 13-17. |
6 | ZHANG Y, XIAN H T, YANG Y, et al. Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health-related quality of life of patients with stoma: a descriptive, cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2019, 28(15/16): 2880-2888. |
7 | XIAN H T, ZHANG Y, YANG Y, et al. A descriptive, cross-sectional study among Chinese patients to identify factors that affect psychosocial adjustment to an enterostomy[J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2018, 64(7): 8-17. |
8 | VERWEIJ N M, BONHOF C S, SCHIPHORST A W, et al. Quality of life in elderly patients with an ostomy: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018, 20(4): O92-O102. |
9 | 袁理, 冯红, 丁淑贞. 肠造口患者造口适应的研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(22): 3922-3926. |
YUAN L, FENG H, DING S Z. Research progress on stoma adaptation in patients with enterostomy[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2019, 33(22): 3922-3926. | |
10 | SHARMA A, SANEHA C, PHLIGBUA W. Effects of dyadic interventions on quality of life among cancer patients: an integrative review[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2021, 8(2): 115-131. |
11 | 陈伟, 秦楠, 李辉. 癌症患者及其配偶二元应对的相关研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 31-35. |
CHEN W, QIN N, LI H. Research progress on binary coping of cancer patients and their spouses[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(11):31-35. | |
12 | 许勤, 程芳, 戴晓冬. 中文版造口者社会心理适应量表的修订及信效度评价[J]. 江苏医药, 2010, 36(14): 1647-1649. |
XU Q, CHENG F, DAI X D. Evaluation of reliability and validity of the revised Chinese version of Ostomates Adjustment Inventory-23[J]. Jiangsu Medical Journal, 2010, 36(14): 1647-1649. | |
13 | SIMMONS K L, SMITH J A, MAEKAWA A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2009, 36(1): 69-76. |
14 | ZIGMOND A S, SNAITH R P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale[J]. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983, 67(6): 361-370. |
15 | 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 增订版. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999. |
WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Handbook of mental health assessment scales[M]. Updated ed.Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal Publisher, 1999. | |
16 | 阮卉, 尤黎明. 直肠癌永久性结肠造口患者自我效能及影响因素的调查[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25(11): 1055-1057. |
RUAN H, YOU L M. Self-efficacy and its influencing factors in patients with permanent rectal cancer colostomy[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2010, 25(11): 1055-1057. | |
17 | BEKKERS M J, van KNIPPENBERG F C, van DULMEN A M, et al. Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and nonstoma bowel resection: a 4-year follow-up[J]. J Psychosom Res, 1997, 42(3): 235-244. |
18 | 宋丽莉, 李磊, 孙婷婷, 等. 体象量表中文简体版在直肠癌患者中的适用性[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(3): 192-197. |
SONG L L, LI L, SUN T T, et al. Applicability of the simplified Chinese version of the Body Image Scale in patients with rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2019, 33(3): 192-197. | |
19 | BUSBY D M, CHRISTENSEN C, CRANE D R, et al. A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales[J]. J Marital Fam Ther, 1995, 21(3): 289-308. |
20 | SPANIER G B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads[J]. J Marriage Fam, 1976, 38(1): 15-38. |
21 | 刘华云, 李旭英, 谌永毅, 等. 结直肠癌造口术后患者社会心理适应现状及影响因素分析[J]. 上海护理, 2021, 21(11): 20-23. |
LIU H Y, LI X Y, SHEN Y Y, et al. Analysis on status quo and influencing factors of psychosocial adaptation in patients with colorectal cancer after colostomy[J]. Shanghai Nursing, 2021, 21(11):20-23. | |
22 | BAHRAMI M, MASOUMY M, SADEGHI A, et al. The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: a narrative review[J]. J Educ Health Promot, 2022, 7(11): 227-233. |
23 | 韩杉, 张海邻, 唐瑾, 等. 肠造口患者及家属焦虑抑郁状况及对患者造口自护能力的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(13): 79-82. |
HAN B, ZHANG H L, TANG J, et al. Impact of anxiety and depression levels among colostomy patients and their families on patient selfcare ability[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2019, 34(13): 79-82. | |
24 | MOSHER C E, WINGER J G, GIVEN B A, et al. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2017, 25(7): 2349-2362. |
25 | GÖTZE H, FRIEDRICH M, TAUBENHEIM S, et al. Depression and anxiety in long-term survivors 5 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2020, 28(1): 211-220. |
26 | 叶显辉, 汪秀云. 直肠癌永久性结肠造口患者适应状况及影响因素分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 103-104. |
YE X H, WANG X Y. Analysis of adaptation and influencing factors in patients with permanent rectal cancer colostomy[J]. Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People′s Liberation Army, 2019, 37(5): 103-104. | |
27 | RATLIFF C R, GOLDBERG M, JASZAROWSKI K, et al. Peristomal skin health: a WOCN society consensus conference[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2021, 48(3): 219-231. |
28 | PAUL J C, ZIMNICKI K, PIEPER B A. Encountering ostomies in acute care: peristomal skin changes[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2023,36(1): 54-55. |
29 | DU X X, WANG D Y, DU H Y, et al. The correlation between intimate relationship, self-disclosure, and adaptability among colorectal cancer enterostomy patients[J]. Medicine, 2021, 100(19): e25904. |
30 | CHEN M Z, GONG J L, CAO Q, et al. A literature review of the relationship between dyadic coping and dyadic outcomes in cancer couples[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2021, 54: 102035. |
31 | HASSON-OHAYON I, GOLDZWEIG G, BRAUN M, et al. Beyond being open about it: a systematic review on cancer related communication within couples[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2022, 96: 102176. |
[1] | LUO Chen, SHEN Ling, WANG Chuanwei, GU Jiani, WANG Jin, ZHAO Li, HUANG Shuai. Current status and influencing factors of early mobilization of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(9): 1201-1210. |
[2] | PENG Tian, XU Leiming. Crosstalk between epigenetic modification and circRNA in colorectal cancer: recent advances [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(2): 237-243. |
[3] | TU Juanjuan, JIN Zhiming. Research progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(2): 250-255. |
[4] | HU Muni, JI Linhua, ZHANG Xinyu, SHEN Chaoqin, HONG Jie, CHEN Haoyan. Association analysis of T cell receptor repertoire diversity with clinical characteristics and Fusobacterium nucleatum abundance in colorectal cancer patients [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(8): 1045-1052. |
[5] | QIU Jiahui, CAI Qianqian, YANG Yan, CHENG Feichi, QIU Zhengjun, HUANG Chen. Value of combined perineural lymphovascular invasion and tumor-stroma ratio in guiding the prognosis of colorecatal cancer [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(8): 1070-1080. |
[6] | ZHAO Min, CHU Yimin, PENG Haixia. Research advances in screening modalities for colorectal cancer and colorectal adenoma [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(5): 673-679. |
[7] | GONG Qiyu, CHEN Lei. Role of circulating and infiltrating B cells in immune microenvironment of colorectal cancer by multi-omics data profiling [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2022, 42(4): 472-481. |
[8] | Geng-feng JI, Zhi-bo ZHANG. Factors related to prognosis of portoenterostomy for type Ⅲ biliary atresia [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(9): 1142-1146. |
[9] | Ying XU, Yi-min CHU, Da-ming YANG, Ji LI, Hai-qin ZHANG, Hai-xia PENG. Construction of a metastasis prediction model of microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer based on differentially expressed gene assembly [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(9): 1197-1206. |
[10] | Sheng CHENG, Yi ZHAO, Yong-chen WANG, Ping HUANG. Meta-analysis of the effect of BRAF gene mutation on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases after hepatectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(6): 786-792. |
[11] | Ru-juan BAO, Hui-fang CHEN, Yu DONG, You-qiong YE, Bing SU. Construction of prognostic risk score model of colorectal cancer gene signature based on transcriptome dysregulation [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(3): 285-296. |
[12] | Yan-ru MA, Lin-hua JI, Tian-ying TONG, Yu-qing YAN, Chao-qin SHEN, Xin-yu ZHANG, Ying-ying CAO, Jie HONG, Hao-yan CHEN. Establishment and validation of prognostic prediction model of colorectal cancer based on single-cell RNA sequencing [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(2): 159-165. |
[13] | Zhong-mao FU, Zai LUO, Ze-yin RONG, Jian-ming ZHANG, Teng-fei LI, Zhi-long YU, Chen HUANG. Study on the function and prognosis of circular RNA in colorectal cancer tissues based on high-throughput sequencing [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(2): 187-195. |
[14] | Wen-hui XU, Jing BIAN, Lei-zhen ZHENG. Research progress of the relationship between high-fat diet and colorectal cancer and its prevention and treatment countermeasures [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(11): 1514-1517. |
[15] | Zhi-ling CHEN, Chen LUO, Kang-jia ZHAO, Ling SHEN, San-lian HU. Application of two kinds of analgesia after colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(10): 1344-1350. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||